Sunday, May 3, 2026

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Elections

Elections

No ID? No problem! Californians won’t have to show ID to vote, thanks to Gavin Newsom and other state Dems

Californians looking to cast a ballot in the next several weeks likely won’t have to present proof of identification thanks to a new bill signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).

On Thursday, Newsom signed SB 1174, which bars all local governments in California from “requiring a person to present identification for the purpose of voting or submitting a ballot.”

‘Unnecessary obstacles to voter participation disproportionately burdens low-income voters, voters of color, young or elderly voters, and people with disabilities.’

State Sen. Dave Min (D-Irvine) introduced the bill earlier this year after residents in Huntington Beach voted to approve a local ordinance requiring voters to show ID to cast a ballot in municipal elections.

Folks in Huntington Beach previously ran afoul of state Democrats for fighting back against lockdown measures in 2020 and voting to outlaw the Pride flag on municipal buildings.

In April, California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber sued the city, claiming the local ordinance requiring ID to vote violated state law.

“State election law already contains robust voter ID requirements with strong protections to prevent voter fraud while ensuring that every eligible voter can cast their ballot without hardship. Imposing unnecessary obstacles to voter participation disproportionately burdens low-income voters, voters of color, young or elderly voters, and people with disabilities,” Bonta previously said in a statement.

“We cannot have 100 different charter cities making up 100 different sets of voting rules based on fringe conspiracy theories,” added Min.

Huntington Beach officials have yet to respond to the lawsuit.

Meanwhile, SB 1174 will go into effect, though exactly when is unclear. Democracy Docket reported that the “new law is now in effect,” though Newsweek reported that it won’t go into effect until January 1.

Sam, a likely AI-generated online assistant at the website for the California secretary of state, recommended that voters bring ID to their polling locations this year. Sam went on to explain to Blaze News that “in most cases, California voters are not required to show identification at their polling place.” However, poll workers may request to see an ID in certain cases of incomplete voter registration, Sam said.

Blaze News then called the secretary of state’s voter hotline for further clarification about whether the law will be in effect in the November election. Unfortunately, the call was disconnected before we received an answer. Blaze News called back, only to be told to contact county-level officials.

Elon Musk, a former California resident who moved some of his businesses to Texas in large part because of California’s destructive policies, lambasted the new law.

“Wow, it is now illegal to require voter ID in California!” Musk posted to X. “They just made PREVENTING voter fraud against the law. The Joker is in charge.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

WATCH: MRC’s Bozell Sounds Alarm on Google’s Latest Election Interference

Media Research Center President Brent Bozell sounded the alarm over Google’s latest censorship scheme and accused the tech giant of “deliberately” manipulating its algorithms to sway the election.

Bozell joined Thursday’s episode of Fox Business’s Varney & Co. to detail a new MRC study exposing Google for actively boosting leftist media outlets—most of which are notoriously hostile towards the right—in search results related to the 2024 election. The findings also show Google elevated the campaign website of Vice President Kamala Harris and buried former President Donald Trump’s.

“Google is deliberately playing with the algorithms to deliberately change the electoral count. If that isn’t tampering with democracy, I just don’t know what is,” Bozell told host Stuart Varney, summarizing the MRC findings.

“Google is deliberately playing with the algorithms to deliberately change the electoral count. If that isn’t tampering with democracy, I don’t know what is.”
MRC’s @BrentBozell eviscerates Google’s election interference with @Varneyco on @FoxBusiness pic.twitter.com/FJMkMz8YdY
— Media Research Center (@theMRC) September 26, 2024
Read the Damning Study: Google Up to Same Tricks? Search Giant Pushes Wildly Biased News Above Trump Website

The MRC report showed that Google consistently yielded results from leftist outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post and Politico when users searched for “donald trump presidential race 2024.” Unsurprisingly, the same leftist outlets dominated search results when the query was changed to “kamala harris presidential race 2024.”

Bozell suggested that Google’s boosting of Harris’s website, and leftist outlets that favor the Democratic Party nominee, may amount to illegal campaign contributions that the government should look into. 

“If you want to do something to affect the campaign, make a political contribution within the limits of the law. If this were a political contribution, it would be literally in the billions of dollars of a contribution, which would make it illegal,” Bozell emphasized during the Fox Business interview.

When Varney asked how Americans can counter the “left-wing” push on platforms like Google, Bozell offered a blunt solution: “You’re only going to do that when the government intercedes on this.”

Google, which has earned a notorious reputation for ignoring MRC’s repeated requests for comments and explanations, attempted to save face by dismissing the study’s findings in remarks to Fox Business.  

ICYMI: Mum! Google Fails to Respond to Bozell’s Challenge, Does Not Refute Election Interference

“Both campaign websites consistently appear at the top of Search for relevant and common search queries,” the tech giant claimed, failing to address why leftist outlets are promoted.

The tech giant also dismissed the report as based on a “single rare search term on a single day several weeks ago.” This line of defense conveniently ignored the numerous MRC studies that busted the tech giant meddling in U.S. elections, dating back to 2008.

Related: 41 Times Google Has Interfered in US Elections Since 2008

Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Read More