Tuesday, December 24, 2024

conspiracy resource

Conspiracy News & Views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

Elections

DC removing over 100,000 ineligible voters from ‘dirty voter rolls’ following Judicial Watch pressure campaign | Blaze Media

The governmental transparency outfit Judicial Watch appears to have executed a successful pressure campaign to rid select voter lists of multitudes of ineligible voters in the District of Columbia.

Judicial Watch notified election officials in
D.C., California, and Illinois that they had violated the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 “based on their failure to remove inactive voters from their registration rolls.”

While officials in California and Illinois have time left to act before Judicial Watch makes good on its threat of legal action, D.C. has indicated it has already begun taking remedial steps.

The watchdog claimed in a Sept. 22
letter to the Monica Holman Evans, executive of the District of Columbia Board of Elections, that the board was in violation of Section 8 of the NVRA requiring it to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters for DC.”

The letter cited D.C. data provided to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission indicating zero voter registrations had been removed from November 2020 to November 2022.

According to the watchdog, EAC data showed the number of inactive registrations in the district amounted to nearly one-quarter of the total number of Washington’s registrations. Moreover, the notice stated “DC’s total registration rate — its total number of registrations divided by the most recent census estimates of its citizen voting-age population — is over 131%.”

Judicial Watch wrote, “In our experience, and as a matter of common sense, there is no possible way that the DC BOE is complying with the NVRA if it remove no registrations pursuant to that provision in a two-year period.”

The watchdog threatened to file a federal lawsuit unless the violations were corrected within 90 days.

Evans evidently blinked,
telling Judicial Watch in a letter last month that the board had taken “several list maintenance actions,” including the removal of 65,544 inactive voters on Oct. 30 who had allegedly voted in neither the 2016 nor 2020 general elections.

Evans further noted that an additional 37,962 “inactive” voters would soon be removed who had not voted in the 2018 general election, responded to address confirmation notices, or participated in the November 2022 general election.

While thousands of inactive voters were moved off the list, 73,522 voters were moved from “active to an inactive status on October 3, 2023 as a result of the 2023 biennial canvass process.”

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in a statement, “Dirty voter rolls increase the potential for voter fraud.”

“As Washington, DC’s, quick cleanup of tens of thousands of names in response to Judicial Watch shows, there are potentially hundreds of thousands of names on the voter rolls that should be removed by California and Illinois,” added Fitton.

Although earlier this year, California saw over 1.2 million ineligible voters
taken off rolls in Los Angeles County, the watchdog suggested that 46 counties in the state, containing over 14 million voters, “reported removing only a handful, or no registrations under the NVRA’s change of address rules, or else failed to report any data at all.”

Illinois similarly appears to have trouble dropping ineligible voters from its lists, with 15 counties indicating zero removals from November 2020 to November 2022, according to EAC reports.

Judicial Watch also
noted in its letter to Bernadette Matthews, executive director of the Illinois State Board of Elections, that “15 Illinois jurisdictions have more voter registrations than citizens of voting age.”

It appears this is a problem for other states as well.

The Republican National Committee demanded Friday that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson clean up her state’s voter rolls, citing a recent analysis showing 55 of Michigan’s 83 counties have more registered voters than adults 18 or older,
reported the Detroit Free Press.

“More than 50 Michigan counties have a 100% or higher rate of voter registration,” said RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.

“This is mathematically impossible and means that ineligible voters are on the rolls ahead of the upcoming 2024 election,” continued the chairwoman. “The RNC is demanding that Michigan ensure only eligible voters can vote and will take legal action to ensure that outcome if necessary.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Pfizer mRNA jab leaves 1 in 3 recipients with ‘unintended immune response’: Cambridge study | Blaze Media

A peer-reviewed University of Cambridge
study published Wednesday in the scientific journal Nature has revealed the Nobel Prize-winning technique that paved the way for synthetic messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines is far from flawless.

To trick the body into allowing cellular interventions by synthetic mRNA-based therapeutics, scientists discovered they first had to make chemical modifications to the building blocks of the mRNA. Researchers indicated this week that encounters with repeat base modifications often lead to cellular miscommunications, which ultimately trigger immune flare-ups in vaccine recipients.

Since the mRNA technology rushed to market during the pandemic is now being used to treat various cancers and diseases, the researchers stressed the urgency of addressing this issue.

Anne Willis, a co-author of the study and biochemist from the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, said it is “essential that [mRNA] therapeutics are designed to be free from unintended side effects.”

What’s the background?

Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were
awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in October for their discoveries that enabled the development of “effective mRNA vaccines” against COVID-19.

The duo observed that the body treated synthetic mRNA — genetic material designed to tell cells in the body how to make specific proteins, such as the “spike” protein — as a foreign invader. Faced with this invader, the body would undergo an inflammatory response. This reaction proved troublesome for potential therapeutics as the body’s natural response to the synthetic material hindered its efforts to enter cells and exert its effects,
according to the University of Cambridge.

Karikó and Weissman discovered that by chemically modifying its uridine RNA base, the synthetic mRNA could steal past the body’s defenses and issue its protein schematics.

The Telegraph
reported that it was widely believed until now that the modification to uridine was unproblematic. However, it’s now clear that these covert genetic operations leave an undesired mark on a significant portion of patients subjected to the gene therapy.

Cellular miscommunication

Researchers with the MRC Toxicology Unit set out to analyze whether there were any safety issues linked to mRNA-based therapeutics. They found that “the cellular machinery that ‘reads’ mRNAs ‘slips’ when confronted with repeats of a chemical modification commonly found in mRNA therapeutics,” the university indicated in a release.

The aforementioned “cellular machinery” is called a ribosome. The ribosome reads and translates mRNA code, providing the body with instructions on how to make antibodies. When confronted with a chemical base modification of mRNA called “N1-methylpseudouridine,” ribosomes apparently slip around 10% of the time, according to Anne Willis and immunologist James Thaventhiran.

These so-called slips result in the production of unintended proteins, which set off an “unintended immune response.”

The Cambridge researchers, collaborating with scientists at other English universities, tested for evidence of the production of “off-target” proteins in vaccine recipients, specifically those who took the mRNA Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Sure enough, they “found an unintended immune response occurred in one third of the 21 patients in the study who were vaccinated.”

mRNA is also utilized in the Moderna vaccine, but the scientists did not report testing it for slips.

Despite the immune responses and the small sample size, the researchers claimed there were no “ill effects” as the unintended proteins produced were not viable in the body.

“The safety concern for future mRNA medicines is that misdirected immunity has huge potential to be harmful, so off-target immune responses should always be avoided,” said Thaventhiran.

The Cambridge team determined that the mRNA sequences could be redesigned to ensure the production of the intended protein and thereby avoid such unintended immune responses.

Thaventhiran, senior author of the study, issued the necessary declaration that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, then added, “We need to ensure that mRNA vaccines of the future are as reliable. Our demonstration of ‘slip-resistant’ mRNAs is a vital contribution to future safety of this medicine platform.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo notes ‘DNA fragments detected in mRNA COVID shots’ | Blaze Media

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who notes that DNA fragments have been detected in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, has issued a letter asking questions related to the issue.

“On today’s episode of: What the FDA… I asked @DrCaliff_FDA to address the DNA fragments detected in mRNA COVID shots & how they are hitchhiking into human cells. DNA integration into the human genome & oncogenesis are known risks, even acknowledged by @US_FDA in ’07,” Ladapo tweeted when sharing his letter to FDA Commisoner Robert Califf. CDC Director Mandy Cohen is also included on the letter.

In a letter earlier this year, Ladapo accused Califf and then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky of ignoring many of the risks related to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. In his new letter dated December 6, 2023, he noted that “no response has been received.”

“In addition to my previous letter, I am writing to you to address the recent discovery of host cell DNA fragments within the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines,” Ladapo noted in his new letter.

“This raises concerns regarding the presence of nucleic acid contaminants in the approved Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, particularly in the presence of lipid nanoparticle complexes, and Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoter/enhancer DNA. Lipid nanoparticles are an efficient vehicle for delivery of the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines into human cells, and may therefore be an equally efficient vehicle for delivering contaminant DNA into human cells. The presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA may also pose a unique and heightened risk of DNA integration into host cells,” he noted.

Ladapo pressed for answers to several questions, including one which reads, “Considering the potentially wide biodistribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and DNA contaminants beyond the local injection site, have you evaluated the risk of DNA integration in reproductive cells with respect to the lipid nanoparticle delivery system?”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Natural immunity provides better protection against COVID than vaccines – even against hospitalization, new study finds | Blaze Media

People with natural immunity to COVID-19 have better protection against the respiratory disease than those who received mRNA vaccines, according to a new study.

A group of researchers from Estonia took a pool of 329,496 adults between Feb. 26, 2020, and June 25, 2021.

The analysis was based on data from 246,113 individuals who qualified as one of four categories. The scientists categorized the individuals as those with no immunity against COVID, those with natural immunity from previously being infected, those who had vaccine-induced immunity, and those who had both natural immunity and who were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.

“Natural immunity conferred substantial protection against COVID-19 hospitalization,” the authors of the study wrote. “Our study showed that natural immunity offers stronger and longer-lasting protection against infection, symptoms, and hospitalization compared to vaccine-induced immunity.”

The Epoch Times reported, “People who received a vaccine were nearly five times as likely as the naturally immune to test positive for COVID-19 during the Delta era and 1.1 times as likely to test positive for COVID-19 during the Omicron era, researchers in Estonia found.”

Individuals who were vaccinated against COVID were seven times as likely to be hospitalized during the Delta variant era, and two times when the Omicron variant was spreading, according to the outlet.

The study declared that hospitalization due to COVID was “extremely rare” for those with hybrid immunity. The researchers discovered that hybrid immunity had “substantially lower rates of reinfection” than those with natural immunity. However, the protection was diminished during the Omicron period.

The Estonian researchers noted, “Studies on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines suggest that protection against SARS-CoV-2 decreases over time, waning considerably after six months.”

The authors concluded, “Our findings suggest that the risk of infection (and of developing severe disease) is affected not only by age and comorbidities but also by personal history of immunity-conferring events and by the viral variant responsible for the epidemic. Therefore, personalized risk-based vaccination strategies could be both effective and cost-effective.”

The study was published on Nov. 21 in Scientific Reports – a peer-reviewed journal that is part of the Nature Portfolio and covers natural sciences, psychology, medicine, and engineering.

In February, a study was published that declared that natural immunity provides “at least as high, if not higher” levels of protection against COVID-19 as two doses of an mRNA vaccine. The research analyzing 65 studies from 19 different countries was published in The Lancet – one of the oldest and most respected medical journals in the world.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
2020 Election

Mark Meadows reportedly granted immunity by special counsel on election probe (UPDATED)

UPDATE posted at 9:00 PM EST:

Meadow’s attorney issued a statement about the ABC News report.

George Terwilliger told The Independent that any idea his client would enter a guilty plea was “complete bulls***” but did not address the matter of immunity.

He also gave a brief statement to Catherine Herridge of CBS News.

“I told ABC that their story was largely inaccurate. People will have to judge for themselves the decision to run it anyway,” the statement read.

Original story below:

Mark Meadows, the former chief of staff under former President Donald Trump, was reportedly granted immunity and told special counsel Jack Smith that he had told Trump at the time that election fraud claims were without merit.

ABC News reported the development Tuesday based on sources familiar with the investigation.

Meadows has said in a book published after Trump left the Oval Office that the election was stolen and that Trump actually won the presidential contest.

Those claims are contradicted by what he told the special counsel, according to the ABC News report.

Meadows is said to have met with the special counsel team three times to discuss his time as Trump’s final chief of staff. The former congressman reportedly told them that he said to Trump numerous times in the weeks after the election that claims of voter fraud were baseless.

He also reportedly told the special counsel team that Trump was being “dishonest” when he publicly claimed there was election fraud hours after the results were reported.

“Obviously, we didn’t win,” Meadows reportedly said to investigators.

Meadows previously turned over about 6,000 documents relating to the election to the congressional committee investigating the rioting at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Some of those texts showed Fox News hosts calling on Meadows to tell Trump to tell protesters to go home.

“Mark, the president needs to tell people in the capitol to go home,” read a text from Laura Ingraham to Meadows. “This is hurting all of us. He is destroying his legacy.”

Initially, ABC News said an attorney for declined to comment about the report.

A spokesperson for the Trump presidential campaign released a statement about the report.

“Wrongful, unethical leaks throughout these Biden witch-hunts only underscore how detrimental these empty cases are to our Democracy and System of Justice and how vital it is for President Trump’s First Amendment rights to not be infringed upon by un-Constitutional gag orders. Transparency and free speech are the only way to combat murky gossip,” the statement read.

“President Trump will not be deterred by Crooked Joe Biden’s election interference and will continue to focus on winning back the White House and Making America Great Again,” the statement concluded.

Also on Tuesday, Trump’s former attorney, Jenna Ellis, pleaded guilty to one felony count of aiding and abetting false statements and writings and promised to testify against the other codefendants in the case.

In addition to investigating Trump’s role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, special counsel Jack Smith is investigating accusations that the former president improperly handled classified White House documents.

This story has been updated with additional information

Here’s more about Meadows’ reported immunity:


Mark Meadows Given Immunity To Testify About Trump And 2020 Election, Report Says

www.youtube.com

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Aaron Rodgers mocks Anthony Fauci: ‘If science is Dr. Fauci, you’re damn right I’m defying science’

NFL quarterback and Super Bowl Champion Aaron Rodgers continued his seemingly never ending troll of big pharma by mocking Dr. Anthony Fauci as a representative of science.

Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, was on the receiving end of Rodgers’ latest jab at establishment figures.

Speaking on “The Pat McAfee Show,” where Rodgers now routinely provides his most news-worthy quotes, host Pat McAfee declared that Rodgers “defies science” by returning so quickly from an recent achilles injury.

“That’s what they’re saying about you,” McAfee said. “[Commentator] Shannon Sharpe said this morning—” the host continued, until Rodgers interrupted.

“It’s like we learned, if science is Dr. Fauci, you’re damn right I’m defying science,” the quarterback decried.

“That’s on me!” McAfee replied through laughter.

“You set yourself up for that one!” Rodgers responded.

“Fauci’s just sitting at home, reminiscing about his terrible opening pitch,” McAfee then added.

Rodgers was referring to 2021 statements by Fauci when he infamously claimed that any attacks on science were actually attacks on himself:

“I represent science,” the government doctor said on CBS.

“It’s very dangerous, Chuck, because a lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science,” Fauci also told host Chuck Todd on MSNBC.

Fauci claimed at the time that while Republicans’ goal was to attack mainstream science and that they attached his name to their statements to put a recognizable face on their target. As such, they were attacking him, a person who represents the government’s position on science, which he believed was the correct position.

Rogers also recently referred to fellow NFL player Travis Kelce as “Mr. Pfizer” after Kelce appeared in a 2023 Pfizer commercial. The ad endorsed the idea of getting both a flu vaccine and a COVID-19 vaccine at the same time.

The New York Jets star later challenged Kelce to a debate on vaccines where Rodgers would be paired with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kelce would be backed by Dr. Fauci. Kelce responded by referring to Rodgers as being part of the “Johnson & Johnson family,” as the New York Jets are owned by an heir of the Johnson & Johnson company, Woody Johnson.

In early September 2023, Rodgers mocked vaccine producer Moderna while attending the U.S. Open tennis tournament in New York. Rodgers was supporting tennis star Novak Djokovic, who is famously unvaccinated.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

THESE recently obtained Fauci emails may put him in JAIL

What should be done with Anthony Fauci?

Senator Rand Paul thinks jail time might be sufficient — but not likely.

“We referred him twice to the Department of Justice; we haven’t gotten a lot of action. We barely can even get a letter back saying they’ve received the referral,” the senator tells Dave Rubin.

However, the referral sent was a criminal referral for lying to Congress, which is a felony. Fauci could face up to five years in prison for that.

“I think he deserves that, but above and beyond that, he also deserves the culpability basically for funding the research that became the pandemic. And this is a big deal. This is no small mistake that he made,” Rand says.

“It may be one of the worst mistakes made in modern history.”

And why did that mistake happen?

“Because Dr. Fauci’s opinion is that, even if a pandemic were to occur, gain of function — this juicing up of viruses research — is worth it,” Rand says.

Rand doesn’t believe that the millions of Americans who died or whose family members died would agree that it was worth it.

“I think you’d find that most American families, and frankly, worldwide, would be upset, you know, that this actually came from government-funded projects at the behest of Anthony Fauci,” he says.

However, the American people might be more distrusting next time around, especially considering the recent release of damning emails from January 2020.

In these emails, Fauci’s tenor reflects that he’s concerned not only about the origin of the virus, but that the origins could “boomerang and come back” and that he would be exposed as the one who approved the funding that created it.

“We know, for one thing, Fauci allowed this research to happen in communist China without any review by the safety committee. That alone is malfeasance, and he should be punished for it as well,” Rand adds.

While the pile of evidence for Fauci’s betrayal of the American people is stacked astoundingly high, the mainstream media doesn’t seem to care — at all.

Rand is ultimately in disbelief, as there’s never “been a cover-up so thoroughly exposed and caught and delivered by their own emails,” and “yet not one person from the mainstream media has reported on this at all.”

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, ” target=”_blank”>subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

Rand Paul offers his theories for Dr. Fauci’s alleged secret visit to CIA headquarters: ‘Further the cover-up’

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) floated on Thursday his theories for why Dr. Anthony Fauci allegedly visited the CIA headquarters to advise the intelligence agency on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

What is the background?

The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic revealed this week that it had received “concerning information” about the CIA’s investigation into the origins of the pandemic.

In a letter sent to the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services, committee Chairman Brad Wenstrup explained:

The information provided suggests that Dr. Fauci was escorted into Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Headquarters—without a record of entry—and participated in the analysis to “influence” the Agency’s review. Our goal is to ensure the scientific investigative process regarding the origins of COVID-19 was fair, impartial, and free of alternative influence.

Importantly, the visit remains an allegation only; Congress has not made public evidence proving the visit took place.

What did Paul say?

The Kentucky Republican, Fauci’s archenemy, posited three theories for the purpose of Fauci’s alleged visit to CIA headquarters.

First, Paul suggested that Fauci outright “convinced the CIA to dishonestly obscure the lab origin of COVID.” Second, Paul suggested the inverse, that the “CIA convinced Fauci to obscure the lab origin of COVID.”

Finally, Paul suggested, “An outside entity or person with unlimited monetary resources convinced Fauci to influence the CIA to obscure the lab origin of COVID.”

One thing, however, “is for certain,” Paul declared, “Fauci did not visit the CIA to seek the truth but to facilitate and further the cover-up.”

The CIA is one of the intelligence agencies that has not reached a definitive conclusion about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The Central Intelligence Agency and another agency remain unable to determine the precise origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, as both hypotheses rely on significant assumptions or face challenges with conflicting reporting,” explained a declassified report from the director of national intelligence.

That conclusion, or lack thereof, was purportedly reached despite six of seven CIA investigators allegedly concluding the pandemic originated at the Wuhan bio lab.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Fauci accused of covertly going to CIA headquarters to ‘influence’ COVID-19 origins probe

Anthony Fauci was escorted to CIA headquarters “without a record of entry” to “influence” the agency’s COVID-19 origins investigation, according to
allegations brought to light Tuesday by Congress’ Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

In addition to letting China off the hook for the deaths of millions of Americans, the zoonotic origins theory preferred by Fauci and entertained by those he influenced would indicate that the funding provided to the Wuhan coronavirus lab by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under Fauci’s watch was not ultimately an investment in global devastation.

The accusation raised Tuesday by the subcommittee’s chairman, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), comes just weeks after a CIA whistleblower
accused the agency of bribing six analysts on its COVID Discovery Team to reject the theory that the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

What’s the background?

Federal documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit
revealed earlier this year that the NIAID, under former director Fauci, funded dangerous experiments on coronaviruses at the WIV in China’s Hubei province.

Millions among the dollars funneled from Fauci’s agency to the WIV were mediated by Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, whose subcontractor Ben Hu — the lead on gain-of-function research on SARS-like coronaviruses — was among the
patients zero at the lab and ostensibly among the very first infected in the world.

Despite the nature of the gain-of-function research on coronaviruses conducted at the WIV, past concerns about lab security, the geography of the virus’ early spread, and multiple other clues, Fauci stressed that the virus killing off vulnerable populations at home was likely not man-made but the result of a trans-species jump.

The former NIAID director apparently went to great lengths to convince others of this narrative.

Congressional investigators
indicated in March that Fauci commissioned, edited, and gave final approval to the impactful March 2020 study published in the journal Nature, “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2” — an oft-cited study whose authors expressed concerns in private about the “sh** show that would happen if anyone serious accused the Chinese of even accidental release,” making clear that their cause was “political.”

Fauci repeatedly referenced this paper on the national stage, including once from the White House podium, to bolster the zoonotic origins theory.

With the weight of this study in an esteemed journal behind him and his hand in its fabrication hidden, Fauci
told CBS’ “Face the Nation” in March 2020 that COVID-19 was an animal virus that jumped to a human.

Fauci later
told National Geographic in May 2020 that notwithstanding the concerns privately expressed by other virologists, there was “no scientific evidence” to suggest the virus had come from the Wuhan lab.

It appears Fauci may have secretly advanced his preferred narrative in Langley, Virginia, as well.

Questionable intelligence at the CIA

Wenstrup stated Tuesday, “According to information gathered by the Select Subcommittee, Dr. Anthony Fauci, then-director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, played a role in the Central Intelligence Agency’s review of the origins of COVID-19.”

“The information provided suggests that Dr. Fauci was escorted into Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Headquarters — without a record of entry — and participated in the analysis to ‘influence’ the Agency’s review,” continued the chairman.

In an effort to “ensure the scientific investigative process regarding the origins of COVID-19 was fair, impartial, and free of alternative influence,” Wenstrup is now demanding all documents and communications pertaining to Fauci’s access to CIA facilities and CIA employees, including correspondences between the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIAID, and the U.S. Marshals Service, which had been assigned to protect Fauci.

Additionally, the congressional investigators want HHS Special Agent Brett Rowland made available for a “voluntary transcribed interview at a date to be determined.”

In a Sept. 26
letter to HHS Inspector General Christi Grimm, Wenstrup stated, “The American people deserve the truth — to know the origins of the virus and whether there was a concerted effort by public health authorities to suppress the lab leak theory for political or national security purposes.”

It is presently unclear whether Fauci’s supposed secret visit to Langley is directly connected to the CIA’s
alleged efforts to monetarily incentivize CIA analyst to change their position on the virus’ origin.

A senior high-level CIA officer
told congressional investigators earlier this month that following a review, six members of a seven-member COVID Discovery Team determined there was sufficient evidence to make a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from the Wuhan lab. Only one member allegedly figured zoonosis to be responsible.

The six analysts were bribed to change their position, according to the whistleblower.

Wenstrup and Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) wrote a letter to CIA Director William Burns requesting documents and communications pertaining to the research team and its interactions with other branches of the government, along with pay and bonus histories of the team’s members.

The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic asked on X, “What difference does it make to @CIA whether the pandemic originated at a Chinese lab or in nature?”

Early in the pandemic, the U.S. intelligence community
concluded that the virus “was not manmade or genetically modified.”

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has since changed its tune, noting in a
June 2023 report that the intelligence community found “biosafety concerns” at the WIV and determined “genetic engineering” of coronaviruses was in fact taking place at the Chinese military-linked facility.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Adam Carolla says he’s banned from Howard Stern’s show due to his views on COVID: ‘I was right about everything’

Radio host Adam Carolla said that he’s no longer welcome on “The Howard Stern Show” because of his disagreements with the host regarding COVID-19.

On “The Adam Carolla Show,” the comedian and guest host Teresa Strasser discussed a story about Howard Stern‘s reaction to talk show host Bill Maher. Maher critiqued Stern’s love life on his podcast “Club Random,” which prompted Stern to state that his friendship with Maher was over.

Stern’s reaction stemmed from Maher’s comments that the radio host gushes over his wife too often on his show.

“He goes on about how much he loves his wife, Beth [Stern], which he has been doing on the air for like 10 years,” Maher reportedly remarked. “But we know Howard had this other wife before Beth,” he added.

“Could we just not gush about the person while the other person can still hear it?” Maher said, according to the Huffington Post.

Stern responded to Maher’s comments, “What a sexist thing to say! Like, what a convoluted, nutty thing to say.”

“I think I’m no longer friends with him,” he added.

“That didn’t seem that harsh,” Carolla said about the anecdote. “I think Howard’s skin’s getting a little thinner as he gets a little older,” he added.

This prompted Strasser to ask Carolla if he had been on Stern’s show in recent months.

“Have you been on his show in a while? You were great on that show!”

“No. I’m no longer welcome on that show because I was right about everything COVID,” Carolla quickly replied. “So it’s important that I be punished for being correct about everything COVID.”

“Were you wrong about anything?” another host asked. “Not COVID-related, nothing, no … you can bring it up,” he remarked.

Carolla was one of the earliest critics of COVID-19 mandates and lockdowns, tweeting in September 2020 that it “turns out the people dying from covid are old or sick or both.”

After facing harsh criticism for his remarks, the comedian stood his ground. “No one appreciates being called a ‘pussy.’ I get it,” he said, according to the Wrap.

“I think the backlash has to do with ostensibly being right in many cases,” he opined. “We’re living in a callous world. You guys wanna f**king close down society, you’re gonna get some callous tweets. That’s how it works.”

Stern recently defended the idea of being called “woke,” saying if woke means “I can’t get behind Trump” or “that I support people who want to be transgender, or I’m for the vaccine — dude, call me woke as you f**king want!”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More