Childhood vaccines cause autism, a review of 850 studies concludes

They will try to tell you that the science is settled regarding the relationship between vaccines and autism: i.e. that vaccines do not cause autism.  But it’s not true, as Toby Rogers’ review of more than 850 studies on the causes of autism shows.

Toby Rogers has a PhD in political economy from the University of Sydney, Australia. His doctoral thesis, ‘The Political Economy of Autism’, explores the regulatory history of five classes of toxicants that increase autism risk. He publishes articles on a variety of topics on his Substack page titled ‘uTobian’.

Last week, Dr. Rogers published an article which mapped studies in the US related to the causes of autism.  His article provides a comprehensive overview of autism causation studies, covering over 850 studies in the US.  He grouped the studies into main categories addressing different causation theories, and explained the strengths, weaknesses and key findings.

“If you sat down to read each article individually, it would likely take you several years. But as I will show below, you don’t necessarily have to do that. There is a way to move through all of the literature at a meta level that I believe leads to the right answer and a viable plan for how to stop the autism epidemic,” he wrote.

His article continues to build on the work he started during his doctoral thesis, which reviewed about 80 of the top studies in autism epidemiology and toxicology.  Over the last six years, he has continued work on the causes of autism and now realises “that there are over 800 autism causation studies in the English language focused on the US.”

Rogers begins his article by addressing the studies used in the vaccine/autism cover-up.   Since 2000, there have been more than twenty studies which have concluded that there is no association between vaccines and autism.  “Most of these are studies that claim no association between MMR or thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism, which is odd,” Rogers said, “because the CDC’s own internal research shows that both of these types of vaccines do indeed cause autism.”

Then there are the studies that were conducted in an attempt to prove that autism is genetic.  The US government sank funding of  $2 billion into finding the gene for autism, and found nothing that explained more than 1% of cases.  “Private foundations also sought to prove that autism is genetic and failed categorically,” Rogers said.

Summarising four large epigenetic studies, studies that focus on gene expression, Rogers wrote: “All of these mainstream autism causation studies fail in a similar way – they engage in circular reasoning … standard practice [in epigenetic studies and epidemiology is to] assume[ ] away the question of vaccines rather than studying it.”  He notes the following as the assumptions that the four large epigenetic studies made, which are standard practice:

• The vaccine studies assume that vaccines are safe and effective, so they never bother with a proper placebo group that might prove otherwise.
• The gene studies assume that genes are the cause, so they just gather trillions of data points until they can find a spurious association (the gene studies don’t control for vaccination status, even though the possible mutagenic effects of vaccine ingredients on DNA are an ongoing concern).
• And the epigenetic studies assume vaccines could not be a factor, so they don’t control for them (in spite of the fact that some of the toxicants they are studying in the environment are the same toxicants being injected directly into children’s bodies).

Having detailed the deficiencies, faults and failings of the vaccine cover-up studies and the four epigenetic studies, Rogers then describes the studies that remain; the studies that help us to understand autism causation.

He refers to a significant study conducted in 2018 that found up to 88% of autism cases are characterised by autistic regression. This phenomenon occurs when a child, who initially develops normally, suddenly loses abilities such as eye contact, speech and social interaction over a matter of hours, days or weeks.

“This suggests an acute toxic exposure and we now have eyewitness testimony from hundreds of thousands of parents that the acute toxic exposure that preceded the autistic regression was a ‘well baby’ vaccine appointment with a paediatrician,” Rogers said. 

“The holy grail in autism research is to find vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies. Thankfully, there are now six good studies that we can rely on.”

After providing details and commentary on the six studies, Rogers concluded: “We know what’s causing the autism epidemic. The bloated, unscientific, profit-driven CDC vaccine schedules are causing the autism epidemic.”

“Vaccination in general seems to increase autism risk about 4-fold (the range across these six studies is 3.002 to 8.63). Vaccinating premies (OR = 14.5), vaccination + c-section delivery (OR = 12.5), and vaccination in the absence of breastfeeding (OR = 18.7) causes autism risk to skyrocket. That’s what’s causing the autism epidemic, according to the best available scientific evidence.”

Rogers provided an infographic to illustrate the “entire story”:

You can read Toby Rogers’ full article HERE and a commentary on it by Rebekah Barnett HERE.

Related

While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.