Who Will Be Blamed For Harmful Covid-19 Vaccines? ‘It May be Time to Speak Up…’ says Dr Tess Lawrie.
Although doctors and other medical professionals may be expecting that their actions of the last four years in relation to the use of the dangerous Covid jab, will be defended by politicians, health and regulatory authorities etc, they may be in for a shock, says Dr Tess Lawrie. Doctors, it seems, will instead be the scapegoats “for when the anger and distress of ordinary men and women can no longer be contained” and Dr Lawrie urges the health professional who now realise the harms caused by these jabs, to speak up now.
Who Will Be Blamed For Harmful Covid-19 Vaccines? It may be time to speak up.
What the Prime Minister said
On GB News last week, the UK’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak confirmed what many of us have suspected – that the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ buck may stop with doctors…
Here is the clip where the PM says to a vaccine-injured man that: “At the point when it came to the vaccine, those decisions were always taken on medical advice, from medical experts..to tell us as politicians who are obviously not doctors about how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public interest […]. That was something the doctors recommended on and that’s something we followed.”
What the General Medical Council said
In a further revelation, the General Medical Council (GMC) confirmed that, rather than being accountable to the doctors that it contracts with, or the public it is supposed to protect, it is accountable to parliament!
In case, like me, you had been wondering, this clearly explains why the GMC is responsive to political, and not evidence-based and ethical, directives. Despite unprecedented levels of concerns being raised by doctors and the public about the safety of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’, the GMC continues to ‘investigate’ ethical doctors for raising the alarm about the dangerous jabs and for putting patients’ health and wellbeing first.
You may recall my letter to the CEO of the GMC, Mr Charlie Massey, from October 2023, where I informed him that I would be withholding further fees until the GMC has rectified the breach in contract with doctors. Whilst I never received a response, I have received notification that my name is to be erased from the GMC register.
In my conversation with James Freeman on TNT Radio this week, we talked about how the blame may well be shifted to doctors, who most likely thought they were doing the right thing by following emergency orders. Here is the relevant segment of the interview:
What Dr June Raine of the Medicines Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said
Included in her response to our June 2021 Urgent Report on the Yellow Card Scheme vaccine data highlighting unprecedented Covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions (ADRs), Dr June Raine, head of the MHRA dismissed our suggestion that the Covid-19 vaccine ADRs may be under-reported, claiming: “…there is high public awareness of the Yellow Card scheme and the reporting of suspected reactions.”
I haven’t met a member of the public who knows anything about the Yellow Card Scheme. Neither have I met many doctors who know much about it. Instead of public awareness campaigns to notify people and doctors about the risks of the novel jabs and the importance of reporting suspicions of harms to the (onerous) Yellow Card Scheme, people and health professionals were bombarded with messages about ‘safe and effective’ vaccines and gaslit into taking and giving them.
I have since asked clinical colleagues if they received regular emails highlighting the need to report ADRs, given the novel nature of these Covid-19 ‘vaccines’. Here are some responses:
“As a GP (retired in November) I never received any communication regarding yellow card notifications. In 30 years of medical practice I had probably only sent one or two yellow card reports. Following the Covid- 19 ‘vaccine’ I sent at least 15 reports to the MHRA.”
“No, I never received any emails or any encouragement to use the yellow card system… never used it before in my life and used it at least 4x with the covid vaccine and then stopped reporting as it was too time consuming…”
“The most common response from any medical professional I am given is: “What’s a yellow card?”
“I am a surgeon, so not involved in the unethical practice of giving untried experimental shots, but would have seen any warnings that they were to be used cautiously. There were none. It’s no excuse anyway. The childhood cry of ‘but my big brother told me to do it’ was always met with ‘and if he told you to jump off a cliff, would you do that too?’”
To get an idea of how onerous is it to report an adverse Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ reaction to the Yellow Card Scheme, take a look here.
Last thoughts…
Doctors and other health professionals may believe that politicians, ‘health’ authorities, professional bodies, and regulatory agencies will defend their actions of the past four years in relation to the use of experimental and dangerous Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ in men, women and children. However, I fear they may be in for a nasty shock. As the UK’s PM clearly demonstrated, it seems that doctors are the pre-ordained scapegoats for when the anger and distress of ordinary men and women can no longer be contained.
If you are a doctor or other health professional who has realised that the Covid-19 injections are indeed causing harm – harms such as myocarditis, amyloidosis, rapid cancers, cognitive decline, blood clots and sudden, unexpected deaths – and if you are wondering what to do, I urge you to speak up now or forever hold your peace.
Source Dr Tess Lawrie
The World Council for Health Team is on a mission to help humanity. Make it your mission to support us.
If you find value in these Substack articles and videos, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. All proceeds go to the work of the World Council for Health. You can also make a one-off donation or become a regular monthly donor in 2024 to support our expanding WCH team and humanitarian work.
This article has been archived for your research. The original version from The Exposé can be found here.