The Conversation: How feelings of disconnection and lack of control fuel conspiracy beliefs – new research
Past research suggests three core motivations that can underlie conspiracy beliefs.
First, people have an “epistemic motive” (relating to knowledge) to restore understanding and clarity about the world. Second, people’s “existential motive” captures the need for control and security, particularly in unpredictable situations. Finally, people have a “social motive” to belong and maintain a sense of shared identity.
Together, these motives help explain why some people turn to conspiracy theories to make sense of situations in which they feel powerless or disconnected. Events such as the Covid pandemic provide fertile ground for these beliefs to take hold.
However, there are clear negative consequences of conspiracy beliefs. They often foster distrust in authorities, encourage the spread of misinformation and, in some cases, make people take actions that harm society as a whole.
By understanding the psychological needs behind these beliefs, we can start to address them at their root.
Core needs linked to conspiracy beliefs
Our research focused on four key psychological needs closely linked to the three motives above: control, belonging, self-esteem and meaning in life.
We initially thought all these needs would drive conspiracy beliefs, but our findings reveal that unmet needs for control and belonging are the strongest predictors. Here are our main findings.
- The need for control: People turn to conspiracy beliefs when they feel powerless in their lives. Closely linked to the existential motive, conspiracy theories allow people to explain events as part of a hidden plot, giving them a sense of control – albeit a misplaced one. Our data shows control had the strongest link to conspiracy beliefs among the four needs we studied. Thus, when people feel powerless, they are more inclined to believe in forces working behind the scenes.
- The need to belong: Feeling connected to others is essential for our wellbeing. For those who feel isolated or marginalised, conspiracy groups can provide a community that validates their views. Our data reveals a lack of belonging significantly increased the likelihood of believing in conspiracy theories. People who struggle to feel accepted may be drawn to groups that share alternative explanations, providing a sense of identity and mutual understanding.
- Self-esteem and meaning in life: Surprisingly, these needs didn’t play as big a role as we expected. However, among people who experienced increases in their sense of meaning in life over time, we found they were slightly more likely to believe conspiracies at later time points. This finding goes against the idea that only unmet needs foster conspiracy beliefs and raises important questions for future research.
- Conspiracy beliefs can worsen unmet needs: We also tracked changes in conspiracy beliefs and their impact on psychological needs over time. When individuals held stronger conspiracy beliefs, they were less likely to experience control and belonging in subsequent years. Thus, although unmet needs can drive people toward conspiracy beliefs, conspiracy beliefs can further erode these same needs, potentially creating a self-reinforcing cycle of mistrust and disconnection.
Learning from longitudinal data
Unlike most studies which provide only a snapshot in time, our research followed participants over several years. This approach allowed us to examine how changes in psychological needs precede shifts in conspiracy beliefs.
By taking this broader perspective, our results reveal that, although conspiracy beliefs are relatively stable, they can be influenced by feelings of disconnection or loss of control.
Conspiracy beliefs stem, in part, from unmet needs to belong and feel a sense of control. This helps us understand who may be most likely to believe in conspiracy theories in the future.
Recognising who is most at risk then allows us to develop targeted tools to reduce the allure of conspiracy theories and foster a society grounded in trust and open dialogue. Grasping the “why” behind these beliefs is the first step in building resilience against misinformation in our communities.
– This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.
