Sunday, May 3, 2026

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

COVID-19

NIH staffers storm out as Bhattacharya delivers reality bombshell about COVID origin

National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya hosted his first staff town hall on Monday.

The event, held on the NIH’s main campus in Bethesda, Maryland, was packed with nearly 500 attendees and even more individuals tuning in online to watch Bhattacharya answer some of the 1,200 submitted questions, Science reported.

‘If it’s true that we sponsored research that caused the pandemic, and if you look at polls of the American people, that’s what most people believe.’

Yet when Bhattacharya attempted to answer a question about the origin of the COVID-19 outbreak, many staffers fled the room in apparent protest.

Ahead of his response, Bhattacharya noted that some of those attending the event would likely disagree with his perspective.

“It’s possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings. And it’s also possible that the NIH partly sponsored that research,” Bhattacharya told the crowd.

He appeared to pause as dozens of NIH staffers stood up and left the room.

“It’s nice to have free speech. You’re welcome, you guys,” he said, apparently addressing the protesters.

Some attendees who remained responded with applause.

Bhattacharya continued, “If it’s true that we sponsored research that caused the pandemic, and if you look at polls of the American people, that’s what most people believe. And I’ve looked at the scientific evidence I believe in.”

“What we have to do is make sure that we do not engage in research that’s posing any risk to any human populations,” he added.

RELATED: Vindictive researcher at high-security NIH lab risked deadly outbreak over petty dispute with coworker: Bhattacharya

National Institutes of Health Director Jayanta Bhattacharya, U.S. President Donald Trump, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Anything else?

A Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s minority staff report drafted by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) claimed that President Donald Trump’s administration had “effectively” slashed the NIH’s budget by $2.7 billion in the first three months of the year.

“Trump’s war on science is an attack against anyone who has ever loved someone with cancer,” Sanders said. “The American people do not want us to slash cancer research in order to give more tax breaks for billionaires.”

The Department of Health and Human Services has labeled Sanders’ claims as “unequivocally false.”

“The report released by his office today is a politically motivated distortion that undermines the thousands of dedicated public health professionals across HHS, who remain steadfast in their commitment to delivering results for the American people,” HHS stated.

RELATED: Trump’s NIH closes Fauci’s apparent puppy-torture lab after 40 years of sadistic experiments

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

HHS scrapping COVID jab recommendations for pregnant moms and kids: Report

The Department of Health and Human Services is reportedly preparing to scrap its recommendation that pregnant women and kids get the COVID-19 vaccines. Individuals said to be familiar with the matter told the Wall Street Journal that the announcement is imminent and will coincide with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention kicking off a new vaccine approval framework.

While the relevant agencies apparently did not respond to the Journal’s requests for comment, U.S. Food and Drug Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary provided a fairly strong indication this week that the change was coming.

Makary told Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk that he would “love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another COVID-19 shot — you know, a sixth COVID booster — would help them, but that evidence does not exist, and so we’re not going to rubber-stamp things at the FDA.”

“I don’t think you’re going to see a push at the CDC to be pushing COVID shots in young, healthy children,” continued Makary, adding that he expected an announcement on that front in the coming weeks.

Sources told the Journal that it would only be a matter of days.

At the time of publication, the CDC was still recommending that everyone ages 6 months and older get a COVID-19 vaccine.

‘Connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths.’

The agency states on its website that getting the shot is especially important for individuals who have survived this long without one, geriatrics, pregnant women, those planning to conceive, and breastfeeding mothers. The agency urges parents to get their children 6 months to 4 years of age loaded up with two doses of the Moderna vaccine or three doses of the Pfizer vaccine if they were starting fresh.

As of April 26, 14.4% of pregnant women had received a 2024-25 COVID-19 vaccine and 13% of children 6 months to 17 years of age were up to date, CDC data shows.

RELATED: Jab first, ask questions never: Vaccine truths your doctor won’t tell you


EKIN KIZILKAYA/iStock/Getty Images Plus

The CDC stuck with its recommendations until now despite credible warnings from Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo and other experts; troubling scientific studies demonstrating the vaccines were not as safe and effective as advertised; glaring evidence that kids and teens were at low risk for COVID and could go without; and damning state-leveled allegations that one of the primary vaccine manufacturers sat on evidence that its COVID-19 vaccine “was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths.”

Just last month, a preprint study backed by the Florida Department of Health suggested that adults in the Sunshine State who received the Pfizer vaccine had “significantly higher risk of 12-month all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 mortality” than those who received the Moderna shot.

A study conducted by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project — a Global Vaccine Data Network initiative supported by both the CDC and the HHS — and published last year in the journal Vaccine detailed troubling links between the AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer vaccines and medical conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, brain and spinal cord inflammation, Bell’s palsy, and convulsions.

Another peer-reviewed study published last year in the pharmacotherapy journal Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety indicated that “COVID-19 vaccination is strongly associated with a serious adverse safety signal of myocarditis, particularly in children and young adults resulting in hospitalization and death.”

“COVID-19 vaccines induce an uncontrolled expression of potentially lethal SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within human cells, have a close temporal relationship of events, and are internally and externally consistent with emerging sources of clinical and peer-reviewed data supporting the conclusion that COVID-19 vaccines are deterministic for myocarditis, including fatal cases,” said the study.

‘The current risks of serious adverse events or deaths outweigh the benefits.’

Texas cardiologist Peter McCullough, a leading critic of the vaccines, said in a statement Thursday, “Two presidents, three HHS Secretaries, three FDA Commissioners, and nearly five years into the disastrous COVID-19 vaccine debacle, women and children receive long overdue yet welcome news. After record vaccine injuries, disabilities, and death, America is wondering will any of these leaders be held accountable?”

Dropping the recommendations appears to be a half measure, given that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. previously fought to revoke authorization of COVID-19 vaccines altogether.

RELATED: Mandates, masks, and mayhem: Never again!


Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In a petition he filed with the FDA on May 16, 2021, Kennedy said the agency should revoke all emergency use authorizations and refrain from approving future EUAs for any COVID vaccine for all demographic groups “because the current risks of serious adverse events or deaths outweigh the benefits, and because existing, approved drugs provide highly effective prophylaxis and treatment against COVID, mooting the EUAs.”

Kennedy noted further that the agency should specifically spare children and pregnant women from the novel vaccines.

Kennedy’s warnings and requests evidently fell on deaf ears.

In its final weeks, the Biden HHS extended liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and administrators through Dec. 31, 2029, precluding vaccine recipients who reportedly end up injured or their surviving family members from holding those responsible to account. This was the latest of several such extensions.

The reports of the HHS dropping the vaccine recommendations and other moves made in recent months by the Trump administration have elements of the medical establishment clutching pearls.

Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told the New York Times, “I think that we are in the midst of watching the vaccine infrastructure being torn down bit by bit.”

“I think everything is a target,” said Tara Smith, an epidemiologist at Kent State University College of Public Health.

“Overturning the recommendation means that insurance companies will no longer have to cover these vaccines,” Dorit Reiss, a law professor at UC Law San Francisco, complained to the health publication Stat.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

RFK Jr. BLASTS COVID-era response; promises new chapter

In the years that followed COVID-19, the mainstream media, including outlets like Fox News, continued to push the idea that Americans had to “trust the science.”

And while Fox News did have its share of dissident voices speaking out during the Biden administration’s reign, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. isn’t letting Fox forget when it did fall in line.

“Above all, we are going to get rid of the taboos about challenging orthodoxies, about challenging consensus, and we’re telling the public every day, all of us, ‘That is not science,’” RFK Jr. said in an interview on Fox News — before taking it to task for the part it played in the Biden administration’s tyrannical reign.

“Your whole industry was telling the public for years, ‘Trust the experts.’ ‘Trust the experts’ is not a function of science or democracy, it’s a function of totalitarianism and religion,” he added.

“Hold the vaccines, but inject that into my veins,” Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight” tells Matthew Peterson, who agrees wholeheartedly.

“I can’t emphasize enough that this is important, that people tell the truth in these positions after we’ve been told lies for so long,” he tells Savage. “The fact that you have the director of HHS, the people who are in charge of all these agencies, coming out and saying, ‘Oh no, these people have not earned trust, and science is about questioning and finding the truth.’”

“Straight into our veins and also into the bloodstream of the entire country, because it’s what we need to hear,” he adds.

Want more from ‘Blaze News Tonight’?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

Sacrificing children on the altar of science: How the COVID-19 response hurt our most vulnerable

When COVID-19 washed up on American shores, everyone, including children, were believed by the top scientists in the country to be at grave risk. However, once the threat to children was found to be minimal, children instead became suspected of being “super spreaders.”

“Empirical evidence was being ignored, and instead, the officials were following theory. They made up all sorts of contrived reasons,” David Zweig, investigative journalist and author of “An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions,” tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.”

Despite the fearmongering surrounding schools reopening and children’s status as “super spreaders,” the fact that cases went down in places like Europe after children went back to school didn’t phase the scientists.

“What that does suggest, of course, is that children were not super spreaders, schools were not driving the pandemic,” Zweig tells Stuckey. “The point is, the evidence was there that this wasn’t dangerous, this wasn’t increasing cases, and it was ignored, and it was dismissed with these contrived reasons.”

While the mainstream media and “the science” was focused on the potential harm faced by the immunocompromised, what they didn’t seem to care about was how social isolation, masks, and digital learning would affect children in the most formative years of their lives.

“There is something disordered in asking kids to sacrifice on behalf of adults,” Stuckey tells Zweig, adding, “There is something inherently unjust about that.”

“What they aren’t understanding, perhaps, is the incredible harm on so many children, millions of kids, and you have to think about what kind of society, as you said, what kind of society does this to children?” Zweig agrees.

“No one was saved by long-term school closures. No one was saved from masking 2-year-olds. No one was saved by barriers on desks and all this other nonsense. This was only harm. No trade-off. No benefit,” he continues.

“Even beyond the horrors of child abuse,” he says, which he notes became more prevalent during COVID, “there were plenty of kids who became anorexic and bulimic, screen time skyrocketed during the pandemic and never kind of went back down, anxiety, depression.”

“I talked with a lot of mental health professionals for children. Their practices were exploding during the pandemic, and it wasn’t because of people dying, let me be very clear about that. It was directly correlated with kids being kept out of school,” he explains.

Politicians like Governor Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) claimed that their hard stance on COVID was only so strict because it was worth it to save even one life — but Zweig knows that couldn’t be further from the truth.

“You’re taking one or more lives to ostensibly try to save that one life. It was extraordinarily foolish,” Zweig says.

“Toxic empathy,” Stuckey chimes in. “It blinds you to reality and morality, and you ignore the victim on the other side of the moral equation.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

Trump obliterates Biden’s COVID rules for good

The Trump administration has wasted no time completely revamping the COVID-19 narrative — and has now made it official on the White House website.

The website now has a COVID-19 section, which goes into great detail explaining “misinformation” related to the virus.

“Public health officials often mislead the American people through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions, and a lack of transparency. Most egregiously, the federal government demonized alternative treatments and disfavored narratives, such as the lab leak theory, in a shameful effort to coerce and control the American people’s health decisions,” the website reads.

“When those efforts failed, the Biden Administration resorted to ‘outright censorship—coercing and colluding with the world’s largest social media companies to censor all COVID-19-related dissent,’” it continues.

The website also highlights that Anthony Fauci was given a full and unconditional pardon by former President Biden.

“It is so refreshing to see this White House,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” comments.

“I’m glad we all trusted the plan,” BlazeTV contributor John Doyle chimes in. “We were so angry when everyone started to realize what a sham this was, we were angry with Trump for promoting it, but I will say, I think that we get a little hindsight bias and forget how freaked out even Republicans, like older Republicans, were about COVID.”

“I would just say, their entire argument was ‘trust the experts.’ So if that’s their argument, then again, it’s Anthony Fauci’s fault, because Donald Trump was trusting the expert that they placed in front of him and said, ‘This is the guy,’” Gonzales says.

“So Donald Trump wasn’t in there in a lab with little droppers trying to figure things out; he was trusting the people that he was supposed to be able to trust,” she adds.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

White House endorses COVID lab leak theory, but will anyone be held accountable?

On April 18, the White House publicly endorsed the COVID lab leak theory. The government’s official COVID website was also redirected to a new page titled “Lab Leak: The True Origins of COVID-19,” which contends that the virus originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, and was leaked by accident.

The revamped site criticizes Anthony Fauci, David Morens, Andrew Cuomo, the WHO, EcoHealth Alliance, and the Biden administration, among others, for actively promoting false information and covering up the truth.

It cites five points to support the lab leak claim:

1. “The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.”

2. “Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.”

3. “Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research (gene altering and organism supercharging) at inadequate biosafety levels.”

4. “Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with COVID-like symptoms in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.”

5. “By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced. But it hasn’t.”

After years of the Biden administration and his loyal media allies promoting a lie, it’s refreshing to see the government proclaim the truth.

But while Glenn Beck sees the website as “an amazing thing,” the information on it isn’t exactly news.

“Most of this stuff we had within six or eight months of the actual outbreak,” he says.

The real question is: “Who’s going to jail over this?”

The other question is: Why doesn’t the legacy media seem interested in correcting the narrative?

“Millions of people died here. You’d think that it would be something [the media] would focus on and draw a lot of attention to and continue to kind of beat the drum until someone was held responsible, and they don’t seem to have any interest in that,” says co-host Stu Burguiere, noting that most of these outlets “have run an op-ed” about the lab leak theory and called it good.

“If we make a mistake, we correct it because it drives us crazy that we made the mistake, and I don’t want anybody to believe that I’m standing behind something that is wrong and a lie,” says Glenn.

The legacy media clearly doesn’t have the same convictions.

“They knowingly lied” about COVID, Joe Biden’s cognitive state, and Russiagate, and yet, “There’s no consequence.”

“They’re not going to lose any advertisers. The New York Times hasn’t lost any real money because of this. Their people just continue to watch,” says Glenn.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
Elections

16 noncitizens apparently voted in Michigan in 2024 — and liberals are cheering about it

Michigan Democrats and liberal media are celebrating a report that revealed more than a dozen noncitizens may have cast a ballot in the November election.

On Thursday, Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson — whose campaign for governor has already gotten off to a sloppy start — released a press release about the report entitled “Michigan Department of State review confirms instances of noncitizen voting are extremely rare.”

The report, which is based on an audit launched in December, actually begins with a misleading statement, claiming “15 credible cases” of noncitizens voting had been “identified.” However, the press release later admits that 16 cases had actually been identified, noting that “a Chinese national” also allegedly voted illegally, a case that made national headlines last fall.

Of these 16 cases, all but two have been referred for possible prosecution. One of the noncitizens who allegedly voted in November has since died, and another case remains under further investigation.

The press release suggests that 16 alleged instances of noncitizens voting proves the system works as they “represent 0.00028% of the more than 5.7 million votes cast by Michiganders in the presidential election.”

The Chinese national who allegedly admitted to voting in November … did so by allegedly offering his University of Michigan student ID card.

Benson — who just last September testified before Congress that “there is no evidence that noncitizens are voting” — seemed pleased about the report. She claimed that these cases represent a “tiny fraction” of voters and hinted that further efforts to secure our elections are unnecessary and would only disenfranchise legitimate voters.

“This is a serious issue, one we must address with a scalpel, not a sledgehammer,” Benson said in a statement.

Her fellow Democrats similarly hailed the news. The Michigan Democratic Party claimed the audit “confirm[s] the security of the 2024 election.”

“Democrats are proud to be the only party of election integrity and of defending our democracy. This months-long review is telling us what we already know: Michigan’s elections can be safe and secure without sacrificing access to the ballot box,” said a statement from group chair Curtis Hertel.

Even media outlets like Mid-Michigan Now dutifully parroted the idea that “cases of noncitizens casting a ballot are extremely rare.”

By contrast, Republican state Rep. Bryan Posthumus of Rockford is appalled that Democrats are so cavalier about noncitizens voting in Michigan elections.

“First it was 1, now it’s 15. The truth is, we have no idea how many,” he posted to social media.

What’s more, while Benson’s press release and the media have focused mainly on the 2024 presidential election in Michigan — which President Donald Trump won by a margin of about 80,000 — they have basically ignored the more competitive races down ballot where noncitizen votes could have greater impact.

For instance, the U.S. Senate race in Michigan was razor thin. Democratic candidate Elissa Slotkin prevailed over Republican Mike Rogers by just .3% of the vote, or fewer than 20,000 votes.

Posthumus told Blaze News that in 2022, a state House race was decided by just 12 votes. “This would have swung that election,” he said, referring to the 16 alleged noncitizen voters.

According to Ballotpedia, such tight races are not that uncommon. In 2024 alone, more than 60 state-level races across the country were decided by 100 votes or fewer, including a Maine race in which a Republican state representative prevailed by just a single vote.

Posthumus also pointed to the hotly contested 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and then-Vice President Al Gore. After weeks of recounts and legal wrangling, Bush carried the state of Florida — and therefore the election — by under 550 votes.

“Democrats are trying to just make this as a one-off situation that doesn’t have any real implications,” Posthumus explained to Blaze News. “It really does.”

Posthumus is currently crafting a state constitutional amendment proposal that would require prospective voters to provide proof of citizenship when they register as well as when they vote, and he hopes that Democrats will join him in this endeavor. Polling indicates that voters on both sides of the aisle support securing our elections.

“Nearly 85% of the population agrees,” Posthumus said, “only U.S. citizens should vote in our elections, and photo ID should be required when you cast your ballot.”

Michigan law restricts voting to U.S. citizens only, but as Posthumus noted on social media, the system is vulnerable to exploitation. For instance, the Chinese national who allegedly admitted to voting in November, Haoxiang Gao, did so by allegedly offering his University of Michigan student ID card as proof of local residency.

The application for a Michigan driver’s license also indicates that applicants will be automatically registered to vote. To forestall this automatic registration, applicants must deliberately check a box asking officials not to use their “information for voter registration,” a 2019 application version showed.

Michigan Democrats have recently lobbied hard to permit illegal aliens living in the state to be given driver’s licenses.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Vaccines

Jab first, ask questions never: Vaccine truths your doctor won’t tell you

Disclaimer: With apologies to the few and far-between pediatricians who don’t fit this mold.

Your friendly pediatrician may not think he is lying. But neither is he asking the right questions on behalf of young, vulnerable patients: your children. And that’s outrageously unacceptable amid a growing mountain of evidence suggesting that, indeed, virtually everything we’ve been told about vaccines is untrue and worthy of scrutiny.

I’m going to say a lot of things in this article that may sound shocking. See the resource list at the end for the arguments. But there are many good reasons why HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy
has announced that a panel will examine the childhood vaccine schedule.

‘You’ll be sorry when your baby dies’

I first explored this topic 30 years ago
after reading a history of polio that shook my worldview. For all my life, the polio vaccine had been used as exhibit A in the case for vaccines: If it weren’t for its discovery and widespread administration in the 1950s and 1960s, thousands more would have suffered from this terrible disease.

And yet in my reading, I found that the polio virus
was sharply declining at the time of Jonas Salk’s discovery. Like many diseases, polio cases went through periods of growth and decline independent of human intervention. In other words, “proof” of the vaccine’s effectiveness was hardly decisive.

If this is true with the polio vaccine, what does it suggest about other, riskier vaccines that we’re told are “lifesaving”?

When I brought this information and a few other vaccine questions to our pediatrician, he had no intelligent response. In fact, he simply stated that if we didn’t vaccinate, we’d be sorry when our child died.

That condescending, unhelpful response infuriated me then just as much as it does now. A lot has changed in 30 years, but unfortunately, doctors are still likely to dismiss vaccine concerns with arrogance, disinterest, or downright hostility.

Actually, that’s the standard response when you question anything they learned in their
Pharma-sponsored medical school education. And it applies in spades where the highly profitable vaccines are concerned. (Another area where doctors seem to be deliberately uninformed is cancer treatment, including lucrative-to-them chemotherapy, but that’s a subject for another day.)

You also cannot trust media reporting on this issue, because a significant amount of media income flows from those incredibly annoying Pharma ads. Actual journalism is an endangered species these days, unless you frequent Substack or other alternative platforms like Blaze Media or the Daily Wire or listen to Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and others like them
.

Doctors’ attitudes have not changed, but a few other things have

First, the recommended
childhood vaccine schedule has exploded. Today, children receive dozens more vaccine doses than children 30 years ago, including the injection of multiple substances at a time during “well child” visits (and I put scare quotes there for a reason).

Second, we now have several decades of evidence of harm by childhood vaccines. Reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System number in the thousands. But that number is almost irrelevant because it is estimated that for a variety of reasons, VAERS only catches about 1% of adverse reactions.

There is no lack of anecdotal evidence either — including personal,
heartbreaking reports of vaccine injuries to previously healthy, vibrant children.

Third — and this is good — we now have the internet. We can research alternative thought on almost anything, provided that the powers that be do not censor it. And if something is censored, we must ask ourselves why? Who stands to benefit from that censoring?

We clearly saw this with nearly every topic related to COVID-19, and the evidence is now clear that the
COVID vaccine was an unmitigated health disaster — neither safe nor effective, despite being forced on billions of people around the world. And yes, it is still currently part of your child’s recommended vaccine schedule, despite even the mainstream media now reporting many of the vaccine’s known problems, including the development of myocarditis, turbo cancers, and even sudden death in young people.

How many of us know of someone in one of those categories?

It’s instructive to consider also how the anti-vax movement has grown, even before COVID caused millions to question the medical and media establishments. Countless people who said they were “pro-” have become “anti-” over the years, almost always because they or someone they love experienced a tragedy due to the shots — including life-altering harm to a child.

Then, over the past several years, we’ve won many more to our “side” as evidence mounts in our favor, not only that specific shots are bad, but that:

  1. They’ve failed to be properly vetted (i.e., faulty or corrupted research).
  2. Their ingredient list is a nightmare of toxins (simply read the inserts to see for yourself, or see “One of 174 Reasons to Question Vaccines,” linked below).
  3. The Pharma companies that produce them are unredeemably corrupt, having been protected from legal consequences after lobbying for that protection from lawmakers they financially supported.
  4. And perhaps most worldview-shaking — that they were NEVER really the medical wonder they were made out to be.

I challenge you, if you consider yourself pro-vax (and haven’t already thrown your computer across the room while reading this), to consider the information below.

Books

Fortunately, at this time, Amazon is not censoring any of these books:

Many more books on the topic can be found
at the Children’s Health Defense website.

And if you need help reorienting your attitude about the medical establishment in general, check out “Lies My Doctor Told Me” by Ken Berry, M.D.

Articles and papers

Due to its lack of censorship, Substack is where you’ll find much of the current information about vaccines (and any other controversial topic that threatens the status quo).

Videos


24 Censored Documentaries Exposing the Medical Fraud of Vaccines” (see on Amandha Dawn Vollmer’s Substack: A Healthy Dose of Truth).

What do you want first: the good news or the bad news?

The good news is: We did not vaccinate our daughter, and she did not die.

The bad news is: As a young adult living overseas, she was forced to get the COVID shot and has since battled health problems, having been formally diagnosed as COVID-vaccine-injured.

How about you and your family? Share your story in the comments. After all, we should encourage each other as we seek to care for these precious bodies God has given us — the temples of His Spirit, in fact (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). If our bodies aren’t healthy, it limits our usefulness for Him, as well.

Read More
COVID-19

Chinese scientist with reported ties to USAID finds new bat coronavirus that could infect humans like COVID

Chinese scientists have said that they discovered a new bat coronavirus that could infect humans in the same manner as the virus that causes COVID-19. The lead scientist in the new study has reported links to USAID.

According to a report from the South China Morning Post, the researchers are from the Guangzhou Laboratory, the Guangzhou Academy of Sciences, Wuhan University, and the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The lead scientist in the new bat coronavirus study reportedly had prior financial ties to the embattled United States Agency for International Development.

The new infectious disease is called HKU5-CoV-2. The new coronavirus was first identified in the Japanese pipistrelle bat in Hong Kong.

HKU5-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that is part of the merbecovirus subgenus, which also includes the virus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome.

Researchers claim that HKU5-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 receptor to infect organisms. The ACE2 receptor is the same receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 to infect human cells.

“We report the discovery and isolation of a distinct lineage (lineage 2) of HKU5-CoV, which can utilize not only bat ACE2 but also human ACE2 and various mammalian ACE2 orthologs,” the study said.

The researchers wrote, “Authentic HKU5-CoV-2 infected human ACE2-expressing cell lines and human respiratory and enteric organoids. This study reveals a distinct lineage of HKU5-CoVs in bats that efficiently use human ACE2 and underscores their potential zoonotic risk.”

“Bat merbecoviruses, which are phylogenetically related to MERS-CoV, pose a high risk of spillover to humans, either through direct transmission or facilitated by intermediate hosts,” the scientists stated.

The researchers from China added, “The potential human spillover risk of animal merbecoviruses remains to be investigated.”

The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Cell on Tuesday.

The study was led by Shi Zhengli — a leading virologist who had been the director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Zhengli is often dubbed the “bat woman” by her colleagues because of her extensive research on bat coronaviruses since 2004, including virus-hunting expeditions in bat caves.

The World Society for Virology said of Zhengli, “Her group has discovered diverse novel viruses/virus antibodies in bats, including SARS-like coronaviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, circoviruses, paramyxoviruses and filoviruses in China.”

The lead scientist in the new bat coronavirus study reportedly had prior financial ties to the embattled United States Agency for International Development.

A 2021 article in Vanity Fair noted: “Shi Zhengli herself listed U.S. government grant support of more than $1.2 million on her curriculum vitae: $665,000 from the NIH between 2014 and 2019; and $559,500 over the same period from USAID. At least some of those funds were routed through EcoHealth Alliance.”

According to 990 tax exemption forms it filed in 2018 with the New York state attorney general’s Charities Bureau, EcoHealth Alliance received as much as $15 million a year in grant money from federal agencies, including the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and USAID.

The article spotlighted emails obtained by a Freedom of Information request, including one sent by Peter Daszak, a zoologist and former president of EcoHealth Alliance. The email showed that Zhengli allegedly carried out potentially dangerous gain-of-function experiments.

Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the ‘Statement’ Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that created a coronavirus capable of infecting human cells: “you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak added, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”

During a House Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic hearing in March 2023, former U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield said he believes American tax dollars funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) asked Redfield, “Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?”

Redfield replied, “I think it did, not only from NIH, but from the State Department, USAID, and DOD.”

Zhengli has gone on record to say that she does not believe in the lab-leak theory that COVID-19 came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology — a biosafety level-4 lab, which requires the highest level of safety protocols and equipment because of the study of high-consequence biological agents.

Blaze News reported in July 2021 that Zhengli purportedly had “collaborated with two military scientists on coronavirus work, one of whom is now deceased under unknown circumstances.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Missouri AG tells Glenn Beck the plan for how to hold China accountable for COVID-19

The U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled earlier this month that the State of Missouri’s lawsuit originally filed in 2020 against China seeking damages for the communist regime’s culpability over the COVID-19 pandemic could move forward. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey explained to Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck Monday precisely how the Show-Me State intends to exact its retribution and made clear that retaking American farmland is part of the equation.

“We’re going to win,” said Bailey.

Court documents
indicated that the state’s position in Missouri v. China is that the communist nation “is to blame for COVID-19. In its view, negligence led to the virus’s escape from the laboratories at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. From there, the Chinese government allowed the virus to spread all over the world and engaged in a campaign to keep other countries from learning about it.”

Blaze News
previously noted that besides likely manufacturing the deadly virus and failing to contain it in a lab with a history of hygiene problems, Chinese authorities delayed warning the world about the emergence of the deadly disease, going to great lengths to silence whistleblowers like the late Li Wenliang, who tried to raise the alarm. When the regime finally got around to alerting the World Health Organization on Dec. 31, 2019, China claimed, “The disease is preventable and controllable.”

While burying evidence of the virus and its origins, destroying lab samples, and denying sample requests from other countries, China also
apparently began stockpiling personal protective equipment, such that when the world discovered what was really unfolding, there was a scarcity of medical equipment and masks.

Missouri hammered China with a number of claims in its initial complaints, but the Eighth Circuit appeals panel decided only one claim — which fell under the “commercial activity” exception of the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act — could proceed: namely that China hoarded PPE.

“Missouri’s overarching theory is that China leveraged the world’s ignorance about COVID-19,”
wrote Judge David Stras in the ruling. “One way it did so was by manipulating the worldwide personal-protective market. Missouri must still prove it, but it has alleged enough to allow the claim to proceed beyond a jurisdictional dismissal on the pleadings.”

‘That’s how little the Chinese communist government thinks about these United States of America.’

“We filed a lawsuit against China and the Chinese communist government asking for $25 billion — with a B — dollars in restitution and remediation for the damage they caused the Missourians by unleashing the COVID pandemic on the United States of America and then hoarding and withholding the PPE needed for the state to respond to the crisis,” Bailey told Beck.

A previous effort to hold China accountable, Republican Texas Rep. Troy Nehls’ 2023 “China Lied, People Died” Act (
H.R.566), estimated that “the cover-up of COVID-19 by the … Chinese Communist Party has caused significant economic harm around the world and has cost the United States economy $16,000,000,000,000.”

Bailey noted that the trial for
Missouri v. China kicks off in earnest today in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, adding, “We are going to win.”

When pressed by Beck on the basis for his optimism, Bailey said, “It helps when the other side doesn’t show up.”

Politico
previously noted that neither the Chinese regime nor any other defendant, such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has responded to the case in court.

“That’s how little the Chinese communist government thinks about these United States of America,” continued the state attorney general. “They won’t even participate in a judicial process.”

While China may have no intention to pay up, Bailey indicated that if afforded a valid judgment by a federal court, Missouri can begin “seizing assets that the Chinese government owns, not only in the state of Missouri but using any willing partner in any state in the United States of America.”

Although Bailey suggested that the state is still in the process of identifying potential Chinese assets to seize, farmland might be the way to begin working up to the $25 billion figure. A
2021 report from the Department of Agriculture indicated that China had by that time acquired roughly 384,000 acres of American agricultural land. It will take a lot more, however, to make Missourians whole for the fallout caused by the pandemic.

Bailey noted further that regarding the case, Missouri is in “constant contact with the Trump administration.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More