Monday, March 9, 2026

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

Archives

Electoral College voters officially confirm Donald Trump’s victory
Elections

Electoral College voters officially confirm Donald Trump’s victory

President-elect Donald Trump officially won the Electoral College vote on Tuesday after presidential electors cast their votes.

Trump won 312 electoral votes while Vice President Kamala Harris took only 226. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the presidency.

Trump also won the popular vote with 77.2 million votes compared to Harris’ 75 million votes.

On Monday, a group of Democrats in the U.S. Senate proposed a bill to end the Electoral College, but the effort is a long-shot given Democrats’ lack of power and the high bar for changing the Constitution.

“In an election, the person who gets the most votes should win. It’s that simple,” said Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii. “No one’s vote should count for more based on where they live. The Electoral College is outdated and it’s undemocratic. It’s time to end it.”

A constitutional amendment needs approval of two-thirds of both houses of Congress or approval by three-fourths of state legislatures.

Democrats have long decried the Electoral College because Republicans have been able to win the presidency while losing the popular vote. That was not the case with Trump, who also won the popular vote with 77.2 million votes compared to Harris’ 75 million votes.

Defenders of the Electoral Vote system argue that without it, candidates would neglect less popular states and only campaign in the largest states.

“Eleven blue states will decide the president,” explained “LevinTV” host Mark Levin in October. “All the rest of the country — the 39 other states, tens of millions of people — will literally have no say in the election of the president.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
COVID 2.0? New RSV shots are already harming babies
COVID-19
, ,

COVID 2.0? New RSV shots are already harming babies

I might not be a doctor, but as early as January 2022 — 16 months before the approval of the first RSV vaccine —
I warned that these shots could make children sicker from the virus. For decades, the industry failed to produce an RSV vaccine after an attempt in 1967 was terminated because it caused antibody-dependent disease enhancement.

Now, amid ongoing problems with
the first RSV vaccines from Pfizer and GSK, the FDA is acknowledging that Moderna’s mRNA version is causing severe RSV cases in children. It’s time for the incoming Department of Health and Human Services, along with state officials, to pull the plug on both RSV shots and mRNA vaccines of all kinds.

We have simply too much public information to sustain this deception any longer. The time for action on this long-standing failure is January 20, not a day later.

The
FDA reported last week at least five cases of severe or very severe RSV in infants who received Moderna’s new mRNA vaccine during a clinical trial. The Biden administration had already approved Pfizer’s and GSK’s senior RSV vaccines, Pfizer’s infant vaccine, and a monoclonal antibody treatment for young children — all of which have documented safety concerns. Earlier this year, the administration approved Moderna’s mRNA version (mRESVIA) for seniors.

However, the FDA has now revealed that enrollment of young children in clinical trials is “on hold for all clinical studies of RSV vaccine candidates” under U.S. investigational new drug protocols.

The clinical trial showed shocking results: “Severe illness was 26.3% in the vaccine groups compared with 8.3% in the placebo.” Talk about “the more you inject, the more you infect”! If there are so many problems with infants, why are we giving this shot to anyone — especially seniors, who are not at significant risk for RSV the way they are for flu or COVID?

Moderna used two versions of the vaccine in the clinical trial, and one of them, mRNA-1345 (mRESVIA), induced severe RSV in an infant. This same vaccine is now being administered to seniors.

Given the 60-year concern about enhanced disease, why are we continuing to push any RSV shots? Why are we continuing to approve mRNA vaccines after the documented issues with COVID shots? Why approve Pfizer’s RSV shot for pregnant women when GSK’s nearly identical version was
pulled from clinical trials after causing death and injury?

Finally, why are we promoting vaccines for respiratory viruses at all? COVID and flu have shown that respiratory viruses
do not respond well to blood-based antibodies and often cause immune imprinting, leading to a higher risk of infection in the long run.

These are straightforward questions any layman can understand, yet our medical experts remain stuck in ignorance — and greed.

Greater risk for babies

Pfizer’s and Moderna’s clinical trials for the COVID vaccine in toddlers
revealed that leaky respiratory viral vaccines tend to increase, not decrease, the risk of respiratory viruses. In Moderna’s trial of babies ages 6 to 23 months, researchers found a statistically significant increase in respiratory viruses within 28 days of vaccination.

For croup, 1.3% of mRNA-1273 recipients were infected, compared to just 0.3% of placebo recipients. For RSV, the infection rate was 0.8% for mRNA-1273 recipients and 0.5% for the placebo group. For pneumonia, 0.2% of mRNA-1273 recipients were affected, while no cases occurred in the placebo group.

In Moderna’s trial for children ages 2 to 5 years, 0.3% of participants developed pneumonia compared to none of the placebo recipients. For RSV, the rates were 0.4% for vaccinated children and less than 0.1% for the placebo group. In other words, young children in the vaccine group were
four times more likely to contract RSV within four weeks of the shot than those in the placebo group.

This trend persisted even among 6- to 11-year-olds, who are less susceptible to RSV. In that group, 0.3% of vaccine recipients experienced the illness compared to zero cases in the placebo group.

Pfizer’s children’s vaccine clinical trial for toddlers (
see page 51) also recorded serious adverse events, including RSV bronchiolitis (five participants), pneumonia (two participants), gastroenteritis (two participants), and lower respiratory tract infections (two participants).

Clearly, respiratory viral vaccines make individuals more vulnerable to RSV. Many people now avoid these vaccines, but the industry has adopted a clever marketing tactic: offering a monoclonal antibody as a prophylactic measure against RSV, alongside the GSK, Pfizer, and Moderna shots. Originally developed by AstraZeneca and now distributed by Sanofi, Beyfortus (nirsevimab) has been administered to newborns since last October. New mothers are convinced their babies could suddenly die from RSV, which may have originated in the 1950s through
polio vaccine research. According to the CDC, 40.5% of babies in America received Beyfortus during the last RSV season.

The FDA’s briefing document on Moderna’s clinical trial reported that the Moderna shot not only worsened the disease but also “blunted” Beyfortus’ efficacy in babies who received both. But what the report fails to disclose is that Beyfortus is as problematic as Moderna’s mRESVIA.

After hundreds of thousands of French babies received Beyfortus in 2023, Dr. Helen Banoun identified a
shocking and unexplained increase in infant deaths linked to the vaccine’s uptake. Banoun also highlighted the FDA’s own data, which shows — clearly and alarmingly — a much higher rate of deaths in the Beyfortus treatment group compared to the placebo. This data appears on page 70 of the Biologics License Application for Beyfortus, but it seems the manufacturers rely on no one reading it.

Other literature cited in the Banoun paper shows that children were getting sicker with respiratory illnesses, signaling immune imprinting and disease enhancement — negative efficacy against the very illness the vaccines are supposed to treat.

According to VAERS reports,
a baby boy died immediately after receiving the injection, and a baby girl was found unresponsive seven hours later. “Sudden infant death syndrome,” indeed.

What Trump can do

Moreover, the problem extends beyond the individuals receiving the vaccine. Dr. Peter McCullough has documented
growing evidence that these products may be creating super-resistant strains of RSV.

We cannot continue like this as a civilization. Continuing mass vaccination without immediate restrictions and research violates the principles of the pro-life movement, based on the available data. It also violates the Nuremberg Code on human experimentation.

To that end, Trump’s next HHS secretary would do well to implement the following policies regarding vaccines:

  • No shot should be marketed as a vaccine in any way if it is not proven to stop infection.
  • No shot should be approved without a full placebo group that is kept permanently to study long-term differences with the trial group.
  • No shot should be approved unless it shows an all-cause mortality benefit over time and most certainly cannot show more deaths in the trial group.
  • No shot should be approved for one age group when there are clear safety signals in other age groups, unless it can be proven that those safety issues do not apply to the targeted cohort. For example, even after the FDA admitted that RSV shots caused Guillain-Barré syndrome and walked back its approval for people over 60, the agency still recommends the shots for people over 75.
  • No mRNA shots whatsoever.
  • No shot should be approved without oncogenicity, genotoxicity, or long-term safety studies, none of which were conducted with any of the RSV shots.

This issue is no longer just about COVID or Operation Warp Speed. The RSV vaccine approvals were conducted openly, despite known problems with these shots from day one — just like in 1967. They didn’t even need to rely on emergency use authorization.

We have simply too much public information to sustain this deception any longer. The time for action on this long-standing failure is January 20, not a day later.

Read More
‘Preposterous’: Biden admin extends liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers
COVID-19
, ,

‘Preposterous’: Biden admin extends liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers

The Biden Department of Health and Human Services has extended liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and administrators through Dec. 31, 2029, precluding vaccine recipients who reportedly end up injured or their surviving family members from holding those responsible to account.

Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense,
called the decision from the outgoing administration “very concerning,” not only because it protects pharmaceutical companies and the government but because it “allows for largely unfettered product development.”

Health Secretary Xavier Becerra
suggested in his declaration that continued coverage for the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration, and use of FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act “is intended to prepare for and mitigate the credible risk presented by COVID-19.”

Although the federal public health emergency for COVID-19
expired on May 11, 2023, and the virus has reportedly moved from a pandemic to the endemic phase, Becerra suggested that COVID-19 continues to both “present a credible risk of a future public health emergency” and “cause significant serious illness, morbidity, and mortality during outbreaks.” Citing these supposed risks, he suggested that it was necessary to renew liability protection to ensure the continued development and stockpiling of vaccines.

‘The only threat is a loss of air-tight liability that leaves the vast majority of victims out of luck.’

The Congressional Research Service
previously noted that under the HHS declaration, covered persons in most cases cannot be sued for losses — including death, physical or mental injury, and business interruption loss — relating to the use or administration of COVID-19 vaccines.

The
sole exception to PREP Act immunity is for death or serious physical injury caused by “willful misconduct.” To qualify as willful misconduct, the covered person must have “acted (i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose; (ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and (iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.”

The liability protections for the COVID-19 vaccines were first introduced in January 2020. This is the 12th extension.

Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland suggested the Biden administration was “attempting to tie the hands of the incoming administration in its treatment of emergencies and pandemics. This is not the way elections and transfer of power are supposed to work.”

Ray Flores, who serves as senior outside counsel for Kennedy’s organization,
told the Defender, “It is preposterous that HHS extended PREP Act protections based on a no-longer-existing threat. The only threat is a loss of air-tight liability that leaves the vast majority of victims out of luck.”

Bloomberg Law
reported that Becerra’s declaration comes amid calls for COVID-19 vaccines to be covered under the HHS’ Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. In its notice, the HHS indicated that Americans injured by COVID-19 vaccines will still be unable to seek compensation through the VICP.

COVID-19 vaccines are instead covered “countermeasures” under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. The PREP Act authorizes the CICP to provide some compensation to individuals who suffered serious physical injury as the direct result of the supposedly “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccines.

COVID-19 vaccines have reportedly been shown in some cases to cause significant harm.

A study published January in the pharmacotherapy journal Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
indicated that “COVID-19 vaccination is strongly associated with a serious adverse safety signal of myocarditis, particularly in children and young adults resulting in hospitalization and death.”

In addition to noting the
well-documented correlation between the COVID-19 vaccines and increased risk of heart conditions, a study conducted by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project — a Global Vaccine Data Network initiative supported by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the HHS — and published February in the journal Vaccine detailed troubling links between the AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer vaccines and medical conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, brain and spinal cord inflammation, Bell’s palsy, and convulsions.

Despite suggesting vaccinations were still worthwhile, a 2023 study published in the Elsevier Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
noted that “a survey has found that 65% of participants experience adverse reactions.”

As of Nov. 1, 13,520 claims were
filed with the CIPC. Of the 3,438 decisions made so far, only 65 claims were found eligible for compensation. Of that number, only 18 claims were compensated.

The claims cited a wide range of injuries, including blood clots, strokes, and heart attacks. There were also 671 claims stating the COVID-19 vaccines resulted in death.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Democrat Bob Casey finally concedes Senate election to McCormick after trying to count illegal votes in Pennsylvania
Elections

Democrat Bob Casey finally concedes Senate election to McCormick after trying to count illegal votes in Pennsylvania

The contentious campaign for one of Pennsylvania’s seats in the U.S. Senate is finally over after Democratic incumbent Bob Casey called Republican challenger Dave McCormick to concede.

Republicans accused election officials in several Pennsylvania counties of trying to subvert the election by illegally counting votes in the recount. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court sided with Republicans, but some officials indicated that they would ignore the ruling and continue.

‘When a Pennsylvanian takes the time to cast a legal vote, often waiting in long lines and taking time away from their work and family, they deserve to know that their vote will count. That’s democracy.’

On Thursday, 16 days after Election Day, Casey conceded the election.

“I just called Dave McCormick to congratulate him on his election to represent Pennsylvania in the United States Senate. As the first count of ballots is completed, Pennsylvanians can move forward with the knowledge that their voices were heard, whether their vote was the first to be counted or the last,” he said in a video posted to social media.

McCormick issued a brief response.

“Senator Bob Casey dedicated his career to bettering our commonwealth. Dina and I want to extend our sincere gratitude to Senator Casey, Terese, and their family for their decades of service, hard work, and personal sacrifice,” he said.

The official count of votes gave McCormick a lead of about 16,000 votes over Casey, which added up to a margin of just under .5%. That narrowly fell within the cutoff point for a recount, though critics said it was unlikely to overturn the official results given historical trends.

“When a Pennsylvanian takes the time to cast a legal vote, often waiting in long lines and taking time away from their work and family, they deserve to know that their vote will count. That’s democracy,” Casey concluded.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee had called Casey’s attorney in the matter a “scumbag” as the controversy continued.

The seat will give Republicans a 53-47 majority in the next session of the U.S. Senate.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Dems hatch scheme to shoehorn Kamala Harris into presidency despite losing election — if Biden has the courage
Elections

Dems hatch scheme to shoehorn Kamala Harris into presidency despite losing election — if Biden has the courage

Democrats and other pro-Harris supporters began floating a scheme intended to temporarily insert Vice President Kamala Harris into the Oval Office just to make history and ruin Trump merchandise sales.

‘Generation participation-trophy has reached adulthood & still wants a prize.’

NewsNation contributor Kurt Bardella argued that President Joe Biden should resign and allow Harris to take over presidential duties until Trump’s second inauguration in January.

“I think if you’re President Joe Biden, there’s nothing left to run for. There’s nothing left to really do. Pardon your son, then resign and elevate Kamala Harris to the presidency and make one more mark in the history books while you can,” said Bardella to a NewsNation panel.

“If I were Joe Biden, that’s exactly what I would do,” he added. “Again, you have a very short runway left of being relevant and being able to make your mark in a historic way. Why not do it that way?”

“You know, it’s not the craziest thing I’ve ever heard,” responded Mick Mulvaney, the former acting White House chief of staff under Trump.

Others on social media were also pushing the idea that Harris should be allowed to be called the 47th president of the U.S. even if it were only to be on an temporary basis.

“Biden should resign so Harris becomes 47 and Donald has to throw out all his 47 swag,” read one viral tweet that garnered over 4.1 million views.

“President Biden should resign as an act of protest tomorrow so Kamala Harris could be sworn in as the first female president until January. That would make Trump 48 and ruin that stupid hat of his. Can we get this trending,” wrote an activist account.

“Since we’re never ever going to see a brown person or a woman nominated for President ever again, Biden should resign tomorrow and give Kamala Harris and us a bit of history for the next two months,” read another comment.

Still others mocked what would amount to be a presidential participation trophy.

“‘Let the child win.’ For her self-esteem. The ultimate in insulting DEI infantilization of a world leader,” responded Christopher Bedford, Blaze Media Washington correspondent.

“Generation participation-trophy has reached adulthood & still wants a prize,” he added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Dem-heavy counties in Georgia engage in election shenanigans over weekend, prompting RNC lawsuit
Elections

Dem-heavy counties in Georgia engage in election shenanigans over weekend, prompting RNC lawsuit

Blue counties in and around Atlanta, Georgia, are apparently engaging in some election shenanigans this weekend that may run afoul of state law, prompting the RNC to file yet another election integrity lawsuit.

According to a Saturday morning X post from RNC chairman Michael Whatley, Fulton, Cobb, DeKalb, and Gwinnett Counties will permit voters to drop off absentee ballots at designated polling locations this weekend. Whatley added that extending hours for ballot drop-offs “disregards the law.”

‘The Secretary of State has issued guidance to allow Republican poll watchers in but local officials REFUSE.’

Indeed, Georgia Code § 21-2-385, passed during the 2023-2024 legislative session, says that early voting in Georgia will begin “on the fourth Monday immediately prior to each primary or election” and “end on the Friday immediately prior to each primary, election, or runoff” (emphasis added).

In 2024, that end point should have been November 1.

Furthermore, Ga. Code § 21-2-382 adds that “all drop boxes shall be closed when the advance voting period ends.”

Nevertheless, a report from local PBS and NPR affiliate WABE confirmed that “metro Atlanta residents who live in Fulton, Cobb, DeKalb or Gwinnett counties can drop off their absentee ballots over the weekend and on Monday, Nov. 4, the day before Election Day, at their local election offices.”

What’s worse, there initially may not have been official oversight of some of these drop-off locations. A photo of an email apparently written by Kathryn Glenn, the registration manager of the Department of Registration & Elections in Fulton County, and apparently sent to dozens of office employees indicates that no poll watchers had been authorized.

“FYI – There are NO WATCHERS approved for ballot drop off! Do not let them in the building,” Glenn wrote, according to the photo.

“If they want to observe from the parking lot, you can’t stop that,” her email apparently continued, “but they are not allowed to sit in the building. Have your security detail enforce it!!!”

As a result, the RNC has already filed a lawsuit, Whatley claimed. As of Saturday afternoon, it remains “pending,” he said.

Josh McKoon, the leader of the Georgia Republican Party and a former state senator, called these latest moves from Democrat-area election officials a “blatant violation” of Georgian election law.

“We all know what is going on — Democrats are panicked by the incredible Republican turnout in early voting and will do anything to try to catch up even if it means doing it under the cover of darkness and stiff arming any independent observation of whatever the hell is going on in their four ‘special voting locations’ open today with no notice or approval by anyone authorized to oversee elections administration,” McKoon tweeted on Saturday morning.

McKoon tweeted Saturday afternoon that poll watchers had finally been permitted on the premises.

“Fulton County and other counties are now allowing our poll watchers to observe the voting activity occurring” on Saturday, he wrote.

He attributed the change to a pressure campaign from Republican leaders at the state and national levels.

“While we should not have to alert the public to have Georgia law enforced, I am pleased that lawful observation is now occurring.”

Blaze News reached out to Kathryn Glenn and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) for comment but did not receive a response.

This is a developing story. Check back with Blaze News for further updates.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Pennsylvania officials silent over election integrity concerns
Elections

Pennsylvania officials silent over election integrity concerns

Former President Donald Trump won a lawsuit in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, alongside the Republican National Committee on Wednesday after law enforcement turned voters away from mail-in voter registration before the original deadline lapsed. As a result, the state ruled in favor of Trump and extended the deadline to request a mail-in ballot from Oct. 29 to Nov. 1.

Although this was a victory for the Trump camp as well as for voters, Pennsylvania officials have stayed silent on how this was able to happen in the first place.

Shapiro was quick to criticize Trump, who he said has ‘attacked our elections over and over,’ but has remained silent following the verdict, failing to clarify whether there will be any investigation into the individuals who violated the Pennsylvania election code.

“Pennsylvania is cheating, and getting caught, at large scale levels rarely seen before,” Trump said ahead of the ruling. “REPORT CHEATING TO AUTHORITIES. Law Enforcement must act, NOW!”

Prior to the ruling, Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro responded to Trump’s claim, saying he is just trying to “stoke chaos” ahead of the election.

“Republican and Democratic clerks of elections are doing their jobs here in Pennsylvania — and together with law enforcement, they’re making sure only eligible voters are able to register and vote,” Shapiro said in a post on X before the ruling.

“He’s now trying to use the same playbook to stoke chaos, but hear me on this: we will again have a free and fair, safe and secure election — and the will of the people will be respected,” Shapiro continued.

Shapiro was quick to criticize Trump, who he said has “attacked our elections over and over,” but has remained silent following the verdict, failing to clarify whether there will be any investigation into whether individuals violated the Pennsylvania election code.

Blaze News reached out to officials like Shapiro, as well as Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmitt, Attorney General Michelle Henry, the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Bucks County Deputy Director of Communications James O’Malley, and Director of Policy and Communications Eric Nagy.

As of this writing, none of them have responded to a request for comment from Blaze News.

“This is illegal, and [Shapiro] should do something about operatives in his own party depriving people of their right to vote,” Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, said Thursday of the allegations. “If he doesn’t, he is complicit in voter fraud.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Andrew Cuomo faces criminal referral for alleged COVID-related cover-up
COVID-19

Andrew Cuomo faces criminal referral for alleged COVID-related cover-up

Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is facing a criminal referral for allegedly making “criminally false statements” about a July 2020 report that downplayed the number of COVID-related nursing home deaths.

On Wednesday, the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic referred Cuomo to the Department of Justice, arguing that he lied about his involvement in the New York State Department of Health’s report. However, the subcommittee’s formal referral does not compel the DOJ to move forward with further investigation.

‘The Department of Justice should consider Mr. Cuomo’s prior allegedly wrongful conduct.’

According to a draft of the subcommittee’s criminal referral, the report undercounted the number of deaths by 46%.

Cuomo repeatedly claimed he did not recall seeing the report before its public release, Blaze News previously reported. However, evidence uncovered by the subcommittee allegedly revealed that Cuomo personally made edits to the document.

The referral, signed by Representative Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), accused the former governor of making a “conscious, calculated effort” to skirt responsibility for the nursing home death scandal.

“Mr. Cuomo provided false statements to the select subcommittee in what appears to be a conscious, calculated effort to insulate himself from accountability,” Wenstrup wrote in the referral letter. “The Department of Justice should consider Mr. Cuomo’s prior allegedly wrongful conduct when evaluating whether to charge him for the false statements described.”

A June 2020 email from Cuomo’s former assistant allegedly revealed that he had made edits to the report before its release. He requested that it include language emphasizing how “community spread among employees or possibly visitation by family and friends were relevant factors” in the deaths. His edits were included in the final version of the report.

Additionally, congressional documents allegedly uncovered that Cuomo’s aides requested “two copies” of the report be sent to his residence before its release.

Cuomo fired back at the criminal referral by filing his own against the subcommittee.

The former governor’s criminal referral reads, “This interrogation far exceeded the Subcommittee’s jurisdiction and appears to have been an improper effort to advantage the interests of private litigants against Governor Cuomo, warranting investigation by the Department of Justice.”

Richard Azzopardi, a spokesperson for Cuomo, stated, “This taxpayer-funded farce is an illegal use of Congress’s investigative authority.”

“The governor said he didn’t recall because he didn’t recall. The committee lied in their referral just as they have been lying to the public and the press,” Azzopardi stated.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Read More
Desperate Democrats’ last-ditch election strategy: Vicious lies and smears
Elections

Desperate Democrats’ last-ditch election strategy: Vicious lies and smears

Americans have been waking up and realizing that Kamala Harris does not stand for “A New Way Forward,” as her campaign has been claiming, but rather the same exact thing they’ve gotten for the past few years.

She is the vice president of the current administration, after all. With this in mind, the Democrats are now doing everything they can to instill fear in their voters and smear Donald Trump as he rises in the polls.

“Right now they’re basically telling black voters that they have a racial duty to vote for Kamala Harris, black men in particular,” Blaze News senior political editor Christopher Bedford tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.”

“It’s not going over that well, not even with liberal media,” he continues. “At the same time, apparently white people have a racial duty to vote for Kamala Harris. Basically, everyone’s got a racial duty to vote for Kamala Harris.”

But they’re not just using race to stir division.

The Atlantic recently published an article claiming that Donald Trump said Hitler had good generals.

“Who knows if that was actually real, who knows? If it was, it was certainly said as a joke if it was real,” Bedford says. “But now, that’s getting picked up.”

Whether it’s real or not, Kamala certainly wants America to believe it is.

“Why is Vice President Kamala Harris holding a campaign speech from the vice presidential house with the vice presidential seal where she calls Donald trump ‘Hitler’ and ‘a Nazi?'” Bedford says.

“I think there’s a depression in the ranks amongst Democratic voters. They’re not feeling too good, they’re not feeling confident, they’re not liking their team, they’re not feeling the same motivation of ‘we hate Donald Trump’ that they may have in the past. And the Democrats are going to go full board to be like, ‘Hey, just a reminder, all you liberal voters out there, all you quiet Democrats, Donald Trump is literally Hitler,’” he adds.

Want more from ‘Blaze News Tonight’?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More
ALERT: Why ‘bombshell’ deepfake video days before election is a threat
Elections

ALERT: Why ‘bombshell’ deepfake video days before election is a threat

We’ve been warned about the dangers of artificial intelligence for decades, and now it’s finally here.

Most recently, the state-run media went nuts over an AI-generated image of Donald Trump in a Pittsburgh Steelers uniform, but that’s not the kind of “deepfake” that Americans should be concerned about.

“Deepfake images, audio and video, are reaching a level of sophistication that far surpasses anything we’ve seen before now,” Glenn Beck of “The Glenn Beck Program” says, reading from his new book, “Propaganda Wars.”

This is a massive issue, especially considering that there are more elections happening simultaneously across the globe than ever before in human history.

“We’re one of the last,” Glenn says. “So have deepfakes been used in the last year? Yes. Warning, usually in the last day or two because there’s not enough time to combat it. So right before everybody goes in for the final day, something is released on one of the candidates, and it shows them doing something or saying something.”

And this has already happened in America.

Just last year in Chicago, there was a mayoral race that was extremely contentious between Brandon Johnson and Paul Valas.

Right before one of the rounds of primary voting, a deepfake audio of Valas was released in which he was flippantly discussing cops killing people as if it were a good thing.

“None of this was true. It was a deepfaked audio; none of it was real, but it circulated widely right before the election, and Brandon Johnson ended up doing a lot better than people thought,” Justin Haskins, co-author of “Propaganda Wars,” tells Glenn.

Johnson, who is African-American, then went on to win the race.

“Johnson was the anti-establishment, socialist candidate, presented himself to the African-American community as ‘I’m going to represent you,’ and here you had audio of the other candidate saying, ‘I don’t care if black people get killed by cops,’” Haskins says.

“There’s no way of actually tracking the specific correlation between this and the outcome of the race; it’s just not possible. But that’s the whole point. It creates all sorts of uncertainty and confusion, and we don’t know how many people were impacted by this. Maybe not enough to swing the election, but maybe it was enough to swing the election,” he adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read More