Thursday, December 26, 2024

conspiracy resource

Conspiracy News & Views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

COVID-19

‘There’s something going on’: Scientists acknowledge the severity of ‘long vax’ as well as their reluctance to pursue research that might furnish skeptics with a ‘sensational headline’

Science, the peer-reviewed academic journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, has just published damning admissions substantiating fears about COVID-19 vaccines that would have up until recently been verboten to express online.

Just as there is allegedly “long COVID,” in which persons who contracted the virus suffer various symptoms long after they should have recovered, the American medical establishment now appears comfortable admitting there is similarly “long vax.”

After the obligatory claim that COVID-19 vaccines have saved lives, Science correspondents Gretchen Vogel and Jennifer Couzin-Frankel noted that COVID-19 vaccines aren’t just causing side effects, such as “abnormal blood clotting and heart inflammation,” but have been linked to “a debilitating suite of symptoms that resembles Long Covid.”

“You see one or two patients and you wonder if it’s a coincidence,” Dr. Anne Louis Oaklander, neurologist and researcher at Harvard Medical School, told the journal. “But by the time you’ve seen 10, 20. …. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

Vogel and Couzin-Frankel suggested that symptoms of vaccine fallout “can include persistent headaches, severe fatigue, and abnormal heart rate and blood pressure. They appear hours, days, or weeks after vaccination and are difficult to study. But researchers and clinicians are increasingly finding some alignment with known medical conditions.”

One of these conditions is reportedly small fiber neuropathy, whereby “nerve damage can cause tingling or electric shock-like sensations, burning pain, and blood circulation problems.”

Another is postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), which can manifest as “muscle weakness, swings in heart rate and blood pressure, fatigue, and brain fog.”

The National Institutes of Health noted in December 2022 that researchers examining linkages between COVID-19 vaccines and “uncommon side effects” had found “a slight increase in the number of people who have experienced postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) following vaccination.”

Some patients are reportedly unfortunate enough to suffer “features of one or both conditions.”

Peter Marks, director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccines, told the journal, “We can’t rule out rare cases” where vaccines have triggered small fiber neuropathy or POTS and further stressed the importance of health care providers taking “seriously the concept [of] a vaccine side effect.”

However, Marks appears to be worried that admitting vaccines are hurting people in the long term could give rise to a “sensational headline” that would, as Vogel and Couzin-Frankel phrased it, “mislead the public.”

The article alludes to the German health minister’s recent acknowledgement that COVID-19 vaccines, which were similarly de facto mandatory in his country, have been shown to result in long-term consequences.

Karl Lauterbach, the minister in question, reportedly told Christian Sievers of the ZDF Heute Journal that what has happened to people affected by vaccine injuries “is absolutely dismaying and every single case is one too many. I honestly feel very sorry for these people. There are severe disabilities, and some of them will be permanent,” adding “1 in 10,000 is the frequency of serious side effects.”

DW reported that the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedical Drugs, “has registered 333,492 cases of suspected harmful vaccination side effects and 50,833 suspected cases of serious side effects since the start of the vaccination campaign: a reporting rate of 1.78 per 1,000 vaccine doses.”

Vogel and Couzin-Frankel stressed that researchers studying the long-term fallout of the vaccines, such as Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist at Yale University, are worried about “undermining trust.”

Krumholz reportedly indicated he was initially reluctant to “dive in” for fear of bringing to light truths that might be seized upon by vaccine critics.

Notwithstanding his reservations, Krumholz said, “I’m persuaded that there’s something going on” with these side effects. “It’s my obligation, if I truly am a scientist, to have an open mind and learn if there’s something that can be done.”

Krumholz and Yale immunologist Akiko Iwasaki have started a post-vaccination study called LISTEN, for Listen to Immune, Symptom and Treatment Experiences Now, reported the New York Post.

They are attempting to “understand long COVID, post-vaccine adverse events and the corresponding immune responses by collecting information about symptoms and medical history from participants.”

Theirs is not the only show in town, however.

Researchers at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center analyzed a health database of nearly 300,000 people in Los Angeles, all of whom had received at least one COVID-19 shot.

“They found that within 90 days after a shot, the rate of POTS-related symptoms was about 33% higher than in the 3 months before; 2581 people were diagnosed with POTS-related symptoms after vaccination, compared with 1945 beforehand,” Vogel and Couzin-Frankel indicated.

Some researchers suspect that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, delivered by the vaccines, may be responsible for “long vax,” as it may instigate an immune overreaction and destabilize ACE2 signaling.

Although the specifics of how precisely the vaccines are upending some patients’ lives are presently being worked out, Lawrence Purpura, an infectious disease specialist at Columbia University, is certain about the consequences.

Postvaccination illness is “a long, relentless disease,” said Purpura.

In recent years, amid a broader effort to censor down vaccine skepticism, the Biden White House has pressured social media companies to silence those who raised concerns about the short- and long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines, including Tucker Carlson.

While curbing dissenting views and squelching expressions of concern, the Biden administration imposed vaccine mandates, knowing full well there were “breakthrough” infections despite COVID-19 vaccination, contrary to how they were sold to the public.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
2020 Election

Rogan says the 2020 election was rigged by the media: ‘It’s wild sh** and no one cares’

Joe Rogan is unconvinced that the 2020 presidential election was rigged per se, but is certain the liberal corporate media meddled to guarantee a particular outcome.

In the July 4 episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience,” the titular podcaster, joined by comedian Tom Segura, broached the subject of possible voter fraud in both recent and forthcoming elections after discussing which among the various controversial remarks made by Roseanne Barr on Theo Von’s recent “This Past Weekend” podcast got it yanked from YouTube.

Barr had questioned how President Joe Biden could have won the 2020 election with “the most votes of any presidential candidate in history” while also winning a record-low number of counties.

“I don’t know if there was some shenanigans with the election. I guarantee you it wasn’t zero percent,” said Rogan. “How much voter fraud was there? It’s never zero.”

In pursuit of greater clarity, Rogan appealed to a USA Today “fact-check,” which stated, “With over 81 million votes, Biden received the most votes of any presidential candidate in history. It is also true that he won a record-low number of counties – but counties vary by population size, from those with a few hundred people to others with millions of residents, so county wins don’t correlate with the popular vote.”

This appeared to momentarily assuage the host’s concerns, but then he called to mind a recent security assessment of Georgia’s Dominion voting machines that allegedly found “dangerous vulnerabilities,” then pulled up a CNN report noting the software won’t be updated until after the 2024 election.

While still reluctant to conclude the election was meaningfully steered one way or the other by possible hackers or other rogue actors, Rogan stated that even if the 2020 election wasn’t rigged in the manner suggested by former President Donald Trump, “for sure it was rigged by the media. For sure.”

“Just the Hunter Biden laptop case and the Russia collusion case — just those two things, just those two narratives that they knew were not true, that they pushed out in front of everybody and that we know … had to do with trying to get rid of Trump,” said Rogan.

Segura chimed in, “One overreporting and one underreporting.”

“That is, in many ways … that’s manipulation. It’s manipulation of a public narrative. It’s manipulation of what the people think is real and not real,” said Rogan. “Everybody thought he was in collusion with Russia. It’s what everybody thought.”

The complete Durham Report released in May revealed that the FBI’s Russian collusion investigation into then-candidate Trump was from the get-go a stitch-up predicated upon a false claim, originally approved and advanced by failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Durham indicated the FBI “did not and could not corroborate any of the substantive allegations” made in the infamous Steele dossier — allegations long laundered with other baseless claims by the liberal media and top Democrats, resulting in some outfits receiving once-esteemed awards.

Rogan cited Fox News as the only major mainstream media outlet that didn’t overwhelmingly push the false narrative, adding that “everybody else was pushing it.”

“It was sold hard,” said Segura.

“And it was not true,” added Rogan. “And it’s proven not true. And there’s the Hunter Biden laptop thing, which they knew was true and they said wasn’t true. … They stopped people from sharing it on social media. They stopped people from sharing it on Twitter. Zuckerberg sat in that very chair and said the FBI contacted Facebook and told them it was ‘Russian disinformation.'”

“It’s wild sh** and no one cares,” concluded the host. “No one’s up in arms. No one’s freaking out. ‘Cause that is a way that you’re gonna rig an election without rigging an election. Whether you like [Trump] or not, we have to follow the rules. We have to. And if we don’t follow the rules ’cause you don’t like somebody and we break the law because we don’t like somebody, we don’t want them to win, that’s banana republic sh**.”

That the media, big tech, and the administrative state apparently conspired against Trump to prevent him from remaining in office and did so without consequence is “scary,” said Rogan, adding the intelligence community ultimately made good on Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer’s threat — that “they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”

Rogan likened this apparent totalitarian reflex to that wielded online to silence dissenting voices, calling it “dangerous.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Top NIH official admitted to COVID origins scientists he used personal email, deleted messages, and scrubbed Fauci’s ‘fingerprints’ to avoid transparency: Report

A top adviser to Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health appears to have tried his best to ensure the American people wouldn’t know what he and the scientists looking into the origins of COVID-19 were privately discussing while publicly downplaying the lab-leak theory. His best efforts at obfuscation were evidently not good enough.

Records obtained by the Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic have revealed a troubling admission by David M. Morens, senior scientific adviser to the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who was up until recently Fauci, reported the Intercept.

Morens admitted in correspondence with Fauci’s gang of like-minded virologists that he opted to use a personal email account and delete the exchanges thereon to evade Freedom of Information Act requests.

“As you know, I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly,” Morens reportedly wrote to the top scientists involved in figuring out where COVID-19 came from, including the head of EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak, whose subcontractor Ben Hu conducted deadly gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was reportedly one of the first infected with COVID-19; virologists Robert Garry, Kristian Andersen, and Edward Holmes, who were authors on a Fauci-commissioned and -edited report used to downplay the lab-leak theory; and others.

“Stuff sent to my gmail gets to my phone,” continued Morens, “but not my NIH computer.”

Suspecting that his Gmail account had been hacked by “[gain-of-function] assholes,” Morens told the lab-leak deniers that he might have to “occasionally email” from his NIH account.

“Don’t worry,” Morens reassured. “Just send to any of my adresses and I will delete anything I don’t want to see in the New York Times.”

Morens revealed that he wasn’t alone in the desire to hide the truth in a July 2021 email, where he noted, “Tony [Fauci] doesn’t want his fingerprints on origin stories.”

Just as Fauci apparently did not want his fingerprints on origin stories as it regards the possible manufacture of a deadly pathogen that killed well over 1 million Americans, Daszak similarly can be seen in the email exchanges panicking over losing control of the narrative.

In a September 7 email, Daszak wrote, “The lab leakers are already stirring up bullshit lines of attack that will bring more negative publicity our way — which is what this is about — a way to line up the [gain-of-function] attack on Fauci, or the ‘risky research’ attack on all of us.”

Morens responded, “Do not rule out suing these assholes for murder.”

In addition to advocating for litigation against experts holding alternative viewpoints, Morens used his official capacity at the NIAID to “disparage reporters and belittle his fellow scientists,” according to the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

In one instance, he stated, “Ebright and his ilk are not only NOT experts but are harmful demogogues [sic].”

Dr. Richard H. Ebright is an esteemed professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University who likely drew Morens’ ire for having highlighted a few of Fauci’s apparent lies to Congress and for his sharp criticism of dangerous gain-of-function experiments.

The subcommittee indicated “these are just a few egregious examples,” noting Thursday they had requested all of Morens’ personal email and cellphone records related to COVID-19 origins.

Among the requested documents and communications requested were any to, from, or referencing the Wuhan lab, EcoHealth Alliance and its subcontractor Ben Hu, or the other two patients zero, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu.

Select Subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) penned a letter to Morens Thursday, stating that these documents “suggest you may have used your personal e-mail to avoid transparency and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), potentially intentionally deleted federal records, and acted in your official capacity to disparage your fellow scientists, including by encouraging litigation against them.”

“Further, your e-mails also raise concerns that you may have knowledge or information suggesting Dr. Anthony Fauci … wished to influence the COVID-19 origins narrative without his ‘fingerprints,'” wrote Wenstrup.

The Intercept indicated Morens had not responded to a request for comment. Scott Amey, the general counsel at the nonpartisan Project on Government Oversight, told the Intercept that Morens may have revealed himself to have violated agency regulations as well as civil and criminal record retention laws.”

“His comments in that email are certainly worth an investigation by the agency, the agency inspector general, the National Archives and Records Administration, and the Department of Justice,” said Amey.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Professional basketball player dies suddenly of heart attack, 28-year-old previously blamed COVID vaccines for myocarditis after collapsing on court

A professional Dominican basketball player reportedly died suddenly this week from a heart attack. Óscar Cabrera Adames had previously collapsed on the court during the game and subsequently blamed the COVID vaccine for his “damn myocarditis.”

Cabrera collapsed on the court during a game in December 2021, when he was 26 years old. He fainted during the game in Spain and was transported to a local hospital.

“Óscar Cabrera, a Dominican player who is part of the Cantbasket club, is under observation at the Valdecilla Hospital, after suffering a syncope during the EBA League game that the Cantabrian team played against CB Santurzi, which led to the suspension of the match in the absence of 2.49 minutes for the conclusion of the first quarter,” the report stated.

Fox News reported, “Following his death, social media posts surfaced in which Cabrera Adames suggested he developed the rare heart disease after he received two doses of a COVID vaccine.”

Óscar Cabrera Adames allegedly wrote in a previous post on Instagram, “I got a damn myocarditis from taking a f***ing vaccine. (I got 2 doses of Pfizer) And I knew it! Many people warned me.”

Cabrera said the COVID-19 vaccine was a requirement for him to play professional basketball, and that he had no pre-existing health conditions.

“But guess what? It was compulsory or I couldn’t work. I am an international professional athlete and I am playing in Spain,” he reportedly said. “I have no health problem, nothing, not hereditary, no asthma, NOTHING! I suddenly collapsed to the ground in the middle of a match and almost died. I’m still recovering and I’ve had 11 different cardiology tests done and guess? They find nothing.”

He purportedly added, “I have no cholesterol, no fat, nothing! 7% body fat 93% muscle. When they give me the diagnosis, they tell me that I won’t be able to play for at least 5 months until my heart goes down again and they can’t give me that medicine.”

According to the American Heart Association, “Myocarditis is a serious though rare condition where inflammation develops in the myocardium, or middle muscular layer of the heart wall. Myocarditis can weaken the heart and its electrical system. As a result, the heart’s ability to pump blood declines. The condition may be acute and resolve quickly. Or it may be chronic, lasting longer than two weeks. In severe cases, myocarditis may lead to stroke, heart attack, heart failure or death.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said, “Cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been observed following receipt of COVID-19 vaccines used in the United States. Evidence from multiple monitoring systems in the United States and around the globe support a causal association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (i.e., Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech) and myocarditis and pericarditis.”

Citing a study, NBC News reported last month, “An overactive immune response to the mRNA COVID vaccines may be the culprit in rare cases of heart inflammation seen in some young men after they receive the shot.”

On Thursday, Cabrera suddenly died at age 28 while reportedly undergoing a stress test at a health center in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Dominican sports commentator Héctor Gómez said of Cabrera’s sudden death on Instagram, “Basketball player Óscar Cabrera has just died of a heart attack while performing a stress test, at the age of 28.”

Outkick reported, “During the test, a medical professional attaches electrodes to the patient’s chest. These electrodes connect to a machine that records the electrical activity of the heart (ECG). By watching this screen, doctors can record the heartbeat while the patient exercises. But this stress test was too much for Cabrera, and it caused a heart attack.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

EcoHealth Alliance subcontractor  among COVID-19 ‘patients zero’ at Wuhan lab: Report

A damning new report indicates Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under Anthony Fauci, and the Chinese military-co-opted Wuhan Institute of Virology all have their fingerprints on research that may have ultimately resulted in the deaths of over 1.1 million Americans and well over 6.9 million worldwide.

Federal documents recently obtained as the result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit reveal the NIAID and United States Agency for International Development funded an EcoHealth Alliance subcontractor’s work on coronaviruses to the tune of $41 million.

That subcontractor, listed as an investigator on the grants, was Ben Hu, whom TheBlaze previously noted was the WIV’s lead on gain-of-function research on SARS-like coronaviruses and among the “patients zero” — having been one of the three lab researchers first infected with COVID-19 in November 2019.

Alina Chan, molecular biologist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, said, “Ben Hu is essentially the next Shi Zhengli. … He was her star pupil. He had been making chimeric SARS-like viruses and testing these in humanized mice. If I had to guess who would be doing this risky virus research and most at risk of getting accidentally infected, it would be him.”

The White Coat Waste Project has obtained federal accounting records through a 2021 FOIA lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health that confirm Ben Hu had his name on American taxpayer-funded grants awarded by the then-Fauci led NIAID and the USAID.

According to the grant form, an EcoHealth-administered grant of $3,586,760 from the NIAID was marked “pending” for a project titled “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence” for work to be undertaken from June 2019 through May 2024. The same project had previously received $3,086,735 in American taxpayer money from NIAID between June 2014 and May 2019.

The grant form further indicated that USAID had poured $38 million into an EcoHealth alliance project titled “PREDICT-2” between October 2014 and September 2019, again with Hu’s name on it.

A USAID spokesman told the Wall Street Journal that the funding for research at the Wuhan lab ended in 2019 and “was part of the agency’s mission to identify and contain pandemic threats. The project provided about $815,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and $39,000 to Wuhan University.”

The White Coat Waste Project noted that “Hu’s animal experiments were being bankrolled with U.S. taxpayer funds from NIAID and USAID grants that received over $41 million,” but that the total amount injected into Hu’s lab has not yet been disclosed by the U.S. government.

“Agency stonewalling and reporting loopholes made it incredibly challenging to follow the money from government agencies to the Wuhan lab, but the documents make it clear that U.S. taxpayer money funded some of Hu’s experiments,” Anthony Bellotti, president of WCW, told the Journal.

The Wall Street Journal reported that much of Hu’s research “focused on modifying coronaviruses so they could bind to human cells. The stated purpose of the research was to identify viruses that could lead to a pandemic and facilitate the development of a vaccine.”

The WCW summarized its findings thusly: “U.S. taxpayer-funded Wuhan white coats collect wild coronaviruses from bats in remote caves in China without adequate protective gear, transport the viruses to a lab in a major metropolitan area, do gain-of-function animal experiments to make the viruses more contagious and deadly to humans, and then fall ill with COVID-like symptoms and their identities and medical histories are covered up.”

Investigative reporter Paul Thacker noted that Fauci denied ever funding this research.

Fauci told Congress in May 2021 that the NIH “has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology” and made similar denials on multiple other occasions.

Then-Principal Deputy Director of the NIH Lawrence A. Tabak appeared to undercut Fauci’s denial, writing to Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) on Oct. 20, 2021, that EcoHealth’s “limited experiment” in Wuhan tested whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”

These mice “became sicker,” according to Tabak, who added, “EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant.”

According to a January report from the HHS Office of Inspector General, the NIH also knew about potential risks associated with the research being performed in China that had been executed using federal grant money funneled to and through EcoHealth Alliance.

Despite this knowledge, it reportedly “did not effectively monitor or take timely action to address EcoHealth’s compliance with some requirements.”

British zoologist Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance, previously called NIH requests that U.S. federal officials inspect the WIV “heinous” and derided suggestions that the virus might have leaked from the WIV as “conspiracy theories.”

Hu did not respond to requests for comment from the Wall Street Journal, as Daszak and the NIH similarly declined to provide comment to Thacker.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Joe Rogan slams COVID vaccine advocate who called him a ‘neofascist,’ challenges him to big money debate with RFK Jr., then Elon Musk jumps into the fray

Joe Rogan blasted a COVID vaccine advocate over accusing him of spreading health misinformation and calling him a “neofascist.” Rogan challenged the vaccine researcher to debate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and backed it up with a huge payday for charity.

Peter Hotez is a self-described “internationally-recognized physician-scientist in neglected tropical diseases and vaccine development.” Hotez expanded his public profile during the COVID-19 pandemic by making countless appearances on cable news, where he rigorously advocated the COVID vaccine for all ages.

On Saturday morning, Hotez shared an article on Twitter from Vice titled: “Spotify Has Stopped Even Sort of Trying to Stem Joe Rogan’s Vaccine Misinformation.”

Hotez wrote, “And from all the online attacks I’m receiving after this absurd podcast, it’s clear many actually believe this nonsense.”

The Vice article attacked Rogan’s recent interview on Spotify with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – a skeptic of the mRNA vaccines and Democratic presidential candidate challenging Joe Biden.

The Vice writer claimed that the interview was “an orgy of unchecked vaccine misinformation, some conspiracy-mongering about 5G technology and Wi-Fi, and, of course, Rogan once again praising ivermectin, an ineffective faux COVID treatment.”

The writer asserted that “The Joe Rogan Experience” episode promoted “Kennedy’s most dangerously incorrect views, a far too extensive list to outline in full, all of which Rogan accepted uncritically, his mouth quite often literally agape in awe.”

Rogan fired back at Hotez on Saturday night with a challenge, “Peter, if you claim what RFK Jr. is saying is ‘misinformation’ I am offering you $100,000.00 to the charity of your choice if you’re willing to debate him on my show with no time limit.”

Hotez responded to Rogan, but then quickly deleted the tweet, “Be serious Joe, that’s what you throw out for your hunting buddies on a weekend. $50 million endowment (which You/Spotify/RFK Jr. can easily afford), not for me but so we can continue making low-cost patent-free vaccines for the world’s poor. Preceded by RFK Jr.’s public apology.”

Hotez replied to Rogan, “Joe, you have my cell, my email, I’m always willing to speak with you.”

Rogan slammed Hotez, “This is a non-answer. I challenged you publicly because you publicly quote tweeted and agreed with that dogs**t Vice article. If you’re really serious about what you stand for, you now have a massive opportunity for a debate that will reach the largest audience a discussion.”

The prolific podcaster added, “To those misunderstanding what he’s saying, he’s NOT agreeing to debate @RobertKennedyJr. He’s just offering to come on my show by himself.”

Rogan shared a reported screenshot of a May 2023 tweet from Hotez claiming that he was “concerned” about a “pretty formidable coalition with neofascist leanings” that included Rogan, RFK Jr., Elon Musk, and Tucker Carlson.

Hotez later deleted the tweet because he said, “I decided to take down my tweet on the Tucker-Elon alliance. Some very smart people I respect thought my concerns were premature or shouldn’t be labeled at this point. Another, too over-the-top. I agreed, guess we’ll see what unfolds.”

Rogan asked Hotez, “Are you sure I’m not a part of a coalition with neofascist leanings? Seems like that’s what you really think, or what you’re projecting to the masses.”

RFK Jr. accepted the challenge, “Peter. Let’s finally have the respectful, congenial, informative debate that the American people deserve.”

Elon Musk jumped into the fray by replying, “Maybe @PeterHotez just hates charity.”

Musk asked Hotez if he “endorses” Vice, then shared a 2007 Vice article documenting Columbian women who have sex with donkeys.

Musk told Rogan on Twitter, “He’s afraid of a public debate, because he knows he’s wrong.”

Hotez lashed out at Musk, “Seriously Elon? This is monstrous. 200,000 Americans needlessly perished (including 40,000 Texans, our neighbors) because they were victims of antivaccine disinformation during our awful Covid delta/BA.1 waves in 2021-22. Please don’t do this.”

Musk retorted:

First of all, I am generally pro vaccine. I have been vaccinated against pretty much everything, as have my kids. Second, I think there is tremendous promise in synthetic mRNA. It is like medicine going from analog to digital. That said, the world obviously went crazy with excess vaccination against ‘Covid-19.’ I have that in quotes, because the RNA sequences changed so much that I called it the virus of Theseus. So many people I know had serious side effects from the vaccines, including myself. Failure to acknowledge that is a lie. As for the deaths you claim are due to COVID-19, why is the nation of Sweden still alive!? Just go on Rogan and do the debate.”

Hotez then wrote on Twitter, “Let’s remember what this is about, not a small number of Americans lost their lives from antivaccine disinformation during the pandemic. 200,000 Americans perished, 40,000 from my State of Texas I have nothing personal vs Joe, Elon, RFK Jr. Just hoping to halt more destruction.”

Hotez added, “Not easy to respond when those 3 gang up and tag team. Wish I could be more eloquent and clever when the moment demands, but there you are.”

Hotez later retweeted the Twitter account for the “Sorry Not Sorry” podcast by liberal activist Alyssa Milano, which read: “For the record, @PeterHotez has been on our podcast multiple times. He doesn’t need to debate a science-denier on the podcast of someone who has given platforms to science deniers. He’s already won the debate with the truth.”

Rogan has had Hotez as a guest on “The Joe Rogan Experience” in 2019 and 2020.

Rogan previously invited Hotez to debate RFK Jr., but deflected by comparing him to a “Holocaust denier.”

During a previous interview, Rogan challenged Hotez about how he enhances his immunity without vaccines. Hotez admitted that he is a “junk foodaholic,” which Rogan pointed out that there is a “large body of data that connects poor diet to a host of diseases.”

Rogan questioned why Hotez doesn’t regularly take vitamins, and the scientist said he “didn’t think they’re needed.”

Hotez quickly changed the subject, “But you still need your vaccines.”

Rogan rebutted, “But vaccines aren’t going to prevent cancer.”

Earlier this week, independent journalist Matt Taibbi questioned the consistency of COVID vaccine messaging from Hotez during the coronavirus pandemic.

You can watch the entire Joe Rogan interview with RFK below.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Gain-of-function researchers involved in possible Chinese military bioweapons research were among first infected by COVID-19: Report

The Chinese scientists conducting dangerous gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were the first humans infected by COVID-19, according to a new report published on the Substack Public.

This revelation — coupled with the Sunday Times’ explosive report suggesting researchers at the WIV were involved in military bioweapons research at the time of the leak — serves to further quash the zoonotic origin theory peddled by Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Peter Daszak, and others with links to the lab, as well as by so-called Western scientists eager to adopt Beijing’s wet-market origins narrative.

Investigative journalists Michael Shellenberg, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag learned from multiple U.S. government officials, with one admitting “100%” certainty, that the “patients zero” who got infected in November 2019 included Ben Hu, Yu Ping, and Yan Zhu.

While all three “patients zero” were WIV researchers, Ben Hu’s primary infection is all the more damning given that he ran lead on the institute’s gain-of-function research on SARS-like coronaviruses — research intended to make viruses more infectious.

According to Alina Chan, molecular biologist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, “Ben Hu is essentially the next Shi Zhengli. … He was her star pupil. He had been making chimeric SARS-like viruses and testing these in humanized mice. If I had to guess who would be doing this risky virus research and most at risk of getting accidentally infected, it would be him.”

Zhengli, the so-called “Bat Woman” referenced by Chan, was the top coronavirus researcher at the lab, who years prior to the outbreak of COVID-19 worked with University of North Carolina epidemiologist Ralph Baric to create a novel infectious pathogen by way of gain-of-function research that could infect human cells.

Zhengli and Baric manufactured a “chimeric virus” by placing the “spike of bat coronavirus SHC014” into the molecular structure of the SARS virus, which could replicate in human airway cells and possibly be transmitted to humans.

Hu similarly meddled with COVID-19’s apparent forerunners, co-authoring a 2017 paper on chimeric bat coronaviruses with the head of EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak, who had used American grant money for such dangerous research at the WIV. After his investment went south in a big way, Daszak would go on to champion Fauci’s efforts to downplay the lab-leak theory.

Hu and fellow patient zero Yu Ping co-authored a paper with Zhengli in 2019 detailing the SARS-like lineages they studied over the years along with “insights on the bat origin of human SARS.”

Here is a video showing Hu alongside a lab worker handling specimens where neither are wearing protective gear:


13年不懈追踪,中国科学家寻获SARS病毒源头

youtu.be

Jamie Metzl, a former member of the World Health Organization expert advisory committee on human genome editing, told Public, “It’s a game changer if it can be proven that Hu got sick with COVID-19 before anyone else. That would be the ‘smoking gun.’ Hu was the lead hands-on researcher in Shi’s lab.”

Public noted it is presently unclear how long the U.S. government has known about the WIV workers who first got sick wth COVID-19 or why it neglected to let the American people know that the virus that upended their lives was likely not the result of a zoonotic infection, but almost certainly an error made by an adversary bent on developing a weapon of mass destruction.

Chan told Public, “You would expect the country of origin to be defensive … but you wouldn’t expect a country receiving the virus to be withholding key evidence.”

TheBlaze recently reported on newly reiterated claims that China was engineering mutant coronaviruses for malicious purposes at the WIV, including using the new virus as a bioweapon while developing a vaccine to protect its citizens, prior to the onset of the pandemic.

American investigators with the U.S. State Department told the Sunday Times that the lab wherein Hu, Ping, and Zhu took ill was where a People’s Liberation Army-backed bioweapons program was under way, making mineshaft viruses more infectious to humans.

“It has become increasingly clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was involved in the creation, promulgation, and cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic,” said one investigator.

Dr. Steven Quay, a scientist who advised the State Department on its investigation, suggested that COVID-19, which killed over 1.1 million Americans, was created by inserting a furin cleavage site into one of the mine viruses and then serial passaging it through humanized mice, reported the Times.

Shellenberg noted on Twitter Tuesday that when the WIV “put out their first paper about the pandemic virus, they failed to point out the novel furin cleavage site despite having had plans to and allegedly putting such gain-of-function features into SARS-like viruses in their lab.”

Chan said, “It’s as if these scientists proposed putting horns on horses, but when a unicorn shows up in their city a year later they write a paper describing every part of it except its horn.”

The mounting evidence of a lab leak and malicious intent paints China’s resultant cover-up in a new light.

Chinese authorities delayed warning the world about the emergence of the deadly disease, going to great lengths to silence doctors like the late Lie Wenliang, who had tried to raise the alarm.

While Ben Hu, Yu Ping, and Yan Zhu reportedly got sick with COVID-19 in November 2019, communist officials waited until Dec. 31 to alert the World Health Organization, then claimed, “The disease is preventable and controllable.”

A Five Eyes intelligence dossier accused the CCP in May 2020 of engaging in an “assault on international transparency” to the “endangerment of other countries,” reported the New York Post.

The intelligence dossier indicated that the genocidal Chinese regime had scrambled to bury evidence of the virus and its origins, “destroying” lab samples, censoring evidence of spread, and denying sample requests from other countries.

British conservative politician Bob Seely said in response, “At the end of this when the dust settles, it is also clear that there has to be a re-evaluation by the West of its relationship with China.”

The Department of Homeland Security intelligence service indicated in early 2020 that the CCP simultaneously covered up the outbreak while hoarding critical medical supplies and cutting other countries off from items believed necessary to tackle the virus, TheBlaze previously reported.

“We assess the Chinese Government intentionally concealed the severity of COVID-19 from the International community in early January while it stockpiled medical supplies by both increasing imports and decreasing exports,” said the May 1 DHS report.

The CCP also locked down domestic travel internally while knowingly allowing infected Chinese citizens to travel internationally.

The New York Times revealed that while Chinese officials began locking down Hubei province, home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the alleged patients zero, they nevertheless continued to permit international travel ahead of the Lunar New Year, when hundreds of millions of people were expected to travel back to their hometowns.

About 175,000 people left Wuhan on Jan. 1 alone.

Seven million people left Wuhan in January before travel was restricted, thousands of whom, the Times indicated, were infected. Thousands successfully made it to cities around the world; 900 reportedly made it to New York; 2,200 to Sydney, Australia; and tens of thousands more to various other cities.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Wuhan lab engineered dangerous mutant coronaviruses, worked with Chinese military to develop bioweapons and pre-pandemic COVID vaccines, according to eye-opening report

Scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China were intentionally merging dangerous coronaviruses to create new mutant viruses just before the COVID-19 pandemic began, according to a new report. At the same time, the Chinese military was pursuing biological weapons while also funding researchers at the Wuhan lab, investigators reportedly said.

The Sunday Times published an eye-opening report that accuses China of engineering mutant coronaviruses for malicious purposes, including using the new virus as a bioweapon while developing a vaccine to protect their citizens.

“As the world emerged from lockdown, U.S. State Department investigators were given access to secret intelligence on what had been happening in China in the months and years before COVID emerged,” the report read. “More than a dozen investigators were given unparalleled access to ‘metadata, phone information and internet information’ from intercepts collected by the U.S. intelligence services.”

The Sunday Times spoke with three members of the investigative team, which determined: “Wuhan scientists were conducting experiments on RaTG13 from the Moijang mine, and that covert military research, including laboratory animal experiments, was being done at the institute before the pandemic.”

The source claimed that scientists at the Wuhan lab were working on nine different COVID variants.

In 2012, six men clearing an abandoned copper mine in the Mojiang region of south China were infected with a mystery illness, that had symptoms of fever, coughs, and pneumonia. Three of the men required treatment at a hospital and later died. The men did not test positive for any known illnesses, but did have antibodies for an unknown coronavirus.

The cave in Mojiang had a large bat colony, and the cave was littered with guano – bat feces.

A virus was recovered from the cave in the remote mountains of Yunnan province in southern China. The discovery was made by the team led by Dr. Shi Zhengli – a top Chinese researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who was known as China’s “bat woman.”

Around 2018, the Wuhan Institute of Virology reportedly began combining SARS-like viruses with the cave virus labeled as “WIV1,” using the Wuhan lab’s initials. Rutgers University Professor of Chemical Biology Richard Ebright described the project as the most dangerous coronavirus experiment ever undertaken.

The combination of viruses killed 75% of the albino mice with human-like lungs that were infected with – three times as lethal as the original WIV1.

The Sunday Times stated, “The scientists had created a highly infectious super-coronavirus with a terrifying kill-rate that in all probability would never have emerged in nature. The new genetically modified virus was not COVID-19 but it might have been even more deadly if it had leaked.”

The gain-of-function experiment was partially funded by EcoHealth Alliance’s grant money. However, documents obtained by the Freedom of Information Act show that the deaths of the infected mice were not mentioned in an April 2018 progress report to the NIH by EcoHealth Alliance’s president Peter Daszak.

Daszak reportedly applied for more funding, and asked for $14 million over three years from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. However, DARPA rejected the application to fund the research.

“The application, entitled Defuse — which names Daszak, Shi and Baric — proposed the Wuhan laboratory find large numbers of new SARS viruses and mix some of them with their two deadly strains from the Shitou cave — WIV1 and SHC014 — to see what would happen,” the Sunday Times said.

In November 2019, several researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology purportedly got sick and were taken to a hospital with symptoms similar to COVID. A relative of one of the laboratory workers allegedly died from the same mystery illness.

“We were rock-solid confident that this was likely COVID-19 because they were working on advanced coronavirus research in the laboratory,” an investigator said. “They’re trained biologists in their thirties and forties. Thirty-five-year-old scientists don’t get very sick with influenza.”

At the time of the outbreak, which was a month before the West was made aware of the mystery virus, researchers at the Wuhan lab were conducting dangerous experiments, according to the Sunday Times, citing two U.S. researchers who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The investigators also saw evidence that the institute was conducting “serial passaging” experiments on at least one of the mine viruses. This is a process in which lab animals are infected with viruses and monitored to see which strain is harmful to their health. The most damaging strain is selected for repeat experiments to encourage the pathogens to mutate into something more deadly. The investigators spoke to a Wuhan institute insider who alleged serial passaging experiments were being carried out on RaTG13. “Humanized mice with the serial passaging is a toxic combination,” said a source. “It speeds up the natural mutation process. So instead of taking years to mutate, it can take weeks or months. It guarantees that you accelerate the natural process.”

Dr. Steven Quay, a U.S. scientist who advised the State Department on its investigation, said, “There has never been an example of a bat virus directly infecting humans and killing.”

Quay believes COVID-19 was created by inserting a furin cleavage site into one of the mine viruses and then serial passaging it through humanized mice. He submitted a statement to the U.S. Senate explaining the process. “You infect the mice, wait a week or so, and then recover the virus from the sickest mice. Then you repeat. In a matter of weeks this directed evolution will produce a virus that can kill every humanized mouse.” This explains why from the beginning of the outbreak, he says, the pandemic virus was so remarkably well adapted to infect humans.

The Sunday Times noted that there is no published information about the experiments because it was a top-secret program funded by the Chinese military. U.S. State Department investigators determined that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had conducted experiments on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017.

The report stated, “The investigators believe the Chinese military had taken an interest in developing a vaccine for the viruses so they could be used as potential bioweapons. If a country could inoculate its population against its own secret virus, it might have a weapon to shift the balance of world power.”

A U.S. investigator told the British outlet, “My view is that the reason Mojiang was covered up was due to military secrecy related to [the army’s] pursuit of dual use capabilities in virological biological weapons and vaccines.”

The Sunday Times reported:

The PLA had its own vaccine specialist, Zhou Yusen, a decorated military scientist at the academy, who had collaborated with the Wuhan scientists on a study of the MERS coronavirus and was working with them at the time of the outbreak. Suspicion fell on him after the pandemic because he produced a patent for a COVID vaccine with remarkable speed in February 2020, little more than a month after the outbreak of the virus had first been admitted to the world by China. A report published in April, co-authored by Dr Robert Kadlec, who was responsible for the U.S.’s vaccine development program, concluded that Zhou’s team must have been working on a vaccine no later than November 2019 — just as the pandemic began.

Zhou died in May 2020, at age 54.

Read More
Elections

North Miami Beach Democrat mayor arrested, charged with 3 counts of felony voter fraud, faces 15 years in prison

The mayor of North Beach Miami in Florida – a Democrat – is facing 15 years in prison after being arrested and charged with voter fraud.

Miami Beach Mayor Anthony DeFillipo was arrested on Wednesday. He has been charged with three felony counts of voter fraud. The charges are third-degree felonies, which each count is punishable with up to five years in prison.

Six months before his arrest, a complaint was filed with the Miami-Dade Commission on Ethics & Public Trust alleging DeFillipo lived in the town of Davie in Broward County. The North Miami Beach city charter requires elected officials to reside in the city.

DeFillipo admitted that he owns a property in Davie, but said it was for his family to live in because he was experiencing marital issues at the time. He insisted that he lives at his property in North Miami Beach. Records show that DeFillipo owns two properties in Davie, which he admitted.

DeFillipo and his wife purchased a six-bedroom home in the Sierra Ranches community in Davie for $1,226,500 in July 2022, according to Broward County property records. He acknowledged that he serves on the homeowners association board for the Davie community.

An investigation into DeFillipo allegedly revealed that the Democrat mayor relocated to his residence in Davie.

Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle accused DeFillipo of driving from Davie to North Miami Beach to cast his vote in three different elections in August, October, and November 2022. Rundle said her office utilized cell phone data to determine that DeFillipo traveled from his property in Davie to vote in a precinct in North Miami Beach, and then returned to his home in Davie.

“We believe the evidence shows (DeFillipo) voted illegally three times,” Rundle declared.

Rundle said, “Our voting laws apply to everyone. There are no unwritten exceptions.”

DeFillipo has denied the allegations of voter fraud.

DeFillipo’s attorney, Michael Pizzi, said his client’s arrest is politically motivated.

“The mayor has explained over and over again, and under oath, he always intended to and always lived in North Miami Beach,” Pizzi said. “We look forward to a speedy exoneration.”

The Miami Herald reported, “A registered Democrat, DeFillipo, 51, served on the city commission for five years before becoming mayor in 2018. A licensed real estate broker, DeFillipo is CEO of TD Managing Enterprise.”

DeFillipo is reportedly the third North Miami Beach mayor to be arrested in 11 years.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!


North Miami Beach Mayor Anthony DeFillipo arrested over ‘voting irregularities’

www.youtube.com

Read More
COVID-19

Over 300 COVID-related medical papers retracted due to scientific errors, compromised ethical standards

More than 300 COVID-related medical articles have been retracted or withdrawn from various research journals since 2020, often due to scientific errors and compromised ethical standards, according to watchdog group Retraction Watch.

The watchdog group has been keeping a running list of COVID-related medical papers that research journals have retracted. As of Wednesday, the database contains 330 withdrawn articles ranging from “Acute kidney injury and collapsing glomerulopathy associated with COVID-19 and APOL1 high risk genotype” to “Can Your AI Differentiate Cats from COVID-19?”

Many retracted papers were published in smaller research journals, though some were featured in highly influential publications such as the Lancet and Science.

Gunnveig Grødeland, a senior researcher at the Institute of Immunology at the University of Oslo, told Khrono, a Norwegian newspaper, that some research journals compromised ethical standards to approve more COVID-related publications or take ethics shortcuts.

Grødeland, who reviewed Retraction Watch’s list, noted that the papers had been withdrawn for a number of different reasons. Some of the retracted articles were preprints, which are often updated or published elsewhere, Grødeland explained.

Preprints are rarely retracted by the journal for containing flawed data because “the server made no claim to have peer-reviewed and certified the scientific content in the first place,” Retraction Watch stated. However, preprints will be removed “in instances of fraud, ethics violations, dangerous material, or legal issues.”

Grødeland said that many of the retracted papers were found to be in violation of ethical guidelines.

“It will, of course, be withdrawn when it is found that ethical guidelines have been breached,” she stated.

One of those retracted medical papers included “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19,” published in the Lancet and withdrawn after two weeks. The paper claimed that hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of death from COVID.

A paper published in Science that investigated the spread of the Omicron variant in South Africa was retracted after social media users noted that some of the samples used in the study could have been false positives.

An investigation conducted by Australia’s Monash University found that 270,000 COVID-related papers had been published since 2020, the institute reported in October 2022. Furthermore, the study uncovered that even papers that had been retracted were still being cited.

For example, after investigating 212 withdrawn articles, the university discovered that the retracted papers were cited 2,697 times. Of those citations, 90% failed to mention that the paper had been withdrawn and 80% were published after the retraction.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More