Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

COVID-19

BlazeTV debuts damning docuseries exposing COVID origins ‘coverup’ ahead of Fauci hearing

There was a concerted public-private campaign during the pandemic to downplay the strong likelihood that COVID-19 — a virus that would go on to kill millions worldwide — did not originate in the controversial Chinese communist lab that long engaged in dangerous experiments on coronaviruses with the help of U.S. taxpayer dollars.

While the Chinese communist regime
did its part to bury evidence of a potential lab leak as the virus was first spreading, then-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci ultimately did the heavy lifting in terms of narrative curation.

Anthony Fauci and the virologists in his orbit
worked feverishly to suggest that the virus had a zoonotic origin, concealing their own doubts about that possibility while denigrating those who would suggest otherwise.

There was cause, after all, for them to engage in revisionism and propaganda. Elements of the Western medical establishment admittedly didn’t want to
alienate China by assigning it any blame over the deaths of multitudes of Americans, and Fauci had his fingerprints on the American grant money poured into dangerous work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology via disgraced zoologist Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance — whose gain-of-function subcontractor was ostensibly among the patients zero who took ill in late 2019.

The lab-leak theory was
censored on social media, especially on Facebook, which directly coordinated with Fauci. Talk show hosts, talking heads, and once respected newspapers dutifully parroted the approved talking points.

Yet, not all were convinced in Washington, D.C., the media, and the medical establishment — certainly not Stanford University’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, epidemiologist and co-author of the “Great Barrington Declaration,” and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Both Bhattacharya and Paul are among those featured in ”
The Coverup,” a new documentary series presented by Blaze Media and Free the People, which debuts today on BlazeTV.


The Coverup” explores the evolution of the Fauci-anointed COVID-19 origins narrative, the corresponding censorship campaign, various underlying motives and vested interests, and the ultimate breakdown of truth, breaking new ground and making Fauci’s job of spinning yarns before Congress next week all the more difficult.

‘You would go down in history as one of the world’s greatest monsters.’

In BlazeTV host Matthew B. Kibbe’s deep-dive in the
first episode of the series, entitled “Dissident,” he speaks to Bhattacharya about the research agenda that set the stage for the deadly outbreak and assesses what was at stake for the powers that be — and for Fauci in particular — where narrative control was concerned.

“He’s in a tough position,” said Bhattacharya. “If people understand that what has happened the last three-and-a-half years in the COVID pandemic is potentially, maybe even actually, a result of this kind of research agenda and Fauci was one of its champions, he is in a very tough spot.”

“Millions and millions of people have died. Economies have been devastated,” continued Bhattacharya. “The poor of the world, children, vulnerable people have been hurt by this mad science experiment. … You would go down in history as one of the world’s greatest monsters.”

Later in the episode, Bhattacharya discusses the nature of the infrastructure shoring up the deadly research agenda as well as the possible link between officials’ cognizance of a possible lab leak and the draconian COVID protocols they ultimately promoted.

Extra to speaking to Dr. Bhattacharya and Sen. Paul in the series, in subsequent episodes, Kibbe gleans troubling insights from White House Coronavirus Task Force insiders about the early commitment to the zoonotics origin narrative, from journalists censored for asking questions, and from those working to hold the apparent architects of the pandemic responsible in its aftermath.

‘They want us to just move on.’

Kibbe told Blaze Media, “Free the People produced ‘The Coverup’ to shine light on the shadowy government figures who caused so much pain and suffering with their tyrannical overreach during the pandemic. They would rather we not uncover what really happened. They want us to just move on.”

“Unfortunately for them, I’m not going to let that happen,” continued Kibbe. “As someone who has been fighting big government for most of my career, this fight is the most crucial one. I want to expose their unethical motives and wildly dangerous actions and figure out who really pulls the strings behind the curtain of the pandemic industrial complex. Because they’re not going to stop. The power is too intoxicating.”

“This investigative series from Blaze Media and Free the People will arm alarmed citizens with the truth, and that’s the one thing shadowy bureaucratic schemers like Anthony Fauci cannot withstand — exposure to sunlight,” added series’ host.

Editor’s note: The article has been updated to incorporate Matthew Kibbe’s statement to Blaze Media.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

‘The Coverup’ exposes Fauci and his cabal’s lies about the COVID-19 pandemic

Beginning in March 2020, governments, academics, social media companies, mainstream media, power-hungry bureaucrats, and globalists colluded to drive the narrative of the COVID-19 epidemic. Anyone, whether a concerned citizen, a democratically elected politician, or even a distinguished epidemiologist, going against that narrative needed to be silenced and discredited as quickly as possible.

That same cabal, led by people such as former NIAID director Anthony Fauci, has spent years lying, obfuscating, and avoiding consequences for its actions. The members can hide no more.

‘That’s the one thing shadowy bureaucratic schemers like Anthony Fauci cannot withstand — exposure to sunlight.’

Armed with the facts, BlazeTV host Matt Kibbe and his team at Free the People have spent months investigating the origins of the COVID-19 virus and the extreme lengths to which the government, the media, academics, and public health bureaucrats went to prevent anyone from so much as questioning the official narrative.

On Thursday, May 30, Blaze Media released the first episode in a new docuseries, “The Coverup,” hosted by Kibbe and produced by Free the People. Part political thriller, part true crime investigation, “The Coverup” sheds light on the dissident voices that the corporate media, at the behest of government, tried to silence.

Kibbe told Blaze Media, “Free the People produced ‘The Coverup’ to shine light on the shadowy government figures who caused so much pain and suffering with their tyrannical overreach during the pandemic. They would rather we not uncover what really happened. They want us to just move on.” He added, “Unfortunately for them, I’m not going to let that happen.”

Kibbe continued, “As someone who has been fighting big government for most of my career, this fight is the most crucial one. I want to expose their unethical motives and wildly dangerous actions and figure out who really pulls the strings behind the curtain of the pandemic industrial complex. Because they’re not going to stop. The power is too intoxicating.”

“They will stop at nothing to demonize and destroy anyone brave enough to ask the right questions. This investigative series from Blaze Media and Free the People will arm alarmed citizens with the truth, and that’s the one thing shadowy bureaucratic schemers like Anthony Fauci cannot withstand — exposure to sunlight,” Kibbe concluded.

The series features insights from infectious disease experts who authored the Great Barrington Declaration, pushing back against the wisdom and efficacy of lockdowns. You’ll hear stories from inside the White House Coronavirus Task Force about why the president’s advisers were so committed to the natural origin explanation of the virus. Journalists will explain why they were silenced on social media for attempting to do their jobs, asking questions instead of marching in lockstep with the administration’s talking points. And the lone senator who has dared to demand accountability and transparency from his colleagues, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, will describe the steps he’s taking to get to the bottom of the COVID cover-up and to hold those responsible accountable.

On Monday, Anthony Fauci will appear once again before a congressional committee and try to deflect, deny, and delay any accountability he should face for his actions during the pandemic. On May 30, you can begin to arm yourself with the facts to fight back against his false narrative.

The first episode of “The Coverup” will premiere on Thursday, May 30, on BlazeTV and features Stanford University medical professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the man Anthony Fauci and his sidekick Francis Collins dismissed as a “fringe epidemiologist.”

“The Coverup” is available exclusively on BlazeTV. If you aren’t a BlazeTV+ subscriber, visit FauciCoverup.com and use code FauciLied for $30 off your first year of BlazeTV+.

Read More
COVID-19

Don Lemon gets called out hard for still shilling for vaccines and COVID regulations

Don Lemon has stayed true to his colors and is still shilling for the media and the government — despite losing his coveted gig on CNN.

He made this clear in an interview on “The Full Send Podcast,” where the Nelk boys confronted him with some basic facts about the government’s disastrous COVID policies.

“There’s a certain set of people that no matter what evidence is put in front of them as it pertains to COVID or as it pertains to the border or the economy or anything else — they will still run defense for the system,” Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” explains, before showing the embarrassing clip.

One of the Nelk boys accused Lemon of being like Cuomo, very pro- “take the thing, do it,” about vaccines.

“This whole argument about vaccines is a little weird to me because I think people are Monday-morning quarterbacking the idea of vaccines,” Lemon responded sheepishly, adding he thought that “instead of being selfish” people should have been “doing what was best for our fellow man.”

“So, I think that the people who are questioning the use of masks, even in the moment, were being a bit selfish,” Lemon said, before repeating the commonly heard line that “there was no medical evidence that ivermectin could help save people from getting COVID, or prevent them from getting COVID, or had any effect on the COVID-19 vaccine.”

“I believe in medicine, I believe in science, and I believe that my government is looking out for me and trying to do the best for me,” Lemon continued.

“Shouldn’t other people have the right to not take the vaccine and not forced to put something in their body that they didn’t want?” the other Nelk boy asks, adding, “It seemed at the time like media was really shaming people if you didn’t get a vaccine, like it’s your fault.”

“Well, I don’t know if the media was shaming people,” Lemon responded. “If you don’t get the vaccine, then don’t get the vaccine, but don’t expect to be able to do and go places,” he continued before being cut off.

“Like make a living, right?” one of the boys asked.

“I’ve watched that clip a couple of times, and it gets worse each time. I mean, he is on his knees blowing a system that literally fired him,” Rubin comments, shocked.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

‘I believe my government is looking out for me’: Don Lemon defends COVID response, online censorship in Nelk Boys interview

Former network host Don Lemon was pressed on his positions about the government’s COVID-19 response, online censorship, and the views he expressed as a host on CNN.

Lemon sat down with personalities Kyle Forgeard and Aaron “Steiny” Steinberg from the Nelk Boys, as well as entrepreneur Bradley Martyn for the “Full Send Podcast” that saw tougher questioning than audiences would see on most network news broadcasts.

Lemon faced significant pushback from Martyn and Forgeard regarding his stances on the COVID-19 vaccines and the spread of online “misinformation.”

The former CNN anchor’s position was that he predominantly believed that the information given by vaccine advocates, health officials, and the government was generally in good faith and had the goal of saving “the most amount of people.”

“Did they make mistakes along the way? Absolutely, but that’s life,” Lemon said. The 58-year-old explained that he thought not getting vaccinated or not wearing a mask was “selfish” and that citizens should have been doing what was best for their fellow man.

‘I paid $2,000 for a fake [vaccine card].’

Martyn pushed back, however.

“The COVID vaccine is here now, take it,” Martyn summarized the overarching narrative as. “Listening to [Chris] Cuomo speak and what other people are talking about now, they knew there was other methods that people could have done, Ivermectin was one of them.”

“I believe in medicine, I believe in science, and I believe my government is looking out for me and trying to do the best for me,” Lemon replied. “Scientists, doctors … if virologists are telling me that this vaccine is safe, and Ivermectin has no effect on the virus, then I’m going to take the vaccine.”

Lemon then disagreed with Forgeard when he said the media was shaming people if they weren’t vaccinated and that deaths were then the fault of the unvaccinated.

“I think the people were being selfish about that. If you don’t want to get the vaccine then don’t get the vaccine, but don’t be expected to be able to do and go places where people are who got the vaccine.”

“And work, and make a living, right?” Martyn interjected. “Couldn’t you have seen that the whole legacy media was saying, ‘You need this,’ and to a lot of people it was like, ‘Is this just about protecting and helping people or this about Big Pharma and big business?'”

Lemon called that a “conspiracy theory” and again cited that the virus was “something nobody knew about, something that was new and that was killing people.”

After Forgeard and Martyn revealed they did not get vaccinated, and Lemon did, Forgeard noted that he obtained a fake vaccine card.

“I paid $2,000 for a fake one.”

‘Me, personally, it’s not for me to decide, but I think there is an inherent advantage when someone plays in a women’s sport and perhaps they are stronger.’

Limiting ‘misinformation’

“This was an usual time in the entire world, we don’t live in that time now, and things have eased up,” Lemon said about online censorship, excusing the removal of opinions he said would have been misinformation.

Martyn pointed out that while Lemon was able to go on network television shows and talk about his opinion on the matter, content creators, himself included, literally could not go online and express countering opinions.

“Some people knew, but they were silenced,” Martyn continued. “I can accept [that it’s over] but … it’s about the people whose lives were ruined, you can’t just go, ‘It’s over sorry, it’s different now.'”

Lemon then tried to compare ruined lives from COVID lockdowns to those who were put in jail for smoking pot.

“I think if people are spreading misinformation and lies … I believe in freedom of speech, but I think if people are actively spreading misinformation that’s going to hurt people and if it’s going to put their lives or safety and their health at risk then I think it should be corrected,” he added.

“It’s just so impossible to find misinformation at such an early stage of a virus, too. Who decides what’s misinformation?” Forgeard countered.

Transgender theory

The topic shifted to transgender athletes playing against women, with Steinberg noting that women had a “spectacular year” in sports, only for the South Carolina women’s basketball coach to state that men should be able to play in women’s basketball.

“Do you think biological men should be able to play in women’s sports?” Forgeard asked Lemon directly.

“I think that it should be studied, but I do think …” Lemon replied.

“What are you studying?” Forgeard asked.

“Physically, men are stronger and faster than women. So, I have questions about it myself. Me, personally, it’s not for me to decide, but I think there is an inherent advantage when someone plays in a women’s sport and perhaps they are stronger,” Lemon clarified.

The answer mirrored many of the former CNN host’s replies, which were appeals to authority whether it referred to doctors, health officials, educators, and more.

The latter was used when he was asked about children being taught gender theory in school.

“I don’t think there’s anything wrong with kids having knowledge,” he said about children, citing that he was not an educator, so it wasn’t his place to say.

Forgeard asked if that included telling children “they can be whatever gender they want.” Lemon compared it to being told that he could be Superman when he was a child.

“We all had very similar things told to us,” Lemon retorted.

“Career-wise, not gender-wise,” Forgeard clarified.

“I don’t believe as a whole that kids are being indoctrinated into anything,” Lemon said, citing that he went to Catholic school and still was gay.

The podcasters also asked Lemon to clarify what LGBTQ+ stood for and why gays are grouped in with transgender people. Forgeard remarked Lemon’s explanation was easier to understand than that of a transgender person.

“I think the gay people are better spokesman for the trans people, because the trans people are not that good at defending their own issues.”

“It takes a gay person to come in and really defend them logically.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Great Reset

Why is Bill Gates breeding millions of mosquitoes?

Bill Gates wants to transform Earth into the kind of hellscape that belongs in Dante. For example, his fixation with mass-breeding mosquitoes pulses with a scheming mind that surely can’t be benevolent.

Wall Street Silver recently connected a supposed looming mosquito-borne pandemic to Gates’ overenthusiastic farming of mosquitos. Here’s a video from the Bill Gates YouTube account describing the mosquito factory in Medellín, Colombia, where “scientists work long hours in muggy labs breeding millions and millions of mosquitoes.”


The Mosquito Factory

youtu.be

Gates claims that the project aims to “outsmart the world’s deadliest animal.” Throughout a slick, flawless three-part blog post, Gates (or the PR team in charge of his output) makes the case for his World Mosquito Program.

The objective: “They tend to the insects’ every need as they grow from larvae to pupae to adults, keeping the temperature just right and feeding them generous helpings of fishmeal, sugar, and, of course, blood. Then, they release them across the country to breed with wild mosquitoes that can carry dengue and other viruses threatening to sicken and kill the population of Colombia. This might sound like the beginnings of a Hollywood writer’s horror film plot. But it’s not. This factory is real. And the mosquitoes being released don’t terrorize the local population. Far from it. They’re actually helping to save and improve millions of lives.”

It feels somewhat murderous in spirit. Or maybe ‘sacrificial’ is a better adjective.

But let’s think about things logically here: Surely Gates means what he says, right? Bill Gates doesn’t really want to reduce the human population like some cartoonish villain, right?

Right?

Why would a Big Tech billionaire passionate about deadly viruses be so interested in farming mosquitoes?

This is a villainous conclusion, no matter what, if any, good premises it might have arisen from. It’s sinister to conclude that mosquitos should be farmed, globally, in response to mosquito-born diseases. It feels somewhat murderous in spirit. Or maybe “sacrificial” is a better adjective.

The Associated Press, once known as the law-giving epicenter of objectivity journalism, of fact-giving that no longer exists, has collapsed into a swamp of fiendish activism. Activists attack anyone who doubts any tidbit of their cause.

You wind up with baffling contradictions like this: “The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation doesn’t finance any modified mosquito release projects in the U.S. And experts say the types of mosquitoes that are used for that initiative in Florida are not capable of transmitting malaria.” Which reads a bit like, “These mosquito farms don’t exist, you bigot. But also the mosquitos used in the mosquito farm that does exist are harmless. Also there will be a mosquito-fueled pandemic soon, just coincidentally.”

The man literally founded an initiative called “The World Mosquito Program.”

There’s a reason figures like Gates, George Soros, and Klaus Schwab are widely considered nasty: They fund ghastly initiatives in the name of progress. All they’re missing is a literal banner of the Inferno to follow them around everywhere.

For the past month or so, there’s been a cycle of stories, reels, and tweets about the goodness of the wealthy people on the Titanic who had moral courage. We all know that Gates would shove infants out of the way to get into a lifeboat. “Hey Bill, why are you rowing south, New York is that way?” Straight to Epstein Island.

Read More
COVID-19

It’s been a rough week for Fauci’s inner circle — and things may get a lot worse

It has been a rough week for scientists who were in Anthony Fauci’s inner circle at the outset of the pandemic — particularly for Peter Daszak, head of the scandal-plagued EcoHealth Alliance, and for David M. Morens, senior scientific adviser to the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Where Daszak is concerned, all his years of protest and lab-leak denial were apparently for nought, given that he has finally been cut off from all federal funding.

The Department of Health and Human Services told the British zoologist in a letter Tuesday that it holds him personally responsible for EHA’s egregious shortcomings, oversight failures, and opacity as it pertains to the dangerous coronavirus experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Morens, who served as adviser to previous NIAID director Fauci, was accused Wednesday by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of undermining the operations of the U.S. government; unlawfully deleting federal COVID-19 records; using a personal email to avoid the Freedom of Information Act; “acting unbecoming of a federal employee”; and “likely lying to Congress on multiple occasions.”

Daszak makes a cameo in many of the emails that Morens may now be regretting.

The duo, who had a hand in helping Fauci downplay the likely lab origin of COVID-19, may soon face greater consequences than strongly worded letters and suspended funding.

“Dr. Daszak’s impending debarment does not shield him from accountability to the American people,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chairman of the coronavirus subcommittee, said in a statement Wednesday. “It appears that Dr. Daszak may have lied under oath about his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and his compliance with NIH grant procedures.”

As for Morens, the subcommittee indicated that it now has “overwhelming evidence from Dr. Morens’s own email that he engaged in serious misconduct and potentially illegal actions while serving as a Senior Advisor to Dr. Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Defunding the unaccountable

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General blasted EHA in a January 2023 report for dropping the ball on oversight regarding the use of grant money on coronavirus research in China and for failing to comply with federal requirements.

On May 1, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released its own report recommending that EHA be permanently cut off from taxpayer funding and that Daszak similarly be cut off as well as criminally investigated.

“Dr. Daszak and his organization conducted dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV, willfully violated the terms of a multimillion-dollar National Institutes of Health grant, and placed U.S. national security at risk. This blatant contempt for the American people is reprehensible,” Wenstrup said in a statement.

On May 15, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services suspended EHA from participating in federal procurement and nonprocurement programs and proposed its debarment “to protect the public interest.”

Whereas a suspension is a temporary action, a debarment serves as a more definitive denial of grant money that can last for several years and is used primarily for serious violations, according to Nature.

In the memo detailing the decision, HHS suspension and debarment official Henrietta Brisbon reiterated the grievances raised in both the subcommittee’s report and in HHS’ OIG report, altogether making clear that EHA was irresponsible and untrustworthy.

This week, HHS went a step farther, commencing formal debarment proceedings against Daszak.

HHS’ Tuesday letter to the British zoologist states, “The alleged conduct of EHA is imputed to you, because during all or part of the time relevant, you participated in, knew of, or had reason to know of EHA’s improper conduct, through your role as President of EHA, and also as the [program director/principal investigator]” for the relevant grant.

In addition to blackballing Daszak, the letter indicated he is prohibited from doing business with the federal government and receiving a subcontract from a government contractor valued at $35,000 or more and could face a debarment of over three years.

Wenstrup said of Daszak’s fate, “EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak’s personal debarment will ensure he never again receives a single cent from U.S. taxpayers nor has the opportunity to start a new, untrustworthy organization.”

“This step comes just two weeks after the Select Subcommittee released substantial evidence of Dr. Daszak’s contempt for the American people, his flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and his willful violation of the terms of his NIH grant,” added Wenstrup.

Justin Goodman, senior vice president of the White Coat Waste Project — a watchdog that helped expose Daszak’s and Fauci’s ties to the gain-of-function experiments at the WIV — told Blaze News in a statement, “The current government-wide suspension, and proposed debarment, of EcoHealth and Daszak will ensure taxpayers aren’t forced to fund any more of their wasteful and reckless virus hunting and animal experimentation that can cause pandemics and create bioweapons, especially their scary scheme to build a new bat virus lab on U.S. soil.”

Outing the opaque

Blaze News previously reported on Morens’ admission in correspondence with Fauci’s inner circle that he opted to use a personal email account and delete the exchanges thereon to evade Freedom of Information requests.

“As you know, I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly,” Morens reportedly wrote to the top scientists involved determining COVID-19’s origins, including Daszak, whose subcontractor Ben Hu conducted deadly gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was reportedly one of the first infected with COVID-19; virologists Robert Garry, Kristian Andersen, and Edward Holmes; and others.

On Wednesday, the coronavirus subcommittee released a memo presenting previously unreleased email correspondence further indicating that Morens helped Fauci avoid transparency when discussing the origins of COVID-19 — an alleged “conspiracy amongst the highest levels” to hide and potentially “destroy official records regarding the origins of COVID-19.”

In one email to Daszak, dated April 21, 2021, Morens wrote, “PS, i [sic] forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”

In a May 13, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, “I suggested to Arthur try to interview Tony directly and connected him to our ‘secret’ back channel. He emailed Tony a few hours ago.”

The subcommittee highlighted other efforts by Morens to “backchannel internal NIH information to EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak” and his discussion of Fauci’s intention to protect Daszak.

There also appears to be evidence that Morens received instruction from the NIH FOIA office on “how to make emails disappear” upon being met with a FOIA request.

In a Feb. 25, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, “I learned the tricks last year from an old friend, Marg Moore, who heads our FOIA office and also hates FOIAs.”

Like Fauci, Morens apparently preferred to communicate off the record via his personal account.

“I forgot to clarify in my email yesterday that BOTH my gmail and phone calls are now safe. Test is NOT, as it can be FOIA’d, as can my got email,” Morens wrote in a Nov. 19, 2021, letter. “So you and Peter and others sshould be able to email me on gmail only, with the caveat that no other govt. employee is copied at a govt address, as all govt emails are potentially FOIA’able.”

Morens’ help may have come at a price. The subcommittee highlighted one exchange where Morens appears to press Daszak for a “kickback” for his help editing EHA’s grant compliance efforts.

According to the subcommittee, Morens undermined NIH efforts to oversee EHA, provided Daszak “with inside information regarding NIH operations,” and likely provided false testimony to Congress when giving testifying before the subcommittee on Dec. 22, 2023, and Jan. 18.

The New York Post indicated that when Morens, currently on administrative leave, appeared before the subcommittee Wednesday to testify about the findings detailed in the memo, he faced a bipartisan longue lashing.

Ranking member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.) said, “It is not anti-science to hold you accountable for defying the public’s trust and misusing official resources.”

“What troubles me most about your conduct, Dr. Morens, is the extent to which it so willingly betrays decades of dedication, diligence, and decorum from the thousands of federal scientists and public health workers who came before you, who have served alongside you, and who will serve on into the future,” added Ruiz.

Goodman told Blaze News that for allegedly lying to Congress about what happened in Wuhan, Daszak, Fauci, and Morens “can and should face fines and jail time for perjury, as Senator Rand Paul has requested in referrals to the DOJ.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Great Reset

In Orwellian commencement address, Fauci calls for pushback against ‘untruth’ while ignoring his own lies

Dr. Anthony Fauci came out of hiding to give the commencement speech for this year’s Columbia University graduates, and it was so dystopian, it sounded as if it were ripped straight from the pages of Orwell’s “1984.”

“Differences of opinion or ideology have in certain circumstances been reflected by egregious distortions of reality,” Fauci told the students.

“Sadly, elements of our society are driven by a cacophony of falsehoods, lies, and conspiracy theories that get repeated often enough that after a while, they stand largely unchallenged, ominously leading to an insidious acceptance of what I call ‘the normalization of untruth,’” he continued.

“Wouldn’t that sort of be like if you get the vaccine you will not get nor transmit COVID? Would it be a lie to say that six-foot social distancing was a complete lie? It was. There was no evidence that masks worked — like everything this man has pushed,” Dave Rubin, host of “The Rubin Report,” says.

Fauci went on to blame news organizations and social media and claimed that it’s relevant to those in science and medical professions because “our very identity is anchored in data, evidence, and critical thinking.”

“And we as much or more than anyone else need to push back on these distortions of truth and reality,” Fauci concluded, echoing the Orwellian idea that only the official line of “truth” should be allowed in the public sphere.

“Everything he just accused all of us of is the stuff that he and his cadre of lunatics have been doing,” Rubin concluded.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
COVID-19

Warning: Pfizer wants to do for cancer what it did for COVID

Last year, Steve Deace and I wrote a book amassing the evidence for 21st-century Nuremberg trials of public officials who willingly promoted and mandated deadly biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our case was strong even with what we knew at the time. The evidence that has come out since then makes that level of calamitous death and injury seem insignificant by comparison.

What if the deaths and injuries in the months immediately following the arrival of the COVID shots were just the opening act? A consensus has emerged that we’re in the midst of a cancer crisis. Pfizer itself is acknowledging it and seeks to capitalize on a cancer bomb for which the company may very well be partially responsible.

Until we start holding Republicans and Democrats bought out by special interests accountable, the arsonists will always be there to fight the new fire they started.

Aaron Hertzberg of TrialSite News has collected 36 case reports showing a potential correlation between an individual’s cancer diagnosis and being injected with one of the COVID shots. It’s hard to dismiss casualty in these cases because we now have a wealth of macro-epidemiological data that show an unmistakable link between a once-in-a-lifetime explosion of cancer and introduction of the vaccines.

Scientists in a host of publications have already identified multiple pathologies of how the vaccines either cause cancer or inhibit the body’s anti-tumor surveillance that protects us from cancer. In fact, the smoking gun is so obvious — but so taboo to acknowledge — that authors of one study published last month in the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules had to add a laughable caveat: “It is important to clarify here that mRNA vaccines do not cause cancer; but they could stimulate its development.”

From day one, Pfizer told us that genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of its mRNA shots were “not considered necessary.” Despite the tsunami of adverse events affecting every corner of the body and the revelation that the shots were contaminated with plasmid DNA and potentially access the nucleus of cells, they still have not done any such studies.

Now, we have the 2024 American Cancer Society report warning that colorectal cancer is the top cancer killer for men under 55. Doctors are reporting that colorectal tumors are more aggressive and more difficult to treat. As Dr. Pierre Kory noted, “Compared to pre-pandemic 2019, cancer deaths in 2023 rose strikingly in 15-to-44-year-olds: Uterine cancer, up 37%; colorectal, up 17%; liver, up 8%, and — suggestive of quickly growing disease — “unspecified” metastatic cancer, up 14%.”

Why would there be an explosion of sudden uncontrolled and untreatable cancers? We have a gene in our body known as P53 that helps block cancers and certainly keeps them at bay. Well, we now know that shots contain SV40, a cancer promoting protein, that binds directly to the P53 gene.

Between the SV40, uncontrolled spike proteins, modified nucleotides, and DNA contamination, scientists have identified multiple smoking guns that would explain the surge in aggressive cancers that is impossible to assign to chance.

Shockingly, Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla was invited on Fox Business a few weeks ago to brag that cancer is “our new COVID” and how the company plans to do to cancer what it did to COVID.

Well, aside from the shot causing an endless litany of death, disability, and injury, what exactly did Pfizer do to COVID? It turbo charged it — just like it appears to be doing with cancer!

Thanks to the work of Wouter Aukema in the Netherlands, as reported by British investigative journalist Sonia Elijah, we now have access to millions of adverse effect case reports in EudraVigilance, the European equivalent of VAERS. COVID-19 itself was listed as the most common side effect of the vaccines. This jives with numerous studies we reported on beginning in 2021 and 2022 showing that the more you inject, the more you infect.

The COVID shots seem to weaken the immune system and prime the system for more spike protein by using suboptimal antibody that creates evolutionary effects on the virus leading to what is known as “pathogenic priming” and “original antigenic sin.”

Several weeks ago, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic found that after monitoring 47,500 of its employees during the first part of 2024, there was a 46% greater risk of the vaccinated contracting COVID than the unvaccinated. They found “the more you inject, the more you infect” phenomenon playing out in the real world, as the risk increased with each successive dose. Those with three doses were 95% more likely to get infected than people who declined the shot. People with more than three doses were a whopping 151% more likely to get infected.

The authors concede this is one of many studies that show the same result, but, without evidence, they claim the shots still provide some short-term benefits even it if is undone in the long-term.

So, not only did the shots kill and main countless human beings, but they also perpetuated COVID to this day.

Yet, not only has the government declined to take the shots off the market and hold Pfizer accountable, the FDA is also greenlighting the company’s new, dangerous RSV shots and cancer treatments. Not a single drug regulator will even look at the cancer signals from the COVID shots as they approve Pfizer’s new RSV shots. The British Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency even admitted to Sonia Elijah las year that “there are currently no intentions to test the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine for the presence of fragmented DNA and SV40 enhancer.”

There is a reason why Biden has obsessed with cancer during his past two State of the Union addresses and why Bourla is bragging about cancer treatments replicating his “success” with COVID. Until we start holding Republicans and Democrats bought out by special interests accountable, the arsonists will always be there to fight the new fire they started.

Read More
COVID-19

Elon Musk demands Anthony Fauci be prosecuted after NIH admits to funding gain-of-function research at Wuhan lab

Elon Musk demanded the prosecution of Dr. Anthony Fauci after a National Institutes of Health official confessed that U.S. taxpayer funds were used for risky gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. The alarming admission by the top NIH bureaucrat directly contradicts sworn testimony that Fauci made when questioned by Congress.

On Thursday, acting NIH Director and current Principal Deputy Director Dr. Lawrence Tabak was questioned during a hearing by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. The hearing had a mission to compel Tabak to “explain numerous inconsistencies between the public and private testimonies of NIH employees and EcoHealth President, Dr. Peter Daszak.”

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) asked Tabak about the NIH’s role in risky gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the Manhattan-based EcoHealth Alliance – the nonprofit organization that was involved in controversial coronavirus experiments.

Lesko inquired, “Dr. Tabak, did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth?”

Tabak replied, “It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research. If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic declared, “Dr. Tabak offered substantial evidence that Dr. Daszak purposefully misled both the NIH and the Select Subcommittee about EcoHealth’s efforts to comply with grant procedures.”

Tabak’s response also contradicts Fauci’s repeated claims that there was no gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab funded by the NIH.

As Blaze News previously reported, Fauci clashed with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) during a fiery confrontation before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions in May 2021.

Paul asked Fauci, “Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan?”

Fauci answered, “Sen. Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely, entirely and completely incorrect. The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund ‘gain of function research’ in the Wuhan Institute.”

In July 2021, Paul pressed Fauci about the NIH using taxpayer money to fund gain-of-research experiments at the Wuhan lab.

Paul asked, “Dr. Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11, where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research?”

Fauci replied, “Sen. Paul, I have never lied before the Congress. And I do not retract that statement.”

Fauci, now 83, then attacked Paul by saying, “You don’t know what you’re talking about, quite frankly.”

On Wednesday, Paul told Newsmax, “So, you have this bureaucrat Anthony Fauci in charge of the money spigot who is not really a researcher in this, but saying adamantly that it wasn’t gain-of-function. Why does he say that? Because he wants to escape responsibility for having funded research and for having made the terrible decision to fund research that led to a pandemic that killed millions of people.”


Dr. Paul Questions Dr. Fauci on Wuhan Lab and Gain of Function Research – May 11, 2021

www.youtube.com

On Friday, Elon Musk wrote on the X social media platform: “Prosecute/Fauci.”

U.S. Code Section 1621 states that anyone who “willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true” is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both. The statute of limitations for perjury is five years from the time the statement was made.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services defines gain-of-function research as:

Studies, or research that improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease, help define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, thereby enabling assessment of the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, informing public health and preparedness efforts, and furthering medical countermeasure development.

In October 2014, the Obama administration halted all federal funding for risky gain-of-function studies.

Former President Barack Obama’s White House announced a “pause” to “assess the potential risks and benefits associated with a subset of life sciences research known as ‘gain-of-function’ studies.”

The NIH announced in December 2017 – when Donald Trump was president – that it was lifting the funding pause on gain-of-function experiments.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID-19

Utah mom left ‘disabled’ after COVID-19 vaccine trial launches first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca

Prior to the pandemic,
Brianne Dressen of Salt Lake City was living the active life she always wanted. She went rock climbing with her husband, a chemist for the U.S. Army; ferried her two children to and from soccer games and piano practices; and taught preschool.

Everything came to a screeching halt in November 2020 — not as a result of the union-driven school closures, the lockdowns, or the outcome of the election, but with her participation in an AstraZeneca vaccine trial.

“I walked into the clinic fine, and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.”

The experimental vaccine allegedly left the 42-year-old Utah mother with a debilitating injury.

Dressen cannot bring a product liability action against the company on account of the
federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. She can, however, possibly ding the British-Swedish pharmaceutical giant for breach of contract, which is exactly what she aims to do.

Dressen filed a
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah Monday alleging that she developed a debilitating neurological condition as a result of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and that the British-Swedish pharmaceutical giant failed to cover the cost of her medical care as promised.

When presented with Dressen’s complaint, Daniel Horowitz, the host of “Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz” on the Blaze Podcast Network and author of “Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial So This Never Happens Again,” told Blaze News, “It is shocking how we now have thousands of academic and case studies of injuries affecting every organ system, yet victims remain alone with little legal recourse for compensation.”

“We have VAERS, V-Safe, documents from the vaccine manufacturers, and European Medicines Agency reporting, all showing catastrophic levels of injury, yet there is no critical mass of a political movement in any country at this point to repeal unbridled indemnity of these criminal enterprises,” continued Horowitz. “It’s also peculiar how AstraZeneca was taken off the market, but the mRNA shots, which are even worse, remain funded and promoted by government.”

Background

The Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine was a viral-vector vaccine developed in collaboration with Oxford University and produced for various companies by the
Serum Institute of India.

While 32,000 Americans like Dressen participated in vaccine trials in the homeland and the Biden administration agreed to share up to 60 million doses with other nations, the AstraZeneca vaccine was never rolled out in the United States. It was, however, administered billions of times worldwide.

It quickly became clear that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as health authorities throughout the Anglosphere had guaranteed. After all, there were numerous reports of otherwise healthy recipients experiencing abnormal bleeding, low blood platelets, blood clots, and even dying.

German and Nordic researchers
determined that some recipients were developing a clotting disorder called “vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia,” which produced antibodies that activated platelets and led to clots.

Despite a growing number of likely victims, AstraZeneca
suggested there was “no evidence of an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or thrombocytopenia, in any defined age group, gender, batch or in any particular country.”

The company’s claims have aged like milk.

Last year, Jamie Scott, a father of two left with a permanent clot-related brain injury, filed suit against the company. His complaint was followed by dozens more and ultimately a class-action lawsuit.

Several months after Scott sued AstraZeneca, the company admitted in a February court document that “it is admitted that the AZ vaccine can, in very rare cases, cause [thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome]. The causal mechanism is not known.”

The following month, the company withdrew its “marketing authorization” in the European Union. That application went into effect last week. The Telegraph
reported that AstraZeneca is expected to remove the vaccine from all other markets where it was approved.

‘Hollowed out’

Dressen’s
lawsuit, reportedly the first to be launched stateside against AstraZeneca, claims the company offered various written promises to participants in its vaccine trial, including financial reimbursement for each completed visit to the test clinic for various procedures; financial reimbursement for each completed phone call linked to the study; and compensation for study-related injuries.

“At the moment the substance entered Bri’s blood, a solemn contract had been formed.”

“Defendants defined ‘research injuries’ as ‘[i]njuries that have been caused by the vaccine, tests or procedures,'” said the lawsuit. “Defendants promised that ‘Sponsor will pay the costs of medical treatment for research injuries, provided that the costs are reasonable, and you did not cause the injury yourself.'”

“At the moment the substance entered Bri’s blood, a solemn contract had been formed,” said the complaint. “Her performance was complete and Defendants’ promises were irrevocable.”

When things went south, the lawsuit claims the company effectively left Dressen hanging.

“I was a completely hollowed out version of who I once was.”

Within an hour of receiving the shot, Dressen claims she experienced tingling in her arm. The paraesthesia apparently was not temporary or localized. It soon spread to her other arm.

“That evening other progressively worrying symptoms emerged: blurred vision, double vision, headache, sound sensitivity, a loud ringing in the ears (tinnitus), nausea, vomiting, fever, and chills,” said the lawsuit.

In the weeks that followed, a prickling sensation reportedly spread to Dressen’s legs. She indicated she lost 20 pounds from constant vomiting while this and her other symptoms worsened.

“I walked in to the clinic fine, and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy,” recalled Dressen. “My little girl’s voice was too painful for my ears. My little boy’s hand was too painful for touch. There was no break, no reprieve, no escape. No answers, no help, only questions, and fear of what was overtaking my body more and more each day as new symptoms piled on.”

“I was a completely hollowed out version of who I once was,” added Dressen.

In June 2021, a team of neurologists from the National Institute of Health reportedly diagnosed Dressen as having “Post Vaccine Neuropathy.”

According to the lawsuit, Dressen is still “disabled” three years later; “a shadow of her former self: unable to work, unable to do any athletic activity, unable to parent the way she had, and unable to drive more than a few blocks at a time.”

Dressen
told the Telegraph that the worse part is that her children, now aged nine and 11, can’t remember the kind of person their mother was before the injury.

“It really sucks. The worse part, the biggest punishment of all of this, is the impact on my kids,” said Dressen.

Painful and costly

Dressen’s lawsuit claims that AstraZeneca ignored multiple requests for support until finally coughing up a meager $1,243.30, “a minuscule fraction of the medical bills and lost wages, among other financial costs, that Bri had incurred and will continue to incur.”

After all, Dressen’s biweekly medication supposedly ran her $3,500 per session. One of her current medications would cost her over $430,000 a year. With the help of insurance, she is presently paying roughly $119,000.

“The way we have been and continue to be treated is simply appalling.”

In order to access the $1,243.30, Dressen would have to release AstraZeneca of further responsibility for her care.

“The way we have been and continue to be treated is simply appalling,” Brian Dressen, the plaintiff’s husband, is quoted as saying in the complaint.

The Telegraph reported that Utah law enables complainants who sue for breach of contract to claim for damages and costs resulting from the alleged breach. While Dressen is not suing for a specific amount, she could possibly have AstraZeneca on the hook, not only for her legal and medical bills, but for additional damages — including for lost income and emotional distress.

A spokeswoman for the company told the Telegraph that AstraZeneca would not comment on ongoing litigation. She did, however, say, “Patient safety is our highest priority. From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real-world data, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.”





Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More