Archives

Florida for two years has recommended against taking the COVID-19 shots. Now state officials are calling for them to be taken off the market entirely. And yet, to this day, no other red state has joined the fight against a product that was shoved down our throats like nothing before in history and has likely led to untold numbers of people “dying suddenly.”

Nearly every red-state health department continues to serve as a conduit for the Centers for Disease Control. Public health officials echo and augment their maniacal guidance on COVID shots or the next dangerous product in the biomedical security pipeline. It’s as if the past two years of studies and accumulated data points showing COVID shots damage every corner of the body never existed.

Florida has already been warning about the cardiac problems associated with the vaccines. Now, state Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo is calling for the mRNA shots to be taken off the market because of DNA contaminants and possible carcinogens that have been found in the concoction.

Based on several research papers that came to light last year, Ladapo warned in an open letter to the heads of the CDC and FDA that Simian Virus 40 promoter/enhancer DNA and “lipid nanoparticle complexes” could pose a “heightened risk of DNA integration into human cells.”

I am calling for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

— (@)

“If the risks of DNA integration have not been assessed for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, these vaccines are not appropriate for use in human beings,” Ladapo wrote. “It is my hope that, in regard to COVID-19, the FDA will one day seriously consider its regulatory responsibility to protect human health, including the integrity of the human genome.”

The studies showing these shots are dangerous are so voluminous at this point that Ladapo referred to the vaccines as “the antichrist of all products.”

This comes on top of findings that the shots produce random junk proteins, that the spike causes autoimmune problems by binding to C4 immune cells, and that as many as half of the shot’s recipients potentially never stop producing spike proteins.

Last year, biologist Kevin McKernan found DNA plasmid contamination in the mRNA shots. He also found parts of the SV40 genetic sequence, which has been associated with cancer.

Global drug regulatory agencies have conceded the discovery but refuse to raise awareness or concern about the problems and have shown no desire to study the contamination issue further, let alone pull the shots from the market.

All the while, evidence is mounting that “excess deaths” remain elevated throughout the United States and other developed countries.

Yet despite everything we now know, Florida is still the only state to treat the shots like the abortions they are. Many red states simply parrot CDC guidance and even urge people to get more jabs!

For example, the Arkansas Department of Health, citing the CDC, recommends, “Everyone aged 5 years and older should get 1 dose of the updated Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to protect against serious illness from COVID-19.”

Alaska takes it a step further: “Protect yourself and your community by staying up to date with your vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for everyone 6 months and older.”

Ditto for Indiana, Wyoming, Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, West Virginia, and Idaho.

Under its “updated COVID-19 vaccine information” page, the Tennessee Department of Health states:

… these vaccines protect against the COVID-19 variants currently circulating during the 2023-2024 respiratory virus season. Everyone 6 months and older should get a COVID-19 vaccine regardless of whether they’ve received any original COVID-19 vaccine(s). COVID-19 vaccines can help protect against severe illness, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19.

So clearly, this is not just a leftover page from 2021.

Shockingly, South Carolina public health authorities continue to recommend taking the new booster even after reviewing “the available data.” What data did they review, exactly?

The fact is that most red-state health directors are indistinguishable from Anthony Fauci and blue-state officials despite having Republican governors. They are more aligned with Trump Surgeon General Jerome Adams than Joe Ladapo.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton deserves credit for suing Pfizer for fraud. Unfortunately, Governor Greg Abbott has failed to lead on this issue, and the Texas Health Department is still promoting the shots, while the Texas Medical Board is sanctioning doctors who didn’t wear masks.

Thankfully, few people are still listening to this genocidal advice. More Americans are avoiding the shots, which is why Pfizer’s stock price is plummeting.

But it is still important for red-state legislatures to demand their governments stop promoting these shots. Pregnant women are being brainwashed to get the shots for themselves and their newborn children, and some might be inclined to listen to the government’s misinformation, given the heightened concern surrounding pregnancy. Authorities also continue to bomb vulnerable seniors with these shots.

Additionally, many red states have still not completely banned mandates, including hospital requirements for organ transplant patients or medical and nursing school students.

It’s also vital for states to cut ties with the CDC as it promotes new dangerous shots, such as the RSV jabs for kids and seniors. A few New Hampshire Republicans have introduced a bill to ban the state from promoting CDC policies.

Finally, red states need to oppose the shots in order to build momentum for much-needed liability reform so we can start holding these companies accountable, obtain authentic data on the safety and efficacy of existing vaccines, and abolish the concept of the CDC’s child immunization schedule as a one-size-fits-all mandate on every child born.

Even without mandates, we should never tolerate red-state governments promoting a death shot. Republican states would never promote abortions even though they are not mandated because they are murder. Killing the already born with a government-created poison is certainly not a lesser evil.

The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus grilled Anthony Fauci for 14 hours over two days this week as part of a closed-door deep dive into the origins of COVID-19, the rollout of novel vaccines, and controversial pandemic protocols.

The former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases claimed over 100 times just in the first day of questioning that he could “not recall” possibly damning information. Nevertheless, what Fauci ultimately willed himself to remember or admit was revelatory.

“Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview revealed systemic failures in our public health system and shed light on serious procedural concerns with our public health authority,” wrote Committee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio). “It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely. Should a future pandemic arise, America’s response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data.”

Social distancing was a crock

Wenstrup noted after the second day of interviews that Fauci, who once cast himself as the physical incarnation of science, admitted that social distancing recommendations “forced on Americans ‘sort of just appeared’ and were likely not based on scientific data.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stressed in 2020 the need for adults and school children to “remain at least 6 feet apart,” suggesting that a failure to space students far apart presented the “highest risk.”

The CDC further recommended the use of face masks when the physical distance of six or more feet could not be maintained, confidently claiming that in its guidance that “maintaining physical distance (≥6 feet) lowers the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection through exposure to infectious respiratory droplets and aerosols and is important, even if no symptoms are apparent.

The CDC did not relax its guidelines until summer 2022.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, one of former President Donald Trump’s commissioners of the Food and Drug Administration, suggested as much in 2021, telling CBS News’ “Face the Nation” that the six-foot social distancing rule was “arbitrary” — a compromise between the CDC, which initially sought a recommendation of 10 feet, and an unnamed appointee in the Trump administration who suggested 10 feet was “inoperable.”

Gottlieb underscored that this arbitrary rule was “probably the single costliest recommendation that [the] CDC made,” reported Forbes.

Not a conspiracy theory

Wenstrup indicated that Fauci admitted this week the lab-leak theory “was, in fact, not a conspiracy theory.”

Previously, Fauci all but led the campaign to discredit the likely scenario that the unhygienic Chinese communist-run lab at the center of the pandemic — where patients zero conducted gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses — was indeed the origin of the virus.

Cognizant of top immunologists’ concerns that COVID-19 was created in a lab his agency helped fund, Fauci commissioned, edited, and gave final approval to a 2020 paper suggesting the virus had a zoonotic origin.

Fauci failed to note his involvement with the impactful March 2020 study published the journal Nature, “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2,” when later citing it on the national stage to shore up his claim that it was unlikely the virus originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology ⁠— thereby buttressing the Chinese Communist Party’s denials.

Last year, the subcommittee identified two possible motives behind the apparent efforts by Fauci and his allies to downplay the lab-leak theory and vilify its proponents: The virologists either wanted to “defend China and play diplomat” or “lessen the likelihood of increased biosafety and laboratory regulations.”

A third possibility may have been to displace blame. After all, federal documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit revealed in 2023 that the NIAID, under former director Fauci, funded dangerous experiments on coronaviruses at the WIV in China’s Hubei province.

In his testimony this week, the subcommittee suggested that Fauci “played semantics with the definition of a ‘lab leak’ in an attempt to cover up the inaccurate conclusions of ‘Proximal Origin.’ It is impossible for him to defend ‘Proximal Origin’ as definitive while simultaneously acknowledging that a lab leak is possible.”

Additional admissions and denials

Fauci revealed not only that he failed to correct state-circulated junk science and advanced at least one erroneous presumption on his own but also that he:

• agreed with Trump’s controversial order to restrict travel from China and other nations at the outset of the pandemic;
• advised imposing vaccine mandates on college students;
• did not bother to review proposals when signing off on every foreign and domestic NIAID grant; and
• could not confirm whether his former agency had any mechanisms to conduct oversight of the foreign labs it bankrolls.

Wenstrup (R-Ohio) indicated further that the geriatric scientist was also willing to admit that the policies and mandates he championed “may unfortunately increase vaccine hesitancy for years to come.”

While making some telling admissions, the former bureaucrat doubled down on his past claim that the National Institutes of Health did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

Fauci also denied the allegations that he visited the CIA during the pandemic or influenced the agency’s investigation into the origins of the virus. The subcommittee claimed in September that “Fauci was escorted into Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Headquarters — without a record of entry — and participated in the analysis to ‘influence’ the Agency’s review.”

The committee will hear further testimony from Fauci later this year.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!