Monday, July 20, 2026

Conspiracy Resource

Conspiracy news & views from all angles, up-to-the-minute and uncensored

russia

Russia

5G

Research into remotely controlling our brains and behaviour using electromagnetic waves has been going on for decades

Takuma Ishizuka has conducted a review of over 400 scientific studies exploring how emotional states and motor responses can be affected through stimulation of specific neural structures using electromagnetic waves, electric currents and ultrasonic waves. His review covers various methods of remotely manipulating the nervous system, including brainwave entrainment, temporal interference stimulation and the use of microwave beams to stimulate or suppress brain activity. He notes that neurostrike weapons, utilising microwaves or directed energy beams, are among the weapons that are being developed to alter behaviour and disrupt brain functions and cognitive function. Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox… Takuma Ishizuka, an independent researcher in Japan, has published a comprehensive technical article examining the mechanisms of remotely controlling the human brain. His research, based on a review of more than 400 scientific studies, investigates “how external stimuli such as electromagnetic fields may influence the nervous system” and examines “whether emotional states and motor responses could be affected through stimulation of specific neural structures,” he said in an email to The Exposé. He has noted his findings in an article titled ‘Can the Brain Be Hacked? Examining Scientific Mechanisms on Remote Control of the Human Brain’. The introduction states: In the 1970s, allegations surfaced that the government was researching electrical stimulation of the human brain as a means of mind-controlling its citizens. The fact that this was a serious debate is underscored by the US Congress expressing concern in 1973 about the mass manipulation using such technology, while the US military provided financial support to prominent researchers in this field at that time. If you could stimulate specific sites of the brain with the same precision without using electrodes, then you could alter human emotions and behaviour from a distance, achieving “remote control of the human mind.” In fact, the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) of the Department of Defence [now the Department of War] is believed to have been trying to achieve this [by] focusing microwave beams. US government agencies have long been interested in controlling the brain function and have conducted numerous studies investigating the effects of microwaves on behaviour. An expert at the International Committee of the Red Cross warns that what was once dismissed as a conspiracy theory is now becoming a real threat in the form of “non-lethal weapons” being developed by military organisations. Research is also progressing on “bio-robots,” which connect animal brains to computers and control them wirelessly … If such technologies were to become widespread … there is a risk that we would end up with an extremely precarious society where it would become difficult for people to even live according to their own will. Can the Brain Be Hacked? Examining Scientific Mechanisms on Remote Control of the Human Brain, EMF Hazard, 19 June 2026 Ishizuka’s article, split into 11 chapters or pages, has a well-organised, hyperlinked index to enable readers to move through the sections at their own pace. The first chapter describes various methods of remotely manipulating the nervous system.  Chapters 2 through 9 discuss “numerous studies that show that direct electrical stimulation of the deep brain can induce emotions such as rage, fear, pleasure, desire and inhibition, and can also freely manipulate the body, such as movements of limbs, cardiac arrest and respiratory arrest.” Chapter 10 describes the early attempts at mind control. Chapter 11 lists the 476 references that Ishizuka used in his research. The following is a summary of some of the information contained in Chapter 1. Table of contents Brainwave Entrainment and Temporal Interference The classical method of manipulating the nervous system is direct electrical stimulation via implanted electrodes, but new methods allow for indirect manipulation using electromagnetic waves, electric currents and ultrasonic waves.  Although he does briefly mention the others, Ishizuka focused his research on the manipulation of the brain using electromagnetic waves. Note from The Exposé: Electromagnetic waves are a combination of electrical fields and magnetic fields.  A changing magnetic field will induce a changing electric field and vice versa.  These changing fields form electromagnetic waves, also referred to as electromagnetic radiation, which carry electromagnetic energy. This energy can be described in terms of frequency, wavelength or energy. Electromagnetic wave energy is directly proportional to frequency and inversely proportional to wavelength, meaning waves with shorter wavelengths possess higher energy levels. Electromagnetic waves are classified into the electromagnetic spectrum according to their frequency and wavelength: Radio Waves: Low frequency, longest wavelengths and low energy. Microwaves. Infrared. Visible Light: The narrow band detectable by the human eye. Ultraviolet. X-rays. Gamma Rays: Highest frequency, shortest wavelengths and high energy. Even weak electromagnetic waves or electric currents can activate neurons through a process called “brain entrainment.” Brain entrainment, or brainwave entrainment, is where the brain’s electrical oscillations synchronise to the rhythm of periodic external stimuli, such as sound, light or vibration.  This frequency-following response allows the brain to shift into specific states associated with different conscious activities, ranging from deep sleep to heightened focus. Recently, a technique called temporal interference (“TI”) stimulation has been developed.  It works by applying two pairs of scalp electrodes that deliver high-frequency alternating currents.  These currents intersect in the brain to create a low-frequency beat frequency, activating specific deep-brain sites through brain entrainment. Ishizuka explains why the development of TI is significant: There are two key points for inducing behavioural changes through brain entrainment using external oscillations: Target specific sites of the brain. Match the external oscillations to the functional frequencies of the target sites. This will enable you to induce clear behavioural changes, such as those seen with direct electrical stimulation of the brain, using external oscillations like electromagnetic waves. Recently developed temporal interference (TI) stimulation, which stimulates the brain with a localised composite wave created at the intersection of two waves, has made exactly this kind of stimulation possible. Can the Brain Be Hacked? Examining Scientific Mechanisms on Remote Control of the Human Brain, EMF Hazard, 19 June 2026 In other words, developments in temporal interference stimulation have made it possible to stimulate the brain with electromagnetic waves in such a way as to allow for more precise control over brain entrainment and its effects on behaviour such as sleep, memory, anger, fear, hallucinations, sight and reaction time, depending on the localised composite wave created when different frequencies are used. Microwaves as a Covert Weapon Microwaves can also produce changes in neurons, brainwaves and behaviour through brain entrainment. “The key to producing these [behavioural] changes appears to be modulating the microwaves at extremely low frequency in the brainwave band,” Ishizuka said. “Unmodulated continuous microwaves often suppress neuronal activity or have no effect at all.” Note from The Exposé: Modulated microwaves are microwave radio frequency signals in which a specific property of the carrier wave – such as its amplitude, frequency or phase – is varied in accordance with an information signal (baseband) to encode data or transmit voice.  This process allows high-frequency microwaves to carry digital or analogue information over long distances for telecommunications, radar and wireless networks. On the other hand, unmodulated microwaves refer to a smooth, continuous electromagnetic wave signal that lacks the pulsed, modulated or variable characteristics of modern wireless transmissions. Ishizuka refers to an experiment done by the US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in which rhesus monkeys were irradiated with microwaves. A radio antenna was aimed at the heads of the rhesus monkeys so that it was in line with the brain stem and within a few seconds, the monkey became drowsy. After about a minute, it became agitated and began to move its head from side to side. The monkey then went into a major convulsion and died a few seconds later. The experiment was repeated.  10 monkeys died as a result of exposure to the microwaves.  Another 10 monkeys, whose exposure was cut short of death, showed various symptoms, including symptoms similar to Parkinson’s disease, quadriplegia, weakness in the upper limbs, ataxia and tissue damage found in the brain stem and cerebellum. Ishizuka referred to another experiment in which researchers used microwaves to stop the heart of a frog, which suggests that irradiating the heart or brain with pulse-modulated microwaves in sync with the heartbeat can induce fatal cardiac arrest in humans and animals.  It serves as proof that microwaves could be applied as a covert, highly lethal weapon that leaves no trace. Mobile Phone Radiation Similar to the frequencies mentioned above, mobile phones emit pulse-modulated microwaves that contain extremely low-frequency components in the brainwave band, which may have an impact on memory. “For example, in second-generation mobile phones, extremely low-frequency components of the theta band at 5.6, 5.86, 6.8, and 8 Hz have been detected most strongly,” Ishizuka wrote. Theta waves, which range from 4 to 7Hz, are associated with memory and emotions, such as fear responses and pathological aggression.  Alpha waves, which range from 8 to 12Hz, are associated with inhibition and are said to govern reason. In 2003, Finnish researchers demonstrated that exposure to electromagnetic waves from second-generation (2G) mobile phones has various effects on the human brain, including markedly reduced working memory. Microwave Beams to Stimulate or Suppress Brain Activity Note from The Exposé: Microwave beams are focused streams of electromagnetic radiation. These beams are used in, for example: The use of microwave beams has been explored as a neurostimulation technique.  Recent advances in signal processing technology have allowed for the irradiation of microwaves as beams in specific directions, which can be utilised to facilitate or suppress brain activity. Rice University researchers, inspired by the success of TI stimulation, have developed a method of stimulating specific targets deep within the brain using microwave beams instead of electric currents.  The method involves multiple beams and concentrating the energy at the intersection.  Simulations show that they can stimulate the centre of the brain with an electric field intensity comparable to that of electric current stimulation and with far superior focality. Other researchers, including those at the University of Utah, are also exploring the use of microwave beams for neurostimulation.  Simulations show that they can wirelessly stimulate the deep brain by focusing multiple microwave beams on specific targets inside the brain, using an array antenna and 8 GHz microwave beams. The results of a study by Iranian researchers in 2020 showed that microwave beams can be focused at any point on the human head and can wirelessly stimulate the deep brain by focusing multiple beams on specific targets inside the brain.  In this simulation, multiple array antennas were placed in a cylindrical shape around the head, and 1GHz microwave beams were irradiated toward the centre of the brain, resulting in the electromagnetic force being focused at a depth of 10 cm inside the brain. Neurostrike Weapons Note from The Exposé: Neurostrike weapons are non-kinetic military technologies designed to disrupt, impair or control brain functions and cognitive processes in human targets.  These weapons primarily utilise microwaves, directed energy beams or infrasound to induce neurological degradation, reduce situational awareness and manipulate decision-making without causing overt physical trauma.  One India News reported in 2023 that “China’s People’s Liberation Army is reportedly developing high-technology neurostrike weapons that are designed to disrupt brain functions and influence government leaders or entire populations … The goal is to impair thinking, reduce situational awareness, inflict long-term neurological damage and cloud normal cognitive functions.” The development of neurostrike weapons has been advancing, Ishizuka said, and it seems this technology is being applied for military purposes. An example of this is the Moscow Signal, where the US Embassy in Moscow was attacked with microwaves from 1953 to 1979. From 1953 to April 1979, the 10-story US Embassy in Moscow was attacked with microwaves. This signal came to be known as the Moscow Signal. It was estimated to have been a low intensity of about 0.1-24 µW/cm² in the gigahertz range as a modulated radio-frequency signal for nine hours a day.  It was found to have caused chromosomal abnormalities, serious health problems, such as cancer and leukaemia, and symptoms consistent with electromagnetic hypersensitivity in embassy employees. DARPA’s Project Pandora The US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”) has a long history of attempting to develop techniques for focusing microwave beams to disorient or confuse opponents.  This is evident in their secret research programme called Project Pandora, which was initiated in 1965 to assess the biological and behavioural effects of low-power microwaves. The Project was launched as part of an investigation into the Moscow Signal. However, Project Pandora was suspected of being a research programme on remote mind control.  This was denied by the director of DARPA  in 1967, who said, “the Pandora experiments were never directed at the use of microwaves as a surveillance tool nor in a weapon concept.” A year later, the director expanded on this point in a written response to a congressional inquiry.  “This agency is not aware of any research projects, classified or unclassified, conducted under the auspices of the Defence Department, now on-going or in the past, which would have probed possibilities of utilising microwave radiation as a form of what is popularly known as ‘mind control’,” he said. However, these statements were not historically accurate, as weaponry and mind control were clearly on the minds of some DARPA officials when Pandora began. Researchers at the time had already demonstrated that direct electrical stimulation of the brain could alter behaviour. The question was whether microwaves could have the same effect. “This is what Project Pandora initially set out to discover: whether a carefully constructed microwave signal could direct the mind,” Ishizuka said. Pandora was a multi-million dollar research programme with numerous projects. The main research was conducted at a microwave facility established at the US Army’s Walter Reed Institute of Research, where exposure experiments were conducted by simulating the Moscow Signal targeted at chimpanzees. The study found no notable biological effects which, apparently, led to the project’s cancellation in 1969. Some viewed the reason for the project’s cancellation with scepticism.  Paul Braude, a science investigative journalist for The New Yorker, suggested that Project Pandora was cancelled due to the discovery of serious biological effects that needed to be concealed. According to the 2009 book ‘‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons’ by Neil Davison, “the research programme pursued weapons applications and demonstrated the potential of low-power microwaves to interfere with brain function,” Ishizuka said. “A document that appears to show the results of experiments conducted at the Army’s Walter Reed Institute of Research mentions ‘behavioural performance decrement’, ‘seizures’, ‘gross alterations in brain function’, ‘30 to 100% increases in blood flow’ and ‘lethality’.” US Air Force and Electromagnetic Weapons Davison was a senior scientific and policy adviser in the Department of International Law and Policy Arms Unit at the International Committee of the Red Cross.  His book ‘‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons’ provides a comprehensive overview of microwave weapons and acoustic weapons developed and possessed by US government agencies. Davison’s book, together with a report by US News in 1997, “highlights the historical and technical background in which US government agencies – particularly the US Air Force – have long been interested in technologies for interfering with human brain functions and have explored the development of the operational systems for them,” Ishizuka wrote. These sources point to a report compiled by the US Air Force in 1982.  It outlined biotechnology research problems requiring solutions for aeronautical systems development and operation after 2000. “The research problems included the biological effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RFR), including microwaves,” Ishizuka said.  It discussed the potential of RFR to interrupt, degrade or direct human central nervous system functioning. “From its approach, it is clear that the US Air Force evaluated electromagnetic energy not merely as a means of communication, but as a highly practical technology for remotely controlling and guiding human behaviour,” Ishizuka said. Davison and the US News report noted that research on microwaves was primarily carried out at the Brooks Air Force Research Laboratory in Texas. To investigate the safety of radar systems, the Laboratory launched a comprehensive programme in 1968 on the biological effects of radio frequencies, microwaves and millimetre waves. A 2002 paper summarising the programme said: “At the Air Force Research Laboratory facilities at Brooks, a wide range of RFR exposure parameters are studied, including exposure to microwaves, millimetre waves, high power microwaves (HPM), ultrawideband radiation (UWB), and include both pulsed and continuous wave, acute, chronic and repeated exposures. The research is conducted at biological levels of organisation from sub-cellular fractions, to cells, rodents, goats, monkeys and humans. Biological effects studied include the biochemical, genetic, neural, physiological, behavioural and cognitive.” In 2004, the Air Force’s “Controlled Personnel Effects” concept appeared. “The concept of controlled effects on humans envisions a highly advanced application where a non-lethal force is used to alter a target’s thoughts and actions as desired,” Ishizuka said. Quoting Davison, Ishizuka wrote: “For the Controlled Personnel Effects capability, the S&T [science and technology] panel explored the potential for targeting individuals with non-lethal force, from a militarily useful range, to make selected adversaries think or act according to our needs. Through the application of non-lethal force, it is possible to physically influence or incapacitate personnel. Advanced technologies could enable the war fighter to remotely create physical sensations such as pressure or temperature changes. A current example of this technology is Active Denial … By studying and modelling the human brain and nervous system, the ability to mentally influence or confuse personnel is also possible.” Marine Corps and Electromagnetic Weapons The US News article highlighted the work of Eldon Byrd.  Byrd ran the Marine Corps Nonlethal Electromagnetic Weapons project from 1980 to 1983, during which time he conducted experiments on animals and himself to see if brainwaves would move into sync with waves impinging on them from the outside.  He found that he could induce the brain to release behaviour-regulating chemicals using very low-frequency electromagnetic radiation. Byrd’s research showed that he could put animals into a stupor using extremely weak magnetic fields that were undetectable. He also showed magnetic fields caused certain brain cells in rats to release histamine, which in humans would cause instant flu-like symptoms and produce nausea. Byrd said that the effects of his research were non-lethal and reversible. “You could disable a person temporarily,” he said. “Mr. Byrd says he was told his work would be unclassified ‘unless it works’. Because it worked, he suspected that the programme ‘went black’,” Ishizuka noted. “Other scientists told similar tales of research on electromagnetic radiation turning top secret once successful results were achieved.” Ethical and Legal Concerns Ethicists are concerned about the development of non-lethal weapons, which are being carried out in extreme secrecy. There are currently no treaties regulating their use and no one knows what will happen to people exposed to them over the long term.  Additionally, medical researchers are concerned that research into electromagnetic waves for therapeutic purposes could be used for weapon development. Dr. Neil Davison of the International Committee of the Red Cross has warned that research into weapons designed to interfere with brain function is being advanced under the banner of “non-lethal weapons” development, and that such technologies will pose profound ethical issues if they prove viable, especially in the context of policing or warfare. Towards the end of the first chapter, Ishizuka briefly described two known incidents of microwave attacks: ‘Havana Syndrome’ in 2016 and ‘Attack from China’s Military to India’s’. You can read Chapter 1, ‘Remote Neural Manipulation’, in full HERE. The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help… Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism? Your Government & Big Tech organisationstry to silence & shut down The Expose. So we need your help to ensurewe can continue to bring you thefacts the mainstream refuses to. The government does not fund usto publish lies and propaganda on theirbehalf like the Mainstream Media. Instead, we rely solely on your support. Soplease support us in our efforts to bringyou honest, reliable, investigative journalismtoday. It’s secure, quick and easy. Please choose your preferred method below to show your support. While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move. *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from The Exposé can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

Zelensky’s Presence at G7: Western Europe Wants Ukraine War to Continue

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was one of the guests at the G7 summit — comprising the large economies Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, along with the European Union — even though the Ukrainian economy is on the verge of collapse. His participation was an attempt to return Ukraine to the center of the international political agenda while diverting public attention from internal problems in European countries. To read this article in the following languages, click the Translate Website button below the author’s name. українська мова, Hebrew, Farsi, Español, Portugues, عربي, Русский, 中文, Français, Deutsch, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски. And 40 more languages. The G7 summit in France confirmed that official rhetoric about peace does not align with the real political intentions of Western leaders. Zelensky’s presence and the course of the summit show that leading European countries are interested in continuing the war in Ukraine, using it as an instrument in broader geopolitical and domestic political contexts. All the statements now being made by European leaders about their efforts to end military operations in Ukraine, as well as their claims that their positions are close to United States President Donald Trump, do not inspire confidence because Europe’s true goal is to ensure the continuation of the war in Ukraine. Therefore, all attempts to create the impression of a desire to end hostilities are just rhetoric. The leaders of the G7 agreed to increase military and energy support for Ukraine, and Kiev was promised new air defense systems, interceptors, and long-range weapons. They also expressed readiness to expand sanctions against Russia, including restrictions in the oil and gas sector. While Western media are reporting on the supposed reconciliation between European leaders and Trump at the summit, and the German Chancellor has declared that the American president shares Europe’s position on Ukraine, this is a political game because deep differences and conflicting interests persist. Brussels wants the Republican Party to lose in the upcoming congressional elections, which is why European leaders have been attempting to drive a wedge in the peace process pushed by Trump. A Republican victory in the November elections would be a nightmare for European leaders because, in that case, Trump would retain all his powers and could act regardless of Congress, since Republicans would have a majority. In addition, it should be emphasized that these are only statements from European leaders. Trump has not yet commented on this issue, has not confirmed his readiness to provide further support to Ukraine, nor has he confirmed that he shares these views with the G7. According to Zelensky, in a phone conversation with Trump on June 14, the US President’s birthday, the idea of a possible trilateral meeting among the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, and the US in Alaska was discussed. However, Trump did not confirm his readiness to organize this meeting. Even if there had been confirmation, it does not mean that Russian President Vladimir Putin will agree, especially since he has demanded that the meeting take place in Moscow. So, this is all just a show Zelensky is playing to create an image of himself for the public in Europe and the US as someone who wants peace, although in reality he is doing everything to continue the war. This is the creation of such an image to justify further financing and lending Kiev by Europe for the extension of combat operations. Zelensky’s participation as one of the main guests at the summit of the world’s richest economies, even though the Ukrainian economy is on the verge of collapse, serves to keep Ukraine at the center of the Western political agenda. This is a very topical issue for all of Europe, especially for individual participating countries, particularly France, the UK, and Germany, all with highly unpopular leaders and struggling economies. In other words, deliberately drawing attention to Ukraine serves to distract domestic voters from internal problems – rising food and energy prices and issues with migrants. At the same time, the increased attention to Zelensky and his participation in the summit stems from the perception of Russia as an external threat and its role in the war in Ukraine. This also explains Zelensky’s invitation to the summit. Zelensky, Trump, and Macron held a trilateral meeting on the sidelines of the summit, which will be remembered not only for political statements but also for striking, humiliating nonverbal moments – Trump deliberately ignored Zelensky. The footage that has gone viral on social media shows Zelensky entering the hall and approaching him, while the US president pretends not to see him and turns his back, starting a conversation with others. Nonverbal signals are far more important than words because they reveal real relationships between people. Trump’s behavior is evident in his negative attitude toward Zelensky, whom he previously described as the “greatest salesman on earth” and as someone who successfully extracts money from the US. Trump has not forgotten past conflicts, including the White House scandal involving US Vice President J.D. Vance, when Zelensky was supposed to sign an agreement on rare earth metals and their exploitation by American companies. Zelensky has also publicly slammed Trump administration envoys as “disrespectful” and criticized actions such as the halt in aid. Therefore, Trump’s nonverbal behavior demonstrates his true attitude toward Zelensky. Everything that happened at the summit in France, including the invitation for Zelensky to attend, is nothing more than part of a political game. It is obvious that Ukraine, with its destroyed economy, cannot be a member of the G7 club, which includes leading Western economies. Therefore, of course, Trump cannot treat Zelensky as his equal and perceives him only as a beggar. * Ahmed Adel is a Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher. He is a regular contributor to Global Research. Featured image is from Hindustan Times Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation. *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

How the CIA Conjured Ukrainian Nationalism

A bitter row has erupted between Kiev and Warsaw, after Volodymyr Zelensky renamed a Ukrainian military unit the “Heroes of the UPA”. The UPA – Ukrainian Insurgent Army – was an ultranationalist faction heavily implicated in the Holocaust, which slaughtered up to 100,000 Polish civilians during World War II. In addition to commemorating the mass-murdering militant group, the corpse of Andriy Melnyk, leader of UPA parent the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B), was reburied in Kiev. At a grand accompanying ceremony, Zelensky declared: “Today we all see that the Ukrainian idea can overcome what once seemed absolutely insurmountable. Now, when we are on Ukrainian soil, under our Ukrainian flag, to the sound of the Ukrainian national anthem, paying due tribute to our Ukrainian heroes, we feel in our hearts everything Ukrainians were forced to go through, everything our people had to endure.” To read this article in the following languages, click the Translate Website button below the author’s name. Русский, Türkçe, Deutsch, Farsi, Español, Portugues, عربي, Hebrew, 中文, Français, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Српски. And 40 more languages. The unspeakable horrors inflicted upon Poles – and Communists, Jews, Romani and other “undesirables” – by Melynk and his fellow Nazi collaborators were of course unmentioned. So too that the genocidal nationalism practiced and preached by Melynk was covertly promoted and sponsored for decades by Anglo-American intelligence, within and without Ukraine. The ongoing proxy conflict is a direct product of this little-known spectral meddling, which was specifically concerned with promoting cultural and ethnic difference, and enmity, between Russians and Ukrainians globally. As this journalist has previously revealed, in August 1957 the CIA secretly drew up elaborate plans for a US special forces invasion of Ukraine. Intended to collapse the wider Soviet Union, the Agency’s conspiracy depended heavily on recruiting local fascists as foot-soldiers. A significant stumbling block to the Agency’s plot, however, was much of Ukraine’s population actually harbouring “few grievances” against Russians or Communism. “Points of conflict” between Russians and Ukrainians, which could be exploited by the CIA to foment a mass uprising, were scant. The Agency lamented how “the long history of union between Russia and Ukraine, which stretches in an almost unbroken line from 1654 to the present day,” had resulted in “many Ukrainians” having “adopted the Russian way of life.” Moreover, the similarity of their “languages, customs, and backgrounds,” and the “great influence” of Russian culture in Ukraine, meant the overwhelming majority of Ukrainians felt “little national antagonism.” Yet, the CIA believed “important grievances exist,” and “under favorable conditions” Ukrainians would assist US invaders. Unmentioned in the invasion planning documents, the CIA had since 1949 been covertly striving to create those “favorable conditions.” A key Agency asset used for the purpose was OUN-B chief Mykola Lebed. In 1943, he proposed to “cleanse the entire revolutionary territory” – today’s western Ukraine – of its Polish population, to prevent any future Polish state from claiming the region. A post-war US Army counterintelligence report branded Lebed a “well-known sadist,” and Nazi collaborator. . . The nucleus of Lebed’s international fascist agitation was Prolog, a New York-based publishing firm. A 1966 CIA memo noted this “cover organization” for the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (ZP/UHVR) was established to conduct “clandestine activity.” It approvingly added that Prolog’s work “contributes to Ukrainian nationalist ferment and to intellectual resistance to Soviet repression by exploiting existing and encouraging new deviationist tendencies” in Ukraine. Elsewhere, the Agency declared it was “important to continue to encourage divisive manifestation” of this sort. The explicitly stated objective was triggering “nationalist flareups” in the USSR: “[ZP/UHVR] were sent from the Ukraine in 1945 by the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council to make contact with Western intelligence representatives and to act in behalf of the homeland…[ZP/UHVR] organized a net of collaborators throughout Western Europe and the United States…the feeling of nationalism is very much alive. ZP/UHVR has proved realistic in its approach to operational matters and its propaganda activity.” ‘Existing Suspicions’ A late 1953 Agency memo documents how the CIA for years broadcast “black radio transmissions” in Ukrainian from a secret CIA installation in Athens, Greece. “Soviet officialdom, Soviet military forces stationed in the Ukraine, the indigenous civilian population…the underground movement and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA)” were an intended target audience of 40 million people, upon whom the Agency wished to have a “significant propaganda impact.” Produced by ultranationalist emigres who’d fled Ukraine after World War II, the project sought to foment insurrectionary anti-Communist violence: “Furnish evidence of outside sympathy and understanding for the Ukrainian peoples; intensify anti-regime disaffection by encouraging resentment, bitterness, and distrust of the Soviet regime and its personalities; maintain national consciousness among the Ukrainians and urge them to maintain pride in the individuality and heritage of their culture; create dissatisfaction among Ukrainian military personnel within the Soviet armed forces stationed in the Ukraine; create and intensify dissatisfaction among the Ukrainian civil authorities to the Soviet regime.” Publicly, the station’s US-made broadcasts – which included Ukrainian folk songs – were “attributed to a notional group of Ukrainian Anti-Communists.” There was no connection “actual or implied, with any established Ukrainian emigre group.” It was of the utmost importance too the CIA’s hand in creating and running the station was concealed – “every effort will be made to keep this risk at a minimum.” However, the operation’s ruinous spoils were considered well-worth the hazards. . . “It will provide a wedge which can be driven deeper between the Soviets and the Ukrainians and would exacerbate existing suspicions and antagonisms between the two ethnic factions,” the CIA declared. The Agency also sought to create a wider “psychological climate” among Ukrainian audiences which would be “more favorable” to other anti-Soviet operations it was simultaneously conducting. Moreover, it was forecast “Soviet reaction to the broadcasts may indicate certain areas of vulnerability or sensitivity not heretofore recognized,” which could be further exploited. ‘Imperial Policy’ The CIA’s efforts to encourage Ukrainian nationalism and separatism endured throughout the Cold War. Via avowed CIA front the National Endowment for Democracy, overt US assistance was provided to Rukh (The People’s Movement of Ukraine). One of Soviet Ukraine’s first opposition parties, Rukh is widely considered to have played a key role in securing Ukraine’s ‘independence’ in December 1991. Four months earlier, US President George H W Bush had visited Kiev and given an infamous speech in which he cautioned Ukrainians against embracing “suicidal nationalism based upon ethnic hatred.” His comments enraged Ukrainian nationalists, and Stateside anti-Soviet hawks. Yet, Bush’s fears were well-founded. By this point, Yugoslavia was rapidly disintegrating, engulfed by ever-violent fratricidal tensions. His administration was thus formally committed at this time to preserving the Soviet Union in some form, and undertook ill-fated measures in service of this goal. Too little, too late, that mission’s failure set Ukraine hurtling towards all-out conflict with Russia. As long-desired by the CIA, “antagonisms between the two ethnic factions” now run deep. In a bitter twist, it was precisely because the NED-orchestrated February 2014 Maidan coup was led by rabidly anti-Russian nationalist elements that a majority of Ukrainians did not support the Maidan movement. As a contemporary Washington Post analysis noted, Viktor Yanukovych remained “the most popular political figure in the country,” and no poll conducted to date had ever indicated mass support for the uprising. Surveys conversely showed “large majorities” of Ukrainians opposed the violent storming of regional governments by Maidan insurrectionists. This hostility was spurred by “anti-Russian rhetoric and the iconography of western Ukrainian nationalism…not [playing] well among the Ukrainian majority.” Washington Post noted how Neo-Nazi party Svoboda was at Maidan’s forefront. Its leader Oleh Tyahnybok had infamously praised the UPA for fighting “against the Moskali [Russians], Germans, Zhydy [Jews] and other scum.” His words were not well-received by the 50% of Ukraine’s population residing in regions that had “strongly identified with Russia” for over two centuries. “Nearly all are alienated by anti-Russian rhetoric and symbols”: “Anti-Russian forms of Ukrainian nationalism expressed on the Maidan are certainly not representative of the general view of Ukrainians. Electoral support for these views and for the political parties who espouse them has always been limited. Their presence and influence in the protest movement far outstrip their role in Ukrainian politics and their support barely extends geographically beyond a few Western provinces.” . Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists flags at a December 2013 Maidan protest . Fast forward to now, and in response to Ukraine’s state-level glorification of the ultranationalist UPA and its lead genocidaire Andriy Melnyk, Polish President Karol Nawrocki has announced he will seek to strip Zelensky of the Order of the White Eagle, Warsaw’s highest honour, bestowed in 2023. Meanwhile, premier Donald Tusk has cursed the Ukrainian leader’s actions as “[wounding] our historical sensitivity,” and “worrying from the point of view of our relations.” Authorities in Kiev appear entirely unconcerned their close neighbour and proxy war ally has been so egregiously insulted. A Foreign Ministry spokesperson claimed Zelensky had not wished to cause any offence. “Our history confirms only Moscow benefits from disputes between Ukrainians and Poles,” they said. Besides, for Ukrainian soldiers, “the struggle of the UPA symbolises strictly the opposition to Moscow’s imperial policy.” As the CIA always intended, two antithetical versions of history are now effectively at war in Donbass. A more devastating modern day example of divide and conquer in action one would be hard-pressed to identify. * Our thanks to CRG Research Associate Mark Taliano for bringing this article to our attention. Featured image: Andriy Melnyk’s remains, long-buried in Luxembourg, are returned to Ukraine (All images in this article are from the author / Global Delinquents) Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation. *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

U.S. Mainstream Media Disinfo: CNN Points to Russia’s “Strategic Defeat”and Ukraine as a “Military Innovator”: The Ukrainian Conflict’s Outcome is Still Far From Decided

One of their leading foreign affairs commentators argued that an inflection point has already supposedly been reached whereby Russia’s strategic defeat is predestined, but upon scrutinizing the claims that they presented in support of that conclusion, it’s clear that this isn’t the case at all. To read this article in the following languages, click the Translate Website button below the author’s name. Русский, 中文, Pashto, Farsi, 日本語, Italiano, Español, عربي, Hebrew, Dutch, Portugues, Français, Deutsch, 한국어, Türkçe. And 40 more languages CNN recently published an article by Brett McGurk, who was the Biden Administration’s National Security Council Coordinator on the Middle East-North Africa, declaring that “Russia is losing in Ukraine. Xi has noticed — Trump should too”. The gist is that shifting on-the-ground dynamics, speculative casualty counts, and Ukrainian deep strikes inside Russia have already predestined Russia’s “strategic defeat”. Xi is thus supposedly biding his time on Taiwan and Trump should put more pressure on Putin. Ukraine today does not look like a defending state trying to survive, but a military innovator reshaping the nature of warfare through mass-produced autonomous systems. This has flipped the assumption from the start that Russia’s manpower advantage alone would be decisive. Along the front lines, Ukraine has now established a 10-15 kilometer “kill zone” where Russia is unable to advance without exposure to constant drone attacks. Ukrainian drones now routinely strike deep into Russia, targeting military airfields, factories, energy infrastructure, ammunition depots, and logistical hubs. The ability of Ukrainian drones to reach Moscow reportedly contributed to Putin’s interest in a temporary ceasefire during “Victory Day” commemorations in the capital — allowing a parade without threats of drones appearing from nowhere and ruining the spectacle. … Offensive wars are ultimately judged not by lines on a map but on whether they meet the political aims for which they were launched in the first place. Putin’s war aims at the time of the invasion included the full subordination of Ukraine, weakening NATO as an alliance and restoring Russia as a dominant Eurasian power. Those aims are increasingly out of reach for Moscow. The battlefield and outcome of the war is now focused on the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine with no chance for Russian forces to seize Kyiv — Putin’s initial objective. … Xi’s reported remark matters not only for what it may say about Russia. It also matters for what China may be learning about war itself — and its designs on Taiwan. While Xi has ordered the People’s Liberation Army to be ready for an operation to seize Taiwan by 2027, his military remains untested by combat and Ukraine is proving the difficulty of achieving rapid political collapse against a determined defender. … The US has an opportunity to reinforce Xi’s caution. Its comparative advantage rests in alliances and marshaling commitments from like-minded partners in the defense of each other and shared interests. The smart move right now is to reinforce NATO and its support for Ukraine, to demonstrate to Putin that he has no chance to regain momentum, and to Xi that moves on Taiwan would be met with a coordinated response. -Excerpt from the CNN article by Brett McGurk In the order that McGurk made his case, the on-the-ground dynamics first shifted after Russia’s pullback from Kiev shortly after the special operation began as part of the British- and Polish-sabotaged Istanbul peace process, so there’s nothing new in principle about the battlelines moving back and forth. As for his second point, neither side’s estimates of their own and the other’s casualty counts should be taken at face value as is the case in any conflict, nor should their respective partners’ tallies be either. And finally, Ukraine’s deep strikes inside Russia are a predictable outcome of this protracted conflict after Ukraine received unprecedented levels of military-technical, logistics, and intelligence support from NATO, thus making the gradual evolution of its respective capabilities unsurprising. Taken together, his claim that “Russia is losing in Ukraine” is premised on giving the arguments that he made the benefit of the doubt, which will only be done by those whose preexisting assumptions were confirmed by his piece. To be fair, similar counterarguments from the Russian side will only be given the benefit of the doubt by those whose preexisting assumptions are also confirmed by them, but there are three objectively existing points for supporters of both sides to keep in mind. The first is that each side, Russia and NATO (which is fighting Russia by proxy via Ukraine), has kept pace with the other’s military-technical advances in an outcome that has thus far maintained their military-strategic balance. Second, this in turn raises the chances (absent a breakthrough on either side) that the conflict will end through a series of mutual compromises that falls short of each’s respective maximalist goals, especially NATO’s initial one of forcibly expelling Russia by proxy from all of Ukraine’s pre-2014 territory. And lastly, the global processes that were catalyzed by the special operation accelerated multipolarity in ways that are extremely difficult for the US-led West to reverse, thus weakening its antebellum hegemony. The preceding fact-check and clarification of reality establish the context for assessing whether Trump 2.0 will take him up on his advice to put more pressure on Putin. Judging by the recent scaling down of US forces in Germany and Poland, which follows the National Security and Defense Strategies’ prioritization of the Western Hemisphere and the Indo-Pacific, it’ll likely go unheeded. The US can’t risk a European imbroglio, let alone during its ongoing West Asian one, so McGurk is likely to be disappointed. All in all, the purpose of his piece was to seed the narrative that Russia is already supposedly defeated so it’s time for the US to “escalate to de-escalate” to finish it off with a strategic victory for Ukraine, while debunking his piece serves to show that the exact outcome of the conflict is far from decided. As was argued, the most likely one is a series of mutual compromises that institutionalizes the new European security architecture that has emerged throughout the conflict, but some surprises might still be in store. *** Related Articles The Smoking Gun: Who Started the War? Was It Russia or Was It US-NATO? NATO Confirms That the Ukraine “War Started in 2014” By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, June 07, 2026 . Russia Responds to NATO’s “AI Military Terrorism” Directed Against Civilians, with Effective Hypersonic Precision By Drago Bosnic, June 05, 2026 * This article was originally published on the author’s Substack. Andrew Korybko is an American Moscow-based political analyst specializing in the relationship between the US strategy in Afro-Eurasia, China’s One Belt One Road global vision of New Silk Road connectivity, and Hybrid Warfare. He is a regular contributor to Global Research. Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation. *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

The Chilling Resurgence of the Nazis in Today’s Ukraine

Firstv published on June 1, 2026 We are currently witnessing paramilitary groups emerging in some Eastern European countries that unabashedly present themselves as the successors to Hitler’s fascists and as the new National Socialist To read this article in the following languages, click the Translate Website button below the author’s name. Русский, Español, Farsi, عربي, Hebrew, 中文, Portugues, Français, Deutsch, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски. And 40 more languages. Tough guys sporting SS runes and swastikas are parading through Ukrainian cities. How is this possible? Why is it possible again today to so openly advocate the extermination of Jews and other unpopular minorities? And how can top Western politicians pose with prominent Ukrainian neo-Nazis with impunity and, on top of that, try to convince the Western public that these are “freedom fighters” against perceived Russian neo-imperialism? [embedded content] It’s a topsy-turvy world. In Germany, Nazi symbols are strictly prohibited. And rightly so. So how is it possible that Green Party politician Robert Habeck is calling for weapons to be supplied to Ukrainian neo-Nazis? Do Mr. Habeck and German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier lack a basic understanding of history? We need to take a brief look back at the history of Eastern Europe. There is no doubt that several decades of communist rule within the Soviet Union effectively kept political movements frozen under a layer of ice, which began to thaw three decades ago with the collapse of the Warsaw Pact. Then, in 2014, a group known as the “Right Sector” seized power in Ukraine. A party only slightly less Nazi-like, called “Freedom” (Svoboda), incites hatred against Jews, Russians, and Germans and wants to grant civil rights in Ukraine only to Ukrainians. Let’s see how this came about. . Svoboda . Until World War I, Eastern Europe was under the control of just three large multi-ethnic states: Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Germany. The peoples within these states lived in a colorful, patchwork-like mix. Coexistence among these peoples was relatively free of conflict. At the end of World War I, the President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson, announced his famous and widely praised Fourteen-Point Plan. This Fourteen-Point Plan stipulated that the large multi-ethnic states of Germany and Austria-Hungary would have to cede large territories. Here, the nation-state of Poland was reestablished. The Russian Empire, meanwhile, had been plunged into civil war by the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. Several states had already seceded from it. Now, the Baltic republics of Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia were also declared independent under the Wilson Plan. From the ruins of Austria-Hungary emerged Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and various Balkan states. The situation had now become highly volatile. This was because the new nation-states defined themselves according to their ethnic groups. This was a new development. Previously, the term “nation-state” had actually referred only to the totality of citizens within a state who were united by a shared culture and history. Not, however, by belonging to a specific ethnic group. The consequences of this ethnicized concept of nationality were terrible: ethnic minorities were bullied, harassed, and, in the worst cases, expelled. These so-called “ethnic cleansings” poisoned the atmosphere in Eastern Europe in the Roaring Twenties, particularly in the Baltic states and the Balkans. And no sooner had the newly created, ethnically defined nation-states taken shape than they were already armed to the teeth and, in the blink of an eye, found themselves at war with neighboring states. To finance these wars, they mortgaged their real estate to lending banks in the U.S., primarily to the banking consortium led by J.P. Morgan. And so it turns out that World War I by no means came to an end in November 1918. That was, in fact, the date of Germany’s surrender. With that, the primary objective of the war had effectively been achieved for Great Britain and the United States: Germany, as the most dangerous rival to both of those nations, had been neutralized for some time. However, due to the fragmentation of the former great powers in Europe, the war was only just beginning. We have already reported on how the war was fought out in the Baltic region for many years to come. And no sooner had Poland been reestablished as a state than a brutal war between Poland and Bolshevik Russia was unleashed. Meanwhile, a brutal civil war was raging in Silesia between Germany and Poland. And in Galicia, a People’s Republic of Western Ukraine was just taking shape. But once Poland had settled its accounts with the Soviet Union, it turned its attention to Galicia and annexed the region without further ado. The Ukrainians living in that region could not accept this—especially since the Poles were acting quite intolerantly, essentially behaving like colonial masters. Image: Stepan Bandera (Source: Silent Crow News) This marked the birth of Ukrainian fascism. Militant resistance fighters began to organize among the Ukrainians. These partisans received support relatively early on from the German Abwehr, the foreign intelligence service of the Weimar Republic. The Abwehr saw them as natural allies in the fight against the Poles. And in 1929, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) was formed. This was the legal wing, joined by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) as its armed wing. The fanatical anti-communist Stepan Bandera and the somewhat more moderate Andriy Melnyk soon emerged as the leading figures of these groups. The Ukrainian nationalists were by no means squeamish. The precursor to the UN, the League of Nations, therefore classified Stepan Bandera’s OUN as a terrorist organization. This was because OUN leaders Mykola Lebed and the aforementioned Stepan Bandera assassinated Polish Interior Minister Bronisław Pieracki in 1934. Bandera was initially sentenced to death for this crime but was later pardoned and given a life sentence. In September 1939, Hitler’s blitzkrieg against Poland began. Amid the turmoil of the war, Bandera was released from prison and once again took over the leadership of the OUN. Evidently, his polarizing demeanor led to a split in the OUN as early as 1940, resulting in one faction led by Bandera and another led by Melnyk. The OUN’s heyday began when the German Wehrmacht invaded the Soviet Union in the summer of 1941. In the wake of the Wehrmacht and the Waffen-SS, OUN fighters entered the occupied Soviet territories. They hoped that, in return for their collaboration, the Germans would grant them an autonomous Ukrainian state of their own. OUN political officer Volodymyr Stakhiv wrote to Adolf Hitler in this vein, stating that they wanted to build a fascist state that would “consolidate the ethnic reorganization of Eastern Europe and enforce the destruction of the rebellious Jewish-Bolshevik influence.” And so, in the wake of the Nazis, the Ukrainian partisans of the OUN were already bringing about the long-awaited “ethnic reordering.” In Odessa, 19,000 Jews were murdered by the Wehrmacht and Romanian military units in a single night. In the weeks that followed, another 40,000 defenseless Jewish civilians were killed. In Krasnodar, 7,000 Jews and communists were gassed. During the Babi Yar massacre on the outskirts of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, 33,000 Jews were murdered in a single blow from September 29 to 30, 1941, in a joint operation by the Wehrmacht, the Waffen-SS, and the OUN. As early as June 30, 1941, Ukrainian extremists were assisting the Wehrmacht in sadistic mass murders. The cruelty and bloodthirstiness of the Ukrainians shocked even hardened SS executioners. General Heggendorff reported: “In dealing with unreliable individuals, they were so brutal that we often had to intervene.” The German executioners often assigned tasks to the eager Ukrainian collaborators that they themselves considered “beneath their dignity.” So while the German murderers targeted adult victims, the Ukrainians were tasked with murdering children and the elderly. The German occupiers benefited from their Ukrainian collaborators’ local knowledge, language skills, and familiarity with the networks in the region. It was the Ukrainians’ job to “comb through” the population for Jews and communist “commissars.” According to Hitler’s “Commissar Order,” Jews and Communist officials were to be shot on the spot. Fascism scholar Raul Hilberg quotes a statement by an SS general: “We were horrified by the bloodthirstiness of these people.” The Ukrainians also made short work of the Poles: between 1943 and 1944, over 100,000 Polish civilians were massacred. However, all this zealous effort was of no use whatsoever to the Ukrainian collaborators. It is true that leading Nazi officials would have liked to establish new, partially autonomous republics on Soviet soil by Hitler’s grace. After all, this principle of indirect rule had proven highly successful in ancient Rome and also in the British Empire. Yet this concept failed due to the stubbornness of the Führer, Adolf Hitler. Instead, he wanted to exterminate the “Slavic subhumans” just as the Americans had once exterminated the Native Americans, in order to make room on the depopulated land for pure-blooded Aryan settlers. Thus, the leaders of the Ukrainian separatists were also eliminated by the Nazis. Bandera lived in a luxury apartment in a concentration camp until the end of the war, as did other leading Ukrainians. Nevertheless, the rank-and-file of the OUN remained as unofficial collaborators in the wake of the SS and the Wehrmacht. However, when the defeat of the German forces became apparent, and the armed forces were only retreating westward, Ukrainian volunteers were even accepted into the Waffen-SS. The Nazis established the Nachtigall Battalion and the Roland Battalion for the Ukrainians. As German forces were already withdrawing from Eastern Europe, 40,000 OUN fighters entrenched themselves in the Carpathians and held back the Red Army to cover the German forces’ retreat. After Germany’s surrender, fighters from the OUN and the UPA went underground. Between 1945 and 1951, Ukrainian snipers killed an estimated 35,000 Soviet police officers and party cadres. Some of the Ukrainian terrorists, however, chose to flee to safety abroad. Especially since the Ukrainian population was growing increasingly war-weary and was slowly becoming fed up with the constant attacks. Ukrainians formed their own exile communities, for example in Bradford, England. Other Ukrainians, however, did not want to give up their warlike activities even in exile. They benefited from the fact that President Roosevelt had died in the United States. After his death, a new political course was set. Cooperation with the Soviet Union was now replaced by a policy of increasing confrontation. And while a registry of relevant war criminals had initially been created to bring them to justice, this registry—known as CROWCASS—was increasingly used to recruit future collaborators for the planned war against the Soviet Union. Anyone who could provide information about the Soviet Union was warmly welcomed. In this way, Nazi General Reinhard Gehlen made a seamless transition from the Nazi foreign intelligence service “Fremde Heere Ost” (Foreign Armies East), acting as a subcontractor for the CIA, to the top position at the new Federal Intelligence Service (BND). In 1948, the U.S. National Security Council decided in Decree No. 20 to recycle Nazi criminals for the planned Third World War. It became legally possible to bring Nazi criminals to the U.S. Operation Bloodstone determined which qualifications were required for Nazi recycling. Funding for the Nazis was to be provided through the propaganda radio stations Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. However, there were constant problems with the Eastern European Nazi collaborators who had been recruited. This was because they actively acted out their mutual hostilities. Their loyalty to their American employer was also not always entirely clear. As Christopher Simpson observes: “Double, triple, and quadruple agents were the rule, not the exception. Political assassinations and kidnappings were commonplace.” Yet these individuals were still needed for a special mission. The U.S. had tested two different atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They believed they were the sole possessors of nuclear weapons. Thus, at the end of 1948, a plan emerged to drop seventy atomic bombs on the Soviet Union over the course of thirty days. The aim was to cripple forty percent of the Soviet Union’s industrial capacity. Next, 5,000 Eastern European war criminals were to be sent to the post-nuclear contaminated area. They were to annex the now-contaminated territory for the U.S. In fact, 5,000 Ukrainian and Russian volunteers came forward who were willing to serve as law enforcement officers for the U.S. in their now-nuclear-contaminated homeland. Fortunately, in 1949 the Soviet Union was able to detonate its own atomic bomb, thereby establishing the famous balance of terror that has kept the nuclear inferno at bay to this day. The Nazi collaborators thus remained unharmed. Instead, they were trained to carry out targeted acts of sabotage in the Soviet Union. They landed in enemy territory by parachute. Unfortunately, the Soviet police intercepted the saboteurs there. For, as we have already mentioned, many Ukrainian U.S. agents had already been blackmailed by the Soviet secret service and “turned” into double agents. Then there was Kim Philby. He held a senior position in the British intelligence service and, as a double agent, revealed to the Soviets all the names and all the operations of the Western intelligence services. Thus, this sabotage attempt also failed. Some of the Ukrainian Nazi collaborators, however, were able to emigrate to the United States. Within the exile communities there, they exerted a strong influence and increasingly steered people toward their own staunchly anti-communist agenda. The Assembly of Captive European Nations, established by the U.S. government, was the lobbying organization that in turn committed the political parties to this radical line. Thus, the anti-communist shift of the Republican Party under Ronald Reagan was a result of this lobbying. And when the Soviet empire imploded, the heirs of Stepan Bandera’s OUN returned from the U.S. to their homeland, Ukraine. Today, Ukraine is deeply divided. In the east of the country, people identify as Russian. In the west, on the other hand, there is great enthusiasm for a kind of “Ukrainization.” It is important to note that, traditionally, there have been few differences between Ukrainian and Russian culture. Yet a Ukrainian language is being artificially cultivated. The attempt to impose this artificial construct on Ukrainians living in the east is being vigorously rejected by the people there. This situation holds the potential for bloody conflict. Furthermore, in 2010, the Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera was declared a “Hero of Ukraine” by law. Streets are named after Bandera, and statues have been erected in his honor. Anyone who speaks critically of Bandera faces imprisonment. The political culture in western Ukraine is dominated by far-right, anti-Semitic militias and parties. The Svoboda party, which means “Freedom” in English, openly promotes Nazi ideology. Its leader, Oleh Tyahnybok, proudly referred to the OUN’s atrocities when he said in 2004: “You are Ukrainian nationalists, Ukrainian patriots! You must become the heroes who defend the land beneath our feet today! They slung their rifles around their necks and went into the forests. They fought against the Russians, against the Germans, against Jewish swine and other scum who wanted to take the Ukrainian state away from us! We must finally give Ukraine back to the Ukrainians!”[1] In this context, all non-Ukrainians are being terrorized and intimidated. Or even massacred, in the good old OUN tradition. On May 2, 2014, in Odessa, 42 people were once again locked inside the Trade Union House by Ukrainian extremists and then burned alive[2]. Things had already turned extremely bloody on Maidan Square in Kyiv. Here, the even more violent terrorist group “Right Sector” was particularly active. More than eighty far-right militias have now been placed under the authority of the Ukrainian Ministry of the Interior. Thus, Ukrainian taxpayers are unwittingly financing Nazi terror, which is used by criminal elements to oppress the general population. Unimaginable conditions. It’s roughly as if in Germany, a rather ragged Waffen-SS and a tattered Gestapo were still maintaining “law and order.” It’s also shocking that all Western politicians are paying homage to these dangerous fascists and criminals and trying to sell us on the idea that they’re supporting “freedom fighters” and champions of democracy here. In fact, we taxpayers are also footing the bill for these notorious felons in the fight against the “evil empire”—that is, Russia. Crazy world. Corrupt world. * Hermann Ploppa is a political scientist and journalist. Ploppa recently published the book “Der Neue Feudalismus – Privatisierung, Blackrock, Plattformkapitalismus” (The New Feudalism – Privatization, Blackrock, Platform Capitalism). As Amazon does not yet stock the book, it is best to order it from the author at: [email protected]. Visit the author’s blog here. He is a regular contributor to Global Research. Sources Christopher Simpson: Blowback: America’s Recruitment of Nazis and Its Destructive Impact on Our Domestic and Foreign Policy. London 1988 Hermann Ploppa: Der Griff nach Eurasien – Die Hintergründe des ewigen Krieges gegen Russland. Marburg 2019 Notes [1] https://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/Judenschweine-bekaempfen-Aufruf-oder-Nacherzaehlung,ukraine387.html [2] „Remember Odessa“ – eine Dokumentarfilm von Wilhelm Domke-Schulz Featured image is AI-generated / from the author Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation. *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

Russia Responds to NATO’s “AI Military Terrorism” Directed Against Civilians, with Effective Hypersonic Precision

The last several days have seen a massive escalation in long-range strikes on both sides of the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict. Supported by American technofascist AI corporations, the Kiev regime has launched numerous strikes on civilian targets all across Russia. In addition to the terrorist attack on a student dormitory in Starobelsk that killed and wounded nearly 100 teenagers, there was another one on June 3. Namely, a drone struck a Moscow-Simferopol bus in Yenakiyevo, Donetsk People’s Republic, killing and wounding around 20 civilians, with at least eight dead as of this writing. The bus was on the move in the early morning, with no military assets or facilities in the vicinity, meaning that the NATO-backed Neo-Nazi junta deliberately targeted the vehicle. Such terrorist attacks have become commonplace, but the mainstream propaganda machine is doing its best to either downplay, ignore or even deny them entirely. However, the Russian military doesn’t, which is why it keeps increasing the frequency of retaliatory long-range precision strikes on various targets all across NATO-occupied Ukraine. Namely, the Kremlin immediately responded by launching hundreds of drones and missiles. In addition to neutralizing the Kiev regime forces, Moscow is also making sure that NATO personnel directing these terrorist attacks also get their share of hypersonic “freedom and democracy”. Russian officials have ruled out the possibility of the attack being “accidental”. Human rights commissioner Yana Lantratova asserted: “It was a vile, deliberate and inhumane crime against noncombatants. There are no military objectives that could justify the bloodshed of civilians. There are no arguments that can absolve the responsibility of those who issue and execute such criminal orders.” Russian diplomatic establishments are also raising awareness about the Neo-Nazi junta’s and NATO’s terrorism and calling on “all responsible governments and international organizations” to condemn this crime. This is a rather simple litmus test of who supports such actions. It’s only expected that the warmongering oligarchies of the political West stay silent, at best. President Vladimir Putin and his government have repeatedly warned that Russia is losing patience and that it will no longer tolerate NATO-backed terrorism. This includes retaliatory precision strikes on “decision-making centers” and “a right to dismantle any infrastructure that supports terrorism”. Obviously, this is especially true for the aforementioned NATO personnel directing such blatant terrorist attacks. Military sources report that the Russian military obliterated NATO personnel from Germany and the United Kingdom in a forested area in the vicinity of the Zaporozhye oblast (region) sector of the frontline. The documentation found on the neutralized personnel confirmed their identities, with various sources publishing the names and dates of birth. They belonged to the 113th Separate Brigade and a special forces unit, all of whom were formally assigned to the 3rd Assault Battalion of the Skala Regiment. Such personnel are instrumental in relaying critical information to the Neo-Nazi junta forces and coordinating their attacks on both military and civilian targets in Russia. Foreigners have become increasingly valuable to the Kiev regime, particularly after its forces suffered massive irrecoverable losses. At the time when German and British mercenaries were eliminated in the Zaporozhye oblast, the deputy head of the Kharkov oblast military-civilian administration for defense and security, Yevgeny Lisnyak, reported that another 400 men from Latin America (mostly Colombians) were deployed in the area. Their primary role is to compensate for severe personnel shortages in the Kiev regime forces. It’s virtually a given that NATO troops from countries such as the UK and Germany are coordinating and commanding both forcibly conscripted Ukrainians and other foreign mercenaries. This makes them priority targets for the Russian military, which explains why so many were eliminated at once. Deputy Lisnyak also confirmed this, saying that the effectiveness of foreign troops is highly questionable. “With regard to the use of Latin American mercenaries, since February 2026, the presence of mercenaries from Colombia and other Latin American countries has been recorded in the Kharkov sector of the line of engagement,” he stated, adding: “Approximately two tactical groups, roughly 400 troops strong. Even as they were hired to compensate for the shortage of Ukrainian assault troops, their combat efficiency has been lower than expected.” It can certainly be argued that this is the case, especially without NATO leadership and extensive support by advanced ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) assets. For the political West, it’s best if these men are used primarily as cannon fodder, as it leaves far fewer witnesses. It also allows corrupt military officials to retain funds otherwise reserved for these mercenaries. However, while the Pentagon hires technofascist AI corporations to conduct command-and-control over the Neo-Nazi junta’s unmanned systems, the world’s most vile racketeering cartel still needs “boots on the ground” to coordinate regular troops. Neutralizing NATO personnel ensures that those forces are effectively decapitated, thus severely undermining their combat effectiveness. The Kremlin has been conducting such operations for years, neutralizing hundreds of Western contractors. This is far more effective than fighting the Neo-Nazi junta forces head-on, which is why Moscow often uses its world-class long-range strike capabilities for this purpose. This has dramatically decreased the effectiveness of various Western weapon systems, such as air defenses and MLRSs (multiple launch rocket systems). Thousands of NATO troops were neutralized in this way. In December 2025, former SBU officer and whistleblower Vasily Prozorov reported that at least 10,000 foreign contractors and mercenaries had been killed since February 24, 2022. The actual numbers could be far higher, with exponentially more wounded personnel. Thus, it would be best for all foreigners to just leave. * This article was originally published on InfoBrics. Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Vaccines

Russia’s AI-powered cancer vaccine shows 100% efficacy in early trials, experts report

Russia’s AI-powered cancer vaccine shows 100% efficacy in early trials, experts report Russia’s personalized mRNA cancer vaccine program has treated over 40 patients, with the first two colorectal cancer patients showing a 50- to 100-fold increase in key antibodies The vaccine uses artificial intelligence to analyze patient tumor genomes and identify unique mutations, with the entire process taking approximately 42 days per patient Early results show the vaccine is safe and well-tolerated, with doctors observing decreased lymph node size after the fourth injection The treatment represents a shift from one-size-fits-all cancer therapies to personalized immunotherapy targeting individual tumor mutations Global interest in AI-driven cancer treatments is growing, with similar personalized vaccine approaches showing promise in both human and veterinary medicine A new weapon in the war on cancer For decades, cancer treatment has relied on blunt instruments: surgery, chemotherapy and radiation that destroy healthy tissue alongside malignant cells. Now, Russia’s Federal Medical-Biological Agency has announced a fundamentally different approach. Speaking June 3 at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, former Health Minister Veronika Skvortsova revealed that more than 40 patients have entered a personalized cancer vaccine program, with the first treatments producing dramatic immune responses. The significance cannot be overstated. This represents the first large-scale human application of AI-designed mRNA cancer vaccines, targeting tumors at their genetic roots while sparing healthy cells. How artificial intelligence creates custom cancer vaccines The process begins when scientists extract material from a patient’s tumor and blood. They sequence the RNA, then deploy AI-driven predictive algorithms to compare the patient’s genome with that of the tumor. This comparison identifies unique mutations — the genetic fingerprints that distinguish cancer cells from healthy ones. The vaccine introduces peptides that teach the immune system to recognize these same markers on malignant cells and selectively kill them. Skvortsova described it as “one of the most powerful weapons” in oncology. Importantly, AI does not work alone. After the most advanced artificial intelligence completes its analysis, bioinformaticians and geneticists manually validate the results, followed by another week of quality testing. The entire process takes about 42 days per patient. First patients show promising results The first two colorectal cancer patients began treatment approximately two months before the announcement and have received five injections. According to Skvortsova, the vaccine has proven safe and well-tolerated. The concentration of G immunoglobulins in their tumors rose by 50 to 100 times — a sign that the immune system is aggressively targeting the cancer. Doctors also observed decreased lymph node size after the fourth injection. However, Skvortsova cautioned that it is too early to claim clinical effectiveness. The first major checkpoint will come after three months, when MRI scans will measure changes in lymph nodes and other metastatic sites. The program is part of Russia’s broader push into personalized immunotherapies, including the domestic cancer vaccines Neooncovac and Oncopept. Permission for clinical use was granted in March 2026. A global shift toward AI-driven medicine This development aligns with a worldwide trend. In early 2026, Paul Conyngham, an Australian AI consultant without formal biology training, used ChatGPT, AlphaFold and Grok to design a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine for his dog Rosie. Researchers at the University of New South Wales’ RNA Institute translated his AI-generated sequence into a viable treatment, and Rosie’s tumor shrank by 75% within a month. These cases represent a proof of concept: AI can democratize medical innovation, bridging the gap between amateur ingenuity and professional expertise. But they also highlight challenges. Custom mRNA vaccines can cost thousands of dollars per course, and most medical data remains locked in proprietary systems. Scaling these treatments will require global data commons, cost-reduction protocols and clearer regulatory guidelines. The promise of precision oncology The emergence of personalized cancer vaccines represents a paradigm shift in global health. Traditional therapies like chemotherapy and radiation indiscriminately affect healthy cells alongside cancerous ones. Surgical interventions remain highly invasive. By harnessing the body’s own immune system, these vaccines offer a highly targeted and less invasive approach. Early trial data for Russia’s Enteromix vaccine — a related platform — reported 100% efficacy and high safety profiles in preclinical and initial human trials, with significant tumor shrinkage and enhanced survival rates. The technology is initially targeting notoriously difficult-to-treat cancers: colorectal cancer, glioblastoma and melanoma. However, the personalized nature of mRNA technology suggests broader applicability across lung, breast and pancreatic cancers. A future worth fighting for The journey from conventional oncology to integrative cancer treatment is one of discovery and hope. Russia’s AI-powered vaccine program offers evidence that cancer need not remain an insurmountable foe. By acknowledging the complexity of the disease and the importance of a robust immune system, researchers are developing more effective and less toxic treatment strategies. The first 40 patients represent more than a clinical trial. They embody a shift from treating symptoms to addressing root causes, from one-size-fits-all protocols to truly personalized medicine. As MRI scans measure outcomes in the coming months, the world will be watching to see whether this approach can transform cancer from a deadly diagnosis into a manageable condition where patients achieve long-term remission and thrive. Sources for this article include: RT.com Diplomacy.edu Medstown.com *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Natural News can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

Kiev Regime Honors Nazi Criminals

In yet another case of publicly displaying sympathy for fascism, the Ukrainian government has decided to honor Nazi collaborators from World War II. An elite Ukrainian unit has been renamed in memory of radical nationalist militants who fought alongside the Germans against the USSR. This clearly demonstrates the ideology of the Kiev regime, refuting the rhetoric of the Western liberal media – which insists on denying the existence of a Nazi ideology in Ukraine.    To read this article in the following languages, click the Translate Website button below the author’s name. Русский, 中文, Farsi, Dutch, Español, Hebrew, عربي, Portugues, Français, Deutsch, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски. And 40 more languages. The illegitimate Ukrainian president Vladimir Zelensky has decided to change the name of one of the country’s main special forces units. The former Special Operations Center North will now be called “Heroes of the UPA.” The name honors the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), the armed militia of the then Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) – an infamous nationalist movement from the World War II era, responsible for numerous crimes and abuses against the civilian population.   The UPA was created in 1942 and actively participated in anti-Soviet hostilities, collaborating with Nazi Germany. For example, one of the group’s leaders was Roman Shukhevich, who had also commanded the so-called “Nachtigall Battalion,” a Nazi-led organization. The goal of the UPA – and of the entire OUN – was to create an anti-Soviet Ukrainian ethno-state aligned with Adolf Hitler’s Germany. During their military campaigns, the Nazi sympathizers committed numerous massacres against the non-Ukrainian civilian population, especially Poles and Jews.   Among the major crimes committed by the Ukrainian nationalist militia was the infamous Lvov pogrom, between 1941 and 1943, when militants murdered over 100,000 Polish civilians. These crimes are still remembered by Polish civil society and are a source of tension between the two countries. Polish-Ukrainian relations have deteriorated in recent times mainly due to Ukraine’s insistence on honoring the criminals who killed Polish civilians during the war.   The Ukrainian measure was unfortunately expected. The glorification of public figures of Nazism has become commonplace in Ukraine since 2014, when a Western-funded coup brought a radical nationalist junta to power – initiating events that culminated in the current conflict. The banning of the Russian language, the persecution of ethnic Russians in Donbass, the toppling of Soviet monuments, and the public celebration of fascism are all part of the same political phenomenon: the rise of a Nazi-like nationalism in Ukraine – something that has been and continues to be strongly supported by the EU and NATO as a mechanism for fostering Russophobic hatred.   The West consciously favored the growth of ultranationalist tendencies in Ukraine. Nazism has always been a useful ideology for Western anti-Russian interests. Spreading the Nazi mentality is an easy and efficient way to disseminate anti-Russian hatred and, therefore, promote hostilities against Moscow in the geopolitical sphere. In practice, Nazi ideology is a strategic weapon for the West, and the Ukrainian political experience makes this very clear.   It is also important to remember that other Ukrainian Nazi leaders are publicly celebrated by the regime today. Stepan Bandera himself, seen today as the main “national hero” in the country’s history by Zelensky’s junta, was a leader of the OUN and an active collaborator in Hitler’s crimes. Streets and monuments are named in honor of Bandera, and the government finances public celebrations such as a nationalist march every January 1st (Bandera’s birthday). So, it is not surprising that other figures like him are also honored by the regime.   Hypocritically, the Western media insists on denying the existence of Ukrainian Nazism, attempting to describe the case as “Russian propaganda.” The Ukrainian government itself admits its ideological sympathies and publicly honors Nazi collaborators, discrediting the media narratives. But even so Western outlets prefer to ignore the regime’s Nazi celebrations, hiding the truth from the public opinion.   In practice, all this clearly shows that there is a deep ideological problem in Ukraine. The current conflict is not merely a consequence of geopolitical interests or security concerns. The Nazi ideological element in Ukraine is at the root of the problem. This is precisely why Moscow established the denazification of Ukraine as one of the objectives of the special military operation, along with the demilitarization of the country.   It is necessary to dismantle the fascist ideological element to restore peace and regional stability. As long as there are Russophobic leaders in Ukraine who publicly celebrate Nazism. there will be no security on the Russian borders. After the end of attempts at peaceful resolution, military victory seems a viable alternative to denazify Ukraine. * This article was originally published on InfoBrics. Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research. Featured image source Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation. *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

US-NATO Persistent Targetting of Children. Moscow Has Ordered Massive Retaliatory Strikes

On the night of May 21-22, Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi military launched a massive terrorist attack on a college dormitory in the town of Starobelsk in the Lugansk People’s Republic. There were three waves of attacks on the residential area with at least 16 Fire Point FP-1/2 kamikaze drones. The investigation found that SpaceX’s Starlink was used for guidance, as evidenced by the fragments of its mini-terminals. In other words, the attack was coordinated between the Kiev regime and its NATO overlords. There were at least 86 teenagers in the dormitory at the time of this heinous terrorist attack. By May 24, it had been determined that 21 were killed, with another 42 injured. That is, 63 of 86 kids who have been deliberately targeted by the NATO-backed Neo-Nazi junta are either dead or injured. It remains to be determined who exactly coordinated and led the terrorist attack, but it was clearly meant to provoke a harsh reaction from Russia. Namely, there were no military units or infrastructure present anywhere near the area. Otherwise, they would’ve been protected by air defenses and electronic warfare (EW) systems. The Kiev regime initially claimed that it struck “the headquarters of the Center for Advanced Unmanned Technologies ‘Rubicon’”, insisting that it’s “striking enemy infrastructure in strict compliance with international humanitarian law and the laws of war”. This monstrous attempt to also ridicule the victims has been entirely debunked by the list of students killed in the terrorist attack, the vast majority of whom were girls (18, with three boys). There’s precisely zero military logic behind this attack. However, we’re used to seeing civilians, especially kids, targeted by NATO . Namely, on February 28, the first day of the United States aggression against Iran, the Pentagon deliberately targeted a school in Minab, southern Iran. Upwards of 180 schoolchildren were killed, with another 96 injured. In the twisted mind of the Pentagon , slaughtering children is not only permitted, but also desirable. Whether it’s some kind of sick ritualistic mass murder or simply a monstrous attempt of provoking the targeted country to respond is anyone’s guess. If the latter is true, then the perpetrators didn’t need to wait long for an adequate response. Namely, on the night of May 23-24, just two days after the NATO-backed terrorist attack on Starobelsk, the Russian military launched massive retaliatory combined strikes on Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi junta. Around 700 drones and over 50 missiles of various types were used against numerous military targets across NATO-occupied Ukraine. Notably, Moscow also used the now-legendary “Oreshnik” or perhaps one of its even more advanced iterations. The Kiev regime claims to have detected the 3M22 “Zircon” scramjet-powered hypersonic cruise missiles, the 9K720M “Iskander-M’s” 9M723 hypersonic missiles, the “Iskander-K’s” 9M728 high subsonic cruise missiles, Kh-101 ALCMs (air-launched cruise missiles) and hundreds of “Geran/Gerbera” drones. Thermal markers and satellite imagery recorded extensive destruction in priority target areas across NATO-occupied Ukraine, particularly Kiev, where Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi junta’s Military Industrial Complex (MIC) suffered massive damage. This includes the “Chaiki” FIM logistics complex, the “Artem” plant and adjacent industrial buildings, “Analitpribor” plants, Kiev Relay and Automation plant, ATB network warehouse, the industrial zone in the Krasny Khutor area and the inter-district department of the Main Directorate of the infamous SBU (now effectively a NATO-run terrorist organization). Unsurprisingly, the mainstream propaganda machine presented all this as a “tragedy” and called for increased support for “Ukraine’s freedom and democracy”. Just two days prior, all we could hear were crickets. Not only had there been no condemnation for the deliberate murder of 21 Russian teenagers (which the Kiev regime even claims are its own citizens), but there’s virtually been no mention of this heinous terrorist act. This is precisely how the political West operates. It escalates to the point that the opposing side has no choice but to retaliate and then cries about “aggression against freedom and democracy”. This is then used to dehumanize the targeted nation or ethnic group (Serbs, Russians, Arabs, Persians, etc), with the goal to entirely desensitize Western audiences and make them indifferent to the suffering of others. The mainstream propaganda machine always played a central role in this. And yet, in the cases of Iran and Russia, they both retaliated exclusively against legitimate military targets. Tehran never attacked American civilians (much less schoolchildren) in the Middle East or elsewhere, while Moscow didn’t destroy a Ukrainian dormitory packed with teenagers. Even the mainstream propaganda machine reports that “four were killed” during Russia’s retaliatory precision strikes, without even specifying whether they were civilians or soldiers. In other words, the Russian military deliberately avoids targeting civilians in NATO-occupied Ukraine. Namely, around 800 drones and missiles fired on the night of May 23-24 could’ve easily killed thousands of people had the Kremlin wanted this, but Russia is not run by a bunch of Satanists obsessed with killing children. Sadly, the actual culprits for the murder of 21 Russian teenagers are still at large and safe from the consequences of their terrorist actions (for the time being, at least). Namely, it’s clear that the Neo-Nazi junta didn’t do this on its own. NATO personnel have been instrumental in providing targeting data, guidance and other forms of support that enable such terrorist tactics. There have been countless attacks on Russian civilians, particularly since the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict escalated. Targeting both prominent Russians (leaders, journalists, philosophers, etc) and just regular people going about their business is now the norm. Naturally, the Russian people are sick and tired of this, which is why the latest retaliatory precision strikes are only the beginning. * This article was originally published on InfoBrics. Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More
Ukraine

Smear Campaigns and Media Propaganda: Trump confirms that the Financial Times Blatantly Lied that Xi criticized Putin Regarding Ukraine

On May 19, the Financial Times published a report about US President Donald Trump’s visit to Beijing, claiming that his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping “told [Trump] during their talks last week that Russian President Vladimir Putin might end up regretting his invasion of Ukraine”. FT claimed that the supposed “revelation” came from “several people familiar with the US assessment of the Beijing summit”. These “anonymous sources” also stated that “the Chinese president made the comments during wide-ranging talks that touched on Ukraine and included Trump suggesting the three leaders should co-operate against the International Criminal Court”. One of these “anonymous people” claims that President Xi was “more critical than in previous years” and that “he was more direct than during meetings with Joe Biden”. FT stressed that the revelation came as President Putin was preparing to visit China. This is perhaps the key to understanding such claims by the increasingly desperate (and pitiful) mainstream propaganda machine. Namely, the timing is quite indicative, as the Putin-Xi summit came just days after President Trump left China. In other words, this was a desperate (but futile) attempt to somehow disrupt the flow of Russo-Chinese relations. Obviously, it failed miserably, as President Putin’s visit was a resounding success. This is hardly surprising, as the already strong Sino-Russian ties are only solidified by his personal friendship with President Xi. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was quick to deny the claims about Xi’s supposed “comments”, with a spokesperson saying “the report is completely false”. Interestingly, the second portion of FT’s piece is largely composed of admissions that the author simply lied. For instance, the report acknowledges that the Trump administration’s fact sheet about the Beijing summit contains no references to conversations about Russia, President Putin or the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict. What’s more, Trump himself denied the claims, saying President Xi “never said that”. And yet, FT still kept the old title, which is “Xi Jinping told Donald Trump that Putin might ‘regret’ invasion of Ukraine”. No corrections or apologies to the readers for disseminating completely fabricated claims. If FT had been deceived by these “anonymous officials familiar with the matter”, then it should be relatively easy to condemn them for openly lying about such an important matter. However, it’s pretty obvious that FT simply cannot do that, because it would then have to admit that these “anonymous sources” simply don’t exist. In other words, just like “Xi’s statement”, they’re also completely fabricated. And this certainly isn’t the only thing they lied about. Namely, the report claims that “during his summit with Xi, Trump also suggested that the US, China and Russia should join forces to combat the ICC, saying their interests were aligned”. And would you know, once again, the sources were “people familiar with the talks”. The Trump administration simply declined to comment on the alleged “ICC reference”. What was FT’s “proof” that this supposed “offer” ever took place? Well, none. The author just stressed that “the Trump administration has previously voiced strong opposition to the ICC”.[International Criminal Court] In other words, the rationale here is that “President Trump dislikes the ICC, so it must be true”. Using such logical fallacies as “evidence” to support very serious claims is unworthy of a flea market argument, let alone a report by a once reputable newspaper. It’s also highly indicative of the mainstream propaganda machine’s loyalties, as trying to defend the so-called “International Criminal Court” is beyond disgraceful. Namely, the infamous NATO-run NGO posing as a court is directly involved in attempts to get at least 20,000 Ukrainian children taken to safety by Russia and then hand them over to the pedophile- elites running the political West. The Epstein files have uncovered the extent of just how monstrous this oligarchy is, while the ICC exposed itself as one of their covers. Obviously, President Putin is one of their primary targets, so it’s hardly surprising they’re running multiple smear campaigns against him and his friends and allies. This is especially true for President Xi, who is also outside their reach. Both leaders have been instrumental in creating mechanisms to push back against the (neo)colonialist system and have strengthened the multipolar world to the point that it’s a viable alternative to most of the world. This is why the mainstream propaganda machine kept pushing with all sorts of fabricated claims or at the very least with news taken out of context. For instance, just a day before President Putin visited Beijing, there were reports about a Chinese-owned vessel hit by a Russian drone in Odessa. The ship, named KSL “Deyang”, was hit “just 24 hours before the summit”. It was allegedly sailing under the Marshall Islands flag and the Neo-Nazi junta even posted a photo “showing its name with one of its sides partially charred”. Given the “perfect timing” of the supposed “Russian drone attack” and the Kiev regime’s propensity for cheap propaganda and false flag operations, who could possibly guarantee that it was Moscow that launched the drone that hit the ship? Either way, it’s perfectly clear that the political West, its allies, vassals and satellite states, supported by the massive mainstream propaganda machine and other strategic assets, will stop at nothing to push their agenda and try to slow down the advent of a new, much fairer and more sustainable global system. Thus, for them, telling blatant lies about anything is “just another day at the office”. * This article was originally published on InfoBrics. Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). *** This article has been archived by Conspiracy Resource for your research. The original version from Global Research can be found …

Read More