Saturday, June 14, 2025

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

White House endorses COVID lab leak theory, but will anyone be held accountable?
COVID-19

White House endorses COVID lab leak theory, but will anyone be held accountable?

On April 18, the White House publicly endorsed the COVID lab leak theory. The government’s official COVID website was also redirected to a new page titled “Lab Leak: The True Origins of COVID-19,” which contends that the virus originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, and was leaked by accident.

The revamped site criticizes Anthony Fauci, David Morens, Andrew Cuomo, the WHO, EcoHealth Alliance, and the Biden administration, among others, for actively promoting false information and covering up the truth.

It cites five points to support the lab leak claim:

1. “The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.”

2. “Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.”

3. “Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research (gene altering and organism supercharging) at inadequate biosafety levels.”

4. “Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with COVID-like symptoms in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.”

5. “By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced. But it hasn’t.”

After years of the Biden administration and his loyal media allies promoting a lie, it’s refreshing to see the government proclaim the truth.

But while Glenn Beck sees the website as “an amazing thing,” the information on it isn’t exactly news.

“Most of this stuff we had within six or eight months of the actual outbreak,” he says.

The real question is: “Who’s going to jail over this?”

The other question is: Why doesn’t the legacy media seem interested in correcting the narrative?

“Millions of people died here. You’d think that it would be something [the media] would focus on and draw a lot of attention to and continue to kind of beat the drum until someone was held responsible, and they don’t seem to have any interest in that,” says co-host Stu Burguiere, noting that most of these outlets “have run an op-ed” about the lab leak theory and called it good.

“If we make a mistake, we correct it because it drives us crazy that we made the mistake, and I don’t want anybody to believe that I’m standing behind something that is wrong and a lie,” says Glenn.

The legacy media clearly doesn’t have the same convictions.

“They knowingly lied” about COVID, Joe Biden’s cognitive state, and Russiagate, and yet, “There’s no consequence.”

“They’re not going to lose any advertisers. The New York Times hasn’t lost any real money because of this. Their people just continue to watch,” says Glenn.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
Jab first, ask questions never: Vaccine truths your doctor won’t tell you
COVID-19
,

Jab first, ask questions never: Vaccine truths your doctor won’t tell you

Disclaimer: With apologies to the few and far-between pediatricians who don’t fit this mold.

Your friendly pediatrician may not think he is lying. But neither is he asking the right questions on behalf of young, vulnerable patients: your children. And that’s outrageously unacceptable amid a growing mountain of evidence suggesting that, indeed, virtually everything we’ve been told about vaccines is untrue and worthy of scrutiny.

I’m going to say a lot of things in this article that may sound shocking. See the resource list at the end for the arguments. But there are many good reasons why HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy
has announced that a panel will examine the childhood vaccine schedule.

‘You’ll be sorry when your baby dies’

I first explored this topic 30 years ago
after reading a history of polio that shook my worldview. For all my life, the polio vaccine had been used as exhibit A in the case for vaccines: If it weren’t for its discovery and widespread administration in the 1950s and 1960s, thousands more would have suffered from this terrible disease.

And yet in my reading, I found that the polio virus
was sharply declining at the time of Jonas Salk’s discovery. Like many diseases, polio cases went through periods of growth and decline independent of human intervention. In other words, “proof” of the vaccine’s effectiveness was hardly decisive.

If this is true with the polio vaccine, what does it suggest about other, riskier vaccines that we’re told are “lifesaving”?

When I brought this information and a few other vaccine questions to our pediatrician, he had no intelligent response. In fact, he simply stated that if we didn’t vaccinate, we’d be sorry when our child died.

That condescending, unhelpful response infuriated me then just as much as it does now. A lot has changed in 30 years, but unfortunately, doctors are still likely to dismiss vaccine concerns with arrogance, disinterest, or downright hostility.

Actually, that’s the standard response when you question anything they learned in their
Pharma-sponsored medical school education. And it applies in spades where the highly profitable vaccines are concerned. (Another area where doctors seem to be deliberately uninformed is cancer treatment, including lucrative-to-them chemotherapy, but that’s a subject for another day.)

You also cannot trust media reporting on this issue, because a significant amount of media income flows from those incredibly annoying Pharma ads. Actual journalism is an endangered species these days, unless you frequent Substack or other alternative platforms like Blaze Media or the Daily Wire or listen to Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and others like them
.

Doctors’ attitudes have not changed, but a few other things have

First, the recommended
childhood vaccine schedule has exploded. Today, children receive dozens more vaccine doses than children 30 years ago, including the injection of multiple substances at a time during “well child” visits (and I put scare quotes there for a reason).

Second, we now have several decades of evidence of harm by childhood vaccines. Reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System number in the thousands. But that number is almost irrelevant because it is estimated that for a variety of reasons, VAERS only catches about 1% of adverse reactions.

There is no lack of anecdotal evidence either — including personal,
heartbreaking reports of vaccine injuries to previously healthy, vibrant children.

Third — and this is good — we now have the internet. We can research alternative thought on almost anything, provided that the powers that be do not censor it. And if something is censored, we must ask ourselves why? Who stands to benefit from that censoring?

We clearly saw this with nearly every topic related to COVID-19, and the evidence is now clear that the
COVID vaccine was an unmitigated health disaster — neither safe nor effective, despite being forced on billions of people around the world. And yes, it is still currently part of your child’s recommended vaccine schedule, despite even the mainstream media now reporting many of the vaccine’s known problems, including the development of myocarditis, turbo cancers, and even sudden death in young people.

How many of us know of someone in one of those categories?

It’s instructive to consider also how the anti-vax movement has grown, even before COVID caused millions to question the medical and media establishments. Countless people who said they were “pro-” have become “anti-” over the years, almost always because they or someone they love experienced a tragedy due to the shots — including life-altering harm to a child.

Then, over the past several years, we’ve won many more to our “side” as evidence mounts in our favor, not only that specific shots are bad, but that:

  1. They’ve failed to be properly vetted (i.e., faulty or corrupted research).
  2. Their ingredient list is a nightmare of toxins (simply read the inserts to see for yourself, or see “One of 174 Reasons to Question Vaccines,” linked below).
  3. The Pharma companies that produce them are unredeemably corrupt, having been protected from legal consequences after lobbying for that protection from lawmakers they financially supported.
  4. And perhaps most worldview-shaking — that they were NEVER really the medical wonder they were made out to be.

I challenge you, if you consider yourself pro-vax (and haven’t already thrown your computer across the room while reading this), to consider the information below.

Books

Fortunately, at this time, Amazon is not censoring any of these books:

Many more books on the topic can be found
at the Children’s Health Defense website.

And if you need help reorienting your attitude about the medical establishment in general, check out “Lies My Doctor Told Me” by Ken Berry, M.D.

Articles and papers

Due to its lack of censorship, Substack is where you’ll find much of the current information about vaccines (and any other controversial topic that threatens the status quo).

Videos

”
24 Censored Documentaries Exposing the Medical Fraud of Vaccines” (see on Amandha Dawn Vollmer’s Substack: A Healthy Dose of Truth).

What do you want first: the good news or the bad news?

The good news is: We did not vaccinate our daughter, and she did not die.

The bad news is: As a young adult living overseas, she was forced to get the COVID shot and has since battled health problems, having been formally diagnosed as COVID-vaccine-injured.

How about you and your family? Share your story in the comments. After all, we should encourage each other as we seek to care for these precious bodies God has given us — the temples of His Spirit, in fact (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). If our bodies aren’t healthy, it limits our usefulness for Him, as well.

Read More
Chinese scientist with reported ties to USAID finds new bat coronavirus that could infect humans like COVID
COVID-19

Chinese scientist with reported ties to USAID finds new bat coronavirus that could infect humans like COVID

Chinese scientists have said that they discovered a new bat coronavirus that could infect humans in the same manner as the virus that causes COVID-19. The lead scientist in the new study has reported links to USAID.

According to a report from the South China Morning Post, the researchers are from the Guangzhou Laboratory, the Guangzhou Academy of Sciences, Wuhan University, and the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The lead scientist in the new bat coronavirus study reportedly had prior financial ties to the embattled United States Agency for International Development.

The new infectious disease is called HKU5-CoV-2. The new coronavirus was first identified in the Japanese pipistrelle bat in Hong Kong.

HKU5-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that is part of the merbecovirus subgenus, which also includes the virus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome.

Researchers claim that HKU5-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 receptor to infect organisms. The ACE2 receptor is the same receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 to infect human cells.

“We report the discovery and isolation of a distinct lineage (lineage 2) of HKU5-CoV, which can utilize not only bat ACE2 but also human ACE2 and various mammalian ACE2 orthologs,” the study said.

The researchers wrote, “Authentic HKU5-CoV-2 infected human ACE2-expressing cell lines and human respiratory and enteric organoids. This study reveals a distinct lineage of HKU5-CoVs in bats that efficiently use human ACE2 and underscores their potential zoonotic risk.”

“Bat merbecoviruses, which are phylogenetically related to MERS-CoV, pose a high risk of spillover to humans, either through direct transmission or facilitated by intermediate hosts,” the scientists stated.

The researchers from China added, “The potential human spillover risk of animal merbecoviruses remains to be investigated.”

The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Cell on Tuesday.

The study was led by Shi Zhengli — a leading virologist who had been the director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Zhengli is often dubbed the “bat woman” by her colleagues because of her extensive research on bat coronaviruses since 2004, including virus-hunting expeditions in bat caves.

The World Society for Virology said of Zhengli, “Her group has discovered diverse novel viruses/virus antibodies in bats, including SARS-like coronaviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, circoviruses, paramyxoviruses and filoviruses in China.”

The lead scientist in the new bat coronavirus study reportedly had prior financial ties to the embattled United States Agency for International Development.

A 2021 article in Vanity Fair noted: “Shi Zhengli herself listed U.S. government grant support of more than $1.2 million on her curriculum vitae: $665,000 from the NIH between 2014 and 2019; and $559,500 over the same period from USAID. At least some of those funds were routed through EcoHealth Alliance.”

According to 990 tax exemption forms it filed in 2018 with the New York state attorney general’s Charities Bureau, EcoHealth Alliance received as much as $15 million a year in grant money from federal agencies, including the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and USAID.

The article spotlighted emails obtained by a Freedom of Information request, including one sent by Peter Daszak, a zoologist and former president of EcoHealth Alliance. The email showed that Zhengli allegedly carried out potentially dangerous gain-of-function experiments.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the ‘Statement’ Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”

During a House Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic hearing in March 2023, former U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield said he believes American tax dollars funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) asked Redfield, “Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?”

Redfield replied, “I think it did, not only from NIH, but from the State Department, USAID, and DOD.”

Zhengli has gone on record to say that she does not believe in the lab-leak theory that COVID-19 came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology — a biosafety level-4 lab, which requires the highest level of safety protocols and equipment because of the study of high-consequence biological agents.

Blaze News reported in July 2021 that Zhengli purportedly had “collaborated with two military scientists on coronavirus work, one of whom is now deceased under unknown circumstances.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Blaze News original: Let us never forget the left’s reprehensible behavior toward fellow Americans who refused COVID jabs
COVID-19
, ,

Blaze News original: Let us never forget the left’s reprehensible behavior toward fellow Americans who refused COVID jabs

After COVID-19 vaccines became available in early 2021, not everybody in America was down with the getting the jabs. Typical vaccines take years of testing prior to approval, but since the COVID vaccines were produced with lightning speed, lots of folks were concerned and resisted getting the shots.

Readers of Blaze News won’t soon forget what happened next. Vaccine mandates and steadily growing pressure to get the jab turned into an all-out assault on “anti-vaxxers” by the government, businesses, the mainstream media, celebrities, politicians, and the medical community.

‘If you ask me what’s my first reaction to you if you’re not vaccinated, and you don’t have any medical reason not to be, you’re a piece of s**t, OK? I just want to punch you in the goddamned face.’

In September 2021, President Joe Biden issued an executive order requiring federal workers to be vaccinated; that same month, he announced a sweeping vaccination mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees, which the Supreme Court later blocked.

In October 2021, Biden said he believed police officers and first responders who refused the jab should be fired.

Widespread firings indeed happened. Teachers were terminated for not getting vaccinated. Businesses and hospitals fired employees who refused the jab. A viral video showed a nurse being escorted out of a hospital after her religious exemption was denied, and a UCLA doctor suffered a similar fate.

An October 2021 New York City vaccine mandate required all city employees — including police and firefighters — to get the jab or lose their jobs. Indeed, 1,400 city workers were canned for refusing vaccinations, but incredibly Mayor Eric Adams (D) in March 2022 exempted city-based athletes and performers from the mandate. That came after the awful optics of then-Brooklyn Nets star Kyrie Irving, who was unvaccinated, being barred from playing in Brooklyn’s home games — but somehow being allowed to watch those games from the seats in the Nets’ arena.

Want more bad looks? How about an unvaccinated Coast Guard member who, after rescuing Hurricane Ian victims, faced termination for not getting the jab? Biden managed to personally thank the hero days before his scheduled dismissal. Or Washington, D.C., Democrat Mayor Muriel Bowser announcing no virtual instruction options for unvaccinated students? Turns out 40% of black students were in that mix. Or a trio of unvaccinated Air Force Academy cadets who were denied their commissions? Or the Navy barring a destroyer from setting sail because its commander wouldn’t get the jab?

How about a hospital pulling the plug on a lifesaving kidney transplant because the donor wasn’t vaccinated? Or a health care system denying an organ transplant to a dying unvaccinated woman? Or another hospital removing a dying man from its heart transplant list because he was unvaccinated?

Along with the aforementioned gut-punches from those in power against the unvaccinated, further bolstering the cause were the seemingly daily insults — which arguably were dangerous in some cases — from the left against those who refused the jab.

A number of your favorite usual suspects show up below, and you may even remember some of their astonishing declarations. A number of them called for shaming and shunning the unvaccinated. Others wanted to make life a “living hell” for them. One even wanted to punch them in the “goddamned face.” You get the idea.

Let’s not ever forget.

Sunny Hostin declares ‘we need to shun those that refuse to get vaccinated’ — specifically ‘white evangelicals’ and ‘Republicans’

Sunny Hostin of “The View” tore into Americans who indicated they wouldn’t get the COVID-19 vaccine by saying we should “shun” them — and the co-host specifically called out “white evangelicals” and “Republicans.”

Hostin said during the show’s May 3, 2021, episode that “when you look at the folks that are not getting vaccinated — because it’s a quarter of Americans that aren’t getting vaccinated — white evangelicals: 45% say they won’t get vaccinated according to … Pew Research … almost 50% of Republicans are refusing to get the vaccine. So we won’t reach herd immunity because of those particular groups.”

Then the co-host lowered the boom: “So I say we need to shun those that refuse to get vaccinated.”

She added that unvaccinated Americans should be refused entry into certain places: “I think if you have not been vaccinated, no entry. You want to get on a plane? You gotta be vaccinated, show proof of vaccination. And those people who don’t want to get vaccinated … that’s fine for you, but you can’t spread it to other people. … You don’t get those other liberties that come with immunity. Something has to break. If that’s your personal choice not to get vaccinated, you don’t then get to infringe on the rights of those who have chosen to protect their fellow citizens.”

You can view Hostin’s comments here just after the 3:30 mark.

James Carville wants law passed that allows him, others to punch ‘piece of s**t’ unvaccinated Americans in the ‘godd**ned face’

“I wish what they’d do is pass a law to make you immune from liability if you punch some unvaccinated person right in the face, which I’d really like to do,” Carville — a famous Democratic operative — said during a February 2022 episode of the “Politics War Room” podcast.

He also said, “If you ask me what’s my first reaction to you if you’re not vaccinated, and you don’t have any medical reason not to be, you’re a piece of s**t, OK? I just want to punch you in the goddamned face.”

Carville added, “That’s the way I look at these people.”

Jimmy Kimmel says unvaccinated Americans who have taken ivermectin should be denied ICU beds and left to die: ‘Rest in peace, wheezy’

Kimmel in a September 2021 monologue took potshots at Americans who have refused the COVID jab — particularly those who have taken the drug ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

“I leave you people alone for two months, and you start taking horse worm medicine?” he asked the crowd in reference to ivermectin.

“Dr. [Anthony] Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they’re gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU bed,” Kimmel also said, before adding a witty gut-buster.

“That choice doesn’t seem so tough to me,” he continued. “Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes, come right on in, we’ll take care of ya. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo? Rest in peace, wheezy.” You can watch the segment here.

Far-left NY Gov. Kathy Hochul actually preaches COVID jab gospel from church pulpit: ‘Smart’ vaccinated people must ‘be my apostles’ and evangelize unvaccinated who ‘aren’t listening to God’

Far-left New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) gave a sermon of sorts to a Brooklyn megachurch on the last Sunday of September 2021 — and the Democrat preached the gospel of getting COVID-19 vaccines. You can view Hochel’s homily here.

Speaking about the trials of the pandemic to the Christian Cultural Center, Hochul told listeners that she “prayed a lot to God during this time, and you know what? God did answer our prayers. He made the smartest men and women — the scientists, the doctors, the researchers — he made them come up with a vaccine!”

Hochul added that the COVID-19 vaccines are “from God to us, and we must say, ‘Thank you, God! Thank you!'” She then held aloft not a cross but her “vaccinated” necklace, telling congregants that she wears it “all the time” to announce to the world that “I’m vaccinated!”

Hochul also gave a sacred mission to the “smart ones” who’ve been vaccinated: to be her “apostles” and spread the Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J gospel to the unvaccinated heathen who “aren’t listening to God.”

Tucker Carlson was taken aback by “high priestess” Hochul and discussed during his Fox News show the following night the growing “cult of coronavirus” that possesses “its own sacraments” and “its own sacred texts” — just like other religions.

MSNBC’s Joy Reid says conservatives who defy COVID jab are ‘angels of death’ — and asks, ‘How many more people have to die before these ghouls are satisfied?’

In late November 2021, Reid ripped into conservatives who refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine: “It’s about power and spreading lies and fake outrage so the MAGA squad wins elections. They are today’s angels of death. Refusing to get vaccinated and urging fellow Americans to remain exposed even as their own parents, grandparents, and children die of COVID. The numbers prove it. Red America has the highest rates of COVID death, but the lowest rates of vaccinations. They are literally killing people.”

She also asked, “How many more people have to die before we say what we have all known for quite some time? This faction of the right is a death cult. Six unvaccinated members of a Florida family dead after contracting COVID, mothers dying shortly after giving birth, parents of young children wiped out. And then the harrowing news that more than 140,000 U.S. children have lost a caregiver due to the pandemic. Almost two years in, the trauma is irreversible. It’s a trauma that has crossed generations. It is permanent and unforgiving. And so we ask again, how many more people have to die before these ghouls are satisfied?”

Keith Olbermann calls unvaccinated people ‘snowflakes,’ ‘morons,’ ‘losers,’ ‘cowards’ in video rant

Leftist Keith Olbermann called unvaccinated people “snowflakes,” “morons,” “losers,” “cowards” — among other descriptors — in a Twitter video rant posted on Oct. 1, 2021. He added that that they’re “afraid” of getting the shot and that vaccinated people should stop “coddling” them.

Here’s his word-for-word diatribe:

It is time to stop coddling them — the ones who won’t get the damn shot already. And our first step, you and I, is symbols. The language we use. We call these people “vaccine-hesitant.” “Vaccine skeptics.” “Anti-vax.” We say they’re “protesting mandates and passports.” They’re “making a personal choice.” They’re “waiting for more information.” They’re “making a medical decision.” Bulls**t! They’re afraid! They’re afraid to get vaccinated. Stop feeding their egos about what they’re doing. Stop legitimizing it. “Vaccine-hesitant”? They’re afraid! “Vaccine skeptics”? They’re afraid! “Anti-vax”? They’re afraid! They’re “protesting mandates and passports”? They’re afraid! They’re “making a personal choice”? They’re afraid! They’re “waiting for more information”? Afraid! They’re “making a medical decision” — to be afraid! The snowflakes are afraid! Afraid of the vaccine. Afraid of being proved wrong. Afraid of doing what anybody else in the world tells them to do. Afraid of needles! So no more pleasant euphemisms about what’s going on here — apart from the people who have legitimate medical complications about vaccines — we have to stop coddling the morons who will not get the shot. We start by calling them what they are. They are all snowflakes. And cowards. And idiots. And losers. And most importantly, they are afraid!

Don Lemon on unvaccinated Americans: They’re ‘stupid’ and ‘harmful to the greater good,’ and we should ‘start shaming them or leave them behind’

In September 2021, the now-former CNN host ripped into “stupid” unvaccinated people and demanded that Americans stop “coddling them.”

“The people who are not getting vaccines, who are believing the lies on the internet instead of science, it’s time to start shaming them,” Lemon declared. “Or leave them behind, because they’re keeping the majority of Americans behind.”

He then screamed at the unvaccinated for not trusting the COVID vaccine while having no problems with other vaccines — which he failed to point out have been around for decades and have been proven safe for generations of Americans: “You didn’t feel that way for the polio vaccine, you don’t feel that way about measles, mumps, rubella when it comes to your children. And all of a sudden this vaccine is different? What’s different about it?” He added, “The only different thing about it is because of your politics today.”

Lemon last year doubled down on his views, calling those who didn’t get the COVID jab “selfish.”

Ana Navarro says she does not want to know any unvaccinated people: ‘Your “personal freedom” is holding the rest of us hostage’

Ana Navarro on Dec. 21, 2021, posted on Twitter that she doesn’t want to be around or even know anyone who remains unvaccinated against COVID-19 unless they have a medical reason.

“Unless you have a LEGITIMATE medical reason, if you’re not vaccinated, I don’t want to see you, talk to you, work w/you, socialize w/you or know you. It’s enough. Your ‘personal freedom’ is holding the rest of us hostage. It’s selfish and stupid,” she wrote.

CNN medical analyst Leana Wen likens unvaccinated people in public to drunk drivers

In September 2021, CNN medical analyst Leana Wen — the former head of Planned Parenthood — likened unvaccinated people in public to drunk drivers.

“You have the option to not get vaccinated if you want, but then you can’t go out in public,” she noted to then-CNN anchor Chris Cuomo. Wen added: “Just like you can choose to drink in private if you want, but if you get behind the wheel of a car and can endanger other people, there is an obligation by society to prevent you from doing that.”

Wen also insisted around that time that life “needs to be hard” for unvaccinated Americans.

But would you believe she was singing different tunes later on?

In December 2022, Wen admitted that natural immunity from COVID-19 is optimal — and a month later she warned that officials have been overcounting COVID-19 deaths.

Joy Behar implies unvaccinated COVID patients don’t deserve medical help since they’ve ‘chosen to listen to the lies’ on Fox News

Leftist Joy Behar implied during a September 2021 episode of “The View” that unvaccinated COVID-19 patients don’t deserve medical help because they’ve “chosen to defy the science” and have “chosen to listen to the lies on Fox [News]” — all while patients with other needs can’t get hospital beds.

Former Utah Rep. Mia Love — a Republican — sat at the table as a guest and argued that it’s a “slippery slope” for doctors to say they won’t treat unvaccinated patients since that declaration could lead to them saying they won’t treat people for other illnesses.

Behar at first agreed with Love that doctors denying health care to smokers and the morbidly obese could be problematic — but Behar then declared that such patients have developed “long-term” habits compared to the one-time decision by unvaccinated people to reject thea COVID-19 shot “based on false information.”

She added — as if she were speaking to unvaccinated COVID-19 patients — they should “go to [Fox News host] Tucker Carlson and make your case. Because he’s telling you lies. He and other people on Fox and on some parts of Facebook are telling you lies about the vaccine.”

Baltimore’s Democrat mayor tells unvaccinated citizens to ‘shut up’: ‘It’s your fault that we’re going back to having an indoor mask mandate’

Democrat Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott in August 2021 left no doubt about whom he blamed for the spike in COVID-19 cases in his city and the subsequent resumption of mask mandates.

“For anyone that’s frustrated about wearing a mask — and you’re not vaccinated — then look in the mirror. It’s your fault that we’re going back to having an indoor mask mandate,” Scott said. “Make sure that folks get vaccinated. If you’re not vaccinated, shut up. Don’t complain.”

You can view a video report here that includes Scott’s remarks.

5-year-old boy reduced to tears as NYPD officers tell his mother they have to leave restaurant because they don’t have their COVID vaccination papers

An Instagram video posted on Christmas Eve 2021 shows a 5-year-old boy reduced to tears at a New York City restaurant as police officers tell his mother they have to leave because they don’t have their vaccination papers.

Police told the boy’s mother that anyone without proof of vaccination could be charged with trespassing: “If you leave voluntarily, there will not be charges pressed against you; otherwise you will be arrested for trespass. This is your only warning.”

Several angry bystanders could be seen recording the incident and yelling at cops about their rights being infringed. “Scaring a child, traumatizing a child. I hope you feel good about yourself, NYPD,” a woman says. “This is disgusting. This is gross.”

The video went viral as New York City began enforcing the strictest private-sector vaccine mandate in the nation at the time. The mandate, enacted by far-left Democrat Mayor Bill de Blasio, required everyone age 12 and up to show proof of vaccination against COVID-19 to patronize businesses with indoor spaces — including restaurants, gyms, music venues, movie theaters, and other indoor public spaces.

‘It’s time to make life a living hell for anti-vaxxers,’ Washington Post columnist writes

A Washington Post columnist lambasted the vaccine-hesitant and praised French President Emmanuel Macron in a January 2022 piece titled, “Macron is right: It’s time to make life a living hell for anti-vaxxers.”

James McAuley, global opinions contributing columnist for the Post, recounted Macron’s headline-grabbing statements from the prior week saying he wanted to push the unvaccinated out of public life in France until they get the jabs.

“The unvaccinated, I really want to piss them off. And so we’re going to continue doing so, until the end. That’s the strategy,” Macron told newspaper Le Parisien in an interview, Reuters reported.

McAuley noted that “the English translation hardly does the comment justice. In French, the verb he used is ’emmerder,’ which means, quite literally, to cover in excrement.”

He added that Macron “happens to be totally right. There is no justifiable excuse for refusing vaccination, which is the only way the pandemic will ever come close to ending. Macron has set a fine example for other world leaders to follow in refusing to kowtow before ignorance or honor selfishness.”

CNN medical guest and ethics ‘expert’ declares America must increase punishments for the unvaccinated: ‘Condemn them,’ ‘shame them,’ ‘blame them,’ ‘penalize them more’

In January 2022, Arthur Caplan — then head of the Division of Medical Ethics at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine — said during a CNN segment that America must increase punishments for the unvaccinated.

Caplan said that though he wants Americans to “act as a team” and doesn’t want to “reject those who still haven’t done the right thing” by getting the jabs, he will gladly “condemn them” and “shame them” and then “blame them.”

“We can penalize them more,” he added. “We can say, ‘You’ve got to pay more on your hospital bill if you weren’t vaccinated. You can’t get life insurance or disability insurance at affordable rates if you aren’t vaccinated.’ Those companies should not treat us as equals in terms of what the financial burdens are that that disease imposes.”

“I can think of a number of ways in which we should say, ‘Here’s the stick. Get on board,'” he concluded.

‘Let hospitals quietly triage emergency care to serve the unvaccinated last,’ writer from the Atlantic declares

David Frum, a staff writer at the Atlantic, in December 2021 wrote on Twitter that hospitals should be permitted to place those who haven’t taken the COVID jab at the bottom of emergency care priority.

In the face of negative reaction to his post, Frum doubled down: “Reading the reactions to this tweet, I am impressed by the immense self-pity of the anti-vaxxers — who see themselves as bottomless victims, even as their own bad choices deny hospital care to so many others in desperate need.”

He added: “If, at this point, you are still unvaccinated, you are not a victim. You are a cause of the victimization of vulnerable others.”

Obama’s education secretary compares ‘anti-mask,’ ‘anti-vax’ Americans to suicide bombers

Arne Duncan, secretary of education for most of Barack Obama’s presidency, in late August 2021 compared terrorist suicide bombers to “anti-mask and anti-vax” Americans.

Duncan in a now-deleted social media post said Americans opposed to face masks and vaccines are “strikingly similar” to terrorists who carried out an attack outside a Kabul airport the previous week: “Have you noticed how strikingly similar both the mindsets and actions are between the suicide bombers at Kabul’s airport, and the anti-mask and anti-vax people here? They both blow themselves up, inflict harm on those around them, and are convinced they are fighting for freedom.”

Middle school teacher says we’d be ‘lucky’ if the unvaccinated die — and adds that could ‘cut out 30% of the population that votes the wrong way’

A middle school teacher in Washington state reportedly said on social media that America would be “lucky” if unvaccinated people are denied health care and die from COVID-19.

The teacher, who reportedly works at Wy’East Middle School in Vancouver, boasted on Facebook that she’s “ready to say let them die,” referring to unvaccinated people, KTTH-AM reported in August 2021.

“You made a choice to not get your shot for any reason other than a doctor’s note, you should not be allowed health care. You are like the brats in class that ruin it for everyone,” the post read.

The teacher even suggested that allowing the unvaccinated to die also solves another issue for her: “If we’re lucky we can cut out 30% of the population that votes the wrong way.” The teacher added, “Plus less people using up all the resources. Let the hunger games begin.”

According to KTTH, the teacher deleted her Facebook account after her post began circulating among local parents. KTTH, however, preserved a screenshot of the shocking comments.

Obama-era official says the unvaccinated should be placed on a no-fly list

Juliette Kayyem — a former assistant secretary for Homeland Security who served under Barack Obama — argued in an August 2021 piece published in the Atlantic that “a no-fly list for unvaccinated adults is an obvious step that the federal government should take.”

“The public debate about making vaccination a precondition for travel, employment, and other activities has described this approach as vaccine mandates, a term that, to conservative critics, suggests that unvaccinated people are being ordered around arbitrarily. What is actually going on, mostly, is that institutions are shifting burdens to unvaccinated people — denying them access to certain spaces, requiring them to take regular COVID-19 tests, charging them for the cost of that testing — rather than imposing greater burdens on everyone. Americans still have a choice to go unvaccinated, but that means giving up on certain societal benefits,” Kayyem wrote. “Amid a global health crisis, people who defy public-health guidance are not, and do not deserve to be, a protected class.”

New York Times gets torched after singling out ‘white evangelical resistance’ as ‘obstacle’ in COVID-19 vaccination effort

The New York Times’ headline in an April 2021 story spelled it out plainly: “White Evangelical Resistance Is Obstacle in Vaccination Effort.” The Times’ piece indeed singled a giant swath of humanity as an enemy of COVID-19 vaccines — using race and faith as its sole parameters.

The story also claimed that white evangelical “opposition is rooted in a mix of religious faith and a long-standing wariness of mainstream science, and it is fueled by broader cultural distrust of institutions and gravitation to online conspiracy theories.”

After the Times posted a link to its story on Twitter, a number of commenters backed the paper’s premise. In fact, one person said white evangelicals should be placed in “one big arena. Let them pray or sing or whatever they do. Let the virus run rampant throughout the venue. Let science decide their fate.”

But others took issue with the Times’ report. One commenter shot back, “Bravo @nytimes, I think you have really outdone yourself with this one. You have found another way to be decisive and to further divide the country. Take the vaccine or else it’s your fault and be seen as an outsider who does not belong in our society.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Biden spy chiefs sidelined FBI, researchers who suspected COVID-19 lab leak: Report
COVID-19

Biden spy chiefs sidelined FBI, researchers who suspected COVID-19 lab leak: Report

Biden spy chiefs sidelined FBI, researchers who suspected COVID-19 lab leak: Report

According to a new report in the Wall Street Journal, spy chiefs prevented the FBI and Pentagon scientists from providing a counterpoint to their preferred COVID-19 origin theory at an important intelligence briefing in 2021.

There was a concerted effort by elements of the Biden administration and the scientific establishment during the pandemic to downplay the possibility that the COVID-19 virus originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where dangerous gain-of-function experiments were conducted on coronaviruses, sometimes with American funding.

While characterizing what was all along the most likely explanation as a conspiracy theory and in some cases censoring discussion of it online, the powers that be also did their best to suggest that a cross-species leap to humans was ultimately to blame. Official acceptance of this narrative would help shift blame for millions of deaths away from the communist Chinese regime, Peter Daszak’s debarred EcoHealth Alliance, and the numerous American federal agencies that were involved with radical experimentation at the epicenter of the pandemic.

According to the Journal, when it came time for the intelligence community to present its findings to President Joe Biden, spy chiefs excluded the FBI — which had concluded with “moderate confidence” that a lab leak was the likely cause — from its Aug. 24, 2021, briefing along with damning genomic analysis from Pentagon scientists, which again pointed to human error.

Jason Bannan, a microbiologist who worked as a scientist at the FBI for nearly 20 years, told the Journal that his superiors primed him for the August intelligence community briefing with Biden but that he was never given the opportunity to offer what would have apparently been a contrasting view to the zoonotic origins narrative ultimately pushed by the director of national intelligence, former CIA Deputy Director Avril Haines.

A report earlier this year from Michael Shellenberger’s investigative outfit, Public, indicated that the bureau possibly knew about a lab leak at the WIV as early as March 2020.

“The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan,” FBI Director Christopher Wray said in a February 2023 interview. “I will just make the observation that the Chinese government … has been doing its best to try to thwart and obfuscate the work here, the work that we’re doing, the work that our U.S. government and close foreign partners are doing. And that’s unfortunate for everybody.”

“Being the only agency that assessed that a laboratory origin was more likely, and the agency that expressed the highest level of confidence in its analysis of the source of the pandemic, we anticipated the FBI would be asked to attend the briefing,” said Bannan. “I find it surprising that the White House didn’t ask.”

The champions of the zoonotic origin theory may have wanted to limit the bureau’s presence at the briefing in order to maintain the credibility of their preferred narrative. After all, experts at the FBI apparently weren’t playing ball.

‘The scientists who had the subject matter expertise were silenced.’

The Journal indicated, for instance, that the National Intelligence Council prepared a chart for inclusion in its report to Biden that insinuated commonalities between the COVID-19 pandemic and past zoonotic outbreaks. However, FBI experts allegedly suggested that the chart betrayed a proper understanding of striking and critical differences between the new virus and past viruses, especially regarding their contagiousness.

Experts at the FBI also apparently ruffled feathers — particularly those of Adrienne Keen, a State Department official who served as a consultant to WHO but now works at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — by highlighting the thesis of a WIV scientist, Yu Ping, which indicated that the virus responsible for the pandemic was indigenous to the mountainous Yunnan province in the west of China. The trouble for proponents of the zoonotic origins theory was that the initial spread was not in Yunnan but nearly 1,000 miles away, in the neighborhood of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Hubei province.

The insights of scientists at the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency were similarly poorly received and ultimately glossed over.

The Journal noted that John Hardham, Robert Cutlip, and Jean-Paul Chretien, whose 2020 paper challenging the zoonotic origin claim was quarantined, conduced a genomic analysis that showed that the virus had undergone meddling in a lab.

The trio, working at the DIA’s National Center for Medical Intelligence, determined that the virus’ spike protein was not a product of evolution but of human engineering, made using techniques developed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and described in a 2008 paper — a telltale sign of gain-of-function experimentation.

Although the trio reportedly briefed their counterparts, including one of Bannan’s partners at the FBI, Hardham, Cutlip and Chretien were ordered by a superior at the Center for Medical Intelligence Center in July 2021 to cut the FBI off from further disclosures about their work.

In addition to having their work siloed, the National Intelligence Council’s briefing to the president reportedly excluded a number of the Pentagon scientists’ proposed edits.

While it appears there was a desire for narrative conformity, a spokeswoman for the director of national intelligence’s office suggested to the Journal that divergent viewpoints were fairly represented.

A source familiar with the investigation told the New York Post, “The scientists who had the subject matter expertise were silenced.”

The NIC report that Haines and two of her senior analysts presented to Biden in August ultimately concluded with “low confidence” that the virus was the result of a cross-species leap and “was probably not genetically engineered.”

“What ended up on the intelligence community’s cutting-room floor needs to be re-examined,” said Bannan.

The Journal suggested that politics was a factor in the approach taken to the competing theories both in Washingon, D.C., and in the scientific community. Then-President Donald Trump suggested in May 2020 that he had seen evidence that gave him a “high degree of confidence” that the virus originated in a Chinese lab.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID 2.0? New RSV shots are already harming babies
COVID-19
, ,

COVID 2.0? New RSV shots are already harming babies

I might not be a doctor, but as early as January 2022 — 16 months before the approval of the first RSV vaccine —
I warned that these shots could make children sicker from the virus. For decades, the industry failed to produce an RSV vaccine after an attempt in 1967 was terminated because it caused antibody-dependent disease enhancement.

Now, amid ongoing problems with
the first RSV vaccines from Pfizer and GSK, the FDA is acknowledging that Moderna’s mRNA version is causing severe RSV cases in children. It’s time for the incoming Department of Health and Human Services, along with state officials, to pull the plug on both RSV shots and mRNA vaccines of all kinds.

We have simply too much public information to sustain this deception any longer. The time for action on this long-standing failure is January 20, not a day later.

The
FDA reported last week at least five cases of severe or very severe RSV in infants who received Moderna’s new mRNA vaccine during a clinical trial. The Biden administration had already approved Pfizer’s and GSK’s senior RSV vaccines, Pfizer’s infant vaccine, and a monoclonal antibody treatment for young children — all of which have documented safety concerns. Earlier this year, the administration approved Moderna’s mRNA version (mRESVIA) for seniors.

However, the FDA has now revealed that enrollment of young children in clinical trials is “on hold for all clinical studies of RSV vaccine candidates” under U.S. investigational new drug protocols.

The clinical trial showed shocking results: “Severe illness was 26.3% in the vaccine groups compared with 8.3% in the placebo.” Talk about “the more you inject, the more you infect”! If there are so many problems with infants, why are we giving this shot to anyone — especially seniors, who are not at significant risk for RSV the way they are for flu or COVID?

Moderna used two versions of the vaccine in the clinical trial, and one of them, mRNA-1345 (mRESVIA), induced severe RSV in an infant. This same vaccine is now being administered to seniors.

Given the 60-year concern about enhanced disease, why are we continuing to push any RSV shots? Why are we continuing to approve mRNA vaccines after the documented issues with COVID shots? Why approve Pfizer’s RSV shot for pregnant women when GSK’s nearly identical version was
pulled from clinical trials after causing death and injury?

Finally, why are we promoting vaccines for respiratory viruses at all? COVID and flu have shown that respiratory viruses
do not respond well to blood-based antibodies and often cause immune imprinting, leading to a higher risk of infection in the long run.

These are straightforward questions any layman can understand, yet our medical experts remain stuck in ignorance — and greed.

Greater risk for babies

Pfizer’s and Moderna’s clinical trials for the COVID vaccine in toddlers
revealed that leaky respiratory viral vaccines tend to increase, not decrease, the risk of respiratory viruses. In Moderna’s trial of babies ages 6 to 23 months, researchers found a statistically significant increase in respiratory viruses within 28 days of vaccination.

For croup, 1.3% of mRNA-1273 recipients were infected, compared to just 0.3% of placebo recipients. For RSV, the infection rate was 0.8% for mRNA-1273 recipients and 0.5% for the placebo group. For pneumonia, 0.2% of mRNA-1273 recipients were affected, while no cases occurred in the placebo group.

In Moderna’s trial for children ages 2 to 5 years, 0.3% of participants developed pneumonia compared to none of the placebo recipients. For RSV, the rates were 0.4% for vaccinated children and less than 0.1% for the placebo group. In other words, young children in the vaccine group were
four times more likely to contract RSV within four weeks of the shot than those in the placebo group.

This trend persisted even among 6- to 11-year-olds, who are less susceptible to RSV. In that group, 0.3% of vaccine recipients experienced the illness compared to zero cases in the placebo group.

Pfizer’s children’s vaccine clinical trial for toddlers (
see page 51) also recorded serious adverse events, including RSV bronchiolitis (five participants), pneumonia (two participants), gastroenteritis (two participants), and lower respiratory tract infections (two participants).

Clearly, respiratory viral vaccines make individuals more vulnerable to RSV. Many people now avoid these vaccines, but the industry has adopted a clever marketing tactic: offering a monoclonal antibody as a prophylactic measure against RSV, alongside the GSK, Pfizer, and Moderna shots. Originally developed by AstraZeneca and now distributed by Sanofi, Beyfortus (nirsevimab) has been administered to newborns since last October. New mothers are convinced their babies could suddenly die from RSV, which may have originated in the 1950s through
polio vaccine research. According to the CDC, 40.5% of babies in America received Beyfortus during the last RSV season.

The FDA’s briefing document on Moderna’s clinical trial reported that the Moderna shot not only worsened the disease but also “blunted” Beyfortus’ efficacy in babies who received both. But what the report fails to disclose is that Beyfortus is as problematic as Moderna’s mRESVIA.

After hundreds of thousands of French babies received Beyfortus in 2023, Dr. Helen Banoun identified a
shocking and unexplained increase in infant deaths linked to the vaccine’s uptake. Banoun also highlighted the FDA’s own data, which shows — clearly and alarmingly — a much higher rate of deaths in the Beyfortus treatment group compared to the placebo. This data appears on page 70 of the Biologics License Application for Beyfortus, but it seems the manufacturers rely on no one reading it.

Other literature cited in the Banoun paper shows that children were getting sicker with respiratory illnesses, signaling immune imprinting and disease enhancement — negative efficacy against the very illness the vaccines are supposed to treat.

According to VAERS reports,
a baby boy died immediately after receiving the injection, and a baby girl was found unresponsive seven hours later. “Sudden infant death syndrome,” indeed.

What Trump can do

Moreover, the problem extends beyond the individuals receiving the vaccine. Dr. Peter McCullough has documented
growing evidence that these products may be creating super-resistant strains of RSV.

We cannot continue like this as a civilization. Continuing mass vaccination without immediate restrictions and research violates the principles of the pro-life movement, based on the available data. It also violates the Nuremberg Code on human experimentation.

To that end, Trump’s next HHS secretary would do well to implement the following policies regarding vaccines:

  • No shot should be marketed as a vaccine in any way if it is not proven to stop infection.
  • No shot should be approved without a full placebo group that is kept permanently to study long-term differences with the trial group.
  • No shot should be approved unless it shows an all-cause mortality benefit over time and most certainly cannot show more deaths in the trial group.
  • No shot should be approved for one age group when there are clear safety signals in other age groups, unless it can be proven that those safety issues do not apply to the targeted cohort. For example, even after the FDA admitted that RSV shots caused Guillain-Barré syndrome and walked back its approval for people over 60, the agency still recommends the shots for people over 75.
  • No mRNA shots whatsoever.
  • No shot should be approved without oncogenicity, genotoxicity, or long-term safety studies, none of which were conducted with any of the RSV shots.

This issue is no longer just about COVID or Operation Warp Speed. The RSV vaccine approvals were conducted openly, despite known problems with these shots from day one — just like in 1967. They didn’t even need to rely on emergency use authorization.

We have simply too much public information to sustain this deception any longer. The time for action on this long-standing failure is January 20, not a day later.

Read More
‘Preposterous’: Biden admin extends liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers
COVID-19
,

‘Preposterous’: Biden admin extends liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers

The Biden Department of Health and Human Services has extended liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and administrators through Dec. 31, 2029, precluding vaccine recipients who reportedly end up injured or their surviving family members from holding those responsible to account.

Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense,
called the decision from the outgoing administration “very concerning,” not only because it protects pharmaceutical companies and the government but because it “allows for largely unfettered product development.”

Health Secretary Xavier Becerra
suggested in his declaration that continued coverage for the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration, and use of FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act “is intended to prepare for and mitigate the credible risk presented by COVID-19.”

Although the federal public health emergency for COVID-19
expired on May 11, 2023, and the virus has reportedly moved from a pandemic to the endemic phase, Becerra suggested that COVID-19 continues to both “present a credible risk of a future public health emergency” and “cause significant serious illness, morbidity, and mortality during outbreaks.” Citing these supposed risks, he suggested that it was necessary to renew liability protection to ensure the continued development and stockpiling of vaccines.

‘The only threat is a loss of air-tight liability that leaves the vast majority of victims out of luck.’

The Congressional Research Service
previously noted that under the HHS declaration, covered persons in most cases cannot be sued for losses — including death, physical or mental injury, and business interruption loss — relating to the use or administration of COVID-19 vaccines.

The
sole exception to PREP Act immunity is for death or serious physical injury caused by “willful misconduct.” To qualify as willful misconduct, the covered person must have “acted (i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose; (ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and (iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.”

The liability protections for the COVID-19 vaccines were first introduced in January 2020. This is the 12th extension.

Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland suggested the Biden administration was “attempting to tie the hands of the incoming administration in its treatment of emergencies and pandemics. This is not the way elections and transfer of power are supposed to work.”

Ray Flores, who serves as senior outside counsel for Kennedy’s organization,
told the Defender, “It is preposterous that HHS extended PREP Act protections based on a no-longer-existing threat. The only threat is a loss of air-tight liability that leaves the vast majority of victims out of luck.”

Bloomberg Law
reported that Becerra’s declaration comes amid calls for COVID-19 vaccines to be covered under the HHS’ Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. In its notice, the HHS indicated that Americans injured by COVID-19 vaccines will still be unable to seek compensation through the VICP.

COVID-19 vaccines are instead covered “countermeasures” under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. The PREP Act authorizes the CICP to provide some compensation to individuals who suffered serious physical injury as the direct result of the supposedly “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccines.

COVID-19 vaccines have reportedly been shown in some cases to cause significant harm.

A study published January in the pharmacotherapy journal Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
indicated that “COVID-19 vaccination is strongly associated with a serious adverse safety signal of myocarditis, particularly in children and young adults resulting in hospitalization and death.”

In addition to noting the
well-documented correlation between the COVID-19 vaccines and increased risk of heart conditions, a study conducted by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project — a Global Vaccine Data Network initiative supported by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the HHS — and published February in the journal Vaccine detailed troubling links between the AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer vaccines and medical conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, brain and spinal cord inflammation, Bell’s palsy, and convulsions.

Despite suggesting vaccinations were still worthwhile, a 2023 study published in the Elsevier Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
noted that “a survey has found that 65% of participants experience adverse reactions.”

As of Nov. 1, 13,520 claims were
filed with the CIPC. Of the 3,438 decisions made so far, only 65 claims were found eligible for compensation. Of that number, only 18 claims were compensated.

The claims cited a wide range of injuries, including blood clots, strokes, and heart attacks. There were also 671 claims stating the COVID-19 vaccines resulted in death.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Democrat Bob Casey finally concedes Senate election to McCormick after trying to count illegal votes in Pennsylvania
Elections

Democrat Bob Casey finally concedes Senate election to McCormick after trying to count illegal votes in Pennsylvania

The contentious campaign for one of Pennsylvania’s seats in the U.S. Senate is finally over after Democratic incumbent Bob Casey called Republican challenger Dave McCormick to concede.

Republicans accused election officials in several Pennsylvania counties of trying to subvert the election by illegally counting votes in the recount. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court sided with Republicans, but some officials indicated that they would ignore the ruling and continue.

‘When a Pennsylvanian takes the time to cast a legal vote, often waiting in long lines and taking time away from their work and family, they deserve to know that their vote will count. That’s democracy.’

On Thursday, 16 days after Election Day, Casey conceded the election.

“I just called Dave McCormick to congratulate him on his election to represent Pennsylvania in the United States Senate. As the first count of ballots is completed, Pennsylvanians can move forward with the knowledge that their voices were heard, whether their vote was the first to be counted or the last,” he said in a video posted to social media.

McCormick issued a brief response.

“Senator Bob Casey dedicated his career to bettering our commonwealth. Dina and I want to extend our sincere gratitude to Senator Casey, Terese, and their family for their decades of service, hard work, and personal sacrifice,” he said.

The official count of votes gave McCormick a lead of about 16,000 votes over Casey, which added up to a margin of just under .5%. That narrowly fell within the cutoff point for a recount, though critics said it was unlikely to overturn the official results given historical trends.

“When a Pennsylvanian takes the time to cast a legal vote, often waiting in long lines and taking time away from their work and family, they deserve to know that their vote will count. That’s democracy,” Casey concluded.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee had called Casey’s attorney in the matter a “scumbag” as the controversy continued.

The seat will give Republicans a 53-47 majority in the next session of the U.S. Senate.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Dems hatch scheme to shoehorn Kamala Harris into presidency despite losing election — if Biden has the courage
Elections

Dems hatch scheme to shoehorn Kamala Harris into presidency despite losing election — if Biden has the courage

Democrats and other pro-Harris supporters began floating a scheme intended to temporarily insert Vice President Kamala Harris into the Oval Office just to make history and ruin Trump merchandise sales.

‘Generation participation-trophy has reached adulthood & still wants a prize.’

NewsNation contributor Kurt Bardella argued that President Joe Biden should resign and allow Harris to take over presidential duties until Trump’s second inauguration in January.

“I think if you’re President Joe Biden, there’s nothing left to run for. There’s nothing left to really do. Pardon your son, then resign and elevate Kamala Harris to the presidency and make one more mark in the history books while you can,” said Bardella to a NewsNation panel.

“If I were Joe Biden, that’s exactly what I would do,” he added. “Again, you have a very short runway left of being relevant and being able to make your mark in a historic way. Why not do it that way?”

“You know, it’s not the craziest thing I’ve ever heard,” responded Mick Mulvaney, the former acting White House chief of staff under Trump.

Others on social media were also pushing the idea that Harris should be allowed to be called the 47th president of the U.S. even if it were only to be on an temporary basis.

“Biden should resign so Harris becomes 47 and Donald has to throw out all his 47 swag,” read one viral tweet that garnered over 4.1 million views.

“President Biden should resign as an act of protest tomorrow so Kamala Harris could be sworn in as the first female president until January. That would make Trump 48 and ruin that stupid hat of his. Can we get this trending,” wrote an activist account.

“Since we’re never ever going to see a brown person or a woman nominated for President ever again, Biden should resign tomorrow and give Kamala Harris and us a bit of history for the next two months,” read another comment.

Still others mocked what would amount to be a presidential participation trophy.

“‘Let the child win.’ For her self-esteem. The ultimate in insulting DEI infantilization of a world leader,” responded Christopher Bedford, Blaze Media Washington correspondent.

“Generation participation-trophy has reached adulthood & still wants a prize,” he added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Pennsylvania officials silent over election integrity concerns
Elections

Pennsylvania officials silent over election integrity concerns

Former President Donald Trump won a lawsuit in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, alongside the Republican National Committee on Wednesday after law enforcement turned voters away from mail-in voter registration before the original deadline lapsed. As a result, the state ruled in favor of Trump and extended the deadline to request a mail-in ballot from Oct. 29 to Nov. 1.

Although this was a victory for the Trump camp as well as for voters, Pennsylvania officials have stayed silent on how this was able to happen in the first place.

Shapiro was quick to criticize Trump, who he said has ‘attacked our elections over and over,’ but has remained silent following the verdict, failing to clarify whether there will be any investigation into the individuals who violated the Pennsylvania election code.

“Pennsylvania is cheating, and getting caught, at large scale levels rarely seen before,” Trump said ahead of the ruling. “REPORT CHEATING TO AUTHORITIES. Law Enforcement must act, NOW!”

Prior to the ruling, Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro responded to Trump’s claim, saying he is just trying to “stoke chaos” ahead of the election.

“Republican and Democratic clerks of elections are doing their jobs here in Pennsylvania — and together with law enforcement, they’re making sure only eligible voters are able to register and vote,” Shapiro said in a post on X before the ruling.

“He’s now trying to use the same playbook to stoke chaos, but hear me on this: we will again have a free and fair, safe and secure election — and the will of the people will be respected,” Shapiro continued.

Shapiro was quick to criticize Trump, who he said has “attacked our elections over and over,” but has remained silent following the verdict, failing to clarify whether there will be any investigation into whether individuals violated the Pennsylvania election code.

Blaze News reached out to officials like Shapiro, as well as Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmitt, Attorney General Michelle Henry, the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Bucks County Deputy Director of Communications James O’Malley, and Director of Policy and Communications Eric Nagy.

As of this writing, none of them have responded to a request for comment from Blaze News.

“This is illegal, and [Shapiro] should do something about operatives in his own party depriving people of their right to vote,” Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, said Thursday of the allegations. “If he doesn’t, he is complicit in voter fraud.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More