Listening to flat-earthers

In elementary school, one of my favorite pastimes was to memorize world capitals. I’d spin the globe in my first-grade teacher’s classroom and point to countries around the world to see if I remembered the differences between Budapest and Bucharest, Tokyo and Kyoto, Macedonia and Mauritania.

But, therein lies the problem: that I was spinning a globe. A spherical globe meant to model the “correct” shape of the earth. And why did I say — why was I taught to say — around the world? Why, from such a young age, was I indoctrinated into the ideology that claimed the Earth was round, rather than the true geomorphic tortilla (or tortilloid) on which civilization has flourished for centuries?

Earth’s spherical geometry has been settled since the third century B.C.E. by ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle who obtained empirical evidence after traveling to Egypt and seeing new constellations of stars. Eratosthenes, in the third century BC, became the first person to calculate the circumference of the Earth, with further geometric calculations performed by Islamic scholars in later centuries. Images from space were final proof in the late 1940s.

The notion of flat earth can be traced to the 19th century English writer Samuel Rowbotham, who wrote under the name Parallax, which sounds kind of like a digestive medication. Rowbotham’s observations on a six-mile straight-line stretch of the Bedford River led him to believe the Earth was actually flat, and he spent the rest of his life investigating and arguing the case. In his 1865 book “Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe,” Rowbotham models the Earth as a flat disc centered at the North Pole with the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars moving only several thousand miles above the surface of the Earth. 

Formed around his views, the Universal Zetetic Society waned in popularity during the world wars, and eventually made a resurgence as the International Flat Earth Society by Samuel Shenton in 1956 as a small group of fringe conspiracists. Following Shenton’s death in 1972, the International Flat Earth Society was taken over by Charles Kenneth Johnson, who was credited by Smithsonian magazine writer Danny Lewis to have transformed the group into an organization of thousands of members, at one point consisting of 3,500 people.

When the Internet took off in the 2000s, Flat Earth found a new platform on YouTube, which is where the majority of today’s Flat Earthers began their journey through channels and podcasts “debunking” claims of scientism and biblical literalism. Flat Earth subcultures have given rise to multiple theories of Earth’s geometries, from Rowbotham’s icy disk, to Earth being flat but encompassed in a Truman Show-esque snowglobe from which nothing can fall off the edges. Some Flat Earthers also reject gravity and distrust scientists and scientific institutions, especially NASA, who many believe to be part of a larger conspiracy of paid actors and falsified images. Many Flat Earthers often believe in other conspiracies too, like the moon landing being faked. 

“If the Earth is round, how can I see skyscrapers in the distance?” “If I live in Australia, how come I’m not standing upside down?” “Why are all the close-up pictures of earth in space flat?” Online forums have made it possible for Flat Earthers to congregate in person for these discussions at international conferences since 2009; the one in 2018 was hosted right here in the Triangle. Flat Earth has even received multiple celebrity endorsements, such as NBA player Kyrie Irving (though he later apologized) and rapper B.o.B., who began a GoFundMe in 2017 to raise 200,000 to launch interstellar satellites to “find the curve.” 

It’s easy for most of us to laugh at such claims, but such derision is only part of the problem. According to Asheley Landrum, a psychologist at Texas Tech who studies scientific misinformation, Flat Earthers are “very sincere in their beliefs,” and are not building these communities out of farce. She says that Flat Earthers aren’t necessarily people who don’t believe in science, and are often in support of the scientific method. “It’s not really an education thing…it really is about distrusting authorities and institutions.”