The Technocracy Movement and the World Economic Forum

The Technocracy Movement of the 1930’s, dominant in Canada and the USA, appears to have greatly influenced much of the ethos of the World Economic Forum (WEF) manifesting itself in the early 1970’s.

WEF policy has been adopted by many of the world’s major influencing bodies and the close relationship with the United Nations organisations is particularly prescient.

One clear example of this is the Strategic Partnership Agreement signed in 2019 between the two organisations to implement Agenda 2030 and its Strategic Development Goals (SDGs).

This agreement facilitates the manipulation of the UN by corporate interests and moves towards increasingly authoritarian and privately controlled form of world governance.

Professor Michel Chossudovsky’s recent article referencing ‘Cyber Polygon’ discusses the WEF 2020 simulation addressing the threat and approach to cyber terrorist attacks.

This simulation follows on from early WEF work such as the 2019 Event 201 simulation of a world wide pandemic, strangely, (or perhaps not), followed by the COVID 19 fiasco.

Coordinated action from international agencies and private capital resulted in an almost 100% world reaction to the COVID 19 narrative, the infamous ‘Lock step’ response, now implicated in huge loss and damage to lives and livelihoods.

To the point then.

It seems pretty clear that having pushed for greater spread and integration of digital networks and all that goes with them, the WEF are providing themselves and their partners with all the control mechanisms available to manipulate world populations.

We see this with the acceleration in the implementation of surveillance systems, expansion of smart devices, control and censorship of communication outlets including media and Internet interaction etc.

Increasing reliance on AI, (albeit that more questions are being raised about it’s potential for detrimental impact) is obviously a useful tool to assist with ordering compliance.

The sophisticated resources available to the powerbrokers including the ability to recruit and reward the most technologically aware people to develop and implement the methods of control would place them in pole position to use these methods for whatever agenda they want to promote.

The genius grandson of Bin Laden sitting in his bombed out cave might well be able to navigate his way past the security protocols of highly sensitive control architectures to cause mayhem and the risk that some kid in his mum’s attic might be able to do this between consuming his last FatMac burger is of cause a possibility, but realistically the chances of their success pail into insignificance when viewed against the capabilities of the powerbrokers.

It is likely that government and corporate agencies set traps to locate useful ‘hackers’ and recruit them or at least take the more problematic ones out of circulation, such is the reach of the international agencies.

If there is a genuine threat from ‘independent’ groups, is it not reasonable to think that the combined intellectual might of the affected nations would be able to counter it if there was a real desire to do that.

Not countering the threat or opposing it in a limited way would enable enormous possibilities in terms of control and blame shifting with all that goes with that including false flag type events of the 911 kind!

So, I conclude by postulating that although the risk of cyber terrorism is real, it is capable of being managed by and used to serve the interests of those who wish to control us.

What a very useful tool for them to initiate continued world panic and fear by having the means to switch OFF/ON all of the resources on which we depend and be able to determine follow on policy dependent upon the reaction they get from us.

No compliance with coercion!

Johnny Sharp is  freelance writer, editor and author, specialising in music, sport, crime, entertainment and lifestyle.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.