Sunday, December 22, 2024

conspiracy resource

Conspiracy News & Views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

Elections

Judge sets date for Trump sentencing after the election to avoid appearance of tampering

Former President Donald Trump chalked up another victory in court after Judge Juan Merchan said he would postpone his sentencing until after the election to avoid an appearance of tampering.

Critics hoped that the former president would face sentencing ahead of the election so that it could be used as a cudgel to beat down his supporters.

‘As mandated by the United States Supreme Court, this case, along with all the other Harris-Biden hoaxes, should be dismissed.’

Merchan agreed in a four-page decision to the request from Trump’s attorneys on Friday.

“Adjourning decision on the motion and sentencing, if such is required, should dispel any suggestion that the Court will have issued any decision or imposed sentence either to give an advantage to, or to create a disadvantage for, any political party and or any candidate for any office,” he wrote.

The former president had been convicted of falsifying business records about a hush payment made to adult film worker Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election. Sentencing in the trial had been delayed for months as Trump’s attorneys argued that a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity meant the convictions should be dismissed.

“There should be no sentencing in the Manhattan DA’s election interference witch hunt,” said Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign. “As mandated by the United States Supreme Court, this case, along with all the other Harris-Biden hoaxes, should be dismissed.”

Merchan went on to note the historical nature of the case and the difficulty in respecting the constitutional rights on all sides of the legal process.

“The members of this jury served diligently on this case, and their verdict must be respected and addressed in a manner that is not diluted by the enormity of the upcoming presidential election,” he concluded. “Likewise, if one is necessary, the Defendant has the right to a sentencing hearing that respects and protects his constitutional rights.”


Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox.
Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

Blaze News investigates: Dems’ election shenanigans facing death by 1,000 cuts

With Election Day 2024 just around the corner and Election Day 2020 still clearly visible in the rearview mirror, a large segment of the Republican voter base may worry that Democrats will once again engage in shady election maneuvers this fall to ensure that their candidates are placed in office.

To those voters fretting about possible election shenanigans, Blaze News brings you good news. Since the 2020 election was called for Joe Biden, right-leaning officials, groups, and advocates have scored dozens of state-level victories regarding election integrity that are sure to give confidence to Republican voters across the fruited plain.

As Cleta Mitchell, senior legal fellow at the Conservative Partnership Institute, told Blaze News: “We are light-years ahead of where we were four years ago at this time.”

In the following sections, Blaze News will explain in detail just some of these victories that have occurred in the key swing states that will likely decide the 2024 election. A summary of other important victories regarding ballot harvesting and so-called “Zuckerbucks” can be read
here as well.

Pennsylvania: Signatures, dates, and counting the voters

By all accounts, whoever wins the Keystone State and its 19 electoral votes is highly likely to win the Electoral College and the presidency, making Pennsylvania ground zero for both former President Donald Trump and border czar Kamala Harris.

In the 2020 election, some Pennsylvania officials alleged voter irregularities, while Biden’s official margin of victory was just
80,000. Between the alleged irregularities and the more than 10,000 ballots that arrived after Election Day that year, reasonable people were right to question the system.

Since that time, at least two major developments could bolster voters’ confidence in the accuracy of the final tally.

The first involves the Philadelphia area only. As the largest city in the state and the sixth-largest city in the country, Philadelphia contributes a sizeable portion of the state’s overall vote totals each election.

Prior to November 2022, the Philadelphia election board did not necessarily follow through with poll book reconciliation, a process of ensuring that those who voted in person had not already cast a ballot by mail. Opponents of mandatory poll book reconciliation argued that such an auditing process unnecessarily
delayed reporting election results.

But on Election Day 2022, the Philadelphia board voted 2-1 to reinstate poll book reconciliation, likely because the board faced further litigation from groups like
RITE — Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections — if it refused. The board’s vote may not have impacted the 2022 election, but according to Derek Lyons, president and CEO of RITE, it certainly will be in effect going forward and will prevent people in a heavily Democratic area of Pennsylvania from “voting twice.”

“Whether it’s maliciously done because they’re trying to have two votes count or for any other reason, whether they’ve forgotten that they sent a mail-in ballot in or whatever, you have to check,” he told Blaze News.

‘Even second-graders know how to write the date on their schoolwork, so every adult voter can do likewise on their ballot envelope.’

Another new election rule that could be enforced in Pennsylvania this year relates to the entire state. In 2020, mail-in ballots with missing or incomplete information on the outer envelope were still counted.

If groups like RITE ultimately have their way, that will no longer be the case.

In the last couple of years, RITE has fought in the courts for a new law that requires the outer envelopes of all mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania to be signed and dated appropriately. Just one week before Election Day
2022, the state supreme court ruled that incorrectly dated ballots could not be counted in the final vote tally.

This year, to make this relatively easy process even easier, the outer envelopes will come with the
full year already printed on them, limiting the chances that voters can err when writing the date and thereby render their ballots invalid.

A
state website that gives step-by-step instructions on how to fill out a mail-in ballot for the 2024 election also explicitly warns those who choose to vote by mail that their “ballot will not be counted” unless they “sign and write the current date on the voter’s declaration on the outside of the outer return envelope.”


Screenshot of Pennsylvania government website

Derek Lyons of RITE explained to Blaze News that this law helps ensure that the ballot is coming from the voter to whom it was sent and that it’s being returned by an eligible voter who was eligible to vote at the time the voter marked that ballot.

In March, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled in favor of upholding the law.

Unfortunately, in late August, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court voted 8-1 to block enforcement of it. Judge Ellen Ceisler, who wrote on behalf of the majority, referred to incorrect dates as “meaningless and inconsequential paperwork errors” that should not prevent otherwise legitimate ballots from being counted.

Lyons claimed that the commonwealth court had no jurisdiction over the matter but had nevertheless rendered an “absurd” ruling that treats Pennsylvania voters like children.

“Let’s be clear: Even second-graders know how to write the date on their schoolwork, so every adult voter can do likewise on their ballot envelope with no trouble whatsoever. Next, we will find out that asking people to mark their own ballots is also a constitutional violation,” Lyons told Blaze News in a statement.

The case will now almost assuredly go before the state supreme court for a final decision before Election Day 2024. Should the court rule at the 11th hour as it did in 2022, the ruling could still apply to the 2024 election and could give greater public confidence in the result.

Wisconsin: Careless and indecisive absentee voters

Wisconsin, with 10 electoral votes, is another state likely to tip the electoral scales toward either Trump or Harris. Despite a state supreme court that now leans liberal, the state has put in place two significant changes that will likely instill confidence in the results of its elections.

Such sudden changes of heart may, in some cases, have been prompted by ‘ballot harvesters or activists.’

In previous elections, including 2020, Wisconsin county clerks were legally permitted to make minor changes to information on the envelopes carrying absentee ballots to prevent those ballots from being rejected. Those minor changes included filling in missing or incomplete addresses, Lyons told Blaze News.

Not any more. Clerks may no longer interfere with the
information on the envelope but only “assess” it, Lyons claimed. “If the address is sufficiently complete,” then the ballot will count, he said. “If it’s not, then it doesn’t count.”

If time permits, clerks may return apparently spoiled mail-in ballots to the voter to correct and resubmit, per
state statute.

Wisconsin has also dispensed with a process Lyons referred to as “re-voting.” In such cases, voters who previously submitted valid ballots but who changed their minds before Election Day could ask their county clerks to find and destroy their ballots so that they might cast new ballots.

Lyons indicated to Blaze News that such sudden changes of heart may, in some cases, have been prompted by “ballot harvesters or activists.”

But even in cases in which voters realize they accidentally made “a mistake” or learn that “someone tampered with” their ballots, state law gives clerks “no authority … to return the ballot or spoil it for the voter[s]” who want to change their vote, a Waukesha County circuit court
ruled in November.

In other words, Wisconsin voters who submit ballots without all the necessary information on the outward envelopes may still have an opportunity to correct the information and resubmit. Those who cast ballots and then later have misgivings may not.

Such seemingly small changes will result in a more trustworthy result in 2024 and will continue to assist with election integrity in future elections as well, Cleta Mitchell of the Conservative Partnership Institute told Blaze News.

“We didn’t end up with the problems in the election systems overnight, and it won’t be reclaimed overnight — because the massive left-wing election advocacy machine fights every step of the way as we try to strengthen accountability, transparency, and legal compliance,” she said.

Nevertheless, “all these changes are important,” she added, “and each has an important impact on the process.”

New Hampshire: Voter ID and same-day registration

New Hampshire has flown under the radar for many Republicans keeping watch on 2024 election polls, especially since the state has not voted to elect a Republican president since
George W. Bush in 2000.

‘If you are issued an affidavit ballot letter and do not provide the Secretary of State with proof of identity within 7 days, your ballot will be retrieved and your votes subtracted from the election results.’

However, in a race as
tight as 2024 is expected to be, the state’s four electoral votes will likely have an outsized impact on the results of the Electoral College. The state’s new voter ID requirements will likely ensure that only eligible voters cast ballots.

New Hampshire is one of 22 states now offering same-day voter registration in some form, a convenient policy for prospective voters but one that could be exploited by bad actors. Previously, same-day registrants in the Granite State needed only to sign under penalty of perjury that they were who they said they were and lived where they said they lived, no documentation required.

The state now requires voters who register on Election Day to show proof of their identity and their residence. If they do not have proper documentation with them on Election Day, they will cast an “affidavit ballot.” They then have seven days to submit documentation to the secretary of state’s office and will even receive a pre-addressed envelope with postage already paid to better facilitate the process.

Those who fail to follow those simple steps will not have their votes counted.

“If you are issued an affidavit ballot letter and do not provide the Secretary of State with proof of identity within 7 days, your ballot will be retrieved and your votes subtracted from the election results,” said
state guidance issued November 28, 2023.

Lyons noted that while the issue is still pending before the state supreme court, he believes that the law will ultimately “prevail at the Supreme Court level as well,” despite ruthless efforts by Marc Elias, perhaps the Democrats’ most formidable election attorney.

“This law has been attacked by Marc Elias, who we defeated,” Lyons explained. “And then the DNC came in and attacked the law, and we defeated them as well.”

Republican state Rep. Mike Belcher is likewise encouraged about the new rules about voter identification. “Voter ID laws are a critical step in securing elections and creating confidence in outcomes,” he said in a statement to Blaze News. “In these days of increased security risks, I hope we continue to look for further solutions and improvements.”

Elias did not respond to Blaze News’ request for comment.

Voter rolls: ‘Ground zero’ for election integrity

Other areas around the country, including the Commonwealth of Virginia and Clark County, Nevada, have recently cleaned up their voting rolls, perhaps the first line of defense against voter fraud.

Following efforts initiated by Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s administration, officials in Virginia removed from their rolls more than 6,000 noncitizens and nearly 80,000 voters who are now deceased, as
Blaze News previously reported.

‘Election administrators have been conditioned not to conduct proper voter roll maintenance.’

Virginia has not voted for a Republican president since George W. Bush in 2004, and current polling indicates that Harris has just a four-point lead there.

However, the
RealClearPolitics polling average for Virginia covers only until August 16, more than a week before Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dropped out of the race and threw his support to Trump, and the most recent poll had Harris’ lead down to just three points, well within the margin of error.

Nevada, which also hasn’t gone Republican since 2004, looks more promising for Trump, who has tied with or led Harris narrowly in recent polls, according to
RCP. Clark County, Nevada, the home of Las Vegas, is the most populous county in the state.

It also happens to be the most
Democratic.

Last month, local officials removed nearly
100,000 names from the Clark County voter rolls, a massive number considering the county has just over 2.3 million residents. The Nevada Republican Party took credit for the move, which Cleta Mitchell described as “impressive.”

Moreover, the state issues a live ballot to every registered voter, Mitchell added. In other words, but for this voter-roll clean-up, as many as 100,000 live ballots may have floated about Clark County in 2024 with no actual or valid recipient, opening the door for voter fraud.

“It is vital that the voter rolls be maintained, and it is required under both state and federal law — but election administrators have been conditioned not to conduct proper voter roll maintenance,” Mitchell insisted.

“The voter rolls are ground zero for protecting the integrity of the elections.”

Another key swing state, Michigan, has not been so proactive about cleaning its voter rolls. In fact, the RNC recently filed a lawsuit against Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson because 53 of the state’s 83 counties allegedly have more actively registered voters than they have residents 18 years of age or older, according to the
Detroit Free Press.

Benson’s office “undermines the integrity of elections by increasing the opportunity for ineligible voters or voters intent on fraud to cast ballots,” asserted the lawsuit filed in May.

Benson called the lawsuit a Republican “PR campaign” and insisted her office had “canceled more than 700,000 voter registrations and identified an additional 520,000 slated for cancellation in 2025.” For now, the lawsuit remains pending.

Other concerns and reasons for hope

Since the Biden-Harris administration took office in January 2021, the U.S. southern border has been overrun with illegal immigrants who have since dispersed to densely populated areas like New York City and Boston as well as purple states like Nevada and Michigan.

What’s more, applicants for a new driver’s license in Michigan — including immigrants claiming asylum — may automatically be registered to vote. The 2019
application for a Michigan driver’s license indicated that an applicant would be registered to vote unless the applicant deliberately checked a particular box:


Screenshot of government document

The
state website does not currently offer this form online, so it is difficult to compare the 2019 application against a more current version. However, at least one online fillable form entitled 2019-2024 MI Form DE-36 suggests that the document has not changed in the last five years.

Since some Michigan officials have gone
out of their way to assist alleged refugees with acquiring a state driver’s license, many Michiganders worry that these same alleged refugees will end up casting ballots in November and possibly affect the outcome of the election.

Benson has promised to “prosecute” anyone who votes without eligibility, and many left-wing outlets dismiss concerns about noncitizens voting since neither Michigan law nor federal law permits them to do so.

Of course, noncitizens are not
legally permitted to vote. Whether they actually do is another story.

Despite insults and harassment from the left, ‘thousands of citizens’ have joined the election-integrity movement … ‘and we are making a difference everywhere.’

Cleta Mitchell agreed that the issue should “alarm” all Americans of goodwill, and her organization, the Conservative Partnership Institute, has already designated September 15-20 to be National Only Citizens Vote Week to draw attention to it.

America First Legal, which has strong ties to Donald Trump, has also identified legal grounds by which states may check the legal status of any voter if there are “any reliable indicators that a voter may not be a U.S. citizen.”

Under AFL’s suggested “plan,” states will submit requests to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to verify the citizenship status of registered voters whose citizenship remains in doubt. States are permitted to make such requests under Sections 1373 and 1644 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, AFL argues.

AFL has already sued all 15 counties in Arizona for allegedly failing to purge foreign nationals from their voter rolls. In the lawsuit, AFL suggested that Arizona recorders implement this “plan” to ensure that in their respective counties, only U.S. citizens are registered to vote.

Executive director Gene Hamilton assured Blaze News that even though no one has yet implemented AFL’s “plan,” it is a practical solution for even populous states like California and New York. “It’s something that provides for the opportunity to do further inquiry,” Hamilton explained.

In late June, AFL sent a
letter detailing the plan to all 50 states. In the weeks since, the organization has already received promising feedback.

Hamilton also encouraged people who believe their state leaders have not effectively addressed the issue of noncitizens voting to remind them about the AFL plan.

“If your state or county officials have not used this method that we have identified of accessing citizenship and alien information about folks in their community, then they have not done everything in their power,” he claimed.

In addition to the looming threat of noncitizens affecting the outcome of American elections, many of these victories remain tied up in the courts, and some final rulings could favor Democrats — because Democrats like Marc Elias never stop fighting.

The good news is that unlike previous years, Republicans have begun to fight back in earnest and have even begun to involve themselves at the state and local levels.

“Many election integrity advocates have become election law experts and have gotten involved as members of election boards in the states — which is why Marc Elias and company want to strip the electoral boards of their authority to certify elections,” Mitchell told Blaze News.

Despite insults and harassment from the left, “thousands of citizens” have joined the election-integrity movement, she continued, “and we are making a difference everywhere.”

Democrats may also eventually run afoul of voters for so consistently and relentlessly attacking even the most modest proposals regarding election integrity. As Lyons explained to Blaze News, cheating in elections should not be just hard. For people to trust their elections, they must
believe that cheating in elections is hard.

“Faith in the institution as important as elections should not be taken for granted.”

With winds in their sails, Mitchell, Derek Lyons of RITE, and Hamilton all believe that, despite the apparent shenanigans from Democrats, Republicans still control their own destiny in November.

“We must all do everything we can — volunteer to be poll observers, sign up to make sure only citizens vote — and then we must vote. If we care about America, that is the only option we have. It is vital. No excuses accepted or acceptable,” Mitchell told Blaze News.

“The election is the opportunity that people of the state of Michigan, the state of Pennsylvania have to speak,” Lyons said, “and I don’t think anybody should forgo that opportunity because they have some concerns about certain aspects of election administration.”

“There is a way. Where is the will?” Hamilton added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

CNN brings ‘Reliable Sources’ host Brian Stelter out of exile. Here are his top 3 unreliable moments.

Billionaire John Malone, now a Warner Bros. Discovery shareholder with major sway,
told CNBC several months ahead of Discovery’s 2022 merger with WarnerMedia, “I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing.”

During his brief stint as CEO at CNN, Chris Licht appeared keen to realize this dream. The company
announced in August 2022 that it was canceling “Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter” and canning its host.

After spending some time soul-searching and concern-mongering about so-called disinformation behind the scenes at Apple, at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, and in guest spots on other cable news shows, Stelter will return to CNN just in time for the election.

Stelter
announced Tuesday on X, “I’m returning to @CNN in a brand new role as Chief Media Analyst. I’ll be appearing on TV, developing digital content, and once again helming the Reliable Sources newsletter.”

While various personalities in the news media ecosystem have celebrated Stelter’s return, some critics have alternatively issued reminders about his track record for less-than-reliable reporting.

Here are three instances in which Stelter prioritized narrative over facts.

Hunter Biden laptop story

Less than a month ahead of the 2020 election, the New York Post
reported about the damning contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop and raised various questions about then-candidate Joe Biden, especially about his shady ties to Ukraine.

Elements of the intelligence community hostile to President Donald Trump —
including active CIA contractors — swooped in to shield Biden in the final weeks before the election, releasing a public letter on Oct. 19, 2020, asserting that the Hunter Biden laptop story had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation” intended to hurt the Democrat’s candidacy.

Facebook under Mark Zuckerberg
censored the corresponding post online.

Stelter dutifully did his part, insinuating that the accurate report published in the paper founded by Alexander Hamilton, censored by Big Tech, and maligned by a cabal of spies was “fake.”

“So let’s take a look at how a storyline is manufactured,” Stelter
said at the time. “In this case, a loudly anti-Biden storyline, redounding to Trump’s benefit. First, it helps to really view this as story-telling — not so much as news coverage but as political entertainment.”

‘That’s misinformation that you’re spreading on my program.’

Writing off the Post’s censored story as political entertainment, Stelter reassured his viewers that Hunter Biden “has already apologized — well, he’s already admitted to poor judgment” and that Joe Biden “has said it would not happen again.”

After alluding to a previous CNN report that suggested the published emails might be “tied to [a] Russian disinformation effort targeting Biden,” Stelter characterized as outlandish the possibility Hunter Biden might have left an incriminating laptop at a Delaware computer shop.

Stelter said:

The Post claimed that the emails were found on a laptop computer that was brought to a computer shop in Delaware in the spring of 2019; that a shop employee saw the emails and then was worried about getting in trouble or getting in danger, and he made copies of them. There is a lot about this story that does not add up.

“For all we know, these emails are made up,” said the then-CNN host. “But we do know that this is a classic example of the right-wing media machine.”

Steele dossier

Jerry Dunleavy, a former senior investigator for House Republicans on the Foreign Affairs Committee, recently
highlighted an instance in 2017 in which Stelter accused then-White House senior advisor Kellyanne Conway of spreading “misinformation” on his show after she criticized CNN’s obsession with the Steele dossier.

Blaze News
previously reported that the Steele dossier was paid for by Democratic operatives who hired research firm Fusion GPS, which then retained former British spy Christopher Steele, who in turn curated the documents of uncorroborated claims about Trump.

“We’ve got multiple investigations through [special counsel Robert] Mueller, through congressional and Senate committees, and CNN itself has been so hot on Russia, Russia, Russia — on the dossier,” said Conway. “CNN’s been obsessed with this dossier over a year now. And now that we know the
DNC and Clinton campaign paid the same firm for said dossier, which is completely unverified, we can’t get you excited.”

Stelter pounced on Conway,
saying, “That’s misinformation that you’re spreading on my program, and I don’t appreciate it.”

“Pieces of the dossier have been verified, and when you say it’s unverified, you actually mislead the American people,” said Stelter.

Stelter had a similar encounter with conservative radio show host Hugh Hewitt
detailed by the Washington Examiner in September 2020

“The primary subsource of the dossier was revealed last week to be a Russian agent investigated by the Obama Department of Justice in 2009 and ’10. The dossier is discredited. There was no collusion. These are factual matters. That’s my problem with ‘Hoax,'” Hewitt told Stelter, referencing the CNN host’s book.

“I’m reflecting, I’m a media reporter, and I’m not a Steele dossier reporter,” said Stelter. “What I know is that when you use the word ‘hoax’ over and over again the way the president has, it’s dangerous and poisonous because it makes people think there’s nothing real and nothing true anymore. And that’s what I think the problem is.”

Vaccine skepticism

Like countless other talking heads on cable news, Brian Stelter would not tolerate criticism of experimental COVID-19 vaccines during and after the pandemic.

‘He’s clearly not responsible enough to have a show that purports or pretends to be news.’

In a May 2021 monologue, Stelter said, “I’ve heard Tucker Carlson repeatedly say that many Americans are dying after getting the [COVID] shot. And he says it with the implication that the shots are to blame with no evidence at all. He’s scaring his audience so recklessly.”

Stelter ran a clip showing Carlson criticize mandatory vaccinations and coercive medicine.

“Carlson acts like he knows some secret truth that’s been covered up by some shadowy enterprise,” said Stelter, around the same time the Biden-Harris administration was
pressuring social media companies to censor vaccine criticism — censorship Stelter appears to have defended on another occasion.

“Maybe you should be writing some junk movie of the week for Netflix or Tubi. Maybe you should go write horror novels for a living, because he’s clearly not responsible enough to have a show that purports or pretends to be news.”

Stelter’s comments have aged poorly. After all, at least one vaccine company
has admitted its product can cause deadly blood clots. The vaccines Stelter appeared desperate to defend from criticism have also been linked to various ailments, including heart disease, blood clots, hemorrhages, gut issues, thromboses, myocarditis, pericarditis, and autoimmune diseases

Dutch researchers
noted in a recent peer-reviewed study in BMJ Public Health about how vaccines and containment protocols likely boosted excess mortality that: “Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World, such as VAERS in the USA, EudraVigilance in the European Union and Yellow Card Scheme in the UK.”

Months after Stelter suggested that Carlson was not booking the right people or seeking the right answers, he ran a segment with a censor from a Biden-allied narrative curation outfit discussing “how ‘do your own research’ leads to misinformation.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

Michigan’s leftist secretary of state warns local officials to certify election results or else: Video

In a new video, Jocelyn Benson, the leftist Democratic secretary of state in Michigan, warned local officials to certify election results, mocked those suspicious of government narratives, and billed the government as the arbiter of truth.

Earlier this month, Benson partnered with the Recount for a video in which Benson responded to a series of “angry election tweets.” The Recount is a “far-left” outlet, according to the Midwesterner, and its website offers the tagline “No bulls**t. No bad faith. And no time wasted.”

‘She’d be much more at home in Nazi Germany.’

In the Recount video, Benson addressed a number of issues social media users mentioned online. One X user identified as Joan Crawford’s eyebrows asked about county officials in Michigan who may not “want to certify” election results. Benson was clear: They don’t have a choice.

“If someone were to violate the law and not certify the election at the local level, we will come for you,” Benson said as she stared into the camera.

“So any local certifier thinking of skirting the law and not certifying the vote, don’t even think about it, because we’ll get you.”

She pointed to issues in 2020 in Wayne County, where the city of Detroit is located, claiming that officials there had been “pressured” not to certify the results.

In response to a request for comment from Blaze News, Republican state Sen. Jim Runestad likewise referenced the issues in Wayne County in 2020 and claimed that the county’s results were never “lawfully certified” after “71% of Detroit’s absentee voter counting boards were found to be ‘unbalanced.'”

“Under current law, if a local board of canvassers does not certify the results, they are not imprisoned,” Runestad continued in a statement to Blaze News. “Instead, all election records are forwarded to the state board of canvassers, who then investigate and make the necessary determinations. After these determinations, the county canvassers are given the chance to certify based on the ‘corrected returns.'”

In addition to threatening to possibly prosecute local election officials, Benson repeatedly mocked people who recoiled at efforts by Michigan executive officials such as herself and Attorney General Dana Nessel to limit so-called misinformation regarding elections.

When a user named Winchester Colt expressed concerns about Benson allegedly trying to “shut people up if they don’t conform to the official State narrative,” Benson seemed bewildered at the notion of a “state narrative” and joked, “I’m not sure what Winchester Colt had for breakfast.”

But just moments after waxing ignorant about state narratives, Benson encouraged listeners to “let us know” about any “misinformation about our elections.”

“That [way] we can correct it and help you get trusted information out there. Bottom line is we want everyone to to know where to find out trusted information about our elections … so that we can protect voters from being fooled by lies about our elections processes.”

Benson made a similar response to another user, Donnie Detroit, who took issue with Benson’s recent attempts to convince Michiganders to “rat out their neighbors” for failing to adhere to “government sponsored truth.”

“There’s not government-sponsored truth,” she insisted dismissively. “There’s just the truth.”

Yet, just a few seconds later, Benson asserted that the most “trustworthy source of information is going to be your local election official every time.”

Despite presenting government as the best source for election truth, Benson still appeared surprised that Donnie Detroit denounced her obsession with people’s thoughts and statements about elections and hinted that he had unfairly made her sound like a “terrible person.”

“Ooh, that sure sounds awful,” she said.

In response to a request for comment, Donnie Detroit noted to Blaze News that Benson never defines misinformation in the video but nevertheless “warns there’s lots of it out there.” He characterized such actions as “reminiscent … of the DDR Stasi.”

“Benson is in the wrong country. She’d be much more at home in Nazi Germany or in the East German’s Stasi,” he continued.

As Blaze News previously reported, Benson has requested that Michiganders report “misleading or inaccurate information regarding voting or elections in Michigan” to the ominous email address Misinformation@Michigan.gov.

The entire Recount video featuring Benson can be seen here. It lasts approximately 13 and a half minutes. The segment about warning county election officials begins around the 3:40 mark.

H/T: Chuck Callesto

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

MSNBC’s Ari Melber locks down his X account after falsely accusing Corey Lewandowski of misquoting him in on-air meltdown

MSNBC host Ari Melber locked up his social media account on X after threatening to sue Trump campaign senior official Corey Lewandowski over comments about the Trump shooting.

Melber went head-to-head with Lewandowski on Wednesday, but the interview devolved into a yelling match when the liberal host accused his guest of lying about a quote the host made.

“Fox News, which has been caught in defamation, ran a false piece, falsely stating that I said something else that I didn’t say. So I stand on that,” Melber yelled.

“So you didn’t say, ‘This bandage was a spectacle from a candidate obsessed with spectacles’?” Lewandowski replied.

“I did not say it!” Melber responded. “What you have is a false quote, and I’m putting you on notice, if you continue to repeat falsely that I said that, you will be potentially in a defamation situation because I didn’t say that. But I understand that you’re working off the internet, there’s a lot of false information.”

That evening, Lewandowski posted a video of Melber’s comments.

“An image for political mobilization, a spectacle for this candidate, who we know is, by his own admission, obsessed with assorted spectacles,” said Melber in the clip.

Lewandowski’s video garnered more than 1.4 million views.

Melber’s account was assailed with ridicule and mockery before he locked it up by Thursday so that no one could send him messages.

Also on Thursday, MSNBC posted the full audio of the Melber interview to show what precipitated the shouting match. Melber was pressuring Lewandowski about his testimony before Congress, where he admitted to making an inaccurate statement to the media.

Some on the left also lambasted Melber for giving Lewandowski a platform on the progressive news network.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

Arizona Governor Hobbs ‘unlawfully’ changed election rules: Lawsuit

The Republican Party of Arizona filed a lawsuit against Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs (D) on Thursday, claiming that two of her executive orders “unlawfully” and “unilaterally” altered the state’s existing election laws.

Arizona GOP chair Gina Swoboda sued Hobbs over Executive Order 23, Authorizing the Use of State Facilities as Voting Locations, and Executive Order 25, Facilitating Voter Registration.

‘Blatant overreach of her authority.’

Hobbs issued the orders in November 2023. Executive Order 23 designated the Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections and the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry, as well as other state-run agencies, as ballot drop-off locations. Executive Order 25 designated those state departments as “Voter Registration Assistance Agencies” that are to “distribute voter registration forms, assist applicants in completing voter registration forms, and accept completed voter registration forms.”

According to the lawsuit, Hobbs “exceeded, and is therefore unlawfully exercising, her authority as Governor, in issuing EO 23 and EO 25.” It argued that both executive actions are “unconstitutional and void.”

“Petitioners seek to enjoin Governor Hobbs from enforcing EO 23 and EO 25 on the grounds they exceed the powers granted her by the Arizona Constitution and Arizona statutes, violate the separation of powers regarding the Legislature’s authority to enact election laws; and usurp the powers lawfully granted to the Secretary of State regarding the designation of Voter Registration Agencies and county recorders regarding ballot drop-off locations,” the complaint read. “EO 23 and EO 25 are contrary to law because, in issuing these executive orders, the Governor usurped the authority of the Legislature by unilaterally changed duly-enacted election laws.”

It noted that the orders fail to address other “important issues,” including “where to store completed ballots until they can be sent to the appropriate election officials or keeping a chain-of-custody log for these completed ballots.”

The lawsuit, which was filed directly with the Arizona Supreme Court, requests that the court declare the two executive actions unconstitutional, prevent Hobbs from enforcing the orders, and “issue a writ of quo warranto to prohibit Governor Hobbs from unlawfully exercising authority she lacks to change election laws.”

In a video posted to X, Swoboda explained, “The governor’s office does not have the authority, under the constitution or under any statutory authority, to designate voter registration agencies and definitely not to designate ballot drop-off locations or voting locations.”

She called the governor’s actions a “blatant overreach of her authority,” the Arizona Capitol Times reported.

Liliana Soto, a Hobbs press aide, told the news outlet that the lawsuit was “frivolous” and claimed the governor was using her “lawful authority” to protect voting rights.

Hobbs’ general counsel, Bo Dul, argued that the executive orders “further the important goals of increasing Arizonans’ access to voter registration.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

The work to secure elections matters more than words at the convention

As Democrats gather in Chicago for their convention, they will deliver soaring speeches, engage in over-the-top rhetoric, and prompt media pundits to peddle hot takes and outlandish predictions.

Amidst the endless war of words, the most important story may be the one no one is discussing: State election laws have changed — for the better.

None of these reforms matter if there are no criminal consequences for bad actors who violate election laws.

Lawmakers across the country answered the call of voters to protect their ballots. Legislators from Tallahassee, Atlanta, and Des Moines to Jefferson City and Columbus took action to protect democracy at the ballot box. In committee rooms, at legislative hearings, in offices and chambers, they crafted strong election integrity bills. And despite an overwhelming media campaign of threats and dishonest coverage, they put Americans first.

Since 2020, 30 state legislatures have passed 225 bills that secure ballots, increase process accountability, and provide transparency to the American people. It’s worth looking at what exactly they’ve accomplished.

First, state lawmakers decided it was common sense to stop billionaires from selectively handing out cash to election officials whose job it is to run elections impartially.

In the past four years, 28 states have banned one of the worst abuses of the 2020 election — the private funding of public election administration. Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg “donated” more than $400 million to election offices across the country. Labeled as COVID relief grants and funneled through a nonprofit organization, this money, known as “Zuckerbucks,” allowed a private organization to not only fund public election operations but also fund them on a highly partisan basis.

Take Georgia, for example, where election offices were awarded $45 million in Zuckerbucks during the 2020 cycle. The money was spent predominantly on get-out-the-vote efforts in strategic districts. As a result, 75% of the counties that received grants shifted significantly leftward. Georgia lawmakers were the first to ban this tactic — and they came back again in 2023 to close a loophole when a government official in DeKalb County took another $2 million in violation of the ban.

In Wisconsin and Louisiana, where Democratic governors twice vetoed anti-Zuckerbucks bills, state lawmakers strategically passed legislation that put bans on the ballot. Voters in both states overwhelmingly approved the laws, which did not require the governors’ signatures and are now in effect.

Second, state legislators recognized the common sense in securing the absentee voting process — determining that it should not be easier to get an absentee ballot through the mail than it is to receive one in person on Election Day.

Since 2020, eight state legislatures have passed bills to require identification, such as a driver’s license number, on absentee ballots. Absentee voting is inherently more vulnerable than traditional in-person Election Day voting, and identification helps to secure these ballots cast by mail.

Lawmakers in states like Ohio, Georgia, Missouri, and South Carolina all faced aggressive scrutiny from the media for passing voter identification legislation. Yet bill sponsors, committee chairmen, and leadership didn’t back down. Ultimately, the voter identification bills that have been challenged have withstood court scrutiny and will be in place to secure absentee votes in November.

Third, state lawmakers passed common-sense reforms to protect vulnerable voters — like the elderly — from ballot harvesting tactics.

In 2020, partisan special-interest groups routinely gathered absentee ballots from voters with no delivery safeguards. Voters had no way of knowing whether their ballots were tampered with or even delivered at all. Lawmakers correctly decided that political operatives, with a stake in election outcomes, should not be handling ballots.

Ten states have recently enacted reforms to stop ballot harvesting practices by narrowly defining who may return an absentee ballot on the voter’s behalf. Florida, Iowa, Ohio, and Texas passed laws that allow specific people, such as a family or household member or designated caretaker, to return a ballot for somebody else.

Of course, none of these reforms matter if there are no criminal consequences for bad actors who violate election laws. State lawmakers in four states enacted reforms to investigate and prosecute nefarious behavior and hold election violators accountable.

In Florida, legislators established a dedicated Office of Election Crimes and Security. This investigative office has trained law enforcement officials with election expertise to review complaints, oversee a public fraud hotline, and conduct investigations. Since the office was created, officials have received more than 2,000 complaints and initiated over 1,000 independent investigations.

These changes represent just a few of the accomplishments that state lawmakers fought hard to achieve. While much more work remains on election integrity, these efforts will lead to safer, more secure elections — exactly what voters demanded.

State lawmakers put Americans first. And it’s their work — not the words of national political parties — that might just determine the outcome in November.

Read More
Elections

Texas AG Paxton launches investigation into reports of organizations illegally registering non-citizens to vote

The attorney general of Texas announced an investigation into reports that non-citizens were being illegally registered to vote.

‘It is a crime to vote—or to register to vote—if you are not a United States Citizen.’

“Texans are deeply troubled by the possibility that organizations purporting to assist with voter registration are illegally registering noncitizens to vote in our elections,” said Attorney General Ken Paxton in a statement Wednesday.

“My office is investigating every credible report we receive regarding potential criminal activity that could compromise the integrity of our elections,” he added.

Paxton went on to criticize the Biden-Harris administration over its failure to secure the border.

“The Biden-Harris Administration has intentionally flooded our country with illegal aliens, and without proper safeguards, foreign nationals can illegally influence elections at the local, state, and national level,” he claimed.

Paxton may have been referring to a report made by Maria Bartiromo of Fox News that immigrants were lined up outside of DMV offices and getting registered to vote at a table and tents outside of the offices. She did not say they were illegal aliens, but many on social media took that to be her meaning.

In his statement, the attorney general referred to the booths outside government offices.

“If eligible citizens can legally register to vote when conducting their business at a DPS office, why would they need a second opportunity to register with a booth outside?” he asked rhetorically.

A spokesperson for the Texas Department of Public Safety said the claims were “simply false” in a statement to the Star-Telegram.

“Contrary to Bartiromo’s friend’s wife’s account, there is no office for the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles in Weatherford. Folks there get their licenses at a DPS Driver License office,” said Sgt. William Lockridge.

“None of it is true,” he added. He went on to say the report was “kind of racist” because he reasoned that, “Just because these people aren’t white, that doesn’t mean they’re illegal.”

In May, Paxton filed a lawsuit against an organization for allegedly engaging in “human smuggling” by shielding illegal aliens from law enforcement agencies. The group denied the accusations and said his claims were “illegal, immoral and anti-faith.”

A coalition of 24 states, including Texas, filed a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to protect elections from non-citizens voting by supporting an Arizona law that required voters to show proof of citizenship.

“It is a crime to vote—or to register to vote—if you are not a United States Citizen. Any wrongdoing will be punished to the fullest extent of the law,” Paxton concluded in his statement.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Elections

Georgia election board’s new ‘common sense’ election integrity rule has angered all the right people

The Republican-led Georgia State Election Board voted 3-2 on Monday to approve a
new rule empowering local officials to ensure that the “total number of ballots cast” does not exceed “the total number of persons who voted.”

The Associated Press
indicated that the rule requires county election officials to generate voter lists categorized by voting method and then to check for duplicates and other discrepancies. If such errors are found, then officials are required to launch an investigation, hand count, and seek remedy. Upon resolving the discrepancies, only those returns that “are entitled to be counted” will be recorded then verified.

The rule, the proposal for which was submitted Cobb County GOP Chairwoman Salleigh Grubbs, also states that county election officials “shall be permitted to examine all election-related documentation created during the conduct of elections” prior to certifying the results.

Grubbs has emphasized that the purpose of the rule is not to disrupt the election process but rather to protect its integrity,
reported the Georgia Recorder.

“We have to have assurance, as Georgians, that what we see printed on our ballot is exactly [accurate] and the only way to do that is by a handwritten affiliation on the precinct level,” said Grubbs.

Grubbs
told CNN, “We have to have assurance, as Georgians, that what we see printed on our ballot is exactly how the balance and the only way to do that is by a handwritten affiliation on the precinct level.”

‘These rules will improve voter confidence in our elections process.’

Democrats and other leftists in the state have expressed outrage in response to this effort to fortify Georgian elections and make sure that only accurate results are certified in an orderly fashion.

Ben Berwick, head of election law at a political outfit co-founded by Obama White House Counsel’s Office lawyers, told ProPublica, “If this rule is adopted, any claims of fraud, any claims of discrepancies, could be the basis for a county board member — acting in bad faith — to say, ‘I’m not confident in the results,’ and hold up certification under the flimsiest of pretext.”

“The bottom line here,” continued Berwick, is that “election deniers are intentionally creating a failure point in the process where they can interfere if they don’t like the results of an election.”

Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight, the leftist organization founded by failed gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams (D),
said in a statement, “Trump and the MAGA operation are using the Georgia State Election Board to give the appearance of legality to their illegal scheme to obstruct certification of Georgia’s 2024 election results.”

At the state election board meeting Monday, Republican board member Janelle King — whom dozens of Georgia House Democrats
are trying to have replacedsaid, “A lot of the attacks I’m hearing is centered around the idea that this particular rule, or some of these rules that were being presented, are being presented based off of us chasing some ghosts that didn’t exist, or some conspiracy theory, some hypothetical.”

“I just want to make sure I note that several times it’s been notated that there were issues that took place in the election cycles, particularly 2020,” added King.

Josh McKoon, chairman of the Georgia Republican Party,
noted on X that Democrats are effectively panicked over rules

  • “Permitting the poll watches from all parties to observe the processing of ballots wherever that activity occurs”;
  • “Asking poll workers to reconcile the poll book and the number of votes tallies at the precinct”;
  • “Asking counties to post the early voting reports they run anyway on a daily basis to their website or in a prominent location in their courthouse”; and
  • “Permitting members of any Board of Election the opportunity to review information prior to the certification deadline.”

“These rules would easily pass if put to a vote of the legislature or the people of Georgia,” said McKoon. “They do not unduly burden elections offices. These rules will improve voter confidence in our elections process”

McKoon added, “It is frankly irresponsible for anyone to suggest these common sense measures would ‘create chaos’ in an elections process that a significant number of Georgians have lost confidence in over the last several years.”

The state GOP chairman noted further that leftist organizations have sought to intimidate members of the board into “reversing course.”

“No one opposing these rule changes has offered any reality based criticism of them,” continued McKoon. “So you have to wonder why are Democrats willing to use these scorched earth tactics to stop poll watchers from meaningfully observing a Georgia election?”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Great Reset

Meet one of the only senators STILL demanding COVID-19 answers

Mask mandates, coercion to vaccinate, lockdowns, and unconstitutional censorship top the long list of atrocities inflicted upon the American people in the name of protection against COVID-19. And yet our government would love nothing more than to turn a blind eye to the economic and social suicide that was a direct result of its failed policies. The government would rather move on from the highly contentious subject of gain-of-function research, championed by Anthony Fauci, who also touted social distancing, vaccines, and boosters and lied repeatedly to American citizens.

However, there’s one individual who has remained relentless in his pursuit of answers to questions that remain mysteries and for justice to be brought against Fauci — Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who was censored by the notorious three-letter agencies for demanding that Fauci answer for his crimes.

Why are these agencies protecting Fauci? And what are they hiding?

This is the subject of Episode 2 of the latest Blaze Originals docuseries “The Coverup,” starring Matt Kibbe.


– YouTube

www.youtube.com

Today, Kibbe joins Glenn Beck on the show to outline the shocking revelations brought forth in the second episode — “Legislator: How Rand Paul Exposed Dr. Fauci’s Lies.”


– YouTube

www.youtube.com

Kibbe explains that as Sen. Paul dug deeper, he discovered that “Fauci [was] not acting alone, and the reason that he and his partners — particularly his consigliere, David Morens — are so untouchable is that their bosses are throughout the alphabet agencies that make up the defense and intelligence community.”

“That’s what we’re trying to get at in this episode — who is Fauci’s boss? Is he a made man? Is he untouchable? Why after we’ve caught him red-handed lying about using taxpayer money to fund gain-of-function research is nothing happening?” he tells Glenn, who points out that above all, Fauci “may be directly responsible for the death of everyone on the planet from COVID.”

But as Kibbe notes, the government is anxious to put the entire subject of COVID-19 in the past — “Right now Rand is fighting a fairly lonely fight. He’s finally gotten the Democratic committee chairman to allow hearings on this subject, but most people, and certainly the political class, are like, ‘let’s just move on. That was so long ago.”’

“They want to talk about something else because they all have blood on their hands — literally,” he says.

To learn more about the deeply disturbing revelations in “The Coverup” episode 2, watch the clip above.

If you haven’t already, check out episode 1 (available for free on YouTube) before watching episode 2 on BlazeTV. If you aren’t already a subscriber to BlazeTV+ join today and get $30 off your first year of BlazeTV+ with code FAUCILIED.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More