Conspiracy News & Views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored
Anthony Fauci is an american physician-scientist and immunologist who serves as the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the chief medical advisor to the president – Wikipedia
 |
(NaturalNews) A year-long investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee has revealed that Tony Fauci, the former head of the National Institute for… |
Anthony Fauci
told Americans to “follow the science.”
Following the facts, the Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has found that Fauci, with the help of then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins and a cadre of willing virologists, “employed fatally flawed science” to “avoid blaming China for the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The subcommittee indicated that to date, it has received over 8,000 pages of documents and over 25 hours of testimony from those involved in the impactful March 2020 study published the journal
Nature, “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2.”
Despite
privately discussing the prospect that the natural-origins theory was rubbish, the paper’s four official authors — Kristian Andersen, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes, and Robert Garry — concluded with dogmatic certainty, “We do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”
The authors did not specify in the publication’s ethics declarations that then-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, who oversaw the funding of coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, commissioned and edited the paper — which congressional investigators have since
determined he did.
This is all the more troubling because Fauci repeatedly cited this paper on the national stage, including once from the White House podium, to bolster his and Collins’ preferred zoonotic origins theory.
On Monday, the subcommittee
published additional damning correspondences between the paper’s official authors, noting, “This is one of the single most impactful and influential scientific papers in history … express[ing] conclusions that were not based on sound science nor in fact, but instead on assumptions.”
The subcommittee concluded that this is “the anatomy of a cover-up.”
It appears from the correspondence that those who worked ardently to set the narrative that COVID-19 was not the accidental byproduct of a leak at the Chinese lab where dangerous experiments were conducted on coronaviruses knew their cause was “political” and sought not jeopardize “international harmony.”
The subcommittee highlighted Monday how Rambaut, communicating with his coauthors over a private Slack channel on Feb. 2, 2020, wrote, “Given the sh** show that would happen if anyone serious accused the Chinese of even accidental release, my feeling is we should say that given there is no evidence of a specifically engineered virus, we cannot possible distinguish between natural evolution and escape so we are content with ascribing it to natural processes.”
In reply to Rambaut’s suggestion that they run a smoke screen for a regime that may be responsible for the manufacture and spread of a pathogen that killed millions worldwide, Andersen said, “Yup, I totally agree that that’s a very reasonable conclusion. Although I hate when politics is injected into science – but its impossible not to, especially given the circumstances. We should be sensitive to that.”
The subcommittee released another email sent by Ron Fouchier — one of the scientists who was on the Feb. 1, 2020, conference call with Fauci and the paper’s future authors — wherein he too expressed concern about the possibility of China facing any fallout over the pandemic.
Fouchier claimed, “An accusation that nCoV-2019 might have been engineered and released into the environment by humans (accidental or intentional) would … do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular.”
Collins, also on the conference call, intimated in a Feb. 2, 2020, email that a united front behind the natural-origin theory “is needed, or the voices of conspiracy will quickly dominate, doing great potential harm to science and international harmony.”
The NIH under Collins
long provided federal funds to EcoHealth Alliance run by fellow lab-leak theory denier British zoologist Peter Daszak. EcoHealth’s subcontractor Ben Hu, whom TheBlaze previously noted was the WIV’s lead on gain-of-function research on SARS-like coronaviruses, happened to be among the three lab researchers first infected with COVID-19 at the Wuhan lab in November 2019.
The subcommittee identified two possible motives behind the apparent efforts to downplay the lab-leak theory: The virologists either wanted to “defend China and play diplomat” or “lessen the likelihood of increased biosafety and laboratory regulations.”
The subcommittee did not raise the possibility that those in Fauci’s orbit might have also wanted to displace the possible culpability that elements of the Western medical administrative state might share with Chinese communists over the deaths of millions.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A social media post falsely links Dr Anthony Fauci to the origins of the AIDS epidemic and repeats a long debunked theory that the smallpox vaccine causes HIV.
Read More
No one who didn’t get the toxic DNA altering jab regrets not getting it. Those who died because of the jab don’t regret that they got it because they are dead. But their families certainly do. The millions of vaccine injured regret they let Big Pharma and Fauci reap billions at their expense. Everyone who … Continue reading “NEVER FORGET – NEVER FORGIVE”
Read More
Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. put Anthony Fauci on notice during his interview with Jesse Watters Monday, stating that as president, he would sic his attorney general on the retired National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director “and not hold off” if criminality on his part could be demonstrated.
The Fox News host first raised the matter, saying, “You think Fauci is the devil. Would you prosecute him if you ever got to the White House?”
“If there were crimes that he committed, of course,” said Kennedy, currently trailing President Joe Biden by
nearly 50 points in the polls. “I would tell the attorney general to prosecute him and not hold off.”
“Do I think that he committed crimes? I think he caused a lot of injury … particularly, by withholding early treatment from Americans. You know we racked up the highest death count in the world? We only have 4.2% of the globe’s population but we had 16% of the COVID deaths in this country and that was from bad policy.”
“There’s countries that did the opposite of what we did, that provided Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, other early treatments to their populations, and had 1/200th of our death rate. So there are many things that we did wrong in this country,” continued Kennedy. “Some of the things that were done by public health officials at that time that they knew that they would be harmful.”
Kennedy has made no bones in recent years about his conviction that Fauci has played a leading role in the “global war on democracy and public health.”
The presidential candidate’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” came out in 2021, detailing how, contra to the notion manufactured by the “pharma-funded mainstream media” that Fauci is a hero, “He is anything but.”
In the book, Kennedy accused Fauci of various misdeeds and failures, including:
RFK Jr. further indicated to Watters that the Biden administration has been reluctant to punish China over the alleged Wuhan lab leak because American institutions helped bankroll the deadly research in the first place and transferred NIH-funded bioweapons to the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
reported the Daily Caller.
TheBlaze
previously noted that federal documents recently obtained via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit revealed that the NIAID under Fauci and the United States Agency for International Development funded an EcoHealth Alliance subcontractor’s work on coronaviruses to the tune of $41 million.
That subcontractor was reportedly Ben Hu, who ran lead on gain-of-function research on SARS-like coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab and was one of the first infected with COVID-19 in November 2019.
The Wall Street Journal
reported that much of Hu’s research “focused on modifying coronaviruses so they could bind to human cells. The stated purpose of the research was to identify viruses that could lead to a pandemic and facilitate the development of a vaccine.”
Fauci
told Congress in May 2021 that the National Institutes of Health “has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology” and made similar denials on multiple other occasions.
Then-Principal Deputy Director of the NIH Lawrence A. Tabak appeared to undercut Fauci’s denial,
writing to Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) on Oct. 20, 2021, that EcoHealth’s “limited experiment” in Wuhan tested whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”
These mice “became sicker,” according to Tabak, who added, “EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant.”
Records recently obtained by the Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic further revealed that David M. Morens, a top adviser to Fauci at the NIH, was admittedly trying to keep Fauci’s “fingerprints on origin stories” amidst an apparent effort by the NIAID director and his colleagues to downplay the possibility that a leak at the lab they funneled taxpayer money to might have been the epicenter of the pandemic that killed millions of Americans.
After Kennedy suggested to Watters that the CIA was involved in the research at the Wuhan lab and that “USAID … was functioning as the CIA surrogate,” the Fox News host asked the 69-year-old son of assassinated former U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of assassinated former President John F. Kennedy whether the CIA still has the ability to execute political assassinations.
“I couldn’t say yes or no to that question. I think that there is — I couldn’t say. Even with my uncle’s assassination, you can’t really say the CIA killed John F. Kennedy. You can say members of the CIA, people working for the CIA were definitely involved. People like E. Howard hunt, David Atlee Phillips. David Morales. People who have confessed to it. Many of them death bed confessions. They may have been operating on a rogue basis, rather than the CIA doing it,” answered Kennedy.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
