Friday, January 31, 2025

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

Why is Bill Gates breeding millions of mosquitoes?
Great Reset
, ,

Why is Bill Gates breeding millions of mosquitoes?

Bill Gates wants to transform Earth into the kind of hellscape that belongs in Dante. For example, his fixation with mass-breeding mosquitoes pulses with a scheming mind that surely can’t be benevolent.

Wall Street Silver recently connected a supposed looming mosquito-borne pandemic to Gates’ overenthusiastic farming of mosquitos. Here’s a video from the Bill Gates YouTube account describing the mosquito factory in Medellín, Colombia, where “scientists work long hours in muggy labs breeding millions and millions of mosquitoes.”


The Mosquito Factory

youtu.be

Gates claims that the project aims to “outsmart the world’s deadliest animal.” Throughout a slick, flawless three-part blog post, Gates (or the PR team in charge of his output) makes the case for his World Mosquito Program.

The objective: “They tend to the insects’ every need as they grow from larvae to pupae to adults, keeping the temperature just right and feeding them generous helpings of fishmeal, sugar, and, of course, blood. Then, they release them across the country to breed with wild mosquitoes that can carry dengue and other viruses threatening to sicken and kill the population of Colombia. This might sound like the beginnings of a Hollywood writer’s horror film plot. But it’s not. This factory is real. And the mosquitoes being released don’t terrorize the local population. Far from it. They’re actually helping to save and improve millions of lives.”

It feels somewhat murderous in spirit. Or maybe ‘sacrificial’ is a better adjective.

But let’s think about things logically here: Surely Gates means what he says, right? Bill Gates doesn’t really want to reduce the human population like some cartoonish villain, right?

Right?

Why would a Big Tech billionaire passionate about deadly viruses be so interested in farming mosquitoes?

This is a villainous conclusion, no matter what, if any, good premises it might have arisen from. It’s sinister to conclude that mosquitos should be farmed, globally, in response to mosquito-born diseases. It feels somewhat murderous in spirit. Or maybe “sacrificial” is a better adjective.

The Associated Press, once known as the law-giving epicenter of objectivity journalism, of fact-giving that no longer exists, has collapsed into a swamp of fiendish activism. Activists attack anyone who doubts any tidbit of their cause.

You wind up with baffling contradictions like this: “The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation doesn’t finance any modified mosquito release projects in the U.S. And experts say the types of mosquitoes that are used for that initiative in Florida are not capable of transmitting malaria.” Which reads a bit like, “These mosquito farms don’t exist, you bigot. But also the mosquitos used in the mosquito farm that does exist are harmless. Also there will be a mosquito-fueled pandemic soon, just coincidentally.”

The man literally founded an initiative called “The World Mosquito Program.”

There’s a reason figures like Gates, George Soros, and Klaus Schwab are widely considered nasty: They fund ghastly initiatives in the name of progress. All they’re missing is a literal banner of the Inferno to follow them around everywhere.

For the past month or so, there’s been a cycle of stories, reels, and tweets about the goodness of the wealthy people on the Titanic who had moral courage. We all know that Gates would shove infants out of the way to get into a lifeboat. “Hey Bill, why are you rowing south, New York is that way?” Straight to Epstein Island.

Read More
It’s been a rough week for Fauci’s inner circle — and things may get a lot worse
COVID-19
,

It’s been a rough week for Fauci’s inner circle — and things may get a lot worse

It has been a rough week for scientists who were in Anthony Fauci’s inner circle at the outset of the pandemic — particularly for Peter Daszak, head of the scandal-plagued EcoHealth Alliance, and for David M. Morens, senior scientific adviser to the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Where Daszak is concerned, all his years of protest and lab-leak denial were apparently for nought, given that he has finally been cut off from all federal funding.

The Department of Health and Human Services told the British zoologist in a letter Tuesday that it holds him personally responsible for EHA’s egregious shortcomings, oversight failures, and opacity as it pertains to the dangerous coronavirus experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Morens, who served as adviser to previous NIAID director Fauci, was accused Wednesday by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of undermining the operations of the U.S. government; unlawfully deleting federal COVID-19 records; using a personal email to avoid the Freedom of Information Act; “acting unbecoming of a federal employee”; and “likely lying to Congress on multiple occasions.”

Daszak makes a cameo in many of the emails that Morens may now be regretting.

The duo, who had a hand in helping Fauci downplay the likely lab origin of COVID-19, may soon face greater consequences than strongly worded letters and suspended funding.

“Dr. Daszak’s impending debarment does not shield him from accountability to the American people,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chairman of the coronavirus subcommittee, said in a statement Wednesday. “It appears that Dr. Daszak may have lied under oath about his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and his compliance with NIH grant procedures.”

As for Morens, the subcommittee indicated that it now has “overwhelming evidence from Dr. Morens’s own email that he engaged in serious misconduct and potentially illegal actions while serving as a Senior Advisor to Dr. Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Defunding the unaccountable

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General blasted EHA in a January 2023 report for dropping the ball on oversight regarding the use of grant money on coronavirus research in China and for failing to comply with federal requirements.

On May 1, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released its own report recommending that EHA be permanently cut off from taxpayer funding and that Daszak similarly be cut off as well as criminally investigated.

“Dr. Daszak and his organization conducted dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV, willfully violated the terms of a multimillion-dollar National Institutes of Health grant, and placed U.S. national security at risk. This blatant contempt for the American people is reprehensible,” Wenstrup said in a statement.

On May 15, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services suspended EHA from participating in federal procurement and nonprocurement programs and proposed its debarment “to protect the public interest.”

Whereas a suspension is a temporary action, a debarment serves as a more definitive denial of grant money that can last for several years and is used primarily for serious violations, according to Nature.

In the memo detailing the decision, HHS suspension and debarment official Henrietta Brisbon reiterated the grievances raised in both the subcommittee’s report and in HHS’ OIG report, altogether making clear that EHA was irresponsible and untrustworthy.

This week, HHS went a step farther, commencing formal debarment proceedings against Daszak.

HHS’ Tuesday letter to the British zoologist states, “The alleged conduct of EHA is imputed to you, because during all or part of the time relevant, you participated in, knew of, or had reason to know of EHA’s improper conduct, through your role as President of EHA, and also as the [program director/principal investigator]” for the relevant grant.

In addition to blackballing Daszak, the letter indicated he is prohibited from doing business with the federal government and receiving a subcontract from a government contractor valued at $35,000 or more and could face a debarment of over three years.

Wenstrup said of Daszak’s fate, “EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak’s personal debarment will ensure he never again receives a single cent from U.S. taxpayers nor has the opportunity to start a new, untrustworthy organization.”

“This step comes just two weeks after the Select Subcommittee released substantial evidence of Dr. Daszak’s contempt for the American people, his flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and his willful violation of the terms of his NIH grant,” added Wenstrup.

Justin Goodman, senior vice president of the White Coat Waste Project — a watchdog that helped expose Daszak’s and Fauci’s ties to the gain-of-function experiments at the WIV — told Blaze News in a statement, “The current government-wide suspension, and proposed debarment, of EcoHealth and Daszak will ensure taxpayers aren’t forced to fund any more of their wasteful and reckless virus hunting and animal experimentation that can cause pandemics and create bioweapons, especially their scary scheme to build a new bat virus lab on U.S. soil.”

Outing the opaque

Blaze News previously reported on Morens’ admission in correspondence with Fauci’s inner circle that he opted to use a personal email account and delete the exchanges thereon to evade Freedom of Information requests.

“As you know, I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly,” Morens reportedly wrote to the top scientists involved determining COVID-19’s origins, including Daszak, whose subcontractor Ben Hu conducted deadly gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was reportedly one of the first infected with COVID-19; virologists Robert Garry, Kristian Andersen, and Edward Holmes; and others.

On Wednesday, the coronavirus subcommittee released a memo presenting previously unreleased email correspondence further indicating that Morens helped Fauci avoid transparency when discussing the origins of COVID-19 — an alleged “conspiracy amongst the highest levels” to hide and potentially “destroy official records regarding the origins of COVID-19.”

In one email to Daszak, dated April 21, 2021, Morens wrote, “PS, i [sic] forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”

In a May 13, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, “I suggested to Arthur try to interview Tony directly and connected him to our ‘secret’ back channel. He emailed Tony a few hours ago.”

The subcommittee highlighted other efforts by Morens to “backchannel internal NIH information to EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak” and his discussion of Fauci’s intention to protect Daszak.

There also appears to be evidence that Morens received instruction from the NIH FOIA office on “how to make emails disappear” upon being met with a FOIA request.

In a Feb. 25, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, “I learned the tricks last year from an old friend, Marg Moore, who heads our FOIA office and also hates FOIAs.”

Like Fauci, Morens apparently preferred to communicate off the record via his personal account.

“I forgot to clarify in my email yesterday that BOTH my gmail and phone calls are now safe. Test is NOT, as it can be FOIA’d, as can my got email,” Morens wrote in a Nov. 19, 2021, letter. “So you and Peter and others sshould be able to email me on gmail only, with the caveat that no other govt. employee is copied at a govt address, as all govt emails are potentially FOIA’able.”

Morens’ help may have come at a price. The subcommittee highlighted one exchange where Morens appears to press Daszak for a “kickback” for his help editing EHA’s grant compliance efforts.

According to the subcommittee, Morens undermined NIH efforts to oversee EHA, provided Daszak “with inside information regarding NIH operations,” and likely provided false testimony to Congress when giving testifying before the subcommittee on Dec. 22, 2023, and Jan. 18.

The New York Post indicated that when Morens, currently on administrative leave, appeared before the subcommittee Wednesday to testify about the findings detailed in the memo, he faced a bipartisan longue lashing.

Ranking member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.) said, “It is not anti-science to hold you accountable for defying the public’s trust and misusing official resources.”

“What troubles me most about your conduct, Dr. Morens, is the extent to which it so willingly betrays decades of dedication, diligence, and decorum from the thousands of federal scientists and public health workers who came before you, who have served alongside you, and who will serve on into the future,” added Ruiz.

Goodman told Blaze News that for allegedly lying to Congress about what happened in Wuhan, Daszak, Fauci, and Morens “can and should face fines and jail time for perjury, as Senator Rand Paul has requested in referrals to the DOJ.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
In Orwellian commencement address, Fauci calls for pushback against ‘untruth’ while ignoring his own lies
Great Reset
,

In Orwellian commencement address, Fauci calls for pushback against ‘untruth’ while ignoring his own lies

Dr. Anthony Fauci came out of hiding to give the commencement speech for this year’s Columbia University graduates, and it was so dystopian, it sounded as if it were ripped straight from the pages of Orwell’s “1984.”

“Differences of opinion or ideology have in certain circumstances been reflected by egregious distortions of reality,” Fauci told the students.

“Sadly, elements of our society are driven by a cacophony of falsehoods, lies, and conspiracy theories that get repeated often enough that after a while, they stand largely unchallenged, ominously leading to an insidious acceptance of what I call ‘the normalization of untruth,’” he continued.

“Wouldn’t that sort of be like if you get the vaccine you will not get nor transmit COVID? Would it be a lie to say that six-foot social distancing was a complete lie? It was. There was no evidence that masks worked — like everything this man has pushed,” Dave Rubin, host of “The Rubin Report,” says.

Fauci went on to blame news organizations and social media and claimed that it’s relevant to those in science and medical professions because “our very identity is anchored in data, evidence, and critical thinking.”

“And we as much or more than anyone else need to push back on these distortions of truth and reality,” Fauci concluded, echoing the Orwellian idea that only the official line of “truth” should be allowed in the public sphere.

“Everything he just accused all of us of is the stuff that he and his cadre of lunatics have been doing,” Rubin concluded.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
Warning: Pfizer wants to do for cancer what it did for COVID
COVID-19
,

Warning: Pfizer wants to do for cancer what it did for COVID

Last year, Steve Deace and I wrote a book amassing the evidence for 21st-century Nuremberg trials of public officials who willingly promoted and mandated deadly biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our case was strong even with what we knew at the time. The evidence that has come out since then makes that level of calamitous death and injury seem insignificant by comparison.

What if the deaths and injuries in the months immediately following the arrival of the COVID shots were just the opening act? A consensus has emerged that we’re in the midst of a cancer crisis. Pfizer itself is acknowledging it and seeks to capitalize on a cancer bomb for which the company may very well be partially responsible.

Until we start holding Republicans and Democrats bought out by special interests accountable, the arsonists will always be there to fight the new fire they started.

Aaron Hertzberg of TrialSite News has collected 36 case reports showing a potential correlation between an individual’s cancer diagnosis and being injected with one of the COVID shots. It’s hard to dismiss casualty in these cases because we now have a wealth of macro-epidemiological data that show an unmistakable link between a once-in-a-lifetime explosion of cancer and introduction of the vaccines.

Scientists in a host of publications have already identified multiple pathologies of how the vaccines either cause cancer or inhibit the body’s anti-tumor surveillance that protects us from cancer. In fact, the smoking gun is so obvious — but so taboo to acknowledge — that authors of one study published last month in the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules had to add a laughable caveat: “It is important to clarify here that mRNA vaccines do not cause cancer; but they could stimulate its development.”

From day one, Pfizer told us that genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of its mRNA shots were “not considered necessary.” Despite the tsunami of adverse events affecting every corner of the body and the revelation that the shots were contaminated with plasmid DNA and potentially access the nucleus of cells, they still have not done any such studies.

Now, we have the 2024 American Cancer Society report warning that colorectal cancer is the top cancer killer for men under 55. Doctors are reporting that colorectal tumors are more aggressive and more difficult to treat. As Dr. Pierre Kory noted, “Compared to pre-pandemic 2019, cancer deaths in 2023 rose strikingly in 15-to-44-year-olds: Uterine cancer, up 37%; colorectal, up 17%; liver, up 8%, and — suggestive of quickly growing disease — “unspecified” metastatic cancer, up 14%.”

Why would there be an explosion of sudden uncontrolled and untreatable cancers? We have a gene in our body known as P53 that helps block cancers and certainly keeps them at bay. Well, we now know that shots contain SV40, a cancer promoting protein, that binds directly to the P53 gene.

Between the SV40, uncontrolled spike proteins, modified nucleotides, and DNA contamination, scientists have identified multiple smoking guns that would explain the surge in aggressive cancers that is impossible to assign to chance.

Shockingly, Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla was invited on Fox Business a few weeks ago to brag that cancer is “our new COVID” and how the company plans to do to cancer what it did to COVID.

Well, aside from the shot causing an endless litany of death, disability, and injury, what exactly did Pfizer do to COVID? It turbo charged it — just like it appears to be doing with cancer!

Thanks to the work of Wouter Aukema in the Netherlands, as reported by British investigative journalist Sonia Elijah, we now have access to millions of adverse effect case reports in EudraVigilance, the European equivalent of VAERS. COVID-19 itself was listed as the most common side effect of the vaccines. This jives with numerous studies we reported on beginning in 2021 and 2022 showing that the more you inject, the more you infect.

The COVID shots seem to weaken the immune system and prime the system for more spike protein by using suboptimal antibody that creates evolutionary effects on the virus leading to what is known as “pathogenic priming” and “original antigenic sin.”

Several weeks ago, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic found that after monitoring 47,500 of its employees during the first part of 2024, there was a 46% greater risk of the vaccinated contracting COVID than the unvaccinated. They found “the more you inject, the more you infect” phenomenon playing out in the real world, as the risk increased with each successive dose. Those with three doses were 95% more likely to get infected than people who declined the shot. People with more than three doses were a whopping 151% more likely to get infected.

The authors concede this is one of many studies that show the same result, but, without evidence, they claim the shots still provide some short-term benefits even it if is undone in the long-term.

So, not only did the shots kill and main countless human beings, but they also perpetuated COVID to this day.

Yet, not only has the government declined to take the shots off the market and hold Pfizer accountable, the FDA is also greenlighting the company’s new, dangerous RSV shots and cancer treatments. Not a single drug regulator will even look at the cancer signals from the COVID shots as they approve Pfizer’s new RSV shots. The British Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency even admitted to Sonia Elijah las year that “there are currently no intentions to test the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine for the presence of fragmented DNA and SV40 enhancer.”

There is a reason why Biden has obsessed with cancer during his past two State of the Union addresses and why Bourla is bragging about cancer treatments replicating his “success” with COVID. Until we start holding Republicans and Democrats bought out by special interests accountable, the arsonists will always be there to fight the new fire they started.

Read More
Elon Musk demands Anthony Fauci be prosecuted after NIH admits to funding gain-of-function research at Wuhan lab
COVID-19
,

Elon Musk demands Anthony Fauci be prosecuted after NIH admits to funding gain-of-function research at Wuhan lab

Elon Musk demanded the prosecution of Dr. Anthony Fauci after a National Institutes of Health official confessed that U.S. taxpayer funds were used for risky gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. The alarming admission by the top NIH bureaucrat directly contradicts sworn testimony that Fauci made when questioned by Congress.

On Thursday, acting NIH Director and current Principal Deputy Director Dr. Lawrence Tabak was questioned during a hearing by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. The hearing had a mission to compel Tabak to “explain numerous inconsistencies between the public and private testimonies of NIH employees and EcoHealth President, Dr. Peter Daszak.”

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) asked Tabak about the NIH’s role in risky gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the Manhattan-based EcoHealth Alliance – the nonprofit organization that was involved in controversial coronavirus experiments.

Lesko inquired, “Dr. Tabak, did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth?”

Tabak replied, “It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research. If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic declared, “Dr. Tabak offered substantial evidence that Dr. Daszak purposefully misled both the NIH and the Select Subcommittee about EcoHealth’s efforts to comply with grant procedures.”

Tabak’s response also contradicts Fauci’s repeated claims that there was no gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab funded by the NIH.

As Blaze News previously reported, Fauci clashed with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) during a fiery confrontation before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions in May 2021.

Paul asked Fauci, “Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan?”

Fauci answered, “Sen. Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely, entirely and completely incorrect. The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund ‘gain of function research’ in the Wuhan Institute.”

In July 2021, Paul pressed Fauci about the NIH using taxpayer money to fund gain-of-research experiments at the Wuhan lab.

Paul asked, “Dr. Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11, where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research?”

Fauci replied, “Sen. Paul, I have never lied before the Congress. And I do not retract that statement.”

Fauci, now 83, then attacked Paul by saying, “You don’t know what you’re talking about, quite frankly.”

On Wednesday, Paul told Newsmax, “So, you have this bureaucrat Anthony Fauci in charge of the money spigot who is not really a researcher in this, but saying adamantly that it wasn’t gain-of-function. Why does he say that? Because he wants to escape responsibility for having funded research and for having made the terrible decision to fund research that led to a pandemic that killed millions of people.”


Dr. Paul Questions Dr. Fauci on Wuhan Lab and Gain of Function Research – May 11, 2021

www.youtube.com

On Friday, Elon Musk wrote on the X social media platform: “Prosecute/Fauci.”

U.S. Code Section 1621 states that anyone who “willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true” is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both. The statute of limitations for perjury is five years from the time the statement was made.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services defines gain-of-function research as:

Studies, or research that improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease, help define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, thereby enabling assessment of the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, informing public health and preparedness efforts, and furthering medical countermeasure development.

In October 2014, the Obama administration halted all federal funding for risky gain-of-function studies.

Former President Barack Obama’s White House announced a “pause” to “assess the potential risks and benefits associated with a subset of life sciences research known as ‘gain-of-function’ studies.”

The NIH announced in December 2017 – when Donald Trump was president – that it was lifting the funding pause on gain-of-function experiments.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Utah mom left ‘disabled’ after COVID-19 vaccine trial launches first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca
COVID-19
,

Utah mom left ‘disabled’ after COVID-19 vaccine trial launches first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca

Prior to the pandemic,
Brianne Dressen of Salt Lake City was living the active life she always wanted. She went rock climbing with her husband, a chemist for the U.S. Army; ferried her two children to and from soccer games and piano practices; and taught preschool.

Everything came to a screeching halt in November 2020 — not as a result of the union-driven school closures, the lockdowns, or the outcome of the election, but with her participation in an AstraZeneca vaccine trial.

“I walked into the clinic fine, and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.”

The experimental vaccine allegedly left the 42-year-old Utah mother with a debilitating injury.

Dressen cannot bring a product liability action against the company on account of the
federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. She can, however, possibly ding the British-Swedish pharmaceutical giant for breach of contract, which is exactly what she aims to do.

Dressen filed a
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah Monday alleging that she developed a debilitating neurological condition as a result of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and that the British-Swedish pharmaceutical giant failed to cover the cost of her medical care as promised.

When presented with Dressen’s complaint, Daniel Horowitz, the host of “Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz” on the Blaze Podcast Network and author of “Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial So This Never Happens Again,” told Blaze News, “It is shocking how we now have thousands of academic and case studies of injuries affecting every organ system, yet victims remain alone with little legal recourse for compensation.”

“We have VAERS, V-Safe, documents from the vaccine manufacturers, and European Medicines Agency reporting, all showing catastrophic levels of injury, yet there is no critical mass of a political movement in any country at this point to repeal unbridled indemnity of these criminal enterprises,” continued Horowitz. “It’s also peculiar how AstraZeneca was taken off the market, but the mRNA shots, which are even worse, remain funded and promoted by government.”

Background

The Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine was a viral-vector vaccine developed in collaboration with Oxford University and produced for various companies by the
Serum Institute of India.

While 32,000 Americans like Dressen participated in vaccine trials in the homeland and the Biden administration agreed to share up to 60 million doses with other nations, the AstraZeneca vaccine was never rolled out in the United States. It was, however, administered billions of times worldwide.

It quickly became clear that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as health authorities throughout the Anglosphere had guaranteed. After all, there were numerous reports of otherwise healthy recipients experiencing abnormal bleeding, low blood platelets, blood clots, and even dying.

German and Nordic researchers
determined that some recipients were developing a clotting disorder called “vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia,” which produced antibodies that activated platelets and led to clots.

Despite a growing number of likely victims, AstraZeneca
suggested there was “no evidence of an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or thrombocytopenia, in any defined age group, gender, batch or in any particular country.”

The company’s claims have aged like milk.

Last year, Jamie Scott, a father of two left with a permanent clot-related brain injury, filed suit against the company. His complaint was followed by dozens more and ultimately a class-action lawsuit.

Several months after Scott sued AstraZeneca, the company admitted in a February court document that “it is admitted that the AZ vaccine can, in very rare cases, cause [thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome]. The causal mechanism is not known.”

The following month, the company withdrew its “marketing authorization” in the European Union. That application went into effect last week. The Telegraph
reported that AstraZeneca is expected to remove the vaccine from all other markets where it was approved.

‘Hollowed out’

Dressen’s
lawsuit, reportedly the first to be launched stateside against AstraZeneca, claims the company offered various written promises to participants in its vaccine trial, including financial reimbursement for each completed visit to the test clinic for various procedures; financial reimbursement for each completed phone call linked to the study; and compensation for study-related injuries.

“At the moment the substance entered Bri’s blood, a solemn contract had been formed.”

“Defendants defined ‘research injuries’ as ‘[i]njuries that have been caused by the vaccine, tests or procedures,'” said the lawsuit. “Defendants promised that ‘Sponsor will pay the costs of medical treatment for research injuries, provided that the costs are reasonable, and you did not cause the injury yourself.'”

“At the moment the substance entered Bri’s blood, a solemn contract had been formed,” said the complaint. “Her performance was complete and Defendants’ promises were irrevocable.”

When things went south, the lawsuit claims the company effectively left Dressen hanging.

“I was a completely hollowed out version of who I once was.”

Within an hour of receiving the shot, Dressen claims she experienced tingling in her arm. The paraesthesia apparently was not temporary or localized. It soon spread to her other arm.

“That evening other progressively worrying symptoms emerged: blurred vision, double vision, headache, sound sensitivity, a loud ringing in the ears (tinnitus), nausea, vomiting, fever, and chills,” said the lawsuit.

In the weeks that followed, a prickling sensation reportedly spread to Dressen’s legs. She indicated she lost 20 pounds from constant vomiting while this and her other symptoms worsened.

“I walked in to the clinic fine, and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy,” recalled Dressen. “My little girl’s voice was too painful for my ears. My little boy’s hand was too painful for touch. There was no break, no reprieve, no escape. No answers, no help, only questions, and fear of what was overtaking my body more and more each day as new symptoms piled on.”

“I was a completely hollowed out version of who I once was,” added Dressen.

In June 2021, a team of neurologists from the National Institute of Health reportedly diagnosed Dressen as having “Post Vaccine Neuropathy.”

According to the lawsuit, Dressen is still “disabled” three years later; “a shadow of her former self: unable to work, unable to do any athletic activity, unable to parent the way she had, and unable to drive more than a few blocks at a time.”

Dressen
told the Telegraph that the worse part is that her children, now aged nine and 11, can’t remember the kind of person their mother was before the injury.

“It really sucks. The worse part, the biggest punishment of all of this, is the impact on my kids,” said Dressen.

Painful and costly

Dressen’s lawsuit claims that AstraZeneca ignored multiple requests for support until finally coughing up a meager $1,243.30, “a minuscule fraction of the medical bills and lost wages, among other financial costs, that Bri had incurred and will continue to incur.”

After all, Dressen’s biweekly medication supposedly ran her $3,500 per session. One of her current medications would cost her over $430,000 a year. With the help of insurance, she is presently paying roughly $119,000.

“The way we have been and continue to be treated is simply appalling.”

In order to access the $1,243.30, Dressen would have to release AstraZeneca of further responsibility for her care.

“The way we have been and continue to be treated is simply appalling,” Brian Dressen, the plaintiff’s husband, is quoted as saying in the complaint.

The Telegraph reported that Utah law enables complainants who sue for breach of contract to claim for damages and costs resulting from the alleged breach. While Dressen is not suing for a specific amount, she could possibly have AstraZeneca on the hook, not only for her legal and medical bills, but for additional damages — including for lost income and emotional distress.

A spokeswoman for the company told the Telegraph that AstraZeneca would not comment on ongoing litigation. She did, however, say, “Patient safety is our highest priority. From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real-world data, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.”





Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Scientist who contributed to UN climate report touts global virus as final solution for curbing emissions
Great Reset

Scientist who contributed to UN climate report touts global virus as final solution for curbing emissions

Bill McGuire, a professor emeritus of earth sciences at University College London and co-director of the New Weather Institute, has long been a climate alarmist. McGuire, whose specialty appears to be volcanoes, contributed to the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2012 report; scaremongered about the weather on numerous BBC Radio 4 series; wrote a book 16 years ago entitled “Seven Years to Save the Planet”; and now criticizes affordable energy in the pages of the Guardian.

In March, McGuire
recommended that Britons “green our towns and cities”; “replac[e] tarmac and concrete with more permeable materials”; “insulate, insulate, insulate”; and paint buildings white. On Friday, the volcanist went farther, recommending against laughing off climate alarmists’ prophesies.

It appears McGuire understands his proposals to be foolhardy — that more is needed than white paint and stoicism to save the world from imagined future harms.

Culling the herd

McGuire noted Saturday in
since-deleted tweet, “If I am brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic #climate breakdown, is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate.”

McGuire’s “realistic” solution sounds like the yet-to-be-released COVID-19 sequel that fellow alarmists, such as Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the head of the World Health Organization, have
warned about in recent months.

At a World Economic Forum event in January, Ghebreyesus discussed Disease X and said, “Anything happening is a matter of when, not if.”

The WEF suggested that “Disease X” could “result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic,”
reported Newsweek.

McGuire appeared to have an idea of what virus might do the trick, having linked in his “culling” tweet to a
Saturday article in the Guardian about the H5N1 strain of influenza, commonly referred to as the bird flu.

The thrust of the linked article was that the bird flu being examined by British scientists might ultimately leap into human beings.

Virologist Paul Digard of the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh is quoted in the artlce as saying, “Now that it seems to be fairly widespread in the cow population in the U.S., that’s a much more direct route where it could transmit to people and gain the adaptations it needs to go pandemic.”

The article noted further as if to reassure, “If H5N1 did start spreading among people, the good news is that the world has plenty of recent experience when it comes to rolling out large-scale vaccination programmes. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there are two candidate vaccines against a related strain of flu viruses that could be shipped within weeks, if necessary.”

Backpedaling

McGuire’s suggestion — that the “only realistic way” to get down emissions to desirable levels would be the deaths of millions if not billions of human beings — was not well received. He evidently decided that the way forwad would be to accuse his critics of illiteracy and a collective failure of comprehension.

“I SAID ‘THE ONLY WAY I SEE EMISSIONS FALLING AS FAST AS THEY NEED TO,'” McGuire wrote in a subsequent tweet.

“SEEMS LIKE A LOT OF PEOPLE CAN’T READ. I SAID ‘THE ONLY WAY I SEE EMISSIONS FALLING AS FAST AS THEY NEED TO…’ I DID NOT SAY ‘WE NEED A PANDEMIC,'” wrote McGuire. “FFS DON’T READ THINGS INTO A STATEMENT THAT AREN’T THERE[.] I COULD HAVE SAD SOCIETY-BUSTING ASTEROID IMPACT INSTEAD OF PANDEMIC.”

McGuire’s first all-caps response to his critics did not go over well, so he tried again hours later, writing, “RIGHT, I AM DELETING THE INITIAL TWEET NOW. NOT BECAUSE I REGRET IT, BUT BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE HAVE MISTAKENLY, OR INTENTIONALLY, TAKE IT THE WRONG WAY.”

The Virginia Project, a Republican political action committee among the many groups and individuals that blasted McGuire, wrote, “The world understood exactly what you meant, which is that in order to meet the goals of ‘climate change’ fanatics, a mass extermination of humanity on a global scale is necessary. That is the logical conclusion of ‘climate change’ advocacy. You just got caught admitting it.”

Multitudes of other users on X suggested likewise, prompting McGuire to suggest that by a pandemic-driven “culling,” he actually meant a drop in economic productivity — the kind that in recent years corresponding with millions of people dying worldwide.

McGuire added in a Sunday tweet, “Would love to hear how emissions can be cut by at east 50% in the next 66 months (by 2030) without a major socio-economic shock that slashes economic activity[.] This MUST happen to have any chance of sidestepping dangerous, all-pervasive, climate breakdown.”

While McGuire appears to have said the quiet part out loud, he is hardly the only Britsh-based climate alarmist to publicly showcase his hostility toward human life in recent months.

Blaze News
previously reported that Donnachadh McCarthy, a failed politician involved in Just Stop Oil and one of the leading figures of Extinction Rebellion, went on British television earlier this year to suggest that “there is a moral issue” with having too many children and that families should be limited to one child.

Late last year, scientists at the U.K. Center for Ecology and Hydrology
raised the alarm that human breathing is contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, urging “caution in the assumption that emissions from humans are negligible.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID tyrant didn’t want the unvaccinated in public, now says vaccines are ‘debatable’
COVID-19
, ,

COVID tyrant didn’t want the unvaccinated in public, now says vaccines are ‘debatable’

As the news finally begins to catch up with the “anti-vaxxers” of 2024, public figures who at one time shamed those unwilling to take the vaccines are now pretending to support them.

In a podcast with Andrew Cuomo, former Commissioner of the Baltimore City Health Department Leana Wen did just this. Wen claimed that vaccines, masks, and natural immunity “are actually not controversial, but they’re more debatable.”

“For a long time, it was taboo to bring it up for fear that you might be called an anti-vaxxer, and so I think that public trust has been eroded,” she said.

Not so long ago, Wen was telling Chris Cuomo on CNN a much different story. Cuomo has also now renounced his prior views on COVID and life-saving drugs like ivermectin — claiming he now takes it regularly himself.

“We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated the same as we look at driving while intoxicated, that you have the option to not get vaccinated if you want, but then you can’t go out in public,” Wen told Cuomo.

Steve Deace is not only not buying it, but he’s far from amused.

“I want to literally see everybody in those videos just put on trial for their lives,” Deace says. “First of all, is it a good idea to turn a woman whose highest professional accomplishment was overseeing one of the worst serial killers in human history and turning her into a public health expert?”

But why are these public figures suddenly coming forward?

“Because they’re not afraid of that. They can gaslight you because the people have spoken and said, ‘No, we’re not going to hold you accountable.’ So, that’s why we’re getting any of this whatsoever from these people. Any amount false or otherwise contrition, that’s why we’re getting it,” Aaron explains.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
Chris Cuomo says he’s now regularly taking ivermectin after unapologetically shaming those who said it worked
COVID-19
,

Chris Cuomo says he’s now regularly taking ivermectin after unapologetically shaming those who said it worked

Disgraced former CNN talking head Chris Cuomo recently revealed that the very life-saving drug he helped smear during the pandemic now courses through his veins.

Background

Ivermectin, an inexpensive anti-parasitic drug with anti-inflammatory properties, was approved for use in humans in 1987 and has since been one of the most commonly prescribed medications in the United States. For discovering some of the ways it could be used to save human lives and stave off blindness, William C. Campbell and Satoshi Omura were
awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015.

“[If] ivermectin is what those of us who have looked at the evidence think it is … the debate about the vaccines would be over by definition,” said Bret Weinstein.

This life-saving and prize-worthy generic medicine underwent a sudden rebrand during the pandemic after various scientists and doctors realized it could be used as a cheap and effective way to treat COVID-19 infections. Among the various indications that the drug worked was a
June 2020 study in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Antiviral Research, which showed that ivermectin inhibited the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.

Evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein
told Tucker Carlson in July 2021, “[If] ivermectin is what those of us who have looked at the evidence think it is … the debate about the vaccines would be over by definition.”

The mainstream media, the
Food and Drug Administration, and various so-called experts — all apparently captive to the idea that the only way to treat COVID-19 was with expensive, novel vaccines produced by the pharmaceutical giants that routinely advertise on CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC — smeared the drug and those who dared prescribe it, suggesting that ivermectin was nothing more than a poisonous “horse de-worming drug.”

Months into this campaign, the FDA
warned in March 2021 that taking the drug could “cause serious harm,” then in August leaned into the horse de-wormer smear, tweeting, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Serious y’all. Stop It.”

The FDA was later sued over its misleading claims and ultimately settled in March. Per the terms of the settlement, the agency agreed to remove its anti-ivermectin propaganda from social media. However, the damage was already done.

Daniel Horowitz, the host of “Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz” on the Blaze Podcast Network and author of “Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial So This Never Happens Again,” told Blaze News, “Words cannot fully capture the degree of human suffering from the war on alternative treatments at a time when the medical establishment had zero answers for patients — including those already vaccinated — with blood oxygen levels dropping. The war on ivermectin and similar drugs was so demonic that they would find every way possible to deny prescriptions and then filling them even at the pharmacies.”

“It was so bad that doctors would tell families their patients were as good as dead, and that it was now time to pull the plug, but [would] still go to court to block their ability to use ivermectin as a last try,” continued Horowitz. “I’m still haunted by nightmares of hundreds of sick people reaching out to me, desperate for treatment and access to the heroic doctors I was privileged to know.”

Cuomo climbs aboard the bandwagon

Around the time the anti-ivermectin campaign was ramping up, Chris Cuomo still had a job at CNN, having not yet been canned over
his role in disgraced former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s sex scandal. Cuomo willingly partook in the horse de-wormer smear.

In one instance, Cuomo joined Don Lemon — who CNN later also ended up firing — in blasting people who considered taking ivermectin.

“People are getting, injecting drugs for animals and horses — oh my God,” said Don Lemon.

“And people telling them to,” Cuomo chimed in. “What person — you know you talk about like cancel culture and who to shame. Ivermectin. A de-wormer. Really? … They need to be called out and shamed, brother.”

‘Nauseating’ about-face

Cuomo, now with NewsNation, recently appeared on Patrick Bet-David’s podcast where he was lightly grilled over his pandemic-era punditry. Bet-David showed Cuomo a viral video of a
July 2021 CNN segment in which he berated Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) for refusing to take or push the COVID-19 experimental vaccine on the American public.

Bet-David asked Cuomo, “What’s changed from that conversation with you and Byron to where you are today?”

“Well, a lot has changed and a lot needs to change that hasn’t,” replied Cuomo, adding he would not apologize.

“It was never personal. I believe as a leader, at that time, you had a duty to be thorough in what you were putting out there as opposed to just playing politics, ok. This was never as simple as vaccine good, vaccine bad. Politics made it that,” said Cuomo, who is suffering from long-term health effects he resists attributing to the vaccines. “And it put us in a toxic environment.”

“Do I now believe that we have data to support the fact that there are thousands of people who have adverse effects, that are not getting attention let alone treatment? Yes, and I fault government for that,” continued Cuomo. “I do not fault myself for telling people at the time what the government was giving us as best practices.”

Deeper into the podcast, Cuomo made a major admission.

“I’ll tell you something else that’s going to get you a lot of hits. I am taking a … regular dose, you know whatever, of ivermectin. Ivermectin was a boogeyman early on in COVID,” said Cuomo. “That was wrong. We were given bad information about ivermectin. The real question is, ‘Why?'”

“Everyone is going to say, ‘Joe Rogan was right.’ No, Joe Rogan was saying — yeah, we was right, but that’s not what matters. What matters is the entire clinical community knew that ivermectin couldn’t hurt you. They knew it, Patrick. I know they knew it. How do I know it?” continued the former CNN host. “Because now I am doing nothing but talking to these clinicians who at the time were overwhelmed by COVID, and they weren’t saying anything, not that they were hiding anything. But it’s cheap, it’s not owned by anybody, and it’s used as anti-microbial, anti-viral in all these different ways and has been for a long time.”

“My doctor … was using it during COVID on her family and on her patients and it was working for them,” added Cuomo. “So, they were wrong to play scared on that. Didn’t know that at the time. Know it now. Admit it now. Reporting on it now.”

Horowitz told Blaze News, “For Cuomo to suddenly acknowledge he knew all along ivermectin worked while joining the COVID genocide bandwagon when it was actually needed is nauseating.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
‘People like me’: Chris Cuomo admits COVID vaccines INJURED MILLIONS, including HIMSELF
COVID-19
,

‘People like me’: Chris Cuomo admits COVID vaccines INJURED MILLIONS, including HIMSELF

Those who pushed the COVID vaccine the hardest are now finally admitting that it might not have been all it was cracked up to be — and was instead much, much worse.

After the New York Times published an article titled “Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is Anyone Listening,” Chris Cuomo became one of those to finally speak out against what’s happened.

Cuomo revealed for the first time that he’s been suffering from side effects that he attributes to the vaccine during an in-depth interview with nurse practitioner Shaun Barcavage, who also claims to have side effects.

Barcavage got his first dose in 2020 and felt side effects immediately.

“Just standing up sent his heart racing, stinging pain in his eyes, mouth, groin,” Cuomo described.

“We know that vaccines can have unintended consequences, aka side effects, but nobody’s really talking about it because they’re too afraid of blame and they just want it to go away,” he continued. “But the problem is people like Shaun and me and millions of others who still have weird stuff with their blood work and their lives and their feelings, you know, physically, are not going away.”

Barcavage told Cuomo that his side effects are “not a belief” but “a fact.”

“As soon as I was injured, 15, 20 minutes after my first dose, I had the numbness, tingling up and down my injected arm that, over days, spread to my face and my eyes,” Barcavage said.

When he went to see a neurologist, he ran tests and was told that “this was all new,” that the hospital would mandate the vaccine — and he was instructed to get a second dose.

“Everything in my medical mind and in my bones was telling me no. If you have a reaction after something, don’t do it again, but the pressure was immense. And then three weeks rolled around, I got a second dose, and after that, everything blew up. I went from being a 100% healthy, fully functioning nurse to in a complete downward spiral of health,” he told Cuomo.

Dave Rubin didn’t get the vaccine himself but feels for those who did.

“There are literally millions of people in this country right now and hundreds of millions all over the world who got that vaccine,” Rubin says. “A huge percentage of them against their will, just to keep their jobs or to make someone in their family happy or because they were completely bamboozled by the media.”

“They were bamboozled by people like Chris Cuomo, and now, Chris Cuomo is dealing with some of the fallout from that literally in his own body,” he adds.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More