Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored
COVID-19 conspiracies
It took 21-year-old Michael Locke from Connecticut, USA, nearly 3 years to conclusively determine that the hell he was going through was due to the covid vaccine. “We are often told that […]
Read More
No one is talking about what is behind everything that is happening – what is behind the fake pandemic, the utterly unscientific global obsession with imaginary global warming, a collapsing global economy […]
Read More
Former network host Don Lemon was pressed on his positions about the government’s COVID-19 response, online censorship, and the views he expressed as a host on CNN.
Lemon sat down with personalities Kyle Forgeard and Aaron “Steiny” Steinberg from the Nelk Boys, as well as entrepreneur Bradley Martyn for the “Full Send Podcast” that saw tougher questioning than audiences would see on most network news broadcasts.
Lemon faced significant pushback from Martyn and Forgeard regarding his stances on the COVID-19 vaccines and the spread of online “misinformation.”
The former CNN anchor’s position was that he predominantly believed that the information given by vaccine advocates, health officials, and the government was generally in good faith and had the goal of saving “the most amount of people.”
“Did they make mistakes along the way? Absolutely, but that’s life,” Lemon said. The 58-year-old explained that he thought not getting vaccinated or not wearing a mask was “selfish” and that citizens should have been doing what was best for their fellow man.
‘I paid $2,000 for a fake [vaccine card].’
Martyn pushed back, however.
“The COVID vaccine is here now, take it,” Martyn summarized the overarching narrative as. “Listening to [Chris] Cuomo speak and what other people are talking about now, they knew there was other methods that people could have done, Ivermectin was one of them.”
“I believe in medicine, I believe in science, and I believe my government is looking out for me and trying to do the best for me,” Lemon replied. “Scientists, doctors … if virologists are telling me that this vaccine is safe, and Ivermectin has no effect on the virus, then I’m going to take the vaccine.”
Lemon then disagreed with Forgeard when he said the media was shaming people if they weren’t vaccinated and that deaths were then the fault of the unvaccinated.
“I think the people were being selfish about that. If you don’t want to get the vaccine then don’t get the vaccine, but don’t be expected to be able to do and go places where people are who got the vaccine.”
“And work, and make a living, right?” Martyn interjected. “Couldn’t you have seen that the whole legacy media was saying, ‘You need this,’ and to a lot of people it was like, ‘Is this just about protecting and helping people or this about Big Pharma and big business?'”
Lemon called that a “conspiracy theory” and again cited that the virus was “something nobody knew about, something that was new and that was killing people.”
After Forgeard and Martyn revealed they did not get vaccinated, and Lemon did, Forgeard noted that he obtained a fake vaccine card.
“I paid $2,000 for a fake one.”
‘Me, personally, it’s not for me to decide, but I think there is an inherent advantage when someone plays in a women’s sport and perhaps they are stronger.’
“This was an usual time in the entire world, we don’t live in that time now, and things have eased up,” Lemon said about online censorship, excusing the removal of opinions he said would have been misinformation.
Martyn pointed out that while Lemon was able to go on network television shows and talk about his opinion on the matter, content creators, himself included, literally could not go online and express countering opinions.
“Some people knew, but they were silenced,” Martyn continued. “I can accept [that it’s over] but … it’s about the people whose lives were ruined, you can’t just go, ‘It’s over sorry, it’s different now.'”
Lemon then tried to compare ruined lives from COVID lockdowns to those who were put in jail for smoking pot.
“I think if people are spreading misinformation and lies … I believe in freedom of speech, but I think if people are actively spreading misinformation that’s going to hurt people and if it’s going to put their lives or safety and their health at risk then I think it should be corrected,” he added.
“It’s just so impossible to find misinformation at such an early stage of a virus, too. Who decides what’s misinformation?” Forgeard countered.
The topic shifted to transgender athletes playing against women, with Steinberg noting that women had a “spectacular year” in sports, only for the South Carolina women’s basketball coach to state that men should be able to play in women’s basketball.
“Do you think biological men should be able to play in women’s sports?” Forgeard asked Lemon directly.
“I think that it should be studied, but I do think …” Lemon replied.
“What are you studying?” Forgeard asked.
“Physically, men are stronger and faster than women. So, I have questions about it myself. Me, personally, it’s not for me to decide, but I think there is an inherent advantage when someone plays in a women’s sport and perhaps they are stronger,” Lemon clarified.
The answer mirrored many of the former CNN host’s replies, which were appeals to authority whether it referred to doctors, health officials, educators, and more.
The latter was used when he was asked about children being taught gender theory in school.
“I don’t think there’s anything wrong with kids having knowledge,” he said about children, citing that he was not an educator, so it wasn’t his place to say.
Forgeard asked if that included telling children “they can be whatever gender they want.” Lemon compared it to being told that he could be Superman when he was a child.
“We all had very similar things told to us,” Lemon retorted.
“Career-wise, not gender-wise,” Forgeard clarified.
“I don’t believe as a whole that kids are being indoctrinated into anything,” Lemon said, citing that he went to Catholic school and still was gay.
The podcasters also asked Lemon to clarify what LGBTQ+ stood for and why gays are grouped in with transgender people. Forgeard remarked Lemon’s explanation was easier to understand than that of a transgender person.
“I think the gay people are better spokesman for the trans people, because the trans people are not that good at defending their own issues.”
“It takes a gay person to come in and really defend them logically.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Bill Gates wants to transform Earth into the kind of hellscape that belongs in Dante. For example, his fixation with mass-breeding mosquitoes pulses with a scheming mind that surely can’t be benevolent.
Wall Street Silver recently connected a supposed looming mosquito-borne pandemic to Gates’ overenthusiastic farming of mosquitos. Here’s a video from the Bill Gates YouTube account describing the mosquito factory in Medellín, Colombia, where “scientists work long hours in muggy labs breeding millions and millions of mosquitoes.”
The Mosquito Factory
Gates claims that the project aims to “outsmart the world’s deadliest animal.” Throughout a slick, flawless three-part blog post, Gates (or the PR team in charge of his output) makes the case for his World Mosquito Program.
The objective: “They tend to the insects’ every need as they grow from larvae to pupae to adults, keeping the temperature just right and feeding them generous helpings of fishmeal, sugar, and, of course, blood. Then, they release them across the country to breed with wild mosquitoes that can carry dengue and other viruses threatening to sicken and kill the population of Colombia. This might sound like the beginnings of a Hollywood writer’s horror film plot. But it’s not. This factory is real. And the mosquitoes being released don’t terrorize the local population. Far from it. They’re actually helping to save and improve millions of lives.”
It feels somewhat murderous in spirit. Or maybe ‘sacrificial’ is a better adjective.
But let’s think about things logically here: Surely Gates means what he says, right? Bill Gates doesn’t really want to reduce the human population like some cartoonish villain, right?
Right?
Why would a Big Tech billionaire passionate about deadly viruses be so interested in farming mosquitoes?
This is a villainous conclusion, no matter what, if any, good premises it might have arisen from. It’s sinister to conclude that mosquitos should be farmed, globally, in response to mosquito-born diseases. It feels somewhat murderous in spirit. Or maybe “sacrificial” is a better adjective.
The Associated Press, once known as the law-giving epicenter of objectivity journalism, of fact-giving that no longer exists, has collapsed into a swamp of fiendish activism. Activists attack anyone who doubts any tidbit of their cause.
You wind up with baffling contradictions like this: “The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation doesn’t finance any modified mosquito release projects in the U.S. And experts say the types of mosquitoes that are used for that initiative in Florida are not capable of transmitting malaria.” Which reads a bit like, “These mosquito farms don’t exist, you bigot. But also the mosquitos used in the mosquito farm that does exist are harmless. Also there will be a mosquito-fueled pandemic soon, just coincidentally.”
The man literally founded an initiative called “The World Mosquito Program.”
There’s a reason figures like Gates, George Soros, and Klaus Schwab are widely considered nasty: They fund ghastly initiatives in the name of progress. All they’re missing is a literal banner of the Inferno to follow them around everywhere.
For the past month or so, there’s been a cycle of stories, reels, and tweets about the goodness of the wealthy people on the Titanic who had moral courage. We all know that Gates would shove infants out of the way to get into a lifeboat. “Hey Bill, why are you rowing south, New York is that way?” Straight to Epstein Island.
Yesterday, New Zealand’s Professor Michael Plank, an “expert” in applied mathematics and biological modelling who has featured in various media outlets, advised everyone to get another covid vaccine. As Dr. Guy Hatchard […]
Read More
It has been a rough week for scientists who were in Anthony Fauci’s inner circle at the outset of the pandemic — particularly for Peter Daszak, head of the scandal-plagued EcoHealth Alliance, and for David M. Morens, senior scientific adviser to the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Where Daszak is concerned, all his years of protest and lab-leak denial were apparently for nought, given that he has finally been cut off from all federal funding.
The Department of Health and Human Services told the British zoologist in a letter Tuesday that it holds him personally responsible for EHA’s egregious shortcomings, oversight failures, and opacity as it pertains to the dangerous coronavirus experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Morens, who served as adviser to previous NIAID director Fauci, was accused Wednesday by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of undermining the operations of the U.S. government; unlawfully deleting federal COVID-19 records; using a personal email to avoid the Freedom of Information Act; “acting unbecoming of a federal employee”; and “likely lying to Congress on multiple occasions.”
Daszak makes a cameo in many of the emails that Morens may now be regretting.
The duo, who had a hand in helping Fauci downplay the likely lab origin of COVID-19, may soon face greater consequences than strongly worded letters and suspended funding.
“Dr. Daszak’s impending debarment does not shield him from accountability to the American people,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chairman of the coronavirus subcommittee, said in a statement Wednesday. “It appears that Dr. Daszak may have lied under oath about his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and his compliance with NIH grant procedures.”
As for Morens, the subcommittee indicated that it now has “overwhelming evidence from Dr. Morens’s own email that he engaged in serious misconduct and potentially illegal actions while serving as a Senior Advisor to Dr. Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General blasted EHA in a January 2023 report for dropping the ball on oversight regarding the use of grant money on coronavirus research in China and for failing to comply with federal requirements.
On May 1, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released its own report recommending that EHA be permanently cut off from taxpayer funding and that Daszak similarly be cut off as well as criminally investigated.
“Dr. Daszak and his organization conducted dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV, willfully violated the terms of a multimillion-dollar National Institutes of Health grant, and placed U.S. national security at risk. This blatant contempt for the American people is reprehensible,” Wenstrup said in a statement.
On May 15, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services suspended EHA from participating in federal procurement and nonprocurement programs and proposed its debarment “to protect the public interest.”
Whereas a suspension is a temporary action, a debarment serves as a more definitive denial of grant money that can last for several years and is used primarily for serious violations, according to Nature.
In the memo detailing the decision, HHS suspension and debarment official Henrietta Brisbon reiterated the grievances raised in both the subcommittee’s report and in HHS’ OIG report, altogether making clear that EHA was irresponsible and untrustworthy.
This week, HHS went a step farther, commencing formal debarment proceedings against Daszak.
HHS’ Tuesday letter to the British zoologist states, “The alleged conduct of EHA is imputed to you, because during all or part of the time relevant, you participated in, knew of, or had reason to know of EHA’s improper conduct, through your role as President of EHA, and also as the [program director/principal investigator]” for the relevant grant.
In addition to blackballing Daszak, the letter indicated he is prohibited from doing business with the federal government and receiving a subcontract from a government contractor valued at $35,000 or more and could face a debarment of over three years.
Wenstrup said of Daszak’s fate, “EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak’s personal debarment will ensure he never again receives a single cent from U.S. taxpayers nor has the opportunity to start a new, untrustworthy organization.”
“This step comes just two weeks after the Select Subcommittee released substantial evidence of Dr. Daszak’s contempt for the American people, his flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and his willful violation of the terms of his NIH grant,” added Wenstrup.
Justin Goodman, senior vice president of the White Coat Waste Project — a watchdog that helped expose Daszak’s and Fauci’s ties to the gain-of-function experiments at the WIV — told Blaze News in a statement, “The current government-wide suspension, and proposed debarment, of EcoHealth and Daszak will ensure taxpayers aren’t forced to fund any more of their wasteful and reckless virus hunting and animal experimentation that can cause pandemics and create bioweapons, especially their scary scheme to build a new bat virus lab on U.S. soil.”
Blaze News previously reported on Morens’ admission in correspondence with Fauci’s inner circle that he opted to use a personal email account and delete the exchanges thereon to evade Freedom of Information requests.
“As you know, I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly,” Morens reportedly wrote to the top scientists involved determining COVID-19’s origins, including Daszak, whose subcontractor Ben Hu conducted deadly gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was reportedly one of the first infected with COVID-19; virologists Robert Garry, Kristian Andersen, and Edward Holmes; and others.
On Wednesday, the coronavirus subcommittee released a memo presenting previously unreleased email correspondence further indicating that Morens helped Fauci avoid transparency when discussing the origins of COVID-19 — an alleged “conspiracy amongst the highest levels” to hide and potentially “destroy official records regarding the origins of COVID-19.”
In one email to Daszak, dated April 21, 2021, Morens wrote, “PS, i [sic] forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”
In a May 13, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, “I suggested to Arthur try to interview Tony directly and connected him to our ‘secret’ back channel. He emailed Tony a few hours ago.”
The subcommittee highlighted other efforts by Morens to “backchannel internal NIH information to EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak” and his discussion of Fauci’s intention to protect Daszak.
There also appears to be evidence that Morens received instruction from the NIH FOIA office on “how to make emails disappear” upon being met with a FOIA request.
In a Feb. 25, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, “I learned the tricks last year from an old friend, Marg Moore, who heads our FOIA office and also hates FOIAs.”
Like Fauci, Morens apparently preferred to communicate off the record via his personal account.
“I forgot to clarify in my email yesterday that BOTH my gmail and phone calls are now safe. Test is NOT, as it can be FOIA’d, as can my got email,” Morens wrote in a Nov. 19, 2021, letter. “So you and Peter and others sshould be able to email me on gmail only, with the caveat that no other govt. employee is copied at a govt address, as all govt emails are potentially FOIA’able.”
Morens’ help may have come at a price. The subcommittee highlighted one exchange where Morens appears to press Daszak for a “kickback” for his help editing EHA’s grant compliance efforts.
According to the subcommittee, Morens undermined NIH efforts to oversee EHA, provided Daszak “with inside information regarding NIH operations,” and likely provided false testimony to Congress when giving testifying before the subcommittee on Dec. 22, 2023, and Jan. 18.
The New York Post indicated that when Morens, currently on administrative leave, appeared before the subcommittee Wednesday to testify about the findings detailed in the memo, he faced a bipartisan longue lashing.
Ranking member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.) said, “It is not anti-science to hold you accountable for defying the public’s trust and misusing official resources.”
“What troubles me most about your conduct, Dr. Morens, is the extent to which it so willingly betrays decades of dedication, diligence, and decorum from the thousands of federal scientists and public health workers who came before you, who have served alongside you, and who will serve on into the future,” added Ruiz.
Goodman told Blaze News that for allegedly lying to Congress about what happened in Wuhan, Daszak, Fauci, and Morens “can and should face fines and jail time for perjury, as Senator Rand Paul has requested in referrals to the DOJ.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
What are the Globalists Hiding The globalists are hiding that we are not a globe. Find out more in this video. If you have heard of Stew Peters, I suggest you watch some of his videos. He is a good … Continue reading
