Czechia data shows that Moderna covid injections are more deadly than Pfizer
Official government data obtained through a Freedom of Formation Act request from the Czech Republic shows that all-cause mortality Moderna’s covid injection was higher than after Pfizer-BioNTech’s injection by over 50%.
This 50% increased mortality rate ratio between Moderna and Pfizer related to people in the 46 to 69 age group who received either two doses of Moderna or two doses of Pfizer’s covid injection.
The data showed that the younger vaccine recipients were the greater the increase in risk. For 20 to 29-year-olds, for example, the mortality rate ratio of Moderna to Pfizer approached 2:1 which means youngsters more than doubled their all-cause mortality if they took a Moderna injection.
A significant number of Czech citizens also had AstraZeneca and their mortality was similar to Moderna’s.
Dr. Clare Craig explains what these findings mean.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Moderna was more deadly than Pfizer: Analysis of Czech data
Steve Kirsch has found a critical finding in the record-level data from Czechia.
Read more: Record-level data from Czech Republic FOIA proves that the Moderna vaccines increased all-cause mortality by over 50% (and the Pfizer vaccines weren’t safe either), Steve Kirsch, 17 July 2024
First, let’s just toy with an idea.
If a widely given drug caused death in 1 in 1000 what would the impact be?
For young people, the impact would be astounding. There would be a huge number of extra deaths and a stunning number of total deaths compared to those who did not take the drug. For 100,000 people there would be only 55 background deaths and 100 extra deaths. Comparing two similar-sized populations the overall mortality would be 155/100 = 1.55.
For old people, the impact would be much more subtle. For example, around 2% of people aged 80-89 will die in a year. For 100,000 people there would be 2,000 background deaths and only 100 extra deaths. Comparing two similar-sized populations the overall mortality would be 2100/2000 = 1.05.
Ultimately any signal would be much clearer in the young.
The Czech government have released record-level data for 10 million people. The clever analysis Steve has done is based on the assumption that Pfizer was harmless. It can then act as a placebo group. It is an excellent placebo group because confounders around health and socioeconomic variables are accounted for because the brands were distributed randomly. All that is needed is to compare the overall mortality rate in the Moderna group with the Pfizer group.
Barely any Moderna was given in January and the sick were being prioritised still in February, so the graph below shows only March onwards. At all ages, there were more deaths in the Moderna group. The impact on the young was higher. The dilution with higher background deaths in the old is clear.
Unless someone can provide compelling evidence of Moderna having been given to those more likely to die in every age group and throughout the time period then this is compelling evidence that it was more deadly.
It is not just a difference in efficacy. If it had been there would have been periods when the effect should have disappeared entirely e.g. June – October 2021 when covid deaths were at a low.
For completeness here is the same graph for January – June when covid rates were high.
A significant number of Czech citizens also had AstraZeneca and their mortality was similar to Moderna’s.
There is more that can be learnt from this data but this is the first big finding that needs addressing.
About the Author
Dr. Clare Craig is a British pathologist. She has a background in medicine, having studied at Cambridge University and practised as a diagnostic pathologist in the NHS for 15 years, becoming a fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists. She specialised in cancer diagnostics including diagnostic testing for cancer within mass screening programmes. She also co-chairs HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team), a multi-disciplinary body of experts providing independent information on covid issues.
Dr. Craig has written extensively on covid-19, including the book ‘Expired: Covid the Untold Story’, which examines evidence of airborne virus transmission and analyses pandemic policies. Her work is characterised by meticulous research and critical analysis, earning her recognition as a subject matter expert in the field. You can subscribe to and follow her Substack page HERE.