Oncogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus and COVID-19 Vaccines
–>
Please enjoy this long format interview the critical topic of COVID-19 turbo-cancers summarized by Alter AI.
1. Background and Rationale
Dr Peter McCullough invited Dr Wafik El‑Deiry following the publication of his Oncotarget review (Kuperwasser & El‑Deiry 2026) entitled “COVID vaccination and post‑infection cancer signals.” Dr El-Deiry is the Director of the Cancer Center at Brown University, founding co‑editor‑in‑chief of Oncotarget, internationally recognized for discovering the WAF1/p21 gene and TRAIL death receptor 5.
El‑Deiry explained he had become concerned through:
- Reports of hematologic and solid tumors arising shortly after infection or vaccination.
- Biological plausibility based on known viral–oncogenic interactions (e.g., HPV, EBV).
- His own P53 research, showing that SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein suppresses p53‑dependent transcription and reduces tumor‑cell sensitivity to chemotherapy agents (cisplatin, 5‑FU).
He stressed that his work does not prove causality but identifies “reasonable suspicion” signals meriting national investigation.
.
.
2. Key Mechanistic Themes Discussed
Mechanistic line of evidence Explanation provided in discussion Spike impact on p53 and DNA‑damage response Spike protein expression in cultured cells diminished p53 transcriptional activity and resistance to DNA‑damage‑induced apoptosis. PD‑L1 up‑regulation mRNA vaccine exposure shown to raise PD‑L1; this could promote immune evasion and tumor growth absent checkpoint blockade. IgG4 class‑switching after 4 + doses May induce immune tolerance, blunting tumor‑immune surveillance. Pseudouridine‑modified mRNA Confers unnatural stability; not previously used in humans before 2020; long‑term effects untested. Plasmid DNA impurities (e.g., SV40 enhancer) Potential for genomic insertion or oncogene activation. Tissue distributions Case reports of sarcomas at injection sites and lymphomas with spike‑positive/nucleocapsid‑negative histology suggest localized biodistribution.
3. Empirical Observations Highlighted
- Review compiled 69 publications describing post‑vaccine or post‑infection cancers (333 patients / 27 countries).
- Phenomena included rapid progression, recurrence, reactivation of otherwise stable disease (“turbo cancers”).
- Population data: Italian (~300 k cohort) and South Korean (~8.4 M cohort) studies reported elevated risks for several tumor types (2025); French study of millions did not find aggregate signal but mostly included people with ≤ 3 doses, so nuance in dose‑response remains unexamined.
-
Case of Japanese MP Kazuhiro Haraguchi — lymphoma metastases expressing spike but not nucleocapsid — cited as possible proof‑of‑concept for vaccine‑derived antigen presence in tumor tissue.
.
.
4. Regulatory and Ethical Gaps
Both doctors emphasized:
- Package inserts for all mRNA vaccines still state “no carcinogenicity or genotoxicity studies performed.”
- No long‑term safety datasets beyond 42 days were required for FDA authorization.
- RSV mRNA vaccine similarly lacks pre‑clinical oncogenicity testing despite non‑emergency status.
- Informed consent must explicitly include known gaps (fertility, carcinogenesis, long‑term biodistribution).
5. Discussion on Scientific Suppression
El‑Deiry recounted:
- Peer‑review bias, editorial retractions after acceptance, and cyber‑attacks on Oncotarget.
- Institutional fear—many faculty chairs block COVID‑vaccine side‑effect papers before submission.
- Importance of independent journals safeguarding open scientific discourse.
McCullough indicated:
- Difficulty publishing such data (“1 % acceptance rate” for vaccine‑safety manuscripts).
Similar censorship in cardiovascular research and noted absence of NIH/NCI/CDC‑funded investigations on mRNA/Spike protein and cancer despite available SEER + immunization databases.
6. Clinical Implications Proposed
- Establish forensic tumor registries testing for mRNA, Spike, and nucleocapsid proteins (e.g., IHC + RT‑qPCR).
- Create assays for circulating spike levels; presently no FDA‑cleared test exists worldwide.
- Stratify risk by number of boosters and prior infection—possible threshold effects beyond 3–4 doses.
- Focus immediate studies on high‑dose recipients (≥ 5–6 boosters) and unusual early‑onset cancers.
- Pursue safer next‑generation vaccine designs minimizing spike‑related cellular stress.
7. Points of Agreement
- mRNA technology could have future value but requires rigorous transparency and oncogenic risk evaluation.
- Current evidence shows rare but biologically plausible risks, underscoring the need for unbiased epidemiology.
- Both rejected personal “anti‑vax” labels and endorsed true informed consent grounded in ongoing data collection.
- Consensus that “science must permit questions without persecution.”
Conclusions
Dr El‑Deiry summarized his stance:
“Our paper doesn’t claim causality. It claims a need for cause testing… If vaccines are to be part of future medicine, they must reach optimal antiviral immunity while limiting collateral damage to host defenses—including anti‑cancer defenses.”
Dr McCullough concluded:
“These products remain on the market with minimal utilization but zero comprehensive oncogenicity data. National registries and spike assays are overdue. Until then, we risk flying blind.”
Together they called for transparent, independently funded, pathology‑based research into possible links between repeated mRNA vaccination, immune dysregulation, and accelerated malignancies.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Sources
Kuperwasser C, El‑Deiry W S. COVID vaccination and post‑infection cancer signals: Evaluating patterns and potential biological mechanisms. Oncotarget 17 (1):1‑29 (2026).
Von Ranke N L et al. Synthetic mRNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new‑onset adverse events and cancers post‑vaccination. World J Exp Med 15 (4):113869 (2025).
Isidoro C. SARS‑CoV‑2 and anti‑COVID‑19 mRNA vaccines: Is there a plausible mechanistic link with cancer? Cancers 17 (23):3867 (2025).
Valdés Angues R, Perea Bustos Y. SARS‑CoV‑2 Vaccination and the Multi‑Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Cureus 15 (12):e50703 (2023).
Chun E M et al. 1‑year risks of cancers associated with COVID‑19 vaccination: large population‑based cohort, South Korea. Biomarker Research 13(114), 2025 — editorial concerns pending.
El‑Deiry W S. LinkedIn posts (2023‑24) “Is the COVID vaccine causing turbo cancers?” and “Can COVID‑19 vaccines cause ‘turbo cancers’?”
MedPage Today (Oct 2025): COVID Vaccines and Cancer Risk: Experts Dissect Flawed Study.
Transcript: The McCullough Report / America Out Loud Talk News, Jan 2026 (“El‑Deiry Interview”).
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”
Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin
ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0, Year: 2022, PDF Ebook, Pages: 164, 15 Chapters
Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.
You may also access the online version of the e-Book by clicking here.
Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.
