Man Returns to Abduction Site – Gets a “Historical Marker”

a reply to: Cravens

I hear you about TTSA but it kind of creates a weird catch 22/conundrum:

I have some ideas for how to zero in on UAPs but those ideas would require thousands of dollars I’d not more to fund – millions at larger scale with
compensated bright minds in the rooms helping. I don’t have that scratch.

So TTSA goes the VC/crowd funding/public route to get the money to do the things I want to d (or not / but things they want to do for research) and
then have to pay back “investors” as they billed it as an “investment” and not a donation.

So on the one hand they were trying and on the other hand they had to turn a profit because they said they would.

Alternately, someone like Bigelow can spend millions of his own dollars, get an answer – and then tell us jack about it.

Neither is a win for the UFO community – but it’s proof that “disclosure” comes down to money and resources.

So how do we get money and resources involved without money corrupting or influencing the outcome?

MUFON May have been that – but then Bigelow effectively bought them in his quest for truth. Which is kind of ironic!