Letters: December 28, 2020 – Winnipeg Sun

Article content continued

Dennis Fitzgerald

We’re sure not even the letter writers will miss it.

“Great Reset”

Trudeau’s announcement of his “Great Reset” complete with massive carbon tax increases will be met with open arms in eastern Canada. Then to boost the sale of this tax, Canadians were again reminded “the CT will put more money in their pockets.” No doubt just like income tax does as well??? Trudeau knows, enough of Ontario, all of Quebec and the Maritimes would follow and support him no matter what. In this case a meager credit on paper at tax time is more than enough to win support. There will be enough support to land Trudeau the majority government he desperately wants. (Taxpayer donations made around the world will strengthen Trudeau’s chances for a UN seat as he desires this as well, but that is another story). After Trudeau’s announcement of the CT going through the roof, very little push back from any of the other political parties was very noticeable. (Letters from angry and disappointed Canadians said much more). The NDP and Greens will only agree with Trudeau, giving the PCs less clout/headaches. At one time Trudeau promised not to increase the CT. But the “Great Reset” says different. And now that Trudeau knows he can do as he pleases, as he pleases, when he pleases. So expect the CT to go even higher than $170/ton and faster than $15/year. Expect 5-700/ton with $75/ton/year increase. The “Great Reset” is intended to get as many unemployed people out of their homes/dwellings and living on the streets as fast as possible.

Rolly Klaepatz

“Great Reset” not so great for average Canadians.

Extinguish the flame

If Trudeau and his minority Liberal Government are serious about reducing carbon emissions and having Canada go “Green”, he should extinguish that 1967 Centennial Flame that burns on Parliament Hill. This flame has been burning needlessly for 54 years using up precious oxygen, energy and polluting the air. A secure, non polluting metal shaped flame could be used instead of a real flame.

Robert J. Moskal

That makes too much sense.

*** This article has been archived for your research. The original version from Google News can be found here ***