“Several Smoking Guns”: The US Senate Hearing. The mRNA Vaccine and The SARS-CoV-2 Virus
Introduction. U.S. Covid-19 Senate Hearing
The U.S. Senate Hearings suggests that a dangerous NEW VIRUS was detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019.
It was initially entitled 2019-nCoV which stands for “2019 New (n) Corona (Co) Virus (V)”.
On January 1, 2020, “the Chinese health authorities closed the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan following Western media reports claiming that wild animals sold there may have been the source of the virus.”
As of early January 2020, it was the object of extensive media coverage and an unfolding Worldwide fear campaign.
Media disinformation 24/7 went into high gear.
The Chinese authorities (allegedly) “identified a new type of virus” on January 7, 2020, using the RT-PCR test.
No specific details were provided regarding the process of isolation of the virus.”
The Mandate of the Senate Hearings
I have reviewed the latest statements of the Senate Hearings, including Dr. Peter McCullough’s outstanding presentation.
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky “has long accused Dr. Fauci of trying to cover up the origin of the coronavirus, and of funding research at a lab in Wuhan in China.
Media reports have point to the so-called “origin of COVID-19” whereas:
“U.S. intelligence agencies are divided on the subject, with some supporting the possibility of the coronavirus emerging from an accidental lab leak in China while others support natural transmission from animal to human”.
Fauci previously said he keeps “an open mind as to what the origin is,” though he has also said he believes the animal-to-human route was more likely.”
[embedded content]
In this article I will focus on two important issues which are of concern to the Senate Hearings
The Identity and Origin of the New Corona Virus
The Nature of the mRNA Vaccine and its Impacts
In both cases I will put forth careful factual analysis and supportive data from official sources.
The Most Devastating Crisis in Human History
This video was first published by Vimeo in March 2021. It was censored and taken down by Vimeo in May 2021.
It focusses on the first phase of the Covid Crisis including the launching of the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020.
Starts At 6’47”. The video is also available at the foot of this article. It is also available (click here) with subtitles in 14 languages
Our thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada
The Identity and Origin of the New Corona Virus
.
There were several name changes. The initial identity of the virus was 2019-nCoV which stands for “2019 New (n) Corona (Co) Virus (V)”.
In late January 2020, the WHO based on the analysis of the Berlin Virology Team (Eurosurveillance) confirmed that:
It did not possess an isolate of 2019-nCoV from a purified sample from an infected patient, which meant that they were unable to confirm the identity of the novel coronavirus.
“Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness [of 2019-nCoV] to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.:”
.
.
Full Text of the Euro-Surveillance entitled 2019 Novel Corona Virus
What this Eurosurveillance (01/20/20) Report suggests is that the “NEW” virus entitled 2019-nCoV is similar to a virus entitled SARS-CoV 2003, which was the object of an indepth May 2003 study by the New England Journal of Medicine.
The NEJM Study Pertaining to SARS-CoV 2003
The New England Journal of Medicine, May 2003 (NEJM):
.
“A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” which broke out in China’s Southern Guangdong Province in 2002 WAS identified and categorized as a “new virus” on May 15, 2003. (17 YEARS PRIOR to the Alleged Covid Outbreak)
.
See Screenshot 0f NEJM May 15 2003 article below:
.
Absence of An Isolate of the “New 2019 Virus (2019-nCoV)”
While the 2003 SARS-CoV was duly isolated as documented in the NEJM, the WHO acknowledged in January 2020 that it did not have an isolate and purified sample of the NEW 2019 coronavirus from an infected patient, which meant that they were unable to confirm the identity of the 2019 novel coronavirus entitled 2019-nCoV. That was the reason given.
Not Wuhan! The Berlin Virology Institute
How was this matter resolved under the auspices of the WHO?
Following advice and funding from the Gates Foundation, the WHO was in liaison with the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital.
Under the scientific guidance of Dr. Christian Drosten, a decision was reached concerning the alleged identity of the New Virus. (Berlin Virology Institute study entitled: Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real time RT-PCR (Eurosurveillance)
The Berlin Virology Institute study firmly acknowledged that:
[While]… several viral genome sequences had been released,… virus isolates or samples [of 2019-nCoV] from infected patients were not available …”
What the Berlin team recommended to the WHO was that in the absence of an isolate of the 2019-nCoV virus, a similar 2003 SARS-CoV virus should be used as a “proxy” (point of reference) of the novel 2019 coronavirus:
“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].
We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.
Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).
What this ambiguous statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “COVID-19 confirmed cases” (aka infection resulting from the 2019 novel coronavirus) would be validated by
its “close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV.”
How could the new virus be categorized as similar without having been identified, i.e. without an “isolate”?
Moreover, bear in mind that while the PCR test does not detect the virus, it detects genetic fragments (of numerous viruses).
.
Smoking Gun. Bill Gates to the Rescue
What this means is that a coronavirus detected in 2002-2003 in Guangdong Province (2003 SARS-CoV) has been used to “validate” the identity of a so-called “novel coronavirus” allegedly detected in China’s Hubei Province in late December 2019.
The recommendations of the Drosten team (financed by a grant of $249,550 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were then transmitted to the WHO. (See (March 2020, 249,500)
They were endorsed by the Director-General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
The WHO did not have in its possession the “virus isolate” required to identify the new virus.
“Never mind”. It was decided by the Berlin Virology Team that an isolate of the new coronavirus was not required.
It stands to reason that if the PCR test uses the 2003 SARS-CoV virus as a proxy or “point of reference”, there can be no “confirmed” cases pertaining to the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV.
In early February. 2020, following the failure to identify the novel coronavirus, a decision was taken to change its name to:
February 11, 2020. The Alleged “New Virus” is Renamed
“Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus”: SARS-CoV-2 which (according to the WHO) is “similar” to a 20 year old virus entitled: 2003-SARS-CoV.
SARS-CoV-2: A Twenty Year Old 2003 Coronavirus Categorized in February 2020 as a “New Virus”? Scientific Nonsense!
There was “Similarity” but there Was No “New Corona Virus”?
I should mention that while SARS-CoV-2 is not a New Virus, this does not signifiy that “other viruses” created in a laboratory could have been released.
The Lancet Letter
The SARS-CoV-2 virus was confirmed on February 11, 2020 (see above).
A week later, the February 11, 2020 decision to rename the virus, was addressed by 27 scientists public healh professionals medical doctors in the Lancet Letter of February 19, 2020 (also referred to as Calisher et al. 2020) was published.
- Dr Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Dr. George Gao Fu (Director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China’s CDC) fro August 2017 to July 2022.
- Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO)
- Dr. Christian Drosten, Director of the Institute of Virology, Charité Hospital, Berlin.
- William Henry Gates, Director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Philantropic support to the WHO and The Berlin Institute of Virology’s study in Eurosurveillance
The WHO decision pertainng to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was endorsed in the U.S by the Trump Administration, while placing the blame on China.
In the EU, it was endorsed in March 2020 by the President of the European Commission headed by Ursula von Der Leyen (2019- )
The World Economic Forum (WEF) met Davos in the Swiss Alps in mid January 2020 played a key role.
The Director General of the WHO Dr. Tedros was present at the meetings in Davos Switzerland.
A couple of weeks later, the WHO Director General’s Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus took the decision on January 30, 2020, to call for a Worldwide Public Health Emergency of International Concern, based on 83 confirmed positve PCR cases outside of China for a population of approximately 6.4 billion people.
There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic
By , July 31, 2026
.
.
II
.
.
The “Classified” Pfizer Report
.
.
Already in early 2021, the Classified “Secret” Report by Pfizer based on data (mortality, morbidity) collected on behalf of Pfizer from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 had been submitted to the U.S. health authorities.
The Senate Hearings have failed to address the relevance of the Classified Pfizer Report which confirmed the impacts of the mRNA vaccine on mortality and morbidity from the very onset in early 2021.
Sections of the so-called “secret” (classified) report were released under Freedom of Information (FOI) in October 2021, nine months following the launching of the vaccine in early January 2021.
That report “says everything”, it comes from the horse’s mouth. It’s their data. Yet medical doctors hesitate to quote Pfizer’s data for obvious reasons.
It is essential that this Pfizer report be addressed by the Hearings.
This interview of Michel Chossudovsky with Caroline Mailloux focussing on Pfizer’s mRNA Vaccine, was conducted on February 24, 2023
To leave a comment or to share the video (Twitter, Facebook, etc. click rumble on the lower right hand corner
The Objective of the Classified Pfizer Report
Tabulate and categorize detailed data pertaining to the impacts of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine on, Mortality, Morbidity and Adverse Events from December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021. namely two and a half months.
The results of Pfizer’s classified Report were not made public. They were available to several health agencies (including the CDC, NIAID and FDA) involved in overseeing the distribution of the vaccine under the clauses of “Emergency Use Authorization”.
Bear in mind, this is Pfizer’s own data.
This Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure provided data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in mid December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).
The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was launched in the US on the 14th of December 2020 after the granting of Emergency Use Authorization on December 11, 2020.
In a twisted irony, the data revealed in this “insider report” confirms mortality and morbidity.
The alleged “vaccine” is a dangerous drug.
It also refutes the official vaccine narrative peddled by the governments and the WHO.
EXCERPT OF CLASSIFIED PFIZER REPORT
As shown in Figure 1 [see below], the System Organ Classes (SOCs) that contained the greatest number (≥2%) of events, in the overall dataset, were General disorders and administration site conditions (51,335 AEs),
Nervous system disorders (25,957), Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (17,283), Gastrointestinal disorders (14,096),
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (8,476), Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (8,848), Infections and infestations (4,610), Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (5,590), and Investigations (3,693)
emphasis added
Who are the main actors behind the Pfizer-Moderna mRNA Killer “Vaccine”.
Important:
Pfizer has a criminal record with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ, 2009).
It’s a criminal entity.
- Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer, Chief Executive Office
- Stéphane Bancel, French billionaire, chief executive officer (CEO) of Moderna,
- William Henry Gates, Philantropist and Director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
- Dr Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO)
Click Here to read the Pfizer Full Year 2022 Revenues Report
The link to the complete report has been removed by Pfizer.
The following video focusses on the Classified Pfizer report as well as The Big Money Report released by Pfizer in 2023.
This interview of Michel Chossudovsky with Caroline Mailloux of Lux Media was conducted on February 24, 2023
To leave a comment or to share the video (Twitter, Facebook, etc. click rumble on the lower right hand corner
By , April 12, 2026
There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic
By , July 31, 2026
The Most Devastating Crisis in Human History
This video was first published by Vimeo in March 2021. It was censored and taken down by Vimeo in May 2021. It focusses on the first phase of the Covid Crisis.
Starts At 6’47”. The video is also available at the foot of this article. It is also available (click here) with subtitles in 14 languages
Our thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada
Michel Chossudovsky’s Message
Dear Readers,
We stand in solidarity Worldwide.
We fully endorse the 2026 U.S. Senate’s Hearings pertaining to mRNA Vaccine.
My writings on the Covid crisis have been the object of censorship.
Below you can download (free of charge) my Book (15 chapters) which provides a detailed analysis of a crisis which is still ongoing.
First published four years ago in August 2022. Print version in Japanese.
Bring it to the consideration of the Senate Hearings.
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
Free of Charge for ALL our Readers. Click here to Download
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”
Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin
Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.
We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page.
