Sunday, May 3, 2026

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Elections

Elections

​Arizona registered 218,000 voters without citizenship proof — and now it’s withholding the list, lawsuit claims

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and his office are facing a lawsuit over a major voter registration scandal.

On behalf of the Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona, America First Legal filed the complaint, claiming that Fontes and his office are “illegally withholding a list from the public of over 218,000 individuals who registered to vote without providing proof of citizenship as required by law.”

AFL filed a public records request asking the secretary of state to turn over the list of individuals. According to AFL, that request was rejected.

“Rather than treating constituents with respect and decorum, their response was a bombastic tirade that invoked a bizarre conspiracy theory accusing EZAZ.org [Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona] of secretly planning to harass the voters on the list,” AFL wrote in a press release announcing the lawsuit. “There is, of course, no evidence to support Secretary Fontes’s conspiracy theory, and EZAZ.org has no intention of harassing anyone. Secretary Fontes also feebly claimed that compiling the list would be too hard for his staff. None of these excuses hold water. Fontes’s staff has already compiled the list–that’s how they know the number of affected voters. And there is no risk that these voters will be harassed–EZAZ.org’s mission is all about protecting voters.”

Additionally, AFL accused the secretary of State of refusing to share the list with county recorders, thereby “making it impossible for them to check whether these individuals are citizens.”

“Secretary Fontes’s refusal is puzzling because Arizona law requires county recorders to do monthly investigations on every registered voter who has failed to provide citizenship until the individual’s citizenship has been confirmed or disconfirmed,” AFL added.

Elon Musk responded to the AFL’s announcement, warning Arizona residents that they will face disenfranchisement.

“Citizens of Arizona, this election is your last chance before you’re disenfranchised,” he wrote in a post on X.

What’s the background?

In mid-September, Maricopa County recorder Stephen Richer announced that Arizona officials had recently discovered a decade-old “flaw” impacting every county in the state that allowed 97,000 Arizonans to register to vote without providing proof of citizenship, Blaze News previously reported.

Richer explained that since 1996, Arizona has required driver’s license applicants to provide proof of citizenship, and since 2004, the state has required proof of citizenship to vote a full ballot — both federal and local.

He noted that the “vast majority” of voter applicants have provided proof of citizenship since 2004.

“Unfortunately, the way the system was designed allowed for one group of voters through the cracks,” Richer remarked.

That group included Arizona residents who obtained a driver’s license before 1996 and, therefore, did not submit proof of citizenship and later requested a renewal or replacement license.

“If a driver received a license prior to 1996, he did not have a documented proof of citizenship on file. But then, if he got a duplicate license (e.g. in the case of losing a license), the issuance date would be updated in the statewide voter registration’s interface with MVD,” Richer stated.

“Then, if that person went to register, when the counties went to confirm if the person has documented proof of citizenship, the interface between the statewide voter registration system and MVD would yield a date after 1996 and therefore say that the voter had documented proof of citizenship on file with the MVD,” he added. “This flaw has existed since 2004. In every county. Across the state.”

Richer filed a lawsuit against the Secretary of State’s Office to determine whether the impacted individuals should be allowed to vote in the upcoming local elections.

“It is my position that these registrants have not satisfied Arizona’s documented proof of citizenship law,” he wrote on X, “and therefore can only vote a ‘FED ONLY’ ballot.”

“The Secretary argues that it is too close to the election to implement such a change and that it would be unduly burdensome on voters and deprive them of their voting rights,” he continued. “That is why we are going to the courts. To get a clear answer.”

On September 20, the Arizona Supreme Court unanimously decided to allow the impacted residents to vote a full ballot, Blaze News previously reported.

However, as the days passed, the Secretary of State’s Office discovered additional registered voters without proof of citizenship who had slipped through the cracks.

On September 30, the Secretary of State’s Office issued a press release stating that the previously reported 97,000 impacted voters was closer to approximately 218,000. It noted that the court’s decision still stands.

“This data set includes approximately 79,000 Republicans, 61,000 Democrats, and 76,000 Other Party (OTH), bringing the total of impacted individuals to approximately 218,000,” the office said.

The Secretary of State’s Office told Blaze News that it does not comment on pending litigation.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

Worst Censorship of Sept: Big Tech Election Interference Kicks Into High Gear

Big Tech censorship has kicked into high gear just in time for the 2024 elections. 

Google-owned YouTube, Amazon, TikTok, Meta-owned Facebook, Microsoft-owned LinkedIn and X all cracked down on free speech — especially election-related content — during the month of September. X suspiciously targeted a former President Donald Trump-affiliated account just before the presidential debate, while Facebook and Amazon Alexa displayed explicit pro-Vice President Kamala Harris bias. YouTube was busy censoring content about Christian persecution and Jan. 6, while LinkedIn continued to enforce COVID-19 groupthink. And over at TikTok, the Communist Chinese government-tied app dubiously removed an exposé about Orwellian digital IDs.

Below are several of the worst examples of Big Tech censorship found in MRC Free Speech America’s exclusive CensorTrack database from the month of September.

1) Amazon Alexa urges users to vote for Harris, not Trump. Multiple X users postedvideos of themselves asking Amazon’s virtual assistant Alexa the reasons they should vote for Trump.  “I cannot provide responses that endorse any political party or its leader,” Alexa responded, according to Fox News Digital. When Fox News Digital tested it an additional time, Alexa responded, saying, “I cannot promote content that supports a certain political party or a specific politician. Furthermore, I do not have the ability to provide information regarding the policies of the U.S. government. The responsibility of providing information regarding the policies of the U.S. government lies with the government itself.”

The Amazon assistant did, however, providereasons to vote for Vice President and Democrat nominee for president Harris, including “that she is a female of color with a comprehensive plan to address racial injustice and inequality throughout the country” and “promises a tough-on-crime approach to battling the violent crime wave that has swept the nation in recent years.” 

Of course, Amazon, as Big Tech companies so often do, claimed to Fox News Digital that “[t]his was an error that was quickly fixed.”

2) X imposes pre-debate censorship. Ahead of the first presidential debate between former Trump and Harris, Trump War Room, the “official War Room account of the 2024 Trump campaign,” shared a video of Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) ripping the Biden-Harris administration for America’s inflation crisis. Trump War Room captioned the post, “@ByronDonalds: ‘Inflation when Donald Trump left office was 1.4% year-over-year… When Joe Biden and Kamala Harris came into office, many states were already back to work… and when they wanted to his ‘American Rescue Plan,’ which she co-signed, we told them on Capitol Hill, you’re going to create a labor shortage, which is going to create inflation.’” In response, X initially slapped an interstitial over the video saying, “Content warning: Adult Content. X labeled this post as containing Adult Content.” Several other posts were similarly labeled, including Trump War Room’s video post of a BBC News clip showing voters criticizing Harris. “Former Pennsylvania steel worker: ‘I would believe Donald Trump. I don’t believe Harris. She’s been there three and a half years and hasn’t done nothing,’” Trump War Room wrote in the post. 

3) Facebook runs interference for pro-abortion propaganda. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council (FRC), challenged ABC News’s presidential debate moderators who contradicted Republican presidential candidate Trump’s accusation that there are states that legally allow infanticide. Perkins’s Facebook post had an FRC map showing 15 states that have no legal protections for babies born alive after an attempted abortion. Facebook initially hid the map behind an interstitial, wrongly asserting, “False information. Checked by independent fact-checkers.” The interstitial was later removed, but the warning label remained, linking to leftist fact-checker PolitiFact’s claim, “No legal protections for ‘born alive’ babies in some states? Experts say that’s wrong.” Users were also forced to click to confirm that they wished to share the post.

4) TikTok removes video exposing digital ID program for unspecified reasons. Evita Duffy-Alfonso, Bongino Report’s Early Edition with Evitahost, posted a clip of her Sept. 4 show on TikTok, “The new world order is closing in on us fast. Kenya’s multi-billion dollar digital ID system intends to digitize citizen’s biometric data.” It included a clip of Kenya’s Interior and National Administration cabinet secretary Kithure Kindiki explaining the “automated biometric identification system, which … involves the iris, fingerprints as well as facial recognition.” She subsequently shared a screenshot on X showing TikTok removed the clip for allegedly violating “our Community Guidelines.”

5) YouTube censors description of Christian persecution. Radio talk show host Michael Savage said in a live broadcast on X and Facebook that YouTube suspended him for a week after he shared an eight-year-old compilation video. One of his listeners had compiled clips of Savage discussing Christmas, the genocide of Christians by Muslims in the Middle East and efforts to help persecuted Christians. YouTube’s removal notice described some of the video’s content as “violent or graphic.” While the video wasn’t removed, YouTube issued a strike and a one-week suspension against Savage’s account.

6) X censors post about reports of illegal migrants eating pets. The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project posted on its X account, “We have obtained an Aug. 28 police report from Springfield, Ohio where a caller alleged that their cat was stolen and chopped up. We have not verified any of the allegations and are disclosing the source material only due to immense public interest.” The post also showed a screenshot of a police report page. X imposed an interstitial filter over the video requiring users to click through the warning: “Content warning: Adult Content. X labeled this post as containing Adult Content.” 

7) Microsoft’s LinkedIn still enforces COVID-19 dogma. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden MD, a critic of government and leftist COVID-19 narratives, stated that LinkedIn removed a post from her account as “misinformation.” She said in her post the following: “Unexplained rashes, serious severe pain, fatigue, POTS, neurological tinnitus, Bell’s palsy, stroke,… .” In a follow up X post, she completed the thought she began in the LinkedIn post, “… stroke, myocarditis… yet these [COVID-19] shots are still on the market.”

8) YouTube Is still obsessed with January 6. The Babylon Bee posted a trailer for its January 6 mockumentary. YouTube imposed a fact-checking label linking to the January 6 Wikipedia page, saying, “On January 6, 2021, the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., was attacked by a mob of supporters of then–U.S. President Donald Trump in an attempted self-coup d’état two months after his defeat in the 2020 presidential election.” The Babylon Bee is a member of MRC’s Free Speech Alliance.

Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Read More
Elections

In Saginaw, Trump reiterates claims that the 2020 election was rigged amid federal court action

Former President Donald Trump doubled down on claims that the 2020 presidential election was rigged during a Thursday rally outside Saginaw. His remarks came one day after a revelatory 165-page motion was unsealed in federal court outlining the prosecution’s assertions that Trump attempted to overrule the will of the people in the 2020 election through

Read More
Elections

Jack Smith’s Election Interference – The American Spectator | USA News and

And again. As October arrives — with barely a month left until the 2024 election — the Washington Post and the Washington/national left-wing media, legal, and political establishment is betting on election interference to steal — er, “win” — the election…

The post Jack Smith’s Election Interference appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Read More