Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

COVID-19

Glenn Beck / RFK Jr. interview going viral — especially the part when Kennedy says how Fauci avoided jail time …

Last week, Glenn Beck sat down with independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for an extensive interview. The duo broached a wide range of subjects, including the World Economic Forum, NATO, the conflicts in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Gaza, climate change, and of course, Big Pharma — which Kennedy has been incredibly outspoken about.

On that subject, Kennedy was quick to bring up the absurdity of how COVID-19 was handled, starting with Donald Trump.

“During COVID … President Trump got rolled by his bureaucrats, and he came in saying, ‘I’m a businessman, I’m gonna run this place like a business,’ [so] he gave the keys to all of our shops and stores and businesses to Tony Fauci and shut down 3.3 million businesses,” he told Glenn.

Glenn agreed wholeheartedly and followed with a question we all want answered: “What do you do to restore the trust [in the medical industry]?”

“What we now know because of the Wuhan lab … [is] they’re messing with Ebola and they’re messing with Chikungunya and all of these really horrific diseases … with 50%, 20%, 10% [mortality rates],” he told Glenn, adding that “of course some of them escape every year.”

Who’s behind this atrocity?

If you guessed Anthony Fauci, you’re correct.

Kennedy explained that when the Patriot Act was passed, it mandated “that any federal officer or employee who violates [the Geneva Convention or the 1973 Bioweapons Convention] cannot be prosecuted.”

“That relaunched the bioweapons arms race,” he said. The Pentagon “started redirecting all that money to Anthony Fauci to do bioweapons research.”

“So, why isn’t he in jail?” Glenn asked.

“He’s not in jail because Joe Biden is president,” was Kennedy’s frank answer.

That honesty perked up the ears of news outlets such as the New York Post and the Daily Mail, which published articles covering Glenn and Kennedy’s candid conversation.

To see the full interview, watch the video below.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

Broken hearts and unanswered COVID questions

Just how pervasive is heart damage following even one dose of the COVID vaccine? A new study out of Saudi Arabia reveals that as many as 27% of a sample of 804 vaccine recipients reported being hospitalized for heart trouble at some point after receiving one of the COVID shots.

We know the spike protein in the shots can cause a host of cardiovascular maladies. The media and medical professions have sought to downplay the prevalence and severity of the problem, but emerging data is confirming anecdotal evidence that the “died suddenly” phenomenon is real.

Pfizer has already been fined by a European drug regulator for lying about the safety of the shots, yet they remain on the market.

The Saudi study, which was published in Cureus and led by researchers at Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies and King Faisal General Hospital, relied on self-reporting. Nevertheless, the study verified that 27% of those surveyed were, in fact, hospitalized within 12 months of receiving the vaccine. More than half of that cohort were admitted within a month of vaccination. So while not every case can be linked to the vaccine, given the numerous signals we already have, it’s a fair bet that the bulk of cases resulted from the jab.

What is particularly jarring is that 58% of those hospitalized were admitted to a critical care unit, and about a third of the patients were hospitalized for four days or longer. More than 60% underwent at least 12 months of treatment, and some remained in continuous treatment through the time of the study. Just 31 of the 218 hospitalized for cardiac complications had their treatment completed in under six months.

The study has some limitations. An inordinate number of the people surveyed also reported suffering from obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. If 27% seems impossibly high, the fact that the study cohort had so many comorbidities would help explain why.

But that only raises an obvious question: Aren’t the very people who were most vulnerable to serious illness from the virus also most vulnerable to spike protein syndromes, particularly those affecting the heart, caused by the vaccine itself?

The authors of the study, led by microbiologist and immunologist Muazzam M. Sheriff, tap-dance around the question by observing the study’s revelations provide “valuable insights into the safety profile of mRNA vaccines in the specific context, fostering informed public health strategies in Saudi Arabia.”

Indeed, they do — especially when taken together with the wealth of research we already have linking the shots to cardiac damage.

Let’s not forget that a confidential Pfizer document released by the European Medicines Agency showed that the manufacturer knew of extensive damage to nearly every organ system.

The 393-page confidential Pfizer document, dated August 19, 2022, shows that Pfizer observed more than 10,000 categories of diagnosis, many of them very severe and very rare, affecting 508,351 individual case reports of adverse events containing 1,597,673 events. Among them were almost 127,000 cardiac disorders, running the gamut of about 270 categories of heart damage, including many rare disorders, in addition to myocarditis. There were also 73,542 cases of 264 categories of vascular disorders stemming from the shots.

We could rehash three years of research, but let’s just focus on a few new revelations. Far from being “mild” and transient, a new Australian preprint found that 20 of 60 patients diagnosed with post-vaccine myocarditis still had persistent late gadolinium enhancement more than 12 months later, which often indicates heart scarring. Heart scarring doesn’t go away. The Epoch Times has a list of recent studies showing ominous signs of long-term heart damage from those diagnosed with myocarditis.

The catastrophic fire we see from a steady stream of academic research was reflected in the “smoke” the U.S. Centers for Disease Control detected from the first day of the vaccines’ release in December 2020. Thanks to court-released documents from the secret V-Safe program, we are beginning to view the 780,000 reports from some 523,000 vaccinated Americans who reported dire injuries to the CDC in the first hours of the first days of its distribution.

We already knew that 7.7% of this very large sample reported having to seek medical attention following vaccination. But the CDC did not establish a database to report, collate, and analyze injuries by category. Instead, they let people report back in 250 characters or less of text messages on how they felt post-jab.

The Informed Consent Action Network, which obtained the V-Safe documents, learned that the very ailments that are showing up all over VAERS and in academic literature were being reported by desperate V-Safe users from day one. ICAN has received two batches of text messages so far, and they are remarkably consistent in reporting cardiac events, neurological complications, tinnitus, and miscarriages — all maladies for which we have growing evidence from academic literature and macro epidemiological data linking the explosion of these diagnoses to the shots.

Oh, and remember when the FDA required Pfizer to conduct a study on subclinical myocarditis under the likely assumption that the diagnosed cases of heart damage were just the tip of the iceberg? Pfizer was supposed to have the study done by December 2022, but it still has not been produced. Pfizer has already been fined by a European drug regulator for lying about the safety of the shots, yet the shots remain on the market. In fact, the FDA rewarded Pfizer by approving its rushed, dangerous RSV shot for pregnant women and now seeks to expand approval to children.

At this point, is there any amount of data or science that can stop the Pfizer juggernaut? If a generation of broken hearts is not enough to do it, we may be past the point of no return.

Read More
COVID-19

Rand Paul claims ’15 US agencies’ knew about Wuhan’s development of COVID-19 and did NOTHING

Apparently, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) did a little digging into the COVID-19 pandemic and what he found was that “15 U.S. agencies knew full well that the Wuhan lab was trying to create a virus like COVID-19 in 2018, and they did nothing,” reports Pat Gray.

“If that’s true — and certainly it is — somebody’s head needs to roll, somebody needs to go to prison over this,” he tells Jeffy, adding that “that someone is Anthony Fauci.”

“How many millions of people died because nobody said anything, nobody did anything about it?” Pat asks.

Of course, the left is “trying to blame those deaths on Donald Trump because he didn’t act supposedly the way they wanted him to,” and yet “these people did nothing” even though “they knew about [the virus’ development] the whole time.”

“These officials, according to Rand Paul, knew that the Chinese lab was proposing to create a COVID-19 like virus, and not one of them revealed that scheme to the public,” reads Pat. “In fact, 15 agencies with the knowledge of that project have continuously refused to release any information concerning this alarming and dangerous research.”

Further, “Government officials representing at least 15 federal agencies were briefed on a project proposed by Peter Daszak — Ecohealth Alliance head and the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” which “proposed to insert furin cleavage sites into a coronavirus to create a novel chimeric virus that would’ve been shockingly similar to the COVID-19 virus.”

“All technical stuff aside,” says Pat, “they knew about it, they did nothing, and nothing is going to happen to anyone — and we all know it.”

To learn more about Fauci’s likely role in the scandal, watch the clip below.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

Probe into ‘high-risk biological research and technology’ to investigate COVID-19 origins and more

GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Democratic Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan — the ranking member and chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, respectively — plan to conduct a probe into the national security risks pertaining to “high-risk biological research and technology in the U.S. and abroad,” according to a press release, which indicates that the oversight effort will involve investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Paul and Peters plan to hold hearings and conduct government-wide oversight on areas including high-risk life science research, biodefense, synthetic biology, biosafety and biosecurity lapses, early warning capabilities for emerging outbreaks or possible attacks, and potential origins of the COVID-19 pandemic,” the press release notes.

“This bipartisan oversight effort will assess and identify measures to mitigate longstanding and emerging risks and threats that may result in serious biological incidents – whether deliberate, accidental, or natural. The investigation will also seek to increase transparency and strengthen oversight of taxpayer-funded life sciences research, laboratories in the U.S. and abroad, and detection of biological threats,” the release adds.

Paul, who has served in the Senate since early 2011, has experience working as an ophthalmologist.

“It is well past time for the Senate to conduct a bipartisan inquiry into the origins of COVID-19, and, as part of this investigation, we finally will be holding Committee hearings to do just that,” Paul said, according to the press release. “In order to prevent a more catastrophic pandemic from occurring, we must understand the nature of US-funded biotechnology and hold accountable those who engage in risky gain-of-function research.”

“I’ve been banging on the doors of federal agencies for the past three years, relentlessly seeking information on COVID-19, but it’s been nothing short of a wild goose chase. To prevent repeating past mistakes, it’s crucial we fully comprehend the dangers of engaging in potentially hazardous bioresearch. This involves shining a spotlight on the gaping holes in oversight throughout the federal research processes and procedures,” Paul noted.

Blaze Media’s Steve Baker expressed support for the planned probe, writing in a post on X, “Sic ’em, @SenRandPaul !!”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

‘It just has to be done’: NBA legend John Stockton sues Washington state over COVID censorship with RFK Jr. as his lawyer

Former NBA player and Hall of Fame member John Stockton has taken Washington state officials to court over COVID-19 policies that threatened to penalize doctors who went against “the mainstream Covid narrative.”

Stockton is joined in the lawsuit by doctors who faced sanctions from the state and names Washington Medical Commission Executive Director Kyle S. Karinen and Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson as defendants. Stockton’s lawyers include Rick Jaffe, Todd S. Richardson, and presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“The purpose of this lawsuit is to protect the right of physicians to speak, and the right of the public to hear their message,” the lawsuit stated, according to USA Today. “The goal is to stop the Commission from investigating, prosecuting or sanctioning physicians who speak out in public against the so-called ‘mainstream Covid narrative’ i.e., the succession of public health edicts put out by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and repeated by the primary news outlets, which has caused the public to lose trust in the public health authorities, which has caused the CDC to repeatedly apologize and promise to do better.”

Children’s Health Defense, a nonprofit started by RFK Jr., is also reportedly listed as a plaintiff.

Other plaintiffs included a retired ophthalmologist named Dr. Richard Eggleston who faced state sanctions after he wrote an article in the Lewiston Tribune questioning COVID policies and death tolls, which was reported by a reader, attorney Jaffe stated.

“The only thing we’re interested in is the First Amendment issue,” Jaffe said. “Does the medical board have the constitutional authority to investigate, prosecute, and sanction doctors for writing articles, posting blogs on websites, and speaking out in public, even if the government or the medical board thinks what they’re saying is wrong or dangerous?”

“Most other states in the country don’t go as far as Washington. In my view, Washington is an outlier,” he added, the Spokesman-Review reported.

Stockton, who played college basketball at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington, said in the lawsuit that he was fighting for all Washingtonians who share his belief that “people have the First Amendment right to hear the public soapbox speech of Washington licensed physicians who disagree with the mainstream COVID narrative.”

“I think it just has to be done,” Stockton told News Nation. “It’s just another intrusion in Washington state on our right to freedom of speech.”

The former point guard was suspended from attending games at Gonzaga in 2022 after he refused to wear a mask.

“Basically, it came down to, they were asking me to wear a mask to the games, and being a public figure, someone a little bit more visible, I stuck out in the crowd a little bit. … They received complaints and felt like from whatever the higher-ups … they were going to have to either ask me to wear a mask or they were going to suspend my tickets,” Stockton said at the time, the Salt Lake Tribune noted.

Stockton endorsed RFK Jr. for president in late 2023, as well.

The lawsuit asked for a declaration that the state’s policy violated the First Amendment.

Neither the Washington commission nor the attorney general’s office responded to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Erica Samp’s COVID fight: From healthy to heart monitor

I spent an entire hour of my show on Thursday talking about Sen. Ron Johnson’s (R-Wis.) most recent COVID roundtable, a full four years after the scamdemic first began manically manipulating our health and our freedom. And I promise to never stop spending time on this issue because I think it is the most important work I’ve ever done in my life or will ever do.

COVID was a destroyer of worlds, and intentionally so. Nothing about it ever made sense except from a truly demonic perspective. I’ve talked to many of the same brave dissident experts that Johnson did, and the only conclusion one can reach from giving them a fair hearing is that somebody must pay for these crimes against humanity.

“I felt like I was going to die at any moment because my body was just attacking itself.”

There needs to be accountability for what they did to people like Iowa’s Erica Samp — one of the still countless people who emails me with their stories — so that it never happens again.

“I was perfectly healthy prior to getting the Moderna vaccinations,” wrote Samp, a 41-year-old mother of three.

I should have been informed of the risks. I should have had the opportunity to know that there were side effects beyond just a sore arm for a couple days. I should have been told that the concoction is not even a vaccine by definition, and it does not even work to prevent COVID! I should have been given the choice to decide if the risks outweigh the benefits for me! I should not have been able to be forced and mandated to get the vaccine by my employer. I should not have been forced to choose between getting extra money to get the shots and having to pay more if I did not. All of this coercion and bribery and force at the same time the risks and data were hidden from us. How is that legal? I had a perfect life before I was used as a human guinea pig. We are human beings. We are real. We are not just statistics and numbers that billion-dollar corporations can hide and pretend like we do not exist.

Unlike most who took the jab willingly as an almost religiously sacramental act of blind obedience to the Spirit of the Age, Samp wanted no part of it. In May 2021, however, she was backed into a difficult corner when her employer said, “Do it, or else.” Just like too many other corporate agents of tyranny at the time.

Her then-2-year-old son was suffering from a medical condition, which, without proper treatment covered by her health insurance, could have quickly become a life-or-death matter. Yet, even though her job had remote capability and most of her company had already worked off-site for a year, her request to continue to work from home to avoid the jab while keeping her insurance was denied.

Samp’s choice was either to play Russian roulette with her health or let her baby boy suffer. Most of us can see that’s not really a choice, just as more and more Americans can now see the poison poke was never “safe and effective.”

“I have lost vision in my right eye, partial hearing in both ears, my brain is swollen with lesions, I have to wear a heart monitor, and I lose feeling in my hands and feet,” Samp recently told me.

Even though she had some issues immediately after the first dose, Samp said she was not informed of any potential side effects besides a sore arm and possibly being tired for a day or two. Then came June 24 and her second shot, and there was simply no denying thereafter that the loving act of keeping her boy safe and healthy was trying to kill her.

“I felt like I was going to die at any moment because my body was just attacking itself,” said Samp, who was referred to visit the Mayo Clinic in February 2022. “I spent days up there being put through every test possible. I had to suffer through needles in my spine to collect tubes of spinal fluid that left me with headaches for weeks that were unbearable.”

She also had multiple IVs placed in both hands, and both of her eyes were dilated as strongly as possible so she could not see for more than 48 hours.

“They placed a catheter in my artery for angiograms. I spent well over six hours having to lay in an MRI machine for brain and spine imaging while being forced to wear a paper mask as well as a plastic mask. I could not move or I would have to start the test over again,” she said.

“It all felt like torture.”

And in the end, it was all for nothing. “They could not find any other cause for my injuries,” Samp told me.

Ain’t that some Wuhan luck for ya

And clearly, after four years of this demonic garbage, that’s the only luck our overlords will allow us to have.

“Mistakes were made.” “We have to move on.” “But don’t forget to take that 10th booster!”

Did I mention that somebody must pay for this?

On that front, Samp has raised enough money to retain both a worker’s compensation lawyer and a constitutional attorney. She plans to sue the federal government for willful misconduct in violation of the PREP Act, which otherwise provides immunity from liability for the government after responding to conditions determined to be a “present or credible risk of a future public health emergency.”

Is that Anthony Fauci I hear cackling, “I am the science!” in the background? Liability? What liability?

We aren’t seriously going to let Fauci and his assorted cast of Mengeles get away with this forever, are we? So let us pray for Samp and her cause. And in case you are wondering, imprecatory prayers will do just fine.

Read More
COVID-19

‘Hypervaccinated’ German man claims he got 217 COVID shots in 29 months with no side effects

A German man who claimed to have received 217 COVID-19 vaccinations in about two-and-a-half years said he had no adverse reactions or side effects from the shots.

The 62-year-old male from Magdeburg was “hypervaccinated,” according to a report by the Lancet, which studies infectious diseases.

The study noted that the man “deliberately and for private reasons received 217 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 within a period of 29 months.”

The public prosecutor in Germany actually opened an investigation into the man with allegations of possible fraud, but no charges were filed. The research group said it then submitted a request through the public prosecutor to study his DNA. It is claimed that the man then “actively and voluntarily consented to provide medical information and donate blood and saliva.”

The state confirmed 130 vaccinations, and the man recorded another 108 vaccinations, which is said to have resulted in an overlap in data and a higher total.

The study also claimed that throughout the entire “hypervaccination schedule,” the man did not report any vaccine side effects and didn’t catch COVID. The study added that he repeatedly tested negative on antigen, PCR, and nucleocapsid tests.

As reported by Fox News, the man had his first Johnson & Johnson vaccine shot in June 2021. He then began receiving AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines before ramping up his injections in January 2022 when he received vaccine shots 13 out of 14 days and often received doses in each arm. He also got a vaccine every day for the first 12 days of February 2022.

It doesn’t appear that social media users in general are too excited about the man’s claims, but a straggling group of supporters gave comments such as “Biden needs to invite this guy to be his guest for the State of the Union Address.”

“He destroyed the arguments of vaccine deniers,” another X user wrote.

Declaring “no conflicts of interest,” the study stated that the man increased the quantity of “spike-specific antibodies and T cells without having a strong positive or negative effect on the intrinsic quality of adaptive immune responses.”

“While we found no signs of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in HIM to date, it cannot be clarified whether this is causally related to the hypervaccination regimen. Importantly, we do not endorse hypervaccination as a strategy to enhance adaptive immunity,” the study concluded.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

The LIABLE Act would end Pfizer’s and Moderna’s free pass

Should a product that is completely funded, marketed, monopolized, and then mandated by government be less liable than Toyota is for its airbags?

Anyone with a modicum of common sense would understand that the more a product is favored with regulatory shortcuts and other benefits only government can provide, the more the product’s makers should be on the hook for liability if it causes damage. The fact is that the federal government required millions of people — including members of the armed services — to get the jab. We know now that those injections stay in the body indefinitely and potentially alter our DNA.

Giving consumers their day in court will be the perfect way to sort out whether Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products are as safe and effective as they claim.

U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) has a remedy. The congressman on Tuesday introduced legislation that would hold Pfizer and Moderna liable retroactively for vaccine injury and death.

The LIABLE Act would strip the COVID shot manufacturers of the indemnity they currently enjoy under both the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (because the CDC recommends them for children) and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005.

Ideally, the NCVIA and the PREP Act should be repealed entirely. The 1986 law shields manufacturers from nearly all liability except for willful misconduct and created an extremely limited vaccine injury compensation program.

Meanwhile, the PREP Act indemnifies any “countermeasure” during a declared public health emergency and limits damage payouts to an extremely cumbersome and narrow program called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. Only 11 people have been compensated under the CICP — an appallingly low number, especially considering the more than 1.6 million reports of injury to VAERS, including 37,100 deaths, 214,000 hospitalizations, and nearly 70,000 reports of permanent disability.

It’s highly likely that tens of millions of people are currently without recourse for compensation from a product that was fraudulently foisted upon the American people by these companies in collusion with the federal government. Knowing that, Roy’s bill comes as welcome relief.

Although retroactive laws are generally a bad idea, in this case the Big Pharma companies deserve to own the devastation they’ve caused. Given that Roy’s bill would not impose criminal penalties, it would not violate the Constitution’s prohibition of ex post facto laws, so long as it is passed within a reasonable amount of time.

The companies continue to deny all culpability, of course — despite their own documents acknowledging widespread injury. We now have a host of court-released documents showing Pfizer and Moderna knew about injuries during clinical trials and in the early days of the vaccine’s release, yet they lied over and over about safety and efficacy.

We also now know the manufacturers distributed vials that were not used in the clinical trial and lacked the filtration to filter out DNA plasmid contamination, which is suspected of being the culprit for many of the odd disorders that are not fully explained by damage from the shot’s spike protein. Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo has called on the FDA to take these products off the market simply because of the DNA contamination, never mind the other side effects.

Pfizer documents also show that company officials knew of thousands of serious adverse effects and deaths from day one. The Informed Consent Action Network recently persuaded a federal judge to release Moderna documents that confirm the same problems. A Moderna document written for the FDA titled “CBER Requested Tables” (p. 40) shows that in the clinical trial there was a 17.4% rate of “grade 3 or grade 4 systemic” adverse reactions within seven days among those in the trial group, compared to 3.8% in the placebo group. They knew from the start that serious reactions were not rare, yet they pushed to have it injected in every arm by mandate.

It is absurd for an industry that has more wealth, government support, cultural backing, and ubiquitous lionization from the medical industry to accept less liability than Honda or Toyota. Nonetheless, Roy’s bill is a compromise to repeal indemnity for the worst vaccine of all, which has been proven to endanger every major organ system.

States can also leverage laws against the indemnification. Although the liability issue is federal, states can pass laws barring all vaccine requirements for products that are not on the hook for liability. In South Carolina, Rep. Josiah Magnuson (R) has introduced H. 4907, which would bar mandates for all products that are exempt from liability. The bill would apply to public and private employers. You cannot force a human being to take a product that can never be held accountable in court.

The government never tells you that you must buy a Honda car or lawn mower. It doesn’t market the product for Honda, nor does it have every single cultural and medical association of repute and influence monopolizing the public square with taxpayer funding to promote automobiles. Oh, and cars don’t go in your body.

Giving consumers their day in court will be the perfect way to sort out whether Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products are as safe and effective as they claim. If they truly are safe, then they have nothing to fear.

Of course, we know they have plenty to fear.

Read More
COVID-19

Esteemed molecular biologist warns of ‘smoking gun’ evidence COVID-19 was engineered by researchers at Chinese lab

An esteemed molecular biologist has come forward to warn of “smoking gun” evidence that COVID-19 not only originated from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, but it was engineered by researchers at the Chinese lab.

Richard H. Ebright, Ph.D., is a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and is on the Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology. The Harvard Junior Fellow earned the Searle Scholar Award, was named a Johnson & Johnson Discovery Research Fellow, was awarded the Walter J. Johnson Prize, was named Infectious Diseases Society of America Fellow, and took home the National Institutes of Health MERIT Award.

Ebright has also served on the National Institutes of Health Molecular Biology Study Section and National Institutes of Health special emphasis panels.

He has more than 175 publications and more than 40 issued and pending patents.

Ebright is also an outspoken critic of the unchallenged narrative of the origins of the COVID-19 virus. Ebright notes that a document from 2018 points to “smoking gun” evidence that COVID-19 was engineered by researchers at a Chinese lab.

Ebright spotlights a March 2018 grant proposal for experiments called “Project DEFUSE.”

American and Chinese virologists lobbied to receive a $14 million grant from the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA, for funding to engineer bat viruses related to SARS-CoV-1 to examine how they could jump to human transmission.

According to the Wall Street Journal, “The proposal for Project DEFUSE specified that the viruses’ infectivity would be enhanced by inserting into them a genetic element known as a furin cleavage site. Depending on the starting viruses, this protocol could have produced SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, which has a distinctive furin cleavage site.”

The proposal involved Chinese bat researcher Zhengli Shi, EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, and Ralph Baric – a University of North Carolina professor, who reportedly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “risky bat-virus research” in 2015.

Commentary noted, “The proposal outlines a joint project between Baric’s UNC lab and a team headed by WIV senior scientist Zhengli Shi, the famous ‘Bat Lady’ of the Wuhan lab. The proposal was drafted under the supervision of Peter Daszak — whose EcoHealth Alliance would funnel the hoped-for grant money to the researchers — and was addressed to the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).”

The proposal was ultimately denied by DARPA.

However, Project DEFUSE may have been funded by the Chinese government and executed by researchers at the Wuhan Lab of Virology.

The Washington Times reported, “Nonetheless, speculation persists about whether the research may have proceeded with support from the Chinese government. Project DEFUSE also suggested modifications to bat coronavirus spike proteins, introducing ‘human-specific cleavage sites.’ Notably, these techniques are similar to those some biologists surmise could have played a role in crafting the coronavirus responsible for the global health crisis.”

Nicholas Wade – a former science editor of the New York Times – wrote in the WSJ, “Viruses made according to the DEFUSE protocol could have been available by the time COVID-19 broke out, sometime between August and November 2019. This would account for the otherwise unexplained timing of the pandemic along with its place of origin.”

Dr. Filippa Lentzos – an associate professor of science and international security at King’s College London – has also urged the world to acknowledge that the COVID pandemic may have originated from research by scientists.

“We have to acknowledge the fact that the pandemic could have started from some research-related incident,” Lentzos said in a United Nations speech.

“Are we going to find that out? In my view, I think it’s very unlikely that we will,” she stated. “We need to do better in future. We are going to see more ambiguous events.”

“There will be an outbreak, and we won’t know if it’s natural, deliberate, or accidental, and as an international community we need to find ways in which we can investigate that,” Lentzos warned. “For our purposes what is important we need to acknowledge that it could have been, and so what should your responses be.”

As Blaze News reported on Saturday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently announced new guidelines regarding COVID-19 that are in stark contrast to previous recommendations by the health agency.

The CDC now says people who test positive for COVID-19 no longer need to quarantine from others for at least five days, advised treating coronavirus in the same manner as the flu, and to gather outside to prevent sickness.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

VAERS chart shows a shocking result of COVID vaccines

For the longest time, anyone – including medical professionals and scientists – who dared to challenge the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine was censored, silenced, and banished to the realm of crazy anti-vaxxers.

However, now the tides are turning as more and more evidence surfaces about the reality of the rapidly developed COVID vaccine. The same companies that once shoved the vaccine down our throats, swearing that it was 100% safe and effective, are now backtracking.

“Last week we talked about the Pfizer scientists admitting the heart disease coming from the vaccine. This week the biggest study so far ever done on the global safety of the vaccine has just been released, and [the CDC] too is now admitting to severe illness, death, and lingering long symptoms,” says Pat Gray.

No longer can these companies deny that the vaccine is “causing problems neurologically … blood problems, and heart-related conditions.”

“I’ve got a chart here that’s going to blow your mind, Pat,” says Keith Malinak before displaying the following data from VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), managed by the CDC and the FDA.

“These are VAERS’ reported deaths by vaccine between the years 1988 and 2021 … over thirty years of data,” says Keith. “All of the deaths from vaccines (not the COVID one) are on the left,” while the COVID vaccine “accounts for half the deaths” even though by 2021, it had only been in circulation for one year.

What’s perhaps most upsetting is that despite this data, the CDC continues to tell people “to go get it,” says Pat.

To hear more, watch the clip below.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More