Analysis | Steve Scalise’s election rhetoric is no less harmful than Trump’s

“[T]here has been too much good-faith reliance, by the electorate, on the no-excuse mail-in voting regime created by Act 77,” he wrote in a concurring opinion, “to warrant judicial consideration of the extreme and untenable remedies proposed by appellees.” One of those extreme and untenable remedies was rejecting the cast ballots. In other words, even if the law was unconstitutional, that didn’t and shouldn’t make the ballots invalid.
***
This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from The Washington Post can be found here.