Wealth over Health: Decision to withdraw Rotavirus Vaccine in 1999 & NOT withdraw COVID-19 Vaccines proves Health Authorities are Corrupt & only care about Wealth

The decision in 1999 to withdraw the Rotashield rotavirus vaccine from the market due to its association with an increased risk of intussusception—a rare but serious bowel obstruction—set a precedent for vaccine safety and regulatory action in response to adverse events. (Source)

This move seemed to underscore the commitment of health authorities to vaccine safety, even if it meant pulling an allegedly beneficial vaccine off the market.

However, fast forward to the age of Covid-19, and we find Health authorities have been happy to grant emergency use authorisation (EUA) to vaccines that have not even completed phase three trials, and types of “vaccines”, mRNA, which is actually gene therapy, that have never before been authorised for human use.

Data proves that the deployment of Covid-19 vaccines has done nothing to decrease the chance of infection, wiht official Government data proving the vaccinate are by far more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than the unvaccined.

Covid-19 Vaccines increase the risk of Infection

Pfizer claims that its Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of a simple calculation (full details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of infections confirmed amongst the vaccinated group and the not-vaccinated group during the earliest stages of the still ongoing clinical trials.

But thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and the data, unfortunately, paints an extremely concerning picture.

The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in vaccine effectiveness by the month among each age group over a period of 5 months from 16th Aug 21 to 2nd Jan 22 –

The first booster shots were administered in week 37 of 2021, and this graph illustrates clearly how they provided a boost in vaccine effectiveness in the following two months. But unfortunately, it also shows how short-lived this boost was with the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between weeks 49 and 52.

COVID-19 Vaccines increase Mortality

Neither has the deployment of Covid-19 vaccines done anything to decrease deaths. with official Government data proving the vaccinated have significantly higher mortalityh rates per 100,000 population that the unvaccinated population.

In fact, according to a dataset published by the UK Government department the Office for National Statistics (ONS), four x vaccinated youths are up to 318% more likely to die than their unvaccinated peers.

The ONS dataset, available on the ONS website here, details deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023.

Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 18 to 39, and what we found is truly shocking.

In every single month, four-dose vaccinated teenagers and young adults were significantly more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers and young adults. The same can also be said for one-dose vaccinated teenagers and young adults, and two-dose vaccinated teens and young adults in February 2023.

The difference in mortality rates was so stark that the unvaccinated only managed to reach a mortality rate of 31.1 per 100,000 person-years in January, whereas the four-dose vaccinated managed to reach a shocking mortality rate of 106 per 100,000 person-years in the same month.

The one-dose vaccinated also fared much worse than the unvaccinated with a mortality rate of 53.3 per 100,000 person-years in January 2023.

For the remaining months, unvaccinated teens and young adults mortality rate remained within the 20-something per 100,000 person-years. Whereas four-dose vaccinated teens and young adults’ mortality rates only went as low as 80.9 per 100,00 in April and remained within 85 to 106 per 100,000 for the remaining months.

The January to May average mortality rate per 100,000 person-years was 26.56 for unvaccinated teens and young adults and a shocking 94.58 per 100,000 for four-dose vaccinated teens and young adults.

Meaning on average, the four-dose vaccinated were 256% more likely to die than the unvaccinated based on mortality rates per 100,000.

Health Authorities ignore serious Adverse Events due to COVID-19 Vaccination

Reports of serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), myocarditis and pericarditis, and Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), have also raised serious concerns.

Yet the health authorities in America, the UK. Australia, News Zealand etc. have refused to act and are even offering these vaccines to children as young as 6 months of age, and women who are pregnant.

This leads us to ask, why?

Health Authorities care about Wealth, Not Health

The answer is obvious. Health authorities are no longer commited to vaccine safety. Instead they are committed to receiving huge payouts from the major big pharma companies such as Moderna and Pfizer, and powerful corrupt individuals such as Bill Gates, who happen to also hold major shares in these Big Pharma ciomopanies.

The MHRA received a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017 to the tune of £980,000 for a “collaboration” with the foundation. However, a Freedom of Information request which the MHRA responded to in May 2021 revealed that the current level of grant funding received from the Gates Foundation amounts to $3 million and covers “a number of projects”.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also bought shares in Pfizer back in 2002, and back in September 2020 Bill Gates ensured the value of his shares went up by announcing to the mainstream media in a CNBC interview that he viewed the Pfizer jab as the leader in the Covid-19 vaccine race.

“The only vaccine that, if everything went perfectly, might seek the emergency use license by the end of October, would be Pfizer.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also “coincidentally” bought ^{$55 million worth of shares in BioNTech} in September 2019, just before the alleged Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Moderna also confirmed in 2016 that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had granted them $20 million to support their “initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine”.

But Moderna also reveal that the framework agreement they made with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation could bring the total funding up to $100 million for “follow-on projects” that are proposed to and approved by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation up to 2022, and the terms of this agreement stipulate that Moderna are obliged to grant the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive licenses.

A Non-Exclusive Licence grants the licensee the right to use the intellectual property, but means that the licensor remains free to exploit the same intellectual property and to allow any number of other licensees to also exploit the same intellectual property.

Therefore under the terms of the agreement made with Moderna, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have now been granted a non-exclusive license to the Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injection, and are therefore profiting from its use.

Conclusion

Based on what Health authorities did in 1999 by pulling the Rotashield rotavirus vaccine from the market due to its association with an increased risk of intussusception, the Covid-19 vaccines should have been pulled after just a month of Emergency Use Authorisation.